This seems to be missing some of the reasons/why things are remarked, perhaps it would be wise to bring some of the people interested in this to the various vendor-specific lists or such?
For example, for some hardware types, enabling any sort of rate shaping at all will rewrite the DSCP values, even for packets that do not traverse the shaped interfaces. - Jared > On Jun 10, 2022, at 9:31 AM, Livingood, Jason via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > > Hi – Comcast is working on the implementation of ultra-low latency > networking, leveraging the IETF’s upcoming L4S standard. This standard will > require passing ECN and DSCP markings across network boundaries. As a result, > we are interested in your perspective on this and in how you handle markings > today. We have a short survey that should only take a few minutes to > complete. Take the survey at https://forms.office.com/r/vGb0LUXfS1 > > While any network operator is welcome to take this, we are particularly > interested in any networks that are directly interconnected with us today. > > Thank you! > Jason Livingood > Comcast – Technology Policy & Standards > jason_living...@comcast.com > > PS – Apologies if any of you get a duplicate of this request via other > channels.
