* Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-17 11:21]: > Al Hopper wrote: > >On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote: > > > >>I think opensolaris-code can just go away. It was originally created > > > >Agreed. > > > >>during the Pilot program, when there was a single consolidation and a > >>lot fewer people. When I proposed it, I thought of it as a stopgap > >>measure to deal with the high traffic, much of it non-technical, on > >>opensolaris-discuss. Now that we have multiple consolidations, each > >>with (at least) its own "discuss" list, and a whole lot more people, > >>opensolaris-code serves only to confuse people about where they should > >>post. > >> > >>I'd like to see opensolaris-bugs and opensolaris-rfe go away, too. Bugs > >>and RFEs should get posted to the bug database, not mailing lists. > > > >And they can be discussed on opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, if > >necessary. > > It sounds like we have agreement that opensolaris-code, opensolaris-bugs, > and opensolaris-rfe should go away. > > Who will take ownership of this and make it happen?
Someone on the infrastructure team can develop a public procedure for shutting down a list. This procedure will then get OGB blessing, and be carried out for each of the above lists. I'd also be happy to see draft process submissions from non-infrastructure folks for this or any other community-change-event. As an example, I sent http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=6569 to start working on the community demotion problem. The next step for that process is for it to get some proposed timescales, and then to get the OGB to move to adopt it for use. (In case it's not apparent, I really prefer operating under consensus-oriented processes.) - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org