On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 10:31:47AM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 6/10/22 09:52, Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG wrote:
>
> > I did believe that it is about the cost of SFP on the CPE/ONT side: 5$
> > against 7$ makes a big difference if you multiply by 1000000.
> >
> > By the way, there are many deployments of 10G symmetric PON. It was
> > promoted for "Enterprise clients".
> > CPE cost hurts in this case.
> > But some CPE could be 10GE and another 1GE upstream (10G downstream) on the
> > same tree.
>
> Yes, XG-PON.
>
> Most FTTH operator stories I've heard of are still running regular GPON,
> thought.
>
> Seems XG-PON has a high barrier-to-entry for el-cheapo home consumers.
You would be surprised. The equipment isn't that expensive in
the grand scheme of things.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from ja...@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
