* Eric Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-17 11:21]:
> Al Hopper wrote:
> >On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> >
> >>I think opensolaris-code can just go away.  It was originally created
> >
> >Agreed.
> >
> >>during the Pilot program, when there was a single consolidation and a
> >>lot fewer people.  When I proposed it, I thought of it as a stopgap
> >>measure to deal with the high traffic, much of it non-technical, on
> >>opensolaris-discuss.  Now that we have multiple consolidations, each
> >>with (at least) its own "discuss" list, and a whole lot more people,
> >>opensolaris-code serves only to confuse people about where they should
> >>post.
> >>
> >>I'd like to see opensolaris-bugs and opensolaris-rfe go away, too.  Bugs
> >>and RFEs should get posted to the bug database, not mailing lists.
> >
> >And they can be discussed on opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org, if
> >necessary.
> 
> It sounds like we have agreement that opensolaris-code, opensolaris-bugs, 
> and opensolaris-rfe should go away.
> 
> Who will take ownership of this and make it happen?

  Someone on the infrastructure team can develop a public procedure for
  shutting down a list.  This procedure will then get OGB blessing, and
  be carried out for each of the above lists.  I'd also be happy to see
  draft process submissions from non-infrastructure folks for this or
  any other community-change-event.

  As an example, I sent

  http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=6569

  to start working on the community demotion problem.  The next step for
  that process is for it to get some proposed timescales, and then to
  get the OGB to move to adopt it for use.  (In case it's not apparent,
  I really prefer operating under consensus-oriented processes.)

  - Stephen
  
-- 
Stephen Hahn, PhD  Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Reply via email to