If you want money from the government to subsidize your network, you'll follow their rules...
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 12:39 PM Tom Mitchell <tmitch...@netelastic.com> wrote: > Not sure we need the FCC telling us how to build products or run > networks. Seat belts are life-or-death, but bufferbloat is rarely fatal > ;-) Let it be a point of differentiation. > > -- Tom > > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 4:56 PM Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Over here: >> >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19ADByjakzQXCj9Re_pUvrb5Qe5OK-QmhlYRLMBY4vH4/edit >> >> Us bufferbloat folk have been putting together a response to the FCC's >> NOI (notice of inquiry) asking for feedback as to increasing the >> broadband speeds beyond 100/20 Mbit. >> >> "Calls for further bandwidth increases are analogous to calling for >> cars to have top speeds of 100, 200, or 500 miles per hour. Without >> calling also for better airbags, bumpers, brakes, or steering wheels, >> (or roads designed to minimize travel delay), these initiatives will >> fail (and are failing) to meet the needs of present and future users >> of the internet." >> >> Comments (and cites) welcomed also! The text is still somewhat in flux... >> >> >> -- >> :( My old R&D campus is up for sale: https://tinyurl.com/yurtlab >> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos >> >
