m in the morning when things are
breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already has
good experience with OSPF? I would tend towards the latter in my
decision making, unless there is significant enough advantage to be
gained by the other.
Paul
ected long before we moved in
there and had such a steep re-connection fee I'd have got DSL as soon as
it was clear it was going to be a regular problem :-/
Paul
I'm assuming he also has fully redundant water sources, fertilisers etc, along
with a contract for replenishment and resupply.
Can't be too safe.
Scott Morris wrote:
>Did you have backup tomatoes?
>
>
>
>
>
>On 8/26/11 10:05 PM, Chris wrote:
>> Irene is already past me. I'm outside of Jackso
Working fine for me:
$ dig @8.8.8.8 www.noaa.gov
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3 <<>> @8.8.8.8 www.noaa.gov
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64856
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTI
long it takes to
get them through Cell Phone carriers. A number of alternative android
builds are adding the ability to control accepted root certs to their
builds in the interest of speeding this up. The CA system is
fundamentally flawed.
Paul
-14 at 08:33 -0500, N. Max Pierson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Either way, it's pathetic. If someone is going to slander in the
>>>> fashion the site has done, they should at least put a contact form
>>>> somewhere for some feedback :)
>>>
&g
On 10/03/2011 12:35 PM, Aiden Sullivan wrote:
www.he.net seems to be down on both IPv4 and IPv6 -- does anyone know what is
going on?
Linode's Fremont location was effected too, HE are their network
providers, was down for about an hour.
Paul
There are a fair number of reports of Apple's update servers being
down/intermittent. I imagine that's probably fairly inevitable on
launch day. If people haven't already updated and are thinking about
doing it, it's probably worth holding off a day or two just in case.
No packet loss but I'm seeing some fairly variable performance on the
penultimate hop, reaching it both from Timewarner in Hawaii and HE's
fremont location:
ae-31-80.car1.SanJose1.Level3.net Last: 56.2 Average:74.6 Best: 56.1
Worst: 259.3 StDev: 47.4
Paul
On 10/19/2011 07:15
We are using the product. It works fairly well although the code is
still slightly immature at the moment.
Started using it about a year ago in beta and it has greatly improved
over time (due to a lot of input from us beta testing it in the process :> )
On 4/10/2013 5:56 PM, Aaron Wendel wrote
.net (4.69.132.93) 13.840 ms 15.584
ms 17.443 ms
9 ae-94-94.csw4.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.190) 23.420 ms
25.569 ms 18.042 ms
10 ae-4-99.edge2.Washington4.Level3.net (4.68.17.211) 14.052 ms
14.028 ms 13.610 ms
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
15 *
Paul Stewart wrote
dynamic or whatever
-kind of leaping to conclusions here, but possibly the robot is caching
DNS? Which means even if what was broken had been fixed, the robot
wouldn't see it?
Thanks,
--
Paul Hessels
Michelle,
--
Paul
In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind
there are few.
Shunryu Suzuki
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Michelle Sullivan wrote:
That is my view, however most (if not all) of the tickets were for the /22
not the /32 which is why it wa
I have a Bell Canada gig fibre connection. My first attempt was to bridge
their all-in-one box (disaster, unreliable as all hell), second was to set a
bunch of rules for inbound traffic. Apart from inbound access being *very*
iffy, their device was s_l_o_w.
So I pulled the fibre GBIC, used a
realistically need. The rest will flow
from that.
Regards
paul
Autocorrect changed a misspelled recipient to “nanog”.
paul (grovelling for forgiveness)
Typo in the first version copied this to a mailing list.
I sent a newer version shortly after copied to Brian instead :-)
Please delete the earlier one & only reply to the later one.
Thanks
paul
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 1:19 PM, Paul Nash wrote:
>
> After an outage ye
If you don’t have coherent argument, take Trump’s approach with an incoherent
ad-hominem attack.
I have been filling this issue with a lot of interest, and to date you have
offered no evidence of anything, apart from your ability to spew vitriol.
> On Nov 16, 2020, at 10:04 AM, Elad Cohen w
Phoenix-IX Contacts
peer...@phoenix-ix.net
+1 602 688-6414
~Paul Emmons
On 11/16/2020 12:23 PM, Neil Hanlon wrote:
While I agree it is objectively irresponsible to abandon a project
without passing it to another, I think that possibly in this situation
we don't know all the details?
still trying to post . . .
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Phoenix-IX Contact
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:15:34 -0700
From: Paul Emmons
To: nanog@nanog.org
Hello All!
I've been out of the loop here and but have some updates.
There was a change last sprin
Any idea of the outcome?
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 4:54 PM, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:02:01 -0800, Jay Hennigan said:
>
>> In the old days on the NANAE newsgroup, such bogus threats of legal
>> action were categorized as one calling their "cartooney". People who
>> huff and
Yes this is common business practice for almost all of the MSOs.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:45 AM Thomas Yarger
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This past week when I was helping my father perform some home networking,
> I called AT&T to get a newer Arris router and they mentioned that if I were
> to upgr
> You take down a 10g connection and they bill each side $.2 a meg, 95th
> percintile billing. VLAN between the two sites. Both sites have to have a
> different AS number. So if you want to move 1g of data, 95th percentile,
> between 2 datacenters I guess it has some utility at $400 a gig effecti
"You have to let your customer's services contain death threats against
the owner of your company or we'll blacklist you" is the wildest take of
2021 yet.
Blocking Amazon because of who they allow to remain a customer is
something I wholeheartedly encourage my competitors to do.
On 1/12/21 9
The list has public archives. Draw your own conclusions on the policy.
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/
On 1/18/21 2:40 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
Not under that impression at all. That's very different from "what is
the policy" - at least in the groups I run, if the policy is
jlewis> This reminds me of one of the Sprint CO's we were colo'd in.
Ah, Sprint. Nothing like using your railroad to run phone lines...
Our routers in San Jose colo were black from the soot of the trains.
Fondly remember a major Sprint outage in the early 90s. All our data
circuits in the southea
warren> 2: A somewhat similar thing would happen with the Ascend TNT
warren> Max, which had side-to-side airflow. These were dial termination
warren> boxes, and so people would install racks and racks of them. The
warren> first one would draw in cool air on the left, heat it up and
warren> ship it
RPKI can be very useful to mitigate an attempt.
I used to process IP LOAs all the time. I never saw a RR attached but
usually we did a check against the RIR just to make sure (because we
made access-list per interface as well)
On 3/9/2021 1:42 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
Not everyone uses RRs, an
the e.164 address rather than the originating
domain) it's just going to push spammers to exploit those holes. It's
very much to be seen whether victory can be declared, IMO.
Fortunately, positive identification of the caller isn't the intent.
Preventing people from pretending to be the IRS is the intent.
-Paul
On 7/1/21 3:53 PM, Keith Medcalf wrote:
And this is why this problem will not be solved. The "open relay" is making money from processing
the calls, and the end carrier is making money for terminating them. Until fine(s) -- hopefully millions of
them, one for each improperly terminated call,
Fun part is that just because it's a telnyx number with a checkmark, it
doesn't mean the call came from Telnyx, just that the call came from a
carrier that gave the call attestation A. As the carrier, we can see who
signed the call (it's an x509 certificate, signed by the STI-PA, with
the carri
randy>
https://www.vice.com/en/article/jg84yy/data-brokers-netflow-data-team-cymru
randy> at&t, comcast, ... zayo, please tell us you do not do this.
aaron> You know they do.
No, you don't know that.
The above all certainly collect this info. Not all sell it to anyone who
asks.
ing such vital resources as Facebook and Netflix :-)
paul
bzs> When we, The World, first began allowing the general public onto
bzs> the internet in October 1989 we actually had a (mildly shared*) T1
bzs> (1.544mbps) UUNET link. So not so bad for the time. Dial-up
bzs> customers shared a handful of 2400bps modems, we still have them.
The World was also o
C.
They were missing several kilometres of phone wire, so connected the link to
the fence on each side of the road. We get about 1200bps on a good day IIRC,
and would loose carrier whenever someone moved cattle from one field to another
and opened a gate in the fence.
paul
kauer> When *I* were a lad we had to touch the wires with our tongues to
kauer> tell one from zero, no job for a sissy lemme tell you.
Wires? You had wires? We had to cut out our own intestines, braid them
into strands and dip them in salt water to make them conductive.
Our bosses would feed us a
first internet for me was a 300 baud modem from offsite to someplace
buried in the pentagon that I think aggregated all of us into a single
56k upstream.
at 300 baud, you could actually read faster than the screen scrolled. we
started getting 1200 baud, then 2400 baud but the USAF wouldn't let you
phone wire).
I used them to link up the UNHCR in Northern Mozambique. Only problems were
when someone opened a gate in the fence to move cattle — no carried until they
closed it again.
paul
wsimpson> When we first designed PPP in the late '80s to replace SLIP
wsimpson> and SLFP, it was expected to run at 300 bps and scale up, so
wsimpson> the timeouts reflected that. When I designed PPP over ISDN,
wsimpson> added language to allow faster retransmission.
SLIP and PPP were quite... ro
merged with our
biggest client, was sold, sold again, and so on. Last time I looked, it had
become Verizon Africa.
paul
> On Jan 28, 2020, at 6:40 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account)
> wrote:
>
> So to add my two stories:
>
> I provided the Idea and a whole bunch
gleduc> I remember that TI luggable - that sucker weighed a ton!
U of I used those in the libraries. I remember looking up books for
inter-library/lincoln trail and handing the printout to
students. Problem was that clay or whatever it was that made the paper
worked didn't last for more than a mon
It's okay though, because we freed up UDP/53 by moving DNS to TCP/443,
so then we can move HTTPS to UDP/53.
On 2/21/20 6:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
First we moved the entire internet to TCP/443.
Now we propose moving it all to UDP/53.
What’s next? Why not simply eliminate port numbers altogeth
ts, but I feel that that would be a really stupid thing to do right now.
In the meantime, schools are shut down, and I have two children back home from
university.
paul
>
>> (Fortunately, I'm in a position to hide in my apartment and only
> emerge
>> for grocery
That same fuel shortage killed all Internet traffic to sub-Saharan Africa.
Took us a while to figure out what was wrong with the satellite link to the US.
paul
> On Mar 16, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Ben Cannon wrote:
>
> We (Verizon not me) lost a central office during 9/11 becau
connectivity.
Lots of important people lost power as well, so the feds decided to let the
diesel tankers in after a few days’ deliberations.
paul
> On Mar 17, 2020, at 11:21 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 17/Mar/20 17:15, Paul Nash wrote:
>
>> That same fuel shor
not.
paul
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 11:56 AM, Karl Auer wrote:
>
> An untested emergency system has to be regarded as a non-existent
> emergency system.
>
> No matter how painful it is to test, no matter how expensive it is to
> test, the pain and the expense are no
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 6:22 AM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Mr. Morrow - where are you situated approximately?
>
>
He's a network operator. From North America, on the North American Network
Operators mailing list. Something you are not, so please stop spouting y
woody> UUCP kicks ass.
And scary as it sounds, UUCP over SLIP/PPP worked remarkably
robustly. When system/network resources are skinny or scarce, you get
really good at keeping things working.
:)
Don’t hold your breath :-(.
> On Mar 24, 2020, at 4:55 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
> On 24/Mar/20 22:48, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> almost all our cultures have gaps; but some worse than others. we will
>> all learn lessons in the coming many months of plague. i know an office
>> which lost key
entire
sub-continent (along with email) over 9600 bps dial-up circuits.
paul
discounted service provided
we had a 5-year contract that specified that they service *had* to run over
satellite. Job insurance.
As our requirements grew, we added fibre connections. Eventually the telco
canceled the satellite connection as they were starting to focus on VSAT.
paul
> On
censored.
Before TICSA, I also looked at buying a private (pirate) satellite earth
station. The Russian government were selling off surplus 8-wheel-drive
military satellite earth stations, and I was thinking of parking one in my back
garden (I lived on a farm).
paul
> On Jul 9, 2
I’m looking for a technical contact at Disney regarding geo-location. I have a
client (apartment building) with a /24 (one IP per apartment). We recently
upgraded out Internet connection to give a much-needed speed boost. Same
connectivity provider, same IP addresses, just a bigger pipe.
Sin
upon that foundation, for the betterment of the Internet community as a whole.
Once Don’s family have established plans for his memorial, they will be posted
here.
Roland Dobbins
--
Paul Ferguson
Tacoma, WA USA
Illegitimi non carborundum.
reless carriers outside of private testbed connectivity anytime soon)
https://authenticate.iconectiv.com/authorized-service-providers-authenticate
-Paul
On 9/10/20 4:09 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 9/10/20 9:49 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
At this month's FCC rulemaking meeting, it will con
My backyard is private. It offers no privacy with its chain link fence
against a major street.
On 9/16/20 4:38 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Privacy != encryption.
cleartext == privacy * 0
cleartext * complexity == privacy * 0
randy
ARP timeouts of a day or
even just permanent with manual clearing when you see a peer go down.
-Paul
On 9/21/20 6:16 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
yes, privacy is one aspect of security. and, as mpls vns are not
private sans encryption, they are not secure.
randy
As my backyard is not surrounded by a cement enclosure with acoustic
baffling and white noise generators inside, it's not really private
vom513> Observation: iOS 14 now seems to send 3 queries (up from 2) for
vom513> every socket connection to a name. Whereas we've had A
vom513> + for quite some time in many OSes - on iOS 14 we now
vom513> have A + + HTTPS (type 65).
[...]
vom513> Question: iOS 14 now flags networks that
ny idea why this change was made? Is the DoD
planning on actually legitimately putting services on the space soon
instead of using it as a giant honeypot? Or maybe even selling it?
Thanks,
Rich
--
Paul Ferguson
Tacoma, WA USA
Illegitimi non carborundum.
receive the route
> from one of them.
What about setting up a machine with exabgp installed, a iBGP session with
the exabgp instance, and a small script parsing the updates received by
exabgp to raise an alarm whenever $CONDITION is met ?
https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp
Best,
Paul
We have done that with a CVR and 1g sfp.
On 1/31/2022 11:05 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Hey, does anyone know of an SFP28 capable of rate-adapting down from 25G on the
cage side down to 1G on the line side? Can be copper or fiber on the line
side, I don’t care, my interest is in the chip inside.
Do MSOs and CLEC/fiber providers require free power and space?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022, 7:59 PM Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> NANOG'ers;
>
> At least in Boston, commercial property owners are receiving notices that
> 'copper lines are being removed per FCC rules' and replaced with fiber.
> The proper
Saw this
https://www.nojitter.com/consultant-perspectives/decommissioning-copper-gets-real
eric> If Canada doesn't do the same thing at the same time, it'll be a
eric> real hassle, dealing with a change from -8 to -7 crossing the
eric> border between BC and WA, for instance. It has to be done
eric> consistently throughout North America.
You must not have ever dealt with Indiana, where i
niversal
Have you ever considered that this may be in fact:
*/writing/* and */deploying/* the code that will allow the use of 240/4 the
way you expect
Paul
pgp6kGDmOvUU6.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 3/31/22 11:38, Laura Smith via NANOG wrote:
However, perhaps someone would care to elaborate (either on or off-list) what
the deal is with the requirement to sign NDAs with Cogent before they'll
discuss things like why they still charge for BGP, or indeed any other
technical or pricing matt
/www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/04/27/internet-multiple-cities-across-france-suspected-sabotage/
Cheers,
- ferg
--
Paul Ferguson
Tacoma, WA USA
Illegitimi non carborundum.
going to do this, can
you please damned well fix *your* screwups when you get it wrong in a
timely manner - or don't bother doing it at all.
Paul.
e notified them - along with other geoloc
companies - that it was now UK-based).
So if Disney+ are using Neustar, they are caching the results somehow or
applying their own secret sauce that gets it wrong.
Paul.
amounts of shovelware come with a few megabyte
print driver for a modern printer/scanner/copier. Let's just include a
copy of McAfee endpoint protection in this java update in case the user
opts into selecting that as an option during install? etc.
-Paul
On 6/6/22 14:24, Chris Adams wrote:
O
Your rights under the ICA are dead. Since 2002 you were only able to
order it if one end was in a tier 3 wirecenter, and it was killed in
2021 as an orderable product.
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/01/08/2020-25254/modernizing-unbundling-and-resale-requirements-in-an-era-of-ne
4 38365 I (Atomic Originator)
Communities:
Localpref: 100
Paul
pgpblDby5RqkH.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
it was UUNet... and then, they had 3 main ASNs:
- 701 (US)
- 702 (EU)
- 703 (APAC)
Playing with the LG, it may seem that the route is visible in the "703
region", so that may be traffic engineering, geo-whatever reason, config
mistake, ...
Paul
--
Paul Rolland
Akamai isn't supporting 10g ports on IXPs. I'd be surprised if the allowed
it on PNIs. As for not being on the IXPs, that's odd.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:23 AM Jawaid Bazyar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We had Akamai servers in our data center for many years until a couple
> years ago, when they said
Two current experiences . . .
I still do work with an ILEC that gets requests for waves to Cogent. Cogent
has a data center in the market but won't allow the ILEC to build in. So
Cogent burns ports in another data center where Cogent pays for space and
power. Cogent reps says no one gets anything
In our experience, I think, we do a 24 month rpki cert tied the key shared
with ARIN. You simply create a new rpki cert in the ARIN hosted service.
Due operational reasons we will delete an old cert a month after publishing
the new cert just to keep things clean. We don't have a lot of space
turno
RTFilter Constrained Route Distribution.
>
> Do any of the colleagues have any suggestions on this?
ExaBGP ?
https://github.com/Exa-Networks/exabgp/wiki/RFC-Information
Best,
Paul
--
Paul RollandE-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA
QFX5100 as a L3 router + L2 switch performed well for us in the past, I
don't see why it'd fall over in <1g traffic now.
You should be good to go.
On 3/24/2019 04:41 午前, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
Hey there,
I am trying to get my hands on some QFX5000s and I have a rather quick
question.
In the p
FWIW, I have a 250 subscribers sitting on a 100M fiber into Torix. I have had
no complains about speed in 4 1/2 years. I have been planning to bump them to
1G for the last 4 years, but there is currently no economic justification.
paul
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Louie Lee
Mixed residential (ages 25 - 75, 1 - 6 people per unit), group who worked
together to keep costs down. Works well for them. Friday nights we get to
about 85% utilization (Netflix), other than that, usually sits between 25 - 45%
paul
> On Apr 2, 2019, at 5:44 PM, Jared Mauch wr
upgrade to 1G as soon as the dust started settling. They have
postponed the upgrade for 3 years now, with no complaints.
I guess that if they will be directly impacted by higher bandwidth costs, some
people can make do with slower service (or something).
paul
> On Apr 3, 2019, a
hin a decade, even with a government mandate as there's still a
massive embedded base of switches that can't support it and never will).
It may be incredibly frustrating, but there's plenty of money to be made
in prolonging the problem.
-Paul
On 4/23/19 3:55 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
Hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 4/24/2019 10:07 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:
> Just ran into packetstream.io:
>
> "Sell Your Unused Bandwidth
>
> Earn passive income while you sleep
>
What could possibly go wrong? :-)
- - ferg
- --
Paul Fer
ekuhnke> I would caution against putting much faith in the validity of
ekuhnke> geolocation or site ID by reverse DNS PTR records. There are a
ekuhnke> vast number of unmaintained, ancient, stale, erroneous or
ekuhnke> wildly wrong PTR records out there. I can name at least a half
ekuhnke> dozen IS
lg.hadron> And 666 is Nero Caesar :-)
surfer> It's the US Army.
Same same... :)
lhc> How much did it cost? :-)
valdis> I'm willing to guess US$6digits/mo. 5 digits if you qualified for
valdis> the quantity discount. :)
We used to charge $2500 install and $2500/month for a T1 with agreement
to not share or resell. It was something like double that if you wanted
to resell? We
g.org/pipermail/nanog/2019-May/101140.html
Details:
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 10:03:04 -0500
From: "NANOG"
To: "Paul Ferguson"
Subject: Mykolab Ref Id: I32560
X-Authenticated-Sender: s214.panelboxmanager.com
Return-Path:
Attachment: "ATTACHMENT 654860 I32560.doc"
MD5:49f
> On May 29, 2019, at 9:14 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
>
> * fergdawgs...@mykolab.com (Paul Ferguson) [Wed 29 May 2019, 18:04 CEST]:
>> This is apparently (?) part of a wave of spoofed malspams impersonating
>> messages with ‘weaponized' attachments sent to the NANOG (
me spamming outfit is burning
>
> through quite a bit of stolen credentials.
>
> Richard Golodner
>
> Infratection
>
It's Emotet (again).
Cheers,
- ferg
--
Paul Ferguson
Principal, Threat Intelligence
Gigamon
Seattle, WA USA
was their preferred option now. A year
or two back, they wanted everyone to access O365 via Express Route...
Paul.
Chris it would be trivial for this to be fixed, nearly overnight, by
creating some liability on the part of carriers for illicit use of
caller ID data on behalf of their customers.
But the carriers don't want that, so now we have to create tons of
technical half solutions to solve a problem th
pulsing valid numbers, then they should absorb the social costs of
what's going on.
Let's not get this confused - this isn't about customer PBXen outpulsing
forwarded calls when they do it, it's about people shooting millions of
calls a month, the carrier hitting them with short d
uld just be one more risk we'd take into account.
-Paul
On 7/11/19 3:04 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
"with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of
value"
Kind of a huge hole that, unless you record all calls which opens other
liability, is hard to prove.
Be
And after 75 messages, nobody has asked the obvious question. When is
ARDC going to acquire IPv6 resources on our behalf? Instead being all
worried about legacy resources we're highly underutilizing.
Ham Radio is supposed to be about pushing the art forward. Let's do that.
-KC8QAY
On 7/22/19
VoIP is up and running but the web site server crashed. Currently
restoring server.
Voice number 602 688-6414
~Paul
make this stop
Thanks in advance,
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
Seattle, WA USA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAl1i4CEACgkQKJasdVTchbJVHAEA0s7Ej73VPQth2Rho4xwTnv8e
qQFJ6SB+qulM1HFHoUgA/RXAL1BFJC3wq9GsXYJ4sqLSrje/gPm1JzVMeEJMTGlQ
=r3mY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
web> "WTF, PEOPLE??? CAN'T ANYONE AGGREGATE ANYMORE???"
surfer> Is that like the NANOG version of "get off my lawn"? :)
Lawns? You had lawns? :)
BGP when under 2k-ish and CLNP for sins in past lives...
They are obviously not running full tables on their 3640. I'd imagine a
raspberry pi would have more BGP capability and throughput than a 3640,
though I don't recommend doing that even as a joke. But an ERR would be
fine if they're expecting nothing more than a slightly faster 3640 with
maybe s
Is this an indication of a prefix that was highjacked?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Ben Cannon wrote:
>
1 - 100 of 1420 matches
Mail list logo
