Hi Eran, if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your products) then you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for their judgement. They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR applicable and whether they had experience with the IPR holder already.
Ciao Hannes On May 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Eran Hammer wrote: > What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people here are > not expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about the patent's > validity or even applicability as these are questions for lawyers, not > engineers. > > EH > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf >> Of Hannes Tschofenig >> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:44 AM >> To: oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer >> >> Hi all, >> >> an IPR disclosure had been submitted for the OAuth bearer document >> recently. In case you may have missed it, here is the link to it: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1752/ >> >> The ADs will re-run the IETF last call due to this new IPR filing and we >> would >> also like the working group to check the IPR and to think about potential >> implications. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes & Derek >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
