Yes, XG-PON.
>
> Most FTTH operator stories I've heard of are still running regular GPON,
> thought.
>
> Seems XG-PON has a high barrier-to-entry for el-cheapo home consumers.
You would be surprised. The equipment isn't that expensive in
the grand scheme of thin
> On Jun 13, 2022, at 10:25 AM, Brielle wrote:
>
> I quickly reconfigured the Cys WireGuard node to connect to the Den node over
> IPv6 and, after WireGuard did its magic dynamically reconfiguring endpoints,
> suddenly the connection was back up and routing at full speed. Hell yeah!
>
> So,
This seems to be missing some of the reasons/why things are remarked, perhaps
it would be wise to bring some of the people interested in this to the various
vendor-specific lists or such?
For example, for some hardware types, enabling any sort of rate shaping at all
will rewrite the DSCP values
> On Jun 14, 2022, at 12:42 PM, Shawn L via NANOG wrote:
>
> With the current shortages and lead times, I almost feel like I did back in
> the beginning of my career ---
>
> Then it was "what can we do with what we can afford" now it's more like
> "What can we do with what we have (or ca
Yeah the big thing I’ve seen is that companies have historically over claimed
on their 477 reports in weird and interesting ways. I understand why and how
it happens, for example, if we do a HH meet for service at location X in census
tract 2020-01 and I have a 2 mile loop to location Y in cens
I can confirm that the hardware that NANOG does use can't filter it all
automatically I think for v6 as I helped them look at it.
Sent via RFC1925 compliant device
> On Jul 10, 2022, at 5:22 PM, Matthew Luckie wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I just realized that many automatically put emails with the sub
> On Jul 11, 2022, at 11:15 AM, Victor Kuarsingh wrote:
>
> This is the most they can and will say. For liabilities reasons, specifics
> are likely not in the cards. As most services ride over common service
> networks, its quite possible that a network substrate failure can have a
> numb
You always want to prefer customer routes over non customer routes as a service
provider. Of course having a robust set of communities to let adjustments
happen helps.
Without proper tiering of routes you may see unstable routing.
Having a standard set of customer, peer, transit set of local
> >
> >
> > Jawaid
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > *[image: uc%3fid=1CZG_hGEeUP_KD95fSHu2oBRA_6dkOo6n]*
> >
> > *Jawaid Bazyar*
> >
> > Chief Technical Officer
> >
> > VERO Broadband
> >
> > [image: signature_3735065359]
> >
> > 303-815-1814
> >
> > [image: signature_3363732610]
> >
> > jbaz...@verobroadband.com
> >
> > [image: signature_60923]
> >
> > https://verobroadband.com
> >
> > [image: signature_4057438942]
> >
> > 2347 Curtis St, Denver, CO 80205
> >
> >
> >
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
> On Aug 2, 2022, at 11:58 AM, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> This conventional interpretation is the one I'm applying in this question.
>
> I would argue even the 'conventional' definition of 'Tier 1' has been
> nebulous for long enough that it doesn't really matter much anymore.
>
> Who a networ
Can someone flip the option in Mailman for DMARC please, it’s problematic as if
one posts and does DMARC and has feedback on, our messages are possibly
rejected, and the feedback from a post is quite large.
Not sure who manages it anymore these days.
- Jared
I tried to place some new IP space under 4.10 ARIN into service and there's some Samsung thing that doesn't work now per customer reports so I moved people back out, so if there's someone who knows about that I'd also appreciate a ping. Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Sep 17, 2022, at 2:34 PM,
You can ping me off list. Thanks. Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Sep 26, 2022, at 1:39 PM, Dustin Brooks wrote:
Anyone having issues with sites hosted by Akamai? We have several users within a single /24 that are not able to access several (go.microsoft.com,
www.irs.gov, adobe.com, n
Please ping me off list. Thanks.
Sent via RFC1925 compliant device
> On Sep 28, 2022, at 3:47 PM, Joshua Pool via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> Anyone have a contact for AKAMAI?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Josh
Anyone figure this out? Have a new block that works with everything else it seems but them and about to tell this customer to switch from their service. Or if someone knows why 23.138.114.0/24 would be geolocated outside US/Michigan would be great to know. Thanks!Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn
we don't accept the traffic"? Are you putting in some kind of fall back
> > filter
> > in based on something like IRR data?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > Charles Rumford (he/his/him)
> > Network Engineer | Deft
> > 1-312-268-9342 | charl...@deft.com
> > deft.com
> >
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
delay to the providers as
> well.
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 5:35 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> > Anyone figure this out? Have a new block that works with everything else
> > it seems but them and about to tell this customer to switch from their
> > service.
> >
&
like all those
cloud on-ramp type services, you may end up with traffic blackholed or
other side-effects.
Simply put, SAV/BCP-38 et al is hard, and nearly impossible when
you get much further away from the subnet that traffic originates from.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key
> On Nov 15, 2022, at 2:09 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 12:55 PM, Eric Litvin wrote:
> A, Gbics:
>
> If you google ws-g5483, 84, 86, 87 - you’ll see the whole line up. All had sc
> connectors except 83 which was copper rj45 connector.
>
>
>
> Well
I've been waiting for some updates since September, there are good and
reputable geoIP services that accept updates and those that refuse to
acknowledge issues or have no way to update.
Some of the financial institutions and government agencies are examples of bad
consumers of them, but it's n
etup (eg: roa watch, similar to x509watch on
*nix systems) would be appropriate.
I'm sure others can refer to tools or services that can do this,
but it's always a good idea to check your objects and watch when they go
away or expire.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauc
only impacts a few flows.
- jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
I’ve been seeing an increasing problem with IP space not having the ability to
be used due to the behaviors of either geolocation or worse, people blocking IP
space after it’s been in-use for a period of time.
Before I go back to someone at ARIN and say “your shiny unused 4.10 IP space”
is non-
> On Jan 20, 2023, at 8:02 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> I will repeat what I have been saying since the first discussions of the
> concept of ip geo-location some decades ago…
>
> An IP address is not tied to any of the following:
> Location
> Person
>
> An IP address may be trans
> On Jan 20, 2023, at 11:29 PM, Crist Clark wrote:
>
> Are you sure it’s really geolocation blocks? Or is it anonymizer and VPN
> service detection? The geoIP vendors typically sell both since one of
> anonymizers’ top applications is to evade geolocation. Have customers using
> peer-to-pee
The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are
supporting the LR1 to allow its use on 400G and future 800G optics as those use
breakout to support 100G ports.
Would you rather do a 400G port on a router vs 100LR1?
Curious what others think.
Sent via RFC1925 com
Can someone who is familiar with the fiber assets around the union square area
in SF ping me off-list?
Thanks.
- jared
recommend FR1. They're available at a great price-point, and
> 2km reach is adequate for most applications.
>
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 7:25 AM Jared Mauch wrote:
> The common tech is 100G-LR4 these days - I'm wondering how many operators are
> supporting the LR1 to all
> On Apr 3, 2023, at 4:54 PM, Tony Wicks wrote:
>
> I have been using the QSFP-100G-CWDM4 2k optics for within rack/DC for a
> couple of years now. They are about the same price as SR optics but allow the
> use of simple duplex single mode patches without blasting 10K optics at each
> othe
I’ll help you off-list.
- Jared
> On Apr 27, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I run Crocker Communications (AS7849) and have ARIN allocations of
> 161.77.0.0/16 & 66.59.48.0/20. The 66.58.48.0/20 space was used for our
> datacenter which shutdown a couple years
> On May 2, 2023, at 2:29 PM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 02:56:47PM -0600, Matt Erculiani wrote:
> > In short, the idea is that optical networks are wasteful and routers do a
> > better job making more use of a network's capacity than ROADMs. Take
> On May 2, 2023, at 2:43 PM, Daniel Marks via NANOG wrote:
>
> This has been “resolved", I finally got through to some awesome engineer at
> Spectrum who has rerouted traffic while they work with their hardware vendor
> (thanks Jake):
One of the tools that I’ve used in the past is the RIP
> On May 4, 2023, at 6:21 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/4/23 11:40, Denis Fondras wrote:
>
>>
>> You may also take into account the time to deliver.
>> Laying fiber takes much more time than plugging a colored optic.
>
> Indeed - part of the expense of running new fibre is the time i
> On May 2, 2023, at 5:11 PM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
>
> I’ve seen proposals for an LSR MPLS/ROADAM type solution, where imagine you
> are at a hop where in a long distance system solution, you would end up with
> OEO, but instead you get directionality capability with an IP/MPLS c
> On May 11, 2023, at 7:45 AM, Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG
> wrote:
>
> To clarify the table I linked to in the previous email:
>
> Cisco estimates IP traffic exchanged over the access network by both
> businesses and consumers with:
>
> • endpoints over managed networks and
> • e
> On May 11, 2023, at 11:11 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/11/23 15:50, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
>
>> Hi Jared,
>> Could I make a conclusion from your comments: "only Carrier itself
>> understand the traffic - see many examples in the text".
>> I would very agree to this.
>
>
I know when I did the openresolver project stuff I saw a number that would send glue or referrals from before they moved to the root servers domain names. - Jared Sent via RFC1925 compliant deviceOn Jun 2, 2023, at 8:49 AM, Nathan Ward wrote:
On 2/06/2023 at 10:22:46 AM, Wes Hardaker
> On May 16, 2023, at 2:57 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 5/16/23 7:35 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG wrote:
>> +1 to what Josh writes below. I would also differentiate between mobile
>> networks (service provisioned to individual devices & often carrier s/w on
>> the device) and wireli
> On Aug 1, 2023, at 2:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I have a wave transport vendor that suffered issues twice about ten days
> apart, causing my link to flap a bunch. I put in a ticket on the second set
> of occurrences. I was told that there was a card issue identified and would
> be not
> On Aug 17, 2023, at 1:55 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
> I'm familiar with the island, it's it's puzzling that the major 3 cell
> carriers would accept a single point of failure like that, you would think
> they had microwave backup at minimum. Maybe it was a generator issue.
>
It’s common for
> On Aug 15, 2023, at 3:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> actually, i am amazed by the extent of "remote peering." if one
>> measures rtt to all the peers on the six, for example, the curve goes
>> out to well over 200ms. the six has seen remote peers from the gulf
>> states, and i do not mean l
All companies have unique challenges in trying to mitigate abuse and serve
customers well.
Miao I’ll collect details from you in private to see if there is something that
can be done.
Sent from my iCar
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Akamai will _NOT_ be helpful in t
website owners but didn't get any response.
FYI: you can look things up here if you think something is blocking
you:
https://www.akamai.com/us/en/clientrep-lookup/?language=en_US
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++
have them confirm
with customer the config is right if it seems odd.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 2:35 PM, jim deleskie wrote:
>
> +1 on this. its been more than 10 years since I've been responsible for a
> broadband network but have friends that still play in that world and do some
> very good work on making sure their models are very well managed, with more
> math
stayed the same. There are just the
>> nuances added with caches, gaming, OTT streaming, some IoT (like always-on
>> home security cams) plus better tools now for network management and network
>> analysis.
>>
>> Louie
>> Google Fiber.
>>
>>
>
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Torres, Matt via NANOG wrote:
>
> All,
> Side stepping a migration to IPv6 debate…. I’d like to hear advise from the
> group about performing due diligence research on an IPv4 block before
> purchasing it on the secondary market (on behalf of an end-user compan
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 12:04 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 11:58:23 -0400, Jared Mauch said:
>
>> Mostly curious if you are doing IPv6 if you see that slowing your need for v4
>> or if they are growing at the same rate.
>
> And remember ki
I keep mine in airplane mode and use SleepyHead to read the SD card. (I see it
was shut down by the developer, but it should still work for you).
- jared
> On Apr 5, 2019, at 7:47 PM, Eric Parsonage wrote:
>
>
> I personally fell foul of this last night. My CPAP machine switched itself
> of
This is one of (many) reasons why a number of people have been converting to a
streaming telemetry model of getting data out of devices. You can send it to a
relay host and visualize in your favorite magic (eg: grafana w/ influx or some
other storage).
- Jared
> On Apr 10, 2019, at 10:15 AM,
Internet. However, I could be
> wrong. Hope to see you in DC to collect! I already know Brett is in. :)
I would expect far more traffic from patch tuesday to exceed the size of
the document.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.
There are factual errors in the ARIN meeting minutes. It really is a disservice
that people on the AC don’t have facts about ARIN and the function of their
routing registry (for example).
It would be good if the ARIN AC had people that were more aware of the
functions ARIN provides.
If you co
I doubt it. If they use the BAM stuff and launch in October (after World
Series) the timing might be right.
Sent from my iCar
> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:06 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> Agreed, I noticed the single IX as well and asked them about it in my email.
> If they don't expand aggressively
> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:49 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> wrote:
>
> "AP stated that at the LACNIC meeting has discussed it and they dismissed it
> as out of scope."
>
> LACNIC will have the first meeting where this topic will be discussed in two
> weeks from now. How come an AC member can lie
While at NTT and at Akamai we have managed to publish sane PTR records and make
the forward work as well. You need to automate it by pulling from your router
configuration database and publish to your DNS database. If you are still doing
either by hand then it’s time to make the switch ASAP.
S
This matches my experience with running SIP on networks. Slowly over the years
it became more unreliable as “helper” ALGs were in the path.
Eventually we moved some devices off 5060 to alleviate the problem.
Sent from my iCar
> On May 13, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
>
> FYI: More
I would say that it says BOM at the start of the name, perhaps they are sending
you to India?
Are you using a DNS service that uses ECS facing the various CDN/Cloud
providers or a different one?
- Jared
> On May 23, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
> Looking at an mtr goin
> On May 23, 2019, at 4:11 PM, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> I would say that it says BOM at the start of the name, perhaps they are
> sending you to India?
>
> Are you using a DNS service that uses ECS facing the various C
that I would like to publish
> > a checklist with these recommendations which I hope will be useful for all.
> >
> > thanks in advance for your help and recommendation.
> >
> > Mehmet
> >
> >
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
o have opportunity to
>> get out of this venture.
>
>
> Oh, goodness yes -- however, I *still* have barely working Internet
> access at that location (it's basically a weekend home) -- I've
> somewhat started down the Jared Mauch "buy used vibratory plow, t
You also may not know who allows their own ASN inbound as well. It certainly is
a mixed bag.
I do consider poisoning at best horrible hygiene and at worst evidence of
malicious intent.
Good filtering isn’t just prefix or AS path based it’s both.
Best filtering is pinning the prefix to a spe
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 4:02 AM, Filip Hruska wrote:
>
> HE doesn't provide any community based TE and I would say they're a pretty
> major network.
With all respect to my friends at HE, this is a major gap for a network in
2019. I know this has lost them business over time with customers le
I know what I was told and what I observed in store.
They said network issue but it looked more like application/database issue.
When they would Scan an item it would not stay scanned. It would delete itself
and provide an error (likely when it was recording the inventory debit)
They would th
Yes. Here’s some sample code:
https://github.com/jaredmauch/rislive
It also helps the more feeds they get, please add feeds to them so there are
more views of any possible malicious activities.
Sent from my iCar
> On Jun 16, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
>
> RIS Live API is a ch
(Updating subject line to be accurate)
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> here in Ukraine we got an impact as well!
>
> Have two questions:
>
> 1. Why Cloudflare did not immediately announced all their address space by
> /24s? This can put the service up instan
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 11:00 AM, ML wrote:
>
>
> On 6/24/2019 10:44 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> It was impacting to many networks. You should filter your transits to
>> prevent impact from these more specifics.
>>
>> - Jared
>>
>> https://t
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 11:12 AM, Max Tulyev wrote:
>
> 24.06.19 17:44, Jared Mauch пише:
>>> 1. Why Cloudflare did not immediately announced all their address space by
>>> /24s? This can put the service up instantly for almost all places.
>> They may not w
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:03 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
>
> Disclaimer : I am a Verizon employee via the Yahoo acquisition. I do not work
> on 701. My comments are my own opinions only.
>
> Respectfully, I believe Cloudflare’s public comments today have been a real
> disservice. This blog post,
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:50 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I have higher standards for a T1 than any
> of the other players involved. Clearly several entities failed to do what
> they should have done, but Verizon is not a small or inexperienced operation.
> T
> On Jun 24, 2019, at 9:39 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:01 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> >
> > > On Jun 24, 2019, at 8:50 PM, Ross Tajvar wrote:
> > >
> > > Maybe I'm in the minority here, but I have higher stand
Yes. I saw this earlier today. It’s complex to unwind so many years of this
config :-)
Sent from my iCar
> On Jun 25, 2019, at 5:42 PM, Eric Dugas wrote:
>
> Got alerts for 80.67.75.0/24 (Akamai) normally announced by Tier1 providers
> routed by a long AS path from our of our peers:
>
> 80.6
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 3:10 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have to admit that I was hoping to be able to report to this list that
> CL was able to spin up a new 1G in fairly short order (after all, this
> is what they assured me of when discussing it with them...) but it's now
>
> On Jul 2, 2019, at 5:18 PM, Joe Yabuki wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> How do you deal with QoS for Office365, since the IPs are subject to changes ?
>
> How can we mark the trafic while keeping the security (I fear the marking
> based on TCP/UDP Ports since they are not without an additional ris
> On Jul 20, 2019, at 6:14 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
> On 7/17/19 17:54, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> do folk use `netstat -s` to help diagnose on routers/switches?
>
> I suspect there's an unstated question here of should metrics reported
> by netstat -s which includes metrics from the kernel sh
I have to agree with Eric here. 1G should be relegated elsewhere. If you ask
for something that does all these speeds you will soon ask for 10m and that’s a
wide range.
I would go with a 72q and if something needs 1G then add a switch or similar.
Something like that Arista 7050 while EOL will
I would try to isolate it with something like the RBFTC11 or similar if you
can. They’re great boxes, but as with all things lightning you usually can’t
protect from everything. I’ve had a lightning hit cause some major issues
before at a tower site.
You do what you can and keep suitable spar
Sean,
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 2:43 PM, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
>
> Peace,
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 8:05 PM Sean Donelan wrote:
> Do any major ISPs have SLA language about monitoring inter-provider
> agreements for route hijacking, route leaks, address spoofing, and so on?
>
> I'm looking for
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 9:33 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> This time I waited for 768,000. (Everyone happy now?)
>
> I thought the magic number for breaking old Cisco gear was 786432
> (768 * 1024) ... there was a panic about it earlier this year but growth
> slowed
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Chip Marshall via NANOG wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm seeing an oddity when doing DNS lookups for www.google.com from our
> London datacenter, and I'm curious if other people are seeing the same
> behavior.
>
> It appears that when we ask for www.google.com. we sometimes
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 6:34 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>
> Hello everyone
>
>
> Trying to understand the case from operators here who generate IRR based
> filters.
>
>
>
> Say if a given example:
>
> AS X originating 2001:DB8::/32 with IRR route object having AS X in the origin
> AS X ori
I already took care of this via another forum for Chris.
If you have issues let me know in private.
Thanks.
- Jared
> On Sep 18, 2019, at 8:50 PM, Chris Wescott
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for some help with Akamai, I have been in contact with their
> support rep on the phone and
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren
> wrote:
>
> Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
Yes.
Can you please turn off your salesforce/autoresponder to nanog posts please?
- jared
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 6:11 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> TDLR:
> - Using DoT or DoH as a protocol is fine, though the recursor still
> controls/views the DNS queries
> - Using a centralized/forced-upon DNS service (be that over DoT/DoH or even
> plain old Do53 is does not improve security or p
> On Oct 1, 2019, at 9:22 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:11:32PM +0200,
> Jeroen Massar wrote
> a message of 101 lines which said:
>
>> - Using a centralized/forced-upon DNS service (be that over DoT/DoH
>> or even plain old Do53
>
> Yes, but people using a p
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 9:43 PM, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> And this is why the distributed nature of small node’s is detrimental in an
> extended power outage.
>
> There is no practical way to back them up with power for an extended period
> of time.
This is why I’m concerned about a future
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Travis Garrison wrote:
>
> Anyone else have issues where their IP block gets randomly set to China? We
> have been trying to track down this issue for months and our customers are
> starting to get upset. We get a /29 from our upstream provider that we CGNAT
>
If you have questions or issues related to this traffic can you ping me off
list? We can't comment on specific customers but if you are having issues
please reach out to me or your local friendly Akamai person.
Sent from my iCar
> On Oct 15, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Phil Lavin wrote:
>
>
> > Any
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 12:30 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 21 Oct 2019, at 12:05, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 21 October, 2019 09:44, Robert McKay wrote:
>>
>>> The MD5 authentication is built into TCP options.. not obvious how you
>>> would transport it over TLS which afaik doesn't
This was one thing I highlighted to the people telling me how I secure my
network wrong. If it's HTTP and you lose a few clients maybe they don't care.
If it's BGP I have one client and I care a lot and that session dropping can be
gigs to tbps of traffic.
Sent from my iCar
> On Oct 21, 2019,
No,
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> At this point further communications are encrypted and secure against
> eavesdropping.
The problem isn't the protocol being eavesdropped on. The data is already
published publicly by many people.
The problem is one of mutual authe
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 6:31 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
>
> I see. It is an AIC problem, not a CIA problem. TLS in its default
> usage is a CIA thing because, well, it was designed to solve CIA
> problems where even temporary secrecy is more important than being down
> for a week. As had been p
> On Oct 31, 2019, at 3:12 PM, Boyle, Patrick via NANOG wrote:
>
> We are advertising the same prefix to ISP A & ISP B. When looking at various
> route servers across the world, I always see the path through ISP A in the
> BGP table, but most don’t show a path at all through ISP B (some do,
> On Nov 8, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Matt Hoppes
> wrote:
>
> “During an internal maintenance cycle last night, 168,149 previously
> undelivered text messages were inadvertently sent to multiple mobile
> operators’ subscribers," Syniverse said in a statement.
>
>
> how do you inadvertently send
> On Nov 12, 2019, at 4:19 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> People can really only watch one thing at a time. Net streaming of the last
> mile
> is unlikely to change much. Just where that content is coming from may
> change.
This is my feeling as well. It may impact people whose models assume
I can confirm this works well. It’s a bit tricker w/ IPv6 but with IPv4 it
works and you can serve a lot of software updates out of the cache.
Mac mini w/ large SSD is a common application that people do
# AssetCacheManagerUtil status
..
CacheDetails = {
"Apple TV Software" =
> On Nov 20, 2019, at 4:41 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for the replies. My conclusion is that no one here
> knows whether HKIX handles 99% of internet traffic for HK or not.
No more than any other site. Most IXPs may have a significant amount of
traffic but it’s certainl
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 4:45 AM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>
> Howdy!
> A question of interest to me, currently, is whether it's normal for
> providers to cause BGP flaps to their customers nightly... This seems,
> in my case, to be the provider PROBABLY updating prefix-filters on my
> sessio
> On Nov 29, 2019, at 12:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Isn’t NBCUniversal’s streaming service called Xfinity? Isn’t it one of the
> older ones?
No, their new service is Peacock and will launch in 2020. [1]
I’m sure they’ll have the same set of CDNs that service them as the other
streaming
I'm still surprised that for $42/mo you can't afford IPv6. If you already have
a legacy allocation most cases you can get v6 for "free".
I get low budget stuff, but honestly it doesn't have to be you it could be one
upstream that gives you a /48 to get you started.
Sent from my iCar
> On Dec
101 - 200 of 1270 matches
Mail list logo