Seems you could do something with Wireless much easier, guaranteeing access
to speed of +/- 300mbits by using the CBAND spectrum that is coming
available. Why run wires to the home at all?
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 11:22 AM Sean Donelan wrote:
>
> FCC Announces All Of Puerto Rico To Have Access To
quite unbelievable.
>
> My company does low voltage cabling. We charge more than $100 per drop to
> provide CAT6 in a newly constructed office building. It would be impossible
> to provide wires to 1.2 million locations across PR for $100/each.
>
> Brandon
>
> On Nov 2, 2020,
For use cases where DPDK matters, are you really concerned with power
consumption?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:48 AM Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote on 23/02/2021 16:03:
> > "we found that a poll mode driver (PMD)
> > thread accounted for approximately 99.7 percent
> > CPU
NANOG is not a service for receiving details on cable paths for commercial
purposes. Please find somewhere else to collect this information.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:54 AM Rod Beck
wrote:
> This cable is tapped out and I need a 100 gig wave from Hong Kong to
> Singapore. 3 year term.
>
> Roder
ctually, that language was intended to prohibit soliciting business and
> not asking for help. I have some hard words to describe like Shane Ronan,
> but I will forbear.
>
> I suggest you cease and desist before this gets ugly. Obviously you are
> underemployed.
>
> Get
Someone has been spending time at Equinix.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 12:01 PM wrote:
>
>
> Ha! “Surprised”? Well, offering OOB for a reasonable price could be a
> differentiator for the savvy colo providers, but bean counters say: “Huh?
> If customer X wants OOB, they can pay ~$300/mo for a cross-
A lot of the payments for Ransomware come from Insurance Companies under
"Business Interruption Insurance". It in fact may be more cost effective to
pay the ransom, than to pay for continued business interruption.
Of course along with paying the ransom, a full forensic audit of the
systems/network
The iPhone 11 does not have a 5G (NR) capable modem. The 3.5Ghz freq
support is for the CBRS bands in the US.
Support for 5G is not just a freq band support, it requires a chipset/modem
capable of support the NR protocol.
Shane
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, 11:24 AM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petre.
It's not clear to me that HE having reserved AS numbers in THEIR routing
table is actually a problem. These AS numbers are actually reserved for
private use. Perhaps they have a customer who wants to do BGP but doesn't
want to register their own AS number and is single-homed to HE. In this
case, HE
This is a small cell. They are very common across all of the carriers.
It is NOT intended to provide primary coverage for the area.
It IS intended to provide additional capacity to the immediate area.
Think of the large cell towers as providing blanket coverage, while small
cells provide hot spo
I can tell you that most carriers have neither type, at least in the US.
Shane
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 1:18 PM Stephen Satchell wrote:
> There is power backup and then there is power backup.
>
> The former is a small power pack (batteries, supercapacitors, whatever)
> that will allow the microcel
Agreed, specifically talking about small/micro cells.
Shane
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020, 2:11 PM Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:05:15PM -0500, Shane Ronan wrote:
> > I can tell you that most carriers have neither type, at least in the US.
>
> Most towers can
It goes down to county level.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020, 4:48 PM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Le 16/03/2020 à 21:42, sro...@ronan-online.com a écrit :
>
> https://hgis.uw.edu/virus
>
>
> It does not say by City. I cant find my city, department not even region.
>
> I k
Because the hospitals don't own the machines and the companies that do,
charge the hospital per x-ray. The hospitals moved to this model to reduce
their costs during "quiet" periods. And by doing so, put their patients in
jeopardy.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020, 2:07 PM Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> > On Mar
The standards are perfectly feasible.
That doesn't mean people will follow them, however it's much better to say
"I ignored your notification because it didn't follow the objective
standard" then it is to just say "I ignored your notification because I
felt like it"
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020, 11:37 AM
Elad,
How do you expect to get elected when you are attacking the very people who
will be voting in the election?
Further, it would seem you have very little experience in actually
operating large scale networks, network equipment or softwarr. You do
realize that a LARGE number of devices on the
How do you solve for all the devices that don't have vendor support and
will no longer be able to operate? Or are you suggesting we run a third
Internet ( IPv4, IPv4+ and IPv6) further segregating the things that can
communicate on the Internet.
On Wed, May 13, 2020, 6:48 PM Elad Cohen wrote:
>
I think you'd be surprised how much of the 5G Core is containerized for
both the data and control planes in the next generations providers are
currently deploying.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 11:02 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 5/Aug/20 16:15, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
>
> I was actually talk
Yes they are for 5G core.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 11:28 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 5/Aug/20 17:07, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> > I think you'd be surprised how much of the 5G Core is containerized
> > for both the data and control planes in the next generations provider
But in fact with local number portability, you cannot rely on the county
code to tell you where to route a telephone call anymore. Which is many
calls result in a data dip to provide you the routing information from a
central repository.
Shane
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 10:07 AM Masataka Ohta <
mo..
The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi, including
but not limited to guaranteed spectrum.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2021/11/preview-aws-private-5g/
>
> Why would somebody want this over wifi? And
gt;
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:38 PM Shane Ronan
> wrote:
>
>> The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi,
>> including but not limited to guaranteed spectrum.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:29 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
What do you mean 3rd Tier?
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 11:38 AM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> The spectrum is CBRS and there are MANY benefits to 5G over Wifi,
> including but not limited to guaranteed spectrum.
>
> For the 3rd tier I ass
mas wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 12:43 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> What do you mean 3rd Tier?
>
> General Authorized Access? Taken from some random site looking it up.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 2:47 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/30/21 1
at 4:00 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 12:53 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> What makes it different is once you've been allocated spectrum, which for
> in-building use is almost guaranteed, no one else can use that spectrum, so
> it's guaranteed. Unlike Wifi, where
can and should assist you with finding a clean channel and potently
> working as a mediator between GAA users but there is no guarantee or
> protections.
>
> This might be helpful. @10:10 this video from google SAS's tech team
> talks about this very thing.
>
> https://ww
Please provide details on public transit systems that are controlled via
Wifi, I find that very interesting.
Shane
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:43 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
>
>
> tir. 30. nov. 2021 23.19 skrev Tom Beecher :
>
>> In my view there is no practical difference. The owner has full contr
Sorry, I wasn't sure what you meant by 3rd tier, but yes, we are talking
about GAA.
The important bit is as I stated is "or that nobody currently is
transmitting on"
And yes, the CBRS Radio, called a CBSD must be configured ahead of time to
making freq grant requests to the SAS. This happens via
Except that the FAA isn't claiming interference in their LICENSED band,
they are claiming interference OUTSIDE their licensed band. You can't squat
on a frequency and then expect the licensed users to accommodate you.
Shane
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:06 PM Mel Beckman wrote:
> Shane,
>
> Incorre
I think you'd be very surprised if you walked into the central offices of
MANY of the large LECs.
The majority of the wire frames are gone, replaced with fiber, even where
the service is delivered as copper to the end user, it's usually served
from something fiber fed much closer to the end user.
Who are you buying servers from, because I'm going on a year waiting on
servers from HPE, and about 6 months on servers from Dell, although
that may have to do with the types of NICs I need.
I'm told HPE is holding back capacity for some of their large "Government"
contracts which have stiff perfor
What in depth analysis have you seen? Seems to me, this was a failure in a
known maintenance activity, and they simply disconnected the devices under
maintenance from the network.
Shane
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 5:41 AM Jon Sands wrote:
> Given the outage was so bad it was disrupting select E911
The issue isn't which 'prefixes' I accept from my customers, but which
'prefixes' I accept from the people I peer with, because it's entirely
dynamic and without a doing a database dip on EVERY call, I have to assume
that my peer or my peers customer or my peers peer is doing the right thing.
I ca
o police. It's the equivalent to gmail not allowing me to spoof whatever
> email address I want. The FCC could have required that ages ago.
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> htt
e tried.
>>
>>
>> Exactly. And that doesn't require an elaborate PKI. Who is allowed to use
>> what telephone numbers is an administrative issue for the ingress provider
>> to police. It's the equivalent to gmail not allowing me to spoof whatever
>> email address I
Except they've acquired A LOT of companies running C and A LOT of companies
running J, you'd think they'd at least have the same process for the
similar setups, but they don't.
Shane
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:42 AM Matthew Petach
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:19AM Mike Hammett wrote:
Verizon has already proven in 5 cities that you can run fiber to the node
and provide 1G fixed wireless service to both single and multi family
homes. This reduces the fiber cost and the headache of dealing with
landlords in MDU's.
Also, keep in mind that 10 years ago, you didn't know you would wa
My 4G/LTE works when I go behind
> things, miles from the tower, and delivers between 5 and 20 megabits
> which is more than enough for anything I'm doing on a mobile device.
>
> On 12/30/19 3:10 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
> > If you are looking at speed as the only benefit to 5
wrote:
>
>
> On 30/Dec/19 16:50, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> >
> > Also, keep in mind that 10 years ago, you didn't know you would want
> > or need 25mbits to your phone, but I'd bet that now you'd have a hard
> > time living without it.
>
> Whi
Phones aren't the only devices supported by mobile networks. There are many
other devices. My laptop for example has a 4G SIM card, as does my MiFi.
Sometimes my phone needs to be used as a hotspot to support multiple
devices.
All of these are based on current use cases, ignoring use cases that wi
The reason IoT comes into play with 5G is desification. A 4G base station
can support X number of UE (User Equipment - phones, mifis, CatM IoT
modems, etc) based on the LTE protocol. 5G allows X times N number of UE's
per base station, which will allows the network to support the planned
proliferat
Look up VoLTE.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019, 7:39 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 12/30/19 4:19 PM, Brandon Martin wrote:
> >
> > I really don't want to go diving down the 3GPP document hole...
>
>
> Yeah, no kidding. It's like acronym soup. I've been trying all afternoon
> to figure out vowifi and a
VoWIFI from your cell phone is essentially the same thing, except your
phone has to build a tunnel to the providers EPC via an SGW because of the
untrusted connectivity.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2019, 7:45 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 12/30/19 4:41 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
>
> Look up VoLTE
Verizon is already offering fixed access 5G service with unlimited data for
$50.00/month in five cities.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 3:56 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 1/Jan/20 17:35, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>
> >
> > If the mobile companies are providing the WiFi routers they can
> > control it (se
In locations with high population densities, there is nothing you can do to
LTE to provide adequate service.
Shane
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 8:46 AM Mike Hammett wrote:
> Obviously if the technology is available, works well, and is reasonably
> priced, 5G it up. However, if you're adding small cells
This may be the case for single family homes, but bringing ftth into MDUs
can be very ezpensive, as building want to charge entry fees, etc.
Same goes for commercial buildings.
5G fixed wireless allows wireless to be used for the last mile, with the
user still taking advantage of WiFi indoors. An
That's if you can get your fiber into the building. Due to commercial
agreements many residential MDUs don't allow competitive carriers. 4G
didn't have the bandwidth, but with 5G, they can compete.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 4:10 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> On 1/5/20 1:05
If you want money from the government to subsidize your network, you'll
follow their rules...
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:39 PM Tom Mitchell
wrote:
> Not sure we need the FCC telling us how to build products or run
> networks. Seat belts are life-or-death, but bufferbloat is rarely fatal
> ;-) L
Is that really an appropriate response for NANOG?
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 1:41 PM Geoffrey Jackson <
geoffrey.jack...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Pussy.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Taht
> Sent: 2 December 2023 7:11 AM
> To: Shane Ronan
> Cc: Tom Mitch
Unfortunately from my experience it's usually because the small local ISPs
don't have the resources to understand IPv6, and may be using equipment
generations old that may not support IPv6. It's the large ISPs that don't
want to do it because it would increase their operational costs and require
up
It's usually not laziness, it's most often related to cost.
On Sep 1, 2015 12:00 PM, "Rod Beck" wrote:
> Roland is correct. With the caveat that your Internet customer traffic may
> flow over the fibers as your separate management circuits. You should aim
> for end to end physical diversity. This
Roland,
While your way may be best practice, sometimes real life gets in the way
of best practice.
Shane
On 9/1/15 1:12 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On 2 Sep 2015, at 0:08, Steve Meuse wrote:
Your advice is not "one size fits all".
Actually, it is.
Large backbone networks have DCNs/OOBs,
So in your world, the money always exists for a separate flow telemetry
network?
On 9/1/15 1:29 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On 2 Sep 2015, at 0:18, Niels Bakker wrote:
You're just wrong here.
Sorry, I'm not. I've seen what happens when flow telemetry is
'squeezed out' by pipe-filling DDoS a
And how do you propose we solve this?
On Sep 10, 2015 9:06 AM, "Mike Hammett" wrote:
> 5 GHz noise levels affecting people whose primary means of Internet access
> is via fixed wireless .
>
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
>
>
> Midwest Inte
So we should limit our public use of the 5ghz spectrum so that others can
use it? How about we use licensed spectrum for fixed wireless services.
On Sep 10, 2015 9:13 AM, "Matt Hoppes" wrote:
> Use 2GHz instead of 5GHz for the outdoor WiFi plants?
>
> On 9/10/15 9:09 AM
T-Mobile claims they are not accepting any payment from these content
providers for inclusion in Binge On.
"Onstage today, Legere said any company can apply to join the Binge On
program. "Anyone who can meet our technical requirement, we’ll include,"
he said. "This is not a net neutrality prob
When I was asked the default BGP timers across three different vendor
platforms as measure of my networking ability during an interview, I
replied saying I'd look them up if needed them.
I was told I didn't understand BGP in enough detail, despite being able to
describe all the steps of BGP sessio
This would be even more AWESOME if you added routing table lookup.
On 6/13/15 12:38 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
What's out there for setting up your own looking glass? I saw lots of lists of
dead projects or projects that hadn't received any
I think you are over estimating the technical resources at NYSE.
On Jul 8, 2015 1:44 PM, "Matthew Huff" wrote:
> Given that the technical resources at the NYSE are significant and the
> lengthy duration of the outage, I believe this is more serious than is
> being reported. OTOH, the fact that th
1.1.1.1 is usually a good bet
On Jul 10, 2015 6:21 PM, "Mark Andrews" wrote:
>
> In message <20150710215658.gc23...@puck.nether.net>, Jared Mauch writes:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 07:41:53AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > +1 and you will most probably see about 50% of the traffic being IPv6
>
This is actually a good idea. Roll out an IPV6 only network and only pass
out an IPV4 address if it's needed based on actual traffic.
On Jul 13, 2015 11:27 AM, "John Levine" wrote:
> In article vs-kedgu276fwgxqn1j9jmorlq8sw4xpe...@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >http://www.google.com/patents/US201
Dictatorship enabled by consensus == Democratic Republic, Welcome to
America!
On 7/17/15 12:17 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Owen DeLong wrote:
On Jul 16, 2015, at 15:29 , Joe Maimon wrote:
All I am advocating is that if ever another draft standard comes
along to enable people to try and make s
Have you considered a virtual route reflector rather than physical hardware?
On Aug 1, 2015 11:39 AM, "marco da pieve" wrote:
> Hi all,
> this is my first time in asking for advices here and I hope not to bother
> you with this topic (if it has been already covered in the past, would you
> please
Sounds like rancid & par to me. :-)
Par?
I think it depends on the industry you are in, in the financial
industry, no one uses MPLS clouds or VPN's over the Internet, everyone
uses either 1G or 10G links.
On Apr 30, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Stefan wrote:
hmmm ...
http://www.networkperformancedaily.com/2009/04/so_this
OpenNMS has a good tool called Strafeping that is based on Smokeping
that is integrated into the overall system.
On May 8, 2009, at 3:57 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Jitter (e.g. variability in one way or rtt) smokeping is rather good
at
measuring...
The question is do you want to instrument t
I learned DNS initially by reading some great documents by Avi
Freedman, they are a little out dated, but still very relevant and
posted on his website @ http://www.freedman.net/
On May 21, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Philip Lavine wrote:
To all,
I am sure this has been asked 10 to the 1 millionth
Apologies, this should have said I learned BGP initially not DNS.
Sorry!!
On May 21, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
I learned DNS initially by reading some great documents by Avi
Freedman, they are a little out dated, but still very relevant and
posted on his website @ http
I have to agree.
I've been working with BIND for over 10 years, and still use webmin to
help me keep things organized.
On May 21, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Justin Wilson - MTIN wrote:
We have several clients using Webmin. If you don’t know command
line
Webmin is another tool to help you lear
In my experience they are required not only to mark the line, but to
identify it with the initials of the owner.
On Jun 2, 2009, at 10:44 AM, JC Dill wrote:
Elmar K. Bins wrote:
jcdill.li...@gmail.com (JC Dill) wrote:
Why do they "watch" and "monitor" rather than proactively go out
and
I could not agree with the points below more.
Prior to the mergers, I had multiple services each with Looking Glass,
Wiltel and Broadwing and Level3. After Level3's round of acquisitions
the service level for all four of them went way down.
I've had the experience of not being able to resol
What system were you using to monitor link usage?
Shane
On Aug 30, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 30/08/2009 13:04, Randy Bush wrote:
the normal snmp and other averaging methods *really* miss the bursts.
Definitely. For fun and giggles, I recently turned on 30 second
polling on
I'd recommend Equinix which has a site in Hong Kong which I would
recommend over mainland China.
http://www.equinix.com/locations/map/asiapacific/hongkong/
Shane
On Sep 8, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Benjamin Billon wrote:
For Asia, I'd say Hong Kong (and personnaly Mega iAdvantage).
Could be inte
Having work in high traffic colo spaces around the world for the last
ten years or so, in my experience this type of issue is very rare. If
you are having this type of "quality" issue, I would sit down with
your sales rep and ask to be stepped through their processes, there is
obviously som
On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from my
monitoring systems, but I am unsure about how to go about it.
Appreciate the assistance.
Shane Ronan
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Express Web Systems
How do I send out an email if the network is down?
On Sep 22, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Shane Ronan wrote:
On that same note, can someone point me in the direction of an SMS
gateway service? I would like to be able to send SMS messages from
my monitoring systems, but I am
As the CTO of a financial company with multiple data centers in
London, I would recommend Equinix Slough (or London 4) site. They have
a website setup just for Financial firms. http://financial.equinix.com/
I've got space in both Telehouse and Equinix and would recommend
Equinix for someone
Agreed -1 for GroupSpark (AKA 123together)
On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Jeff Saxe wrote:
Barring that, what recommendations might the NANOG community have for
an extremely rock-solid e-mail hosting company? I realize that may
mean self-promotion, but hey, bring it on.
Some people, when they
On a side note, when I was passing the area this morning at around
10am PDT, there were two fiber-trailers working in two separate
manholes.
This is probably the result of having to splice in a new section of
fiber, since it would probably have been difficult to splice the ends
of the
An easy way to describe what your saying is "Security by obscurity is
not security"
On Apr 11, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
Jo¢ wrote:
I'm confussed, but please pardon the ignorance.
All the data centers we have are at minimum keys to access
data areas. Not that every area of fiber sh
This is not such an odd solution.
Locks are really easy to break with a screw driver and a hammer which
almost everyone has and is easy to carry, but most people aren't going
to have or carry a torch or a cutting wheel.
After 9/11 a large portion of the man holes in NYC were welded shut to
nip, snip, snip, fiber cut.
Shane Ronan
On Apr 13, 2009, at 5:54 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, chris.ra...@nokia.com wrote:
I get the feeling you haven't deployed or operated large networks.
Nope.
You never did say what the multiplier was. How many miles or
detect
minutes.
On Apr 13, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Shane Ronan wrote:
This all implies that the majority of fiber is in "tunnels" that
can be monitored. In my experience, almost none of it is in tunnels.
In NYC, it's usually buried in cond
eally do need new
IP space.
Shane Ronan
On Apr 20, 2009, at 7:04 PM, David Andersen wrote:
"Are you asking me to attest, publicly and perhaps legally, that
this information is correct?
nsome process of receiving an IPv4 allocation?
Shane Ronan
--Opinions contained herein are strictly my own--
On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:01 AM, John Curran wrote:
Roger -
A few nits:
A) ARIN's not ignoring unneeded legacy allocations, but can't take
action without the Internet
You really should go ask a CEO if he'd sign off on something that he
doesn't understand. Really. I can assure you that your impression
is wrong, and most CEOs don't prefer to be standing in court
defending their actions.
Actually, being a CTO of a company, I know that my CEO signs things
Not the annual report, the actual books and records, including details
on individual expenses.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 2:54 PM, Kevin Loch wrote:
Shane Ronan wrote:
C) Are ARIN's books open for public inspection? If so, it might be
interesting for the group to see where all our money is
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:19 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Well... ARIN is structured with a bottom-up community driven policy
process. That has
served us well for many years, and, I think that changing it would
be a mistake. However,
in this case, that means that the following people are specifically
Is ARIN, who won't even take back large blocks of space from people
who have long ago stopped using it and aren't paying anything for it,
prepared to start filing civil suits against people who were assigned /
24's (and paid for them) due to inaccurate declaration?
It's means one of two things:
1) Recoup the unused space for paid reallocation
or
2) Have the current "owner" pay the market rate for the IP space
On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Shane Ronan
wrote:
Is ARIN, who won&#
Very simple, just do it.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Shane Ronan
wrote:
It's means one of two things:
sure, but 'how' exactly?
1) Recoup the unused space for paid reallocation
or
arin never (nor do any
list
Subject: Re: The real issue
Shane Ronan wrote:
> Very simple, just do it.
Ha! We have some legacy IP space in continous use here at ASN13345 for
over 12 years now that was recently "revoked" for a few weeks (only to
be later restored via a transfer once the exact definition o
No, but they can sure send them a bill and then go after them for
collections when they don't pay it.
-Original Message-
From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:34 PM
To: Shane Ron
'not my customer, not my issue, you REALLY need to talk to ASX who's
their provider...'
-Chris
I don't believe this is how most ISP's would respond or there wouldn't
be RBLs.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at
Simple, send it to the address and contact listed in their whois record.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:40 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
where do you send the bill? For some even large organizations I've
seen bills get shuffled to random places that didn't deal with 'bills'
and then get dropped. Not ev
But you are okay with them raising your fees to go to court left and
right to enforce the declarations made by CEO's of companies who are
happily paying the fees for the space they've been assigned.
On Apr 21, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
1) I don't care to pay higher member fees bec
Disagree, the EX is a very capable L3 router for LANs.
On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Cord MacLeod wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
>
>> 2009/11/12 David Coulson
>>
>>> You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even leverage
>>> something like VPLS -
I've been using the RAD products for years. The price is right and they are
extremely reliable.
On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Brad Fleming wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> My company is searching for some Ethernet over DS3 converters / adaptors for
> a specific installation. I see several options from
Happy Thanksgiving
ax lol
> Sent from my Blackberry. Please execute spelling errors.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Shane Ronan
> To: nanog
> Sent: Thu Nov 26 13:38:43 2009
> Subject: Happy Thanksgiving
>
> Happy Thanksgiving
>
>
>
>
>
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
