3) I have read the IPR and I believe I could deploy this specification.
NOTE: I am not a legal expert, but I do have extensive experience with identity
related patents and after reviewing the claims, I do not believe that the OAuth
2.0 or OAuth bearer specifications infringe on patent 7272639.
> EH
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-----
>>>> From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:15 PM
>>>> To: Eran Hammer
>>>> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
>>>> Subject: Re: [OAUT
against for several reasons. We would not use
this in our own implementations.
-bill
>
> From: Sam Hartman
>To: Michael Thomas
>Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG"
>Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:45 PM
>Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on O
So, here are statements that you could make as part of this discussion
that would be entirely in scope:
1) I've read the IPR. Prior to this disclosure I was interested in
developing|deploying|shipping an implementation of this
specification. Now I am not.
2) I think you could go so far as to sa
On 05/09/2012 09:31 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>>
>
> That's not what I read Eran as asking for:
>
> "So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct?"
Eran is right about the kinds of discussion I mentioned
as not being for the WG.
This is all business as usual, the rules are in RF
On 05/09/2012 01:26 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 05/09/2012 08:34 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 05/09/2012 12:17 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
Whoever you talk to for legal advice about IPR issues related to
standards you might implement. My only point is, this group is not
qualified to comm
>> From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:15 PM
>>> To: Eran Hammer
>>> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
>>>
>>> On 05/09/2012 12:06 PM, Eran
y, May 09, 2012 12:34 PM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
>
> On 05/09/2012 12:17 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> > Whoever you talk to for legal advice about IPR issues related to standards
> you might implem
nce is
taken to mean "not" in this case.
S
>
> Mike
>
>>
>> EH
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Michael Thomas [mailto:m...@mtcc.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:15 PM
>>> To: Eran Hammer
>>> Cc
c.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:15 PM
To: Eran Hammer
Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
On 05/09/2012 12:06 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct? That's what I
wanted to clarify. You asked
Thanks. This is the clarification I was seeking.
EH
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:17 PM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I
5 PM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
>
> On 05/09/2012 12:06 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> > So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct? That's what I
> wanted to clarify. You asked
gt; To: Eran Hammer
>> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
>>
>> Hi Eran,
>>
>> if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products)
>> then
>> you may want to reach out to
Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
Hi Eran,
if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products) then
you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for their judgement.
They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR a
PR team is the right step.
EH
> -Original Message-
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:37 AM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer
>
> Hi Er
Hi Eran,
if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products) then
you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for their judgement.
They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR applicable and
whether they had experience with the IPR holder already.
What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people here are not
expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about the patent's
validity or even applicability as these are questions for lawyers, not
engineers.
EH
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.or
17 matches
Mail list logo
