No,
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 2:08 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > > At this point further communications are encrypted and secure against > eavesdropping. The problem isn't the protocol being eavesdropped on. The data is already published publicly by many people. The problem is one of mutual authentication and authorization of the transport. - Jared
