This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Spencer Oliver (s...@spen-soft.co.uk) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/167
-- gerrit
commit b6d2fa6a9f0892500b5c632dccc46f0f24cb6031
Author: Spencer Oliver
Date: Thu Nov 3 23:33:37 2011 +
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
> I have to perform execute queue on read operation.
Luckily it only requires minor change of SWD_OPERATION_ENQUEUE into
SWD_OPERATION_EXECUTE parameter :-P :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
__
With current design of OpenOCD it is impossible to queue read
operations as results are returned using single pointers, the read
operation needs to be performed inside of a function that will return
a result, otherwise we can only get a value given at queue time but
not a flush time.
LibSWD can qu
Hmm, things seems to be more suble :-)
I have tried a trick with using int *a; fun(int* &a); and it indeed
works but the address is trimmed no matter what type "a" is (int*,
long*, void*) and this causes problems.
21 int a1=0, a2=0;
(gdb) s
22 double *a3;
(gdb)
23 a3=NULL;
(gdb)
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/166
-- gerrit
commit 4d060d29f5cbafd6703bd36d3ce096d19bdc3a9e
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:51:31 2011 +0100
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/165
-- gerrit
commit 4f112d1b8d93eed59fa5e41b4937475cb52b05ac
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:49:59 2011 +0100
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/164
-- gerrit
commit 1307ca49a71a8977e76818ecd062498f608acd51
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:48:04 2011 +0100
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/163
-- gerrit
commit 8a04e8e3c997a8ce0808af0ddf3f4702e16e3cd7
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:45:38 2011 +0100
I was hoping I was done with Amontec Saga but unfortunately I have one
more thing to report. Today, my boss informed me that that thing that I had
ordered from Europe that cost 30 Euro, cost us $130.00 in shipping.
After I placed my order only thing that was asked to me was my UPS account
info. T
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/162
-- gerrit
commit b311a1a7920d24b7436be3e390b8139700d3ba18
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:43:31 2011 +0100
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
Spencer Oliver (s...@spen-soft.co.uk) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/161
-- gerrit
commit 6a59e2bbe6089b74828bfeab681ae84ccc70ced2
Author: Spencer Oliver
Date: Thu Nov 3 20:42:50 2011 +
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/159
-- gerrit
commit 4a9cbe6c424a6b40f04a6657c71914cd851f500c
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:34:00 2011 +0100
This is an automated email from Gerrit.
?yvind Harboe (oyvindhar...@gmail.com) just uploaded a new patch set to Gerrit,
which you can find at http://openocd.zylin.com/160
-- gerrit
commit 68f4516e3aa75a29ed3c16a812e4219209f40fab
Author: Ãyvind Harboe
Date: Thu Nov 3 21:39:23 2011 +0100
On 2011-11-03 17:38, Tomek CEDRO wrote:
The problem is that C (or GCC) can
only change variable out of function using "*variable=value"
construct.
That's how C works - everything is passed to the function by value, so
when you pass a pointer, you just pass a value which is an address.
4\/3!!
Uhm, I have found a solution :-) The problem is that C (or GCC) can
only change variable out of function using "*variable=value"
construct. This "*variable" syntax is essential. This is the only
possible way of using pointer to pass information outside function.
But this way it is only possible to
> 4.35h is a beta version, probably you can try the new release version
> which is 4.36g.
> http://www.segger.com/jlink-software.html
>
> Or you can try to the old version to get OpenOCD to work again.
> http://www.segger.com/j-link-older-versions.html
In the meantime I tried versions 4.34, 4.14
);
Sorry, no more ideas from my side... Maybe someone else will be able to help
you.
Generally the code you are running on the chip can be somehow blocking JTAG
access so, if you can, try halting chip with empty flash. I think (I'm not
sure) that issuing "poll" command from telnet performs the
Le Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:21:33 +0100,
freddie_chopin a écrit :
> Notice that first you set srst_pulls_trst and then another config
> file sets that back to "separate". Try adding the command to openocd
> call: openocd -f ... -c "reset_config trst_and_srst srst_pulls_trst"
Ah, right. Unfortunately,
On 2 November 2011 20:03, Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> Should we?
>
i guess it makes sense, i will sort out and add a tools/scripts dir.
Spen
___
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/
W dniu 2011-11-03 11:08:39 użytkownik Thomas Petazzoni
napisał:
> > You may also try "reset_config srst_pulls_trst" or other
> > configurations...
>
> Not better, unfortunately. Still the exact same behaviour. Here is my
> interface file:
>
> none srst_pulls_trst
> trst_and_srst separate srst_g
Hello,
Le Thu, 03 Nov 2011 11:01:00 +0100,
freddie_chopin a écrit :
> What's the core speed of your chip?
It's a AT91SAM9263 at 180 Mhz.
> Probably something high, so try high speed of JTAG - 1000 kHz (1MHz)
> - 5kHz is really slow, "rclk 2" should give something like 2MHz
> (6MHz / (2+1)), bu
W dniu 2011-11-03 10:52:11 użytkownik Thomas Petazzoni
napisał:
> > 1. Try changing the speed of JTAG to be 1/8th of core speed.
>
> I have tried with adapter_khz 5 or jtag_rclk 2, and not better. Since
> the JTAG is capable of finding the tap/device, doesn't that mean that
> the communication i
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback!
Le Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:27:49 +0100,
freddie_chopin a écrit :
> 1. Try changing the speed of JTAG to be 1/8th of core speed.
I have tried with adapter_khz 5 or jtag_rclk 2, and not better. Since
the JTAG is capable of finding the tap/device, doesn't that mean th
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Vaclav Peroutka wrote:
> I updated FW, but it was rolled back to some older version from Sep 2008.
> Whenever I run JLink commander, I am getting the message about old FW. I run
> updater:
> SEGGER J-Link Commander V4.35h ('?' for help)
> Compiled Sep 27 2011 18:09
Hi,
I am trying to get OpenOCD working with a Pandaboard. I m getting
"Warn : Invalid ACK 0x6 in JTAG-DP transaction" followed by the
"Polling target failed, GDB will be halted. Polling again in 6300ms".
Machine : Fedora Linux
Debugger : Busblaster v2 (v1.3.jtagkey)
My config files are all stand
Hello all,
I noticed that people use new firmware because of problems. I got FW 4.35h and
tried to update it. With really bad results.
Before, OpenOCD wrote:
Info : J-Link initialization started / target CPU reset initiated
Info : J-Link ARM V8 compiled Dec 1 2009 11:42:48
Info : JLink caps 0xb
1. Try changing the speed of JTAG to be 1/8th of core speed.
2. Try doing "reset halt" from the telnet first.
3. Make sure your board has the same reset configuration as you pass to OpenOCD
- separate lines of TRST and SRST.
4\/3!!
___
Openocd-developme
Hello,
Any idea on this JTAG problem on Calao USB A9263 ?
Thanks!
Thomas
Le Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:52:18 +0100,
Thomas Petazzoni a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> (Resending to the list @berlios.de since the list
> @lists.sourceforge.net doesn't seem to work)
>
> I am trying to use OpenOCD 0.5.0 on the C
28 matches
Mail list logo
