Thanks. This is the clarification I was seeking. EH
> -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 12:17 PM > To: Eran Hammer > Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer > > No, don't share your interpretation about the IPR with us on the mailing list. > > However, if you come to the conclusion that the IPR situation is unacceptable > for you then you could withdraw your previously stated support for the > document. If everyone or many do that then we have to find a plan B. > > Ciao > Hannes > > On May 9, 2012, at 10:06 PM, Eran Hammer wrote: > > > So no discussion of this is expected on the list - correct? That's what I > wanted to clarify. You asked the WG to "think" about its potential > implications but I don't want that "thinking" to happen out-loud on this > list... > > > > Raising the issue with your internal IPR team is the right step. > > > > EH > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 11:37 AM > >> To: Eran Hammer > >> Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG > >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer > >> > >> Hi Eran, > >> > >> if you care about the specification (and want to use it in your > >> products) then you may want to reach out to your IPR folks and ask for > their judgement. > >> They may be able to tell you whether they find the cited IPR > >> applicable and whether they had experience with the IPR holder already. > >> > >> Ciao > >> Hannes > >> > >> On May 9, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Eran Hammer wrote: > >> > >>> What exactly is the expected WG discussion on this? I hope people > >>> here > >> are not expected to read the patent and make legal decisions about > >> the patent's validity or even applicability as these are questions > >> for lawyers, not engineers. > >>> > >>> EH > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On > >>>> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 10:44 AM > >>>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG > >>>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] IPR on OAuth bearer > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> an IPR disclosure had been submitted for the OAuth bearer document > >>>> recently. In case you may have missed it, here is the link to it: > >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1752/ > >>>> > >>>> The ADs will re-run the IETF last call due to this new IPR filing > >>>> and we would also like the working group to check the IPR and to > >>>> think about potential implications. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> Ciao > >>>> Hannes & Derek > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> OAuth mailing list > >>>> OAuth@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
