Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-15 Thread Steve Franks
> Soon I should also know if its possible to create openocd-devel port > that could build and install the package straight from the GIT > repository - this is a nice idea sparked by Xiaofan - so the testing > could be even more simple, however if someone wants to develop the > source code he/she wi

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-15 Thread CeDeROM
Hello Steve! On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Steve Franks wrote: >> Soon I should also know if its possible to create openocd-devel port > (...) > > FYI, I for one would be very happy to see a standard FreeBSD port made > for OpenOCD.  Good for the lazy. There is a devel/openocd port in the Por

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread CeDeROM
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, David Brownell wrote: >> -It is better to name package openocd-0.4.0rc1.tar.gz than >> openocd-0.4.0-rc1.tar.gz, as there are some other system conventions >> that forbids using "-" and "_" mark after the program number (ie. >> "-devel" or "_n" for revision number

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread Øyvind Harboe
> -I cannot build the ZY1000 minidriver: Try the --enable-dummy-minidriver. It tests 90% of buildability of that driver model and it can be built without any funky setup, ditto for the --enable-dummy(but it doesn't exercise the minidriver model). -- Øyvind Harboe Visit us at Embedded World, Marc

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:26 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > Well, in FreeBSD you don't build the packages yourself from scratch - > this is the reason that Ports exists - to be able to build the package > from source with some options enabled/disabled, but the OS specific > quirks are done by the maintaine

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:26 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > If you have installed the GDM package, then the only thing to place in > /etc.rc.conf is to enable the gdm and it will take care of everything > else (HAL/DBUS): > gnome_enable="YES" > Yes that is the key here. Thanks for the hint. Now I am typin

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread CeDeROM
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:49 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > >> Xorg will autoconfigure though HAL and DBUS so you should have these >> installed. If you install gnome2 (pkg_add -r gnome2 xorg) it will >> download and install via network full working X

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:49 PM, CeDeROM wrote: > Xorg will autoconfigure though HAL and DBUS so you should have these > installed. If you install gnome2 (pkg_add -r gnome2 xorg) it will > download and install via network full working X environment for you > with just one command :-) Just did t

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread CeDeROM
Hello Xiao! :-) On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:38 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > > I have now a working 8.0-Release system, only console though. X > is kind of working, but no keyboard and mouse, so not really > useful, tried the vesa driver and the nvidia

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:38 AM, CeDeROM wrote: I have now a working 8.0-Release system, only console though. X is kind of working, but no keyboard and mouse, so not really useful, tried the vesa driver and the nvidia driver port. But never mind, I will solve this later. > -The issue with FT2232

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 7:22 PM, CeDeROM wrote: >> Still the same result, Release 8.0 failed to boot for my PC. I just >> tried the USB image and it immediately failed (dumping some >> resister contents) after I hit enter on the boot menu. This is >> similar to what I have tried before (including

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-14 Thread CeDeROM
Hello Xiao! On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> Probably I will try it later, maybe with a Live CD first to see if it boots. >> Last time I spent sometime to get USB things working under FreeBSD. >> http://mcuee.blogspot.com/search/label/FreeBSD > > Still the same result, Rele

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:04 AM, David Brownell wrote: >>> So Xiaofan, I encourage you to give it a try! :-) > > Probably I will try it later, maybe with a Live CD first to see if it boots. > Last time I spent sometime to get USB things worki

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 9:04 AM, David Brownell wrote: >> So Xiaofan, I encourage you to give it a try! :-) Probably I will try it later, maybe with a Live CD first to see if it boots. Last time I spent sometime to get USB things working under FreeBSD. http://mcuee.blogspot.com/search/label/FreeB

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 13 February 2010, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello Xiao! :-) > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > > (...) > > But I have not used FreeBSD for a while. It did not boot on my desktop > > PC (Nvidia 620i/Geforce 7050 integrated chipset) when I wanted to try it > > last time.

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread CeDeROM
Hello Xiao! :-) On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Xiaofan Chen wrote: > (...) > But I have not used FreeBSD for a while. It did not boot on my desktop > PC (Nvidia 620i/Geforce 7050 integrated chipset) when I wanted to try it > last time. It also had quite bad USB support last time. The new HPS U

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread Xiaofan Chen
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 8:11 AM, David Brownell wrote: > FreeBSD does have parport support though, right?  Is the issuse that > it doesn't work at all with OpenOCD?  Or instead, that it can work > given some changes? > Yes but the API is different from Linux. xBSD uses ppbus. http://www.freebsd.o

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread CeDeROM
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:32 AM, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello David! > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, David Brownell wrote: >>> I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues >>> as for now, however I have some remarks: >> >> Good ... can you let us know if RC2 has any sig

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread CeDeROM
Hello David! On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 12:11 AM, David Brownell wrote: >> I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues >> as for now, however I have some remarks: > > Good ... can you let us know if RC2 has any significant deltas from > this list? Sure thing! I am waiting

Re: [Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 13 February 2010, CeDeROM wrote: > Hello world! :-) > > I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues > as for now, however I have some remarks: Good ... can you let us know if RC2 has any significant deltas from this list? > -It is better to name package o

[Openocd-development] FreeBSD status of 0.4.0-RC1

2010-02-13 Thread CeDeROM
Hello world! :-) I finally got for better testing if 0.4.0-RC1, there are no big issues as for now, however I have some remarks: -It is better to name package openocd-0.4.0rc1.tar.gz than openocd-0.4.0-rc1.tar.gz, as there are some other system conventions that forbids using "-" and "_" mark afte