On 12/27/12 10:29 AM, mike wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:25 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 12/27/12 9:04 AM, mike wrote:
I reloaded their app (yes, I know... sew me) and got this warning:
IP address: 2600:100f:b119:c6bc:bd6f:fabb:ff30:2a3d
Estimated location: Livingston, NJ, US
That's a r
On 1/10/13 12:59 PM, John Levine wrote:
IMHO mail is one of the easiest "first things" to turn on for IPv6.
You can certainly turn it on, and it will work at the current toy
scale, but nobody has a clue how we're going to scale IPv4 spam
management up for large scale IPv6. Anything that's obvio
On 1/11/13 02:44 , Nikolay Shopik wrote:
> Also getting POTS line in your pop sometimes get tricky. 2G/3G modems
> with cheap plans cost like 10$/month (dunno about US though), thats
> almost same as POTS line.
They don't generally have public IPs (that can be arranged). verizon 4G
cards have ipv6
On 1/13/13 12:12 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013, Matthew Petach wrote:
Thank goodness ethernet never has problems with negotiation going
awry, and coming up with mismatched duplexes, and vendors never had
to implement "no negotiation-auto" in their configs because you
could
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - "class c" uses fewer syllables than "slash
twenty four" :-)
You realize that class-c address space was only found within 192/8
On 1/15/13 10:04 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
- Original Message -
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - "class c" uses fewer syllables than
"slash
twenty fo
hawaiiantel is reporting a fibercut which I imagine explains most of this.
On 1/15/13 4:32 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
Looks like you are not the only one with issues connecting to Hawaii:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.org.operators.isotf.outages/5231
On 16 January 2013 00:19, david peahi wrot
On 1/27/13 9:01 AM, Harald Koch wrote:
On 26 January 2013 17:38, Mark Andrews wrote:
As for "breaking" your LAN, if the applications take 60 seconds to
fallback to the other address they were already broken. Go complain
to your application vendor. Some vendors have already fixed this
problem
On 1/30/13 6:39 AM, Harald Koch wrote:
On 30 January 2013 02:39, Jussi Peltola wrote:
High density virtual machine setups can have 100 VMs per host. Each VM
has at least a link-local address and a routable address. This is 200
groups per port, 9600 per 48 port switch.
um - let's compare apples
On 1/30/13 6:33 AM, Jason Baugher wrote:
There is much talk of how many fibers can fit in a duct, can be brought
into a colo space, etc... I haven't seen much mention of how much space the
termination in the colo would take, such as splice trays, bulkheads, etc...
Someone earlier mentioned being
On 1/30/13 8:05 AM, Jason Baugher wrote:
Oh, so all the fault belongs to the financial institutions, and there is no
corruption within the government agencies themselves. Right.
More like it's turtles all the way down.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:58 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 1/30/13
On 11/28/12 4:17 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Nov 29, 2012, at 3:04 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
Getting the cpe vendors to ship in quantity requires the ISP engineering organizations to
say in unison "we are deploying IPv6 and will only recommend products that pass
testing".
Do you see any evidenc
On 1/30/13 5:01 PM, Jake Khuon wrote:
On Wed 30 Jan 2013 16:58:28 PST, John Osmon wrote:
Does anyone make an ONT with a blinky light that you can toggle on/off
remotely? It'd be great to say:
Go look at the "it works" light.
If the remote tech can control the light, the end user would have
On 2/5/13 10:02 AM, Jason Biel wrote:
Agree as well.
Bad assumption on my part that Level3 would doing the items listed in the
workaround already.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Jason Biel wrote:
Workaround is proper filtering and o
On 2/6/13 7:43 AM, Ray Wong wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 07:39:14AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote:
So, I'm wondering what is shocking that someone may have to push out some sort
of upgrade either urgently or periodically that is so impacting
On 2/6/13 8:34 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Ray Wong wrote:
My impression is mostly that people are left feeling uncomfortable by
a massive upgrade of this sort with so little communication about why
and so on. "Emergency work for five hours and 30 minutes
disconnection" t
On 2/6/13 4:41 PM, Brandt, Ralph wrote:
David. I am on an evening shift and am just now reading this thread.
I was almost tempted to write an explanation that would have had
identical content with yours based simply on Level3 doing something and
keeping the information close.
Responsible Vendor
On 2/8/13 5:23 AM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
- Well, as it turns out, we don't have that kind of a problem.
- You don't?
- No, we do not have that kind of a problem in our network.
We have plenty of bandwidth available to our customers,
thank-you-every-much.
- Do you have, just to make an
On 2/8/13 8:23 AM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
The media market has fragmented, so unless we're talking about the first
week in February in the US it's not all from one source or 3 or 5.
Explain further. I did not get that.
The superbowl is the first sunday in feb, it pulls a 75 share of the tv
On 2/8/13 9:02 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2013-02-08 14:15 +), Aled Morris wrote:
"Multicast"
I don't see multicast working in Internet scale.
Essentially multicast means core is flow-routing. So we'd need some way to
decide who gets to send their content as multicast and who are forced to
On 2/8/13 9:46 AM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
About 40 - 50 Mbit/s. Not bad at all.
Downloading software does not have to be in real-time, like watching
a movie, does.
In both cases it's actually rather convenient if it's as fast as
possible,
Yes. What I would like to have is to allow the acce
On 2/9/13 7:55 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Dear NANOG@,
In light of the recent discussion titled, "The 100 Gbit/s problem in
your network", I'd like to point out that smaller operators and
end-sites are currently very busy having and ignoring the 10 Mbit/s
problem in their networks.
Hotel
On 2/17/13 8:33 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Howard"
A VPN or SSH session (which is what most hotel guests traveling for
work will do) won't cache at all well, so this is a very bad idea.
Might improve some things, but not the really important ones.
The ch
On 2/17/13 12:18 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong"
I think by A you actually mean 5Ghz N. A doesn't do much better than G, though
you still have the advantage of wider channels and less frequency congestion
with other uses.
No, my ThinkPad doesn't *do* N,
On 2/18/13 1:42 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Feb 17, 2013, at 21:12 , Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Owen DeLong wrote:
Greater attenuation is an oversimplification.
Along some dimensions sure, e.g. we have quite a lot of parameters we
can fiddle with.
With respect to an is
how you subnet a network operator is is fairly complex topic even if the
principles are rather simple.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5375.html
includes among other things some case studies.
there's quite a lot of source material from the various nog(s) where
people have presented on their own
On 2/25/13 8:42 AM, Warren Bailey wrote:
I should probably know this, but doesn't N just spread better and have the
ability to send receive on multiple polarizations?
That would be a rather extreme over-simplifcation of
spatial-division-multiplexing and space-time-coding.
As an RF engineer I
On 2/27/13 6:26 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
The reason is Hilton outsources it to AT&T. They don't build the networks for
performance in my experience. I have started to avoid some hotels that moved from
level3 to AT&T for their Internet providers as they are very slow at peak times.
Sad as we all
cradlepoint, verizon lte wireless usb dongle and a commercial plan with
the appropiate bandwidth cap.
I would then put a somewhat more powerful wireless-ap/router/nat-box
behind it.
I have stood up a datacenter behind such a thing while waiting for
circuits to arrive.
the cradlepoint can
that the three cellular devices aren't right on top of each other
*From:* joel jaeggli
*To:* Philip Lavine ; NANOG list
*Sent:* Friday, March 8, 2013 11:40 AM
*Subject:* Re: internet in the box
cradlepoint, verizon lte wireless usb dongle and a commercial plan
with the appropiate bandw
On 3/12/13 10:18 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2013-03-12, at 09:30, "Dobbins, Roland" wrote:
On Mar 12, 2013, at 8:25 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
What are better approaches?
Flow telemetry.
Can you use cflow/jflow/ipfix exports with 1:1 samp
On 3/21/13 9:27 AM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 21 March 2013 04:36, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Are you suggesting that geolocation is inaccurate enough to misplace
Europe with Asia?
Yes, of course.
Think mobile.
Why are you insisting that mobile will have wron
On 3/21/13 11:09 AM, Buz Dale wrote:
Is anyone else seeing a lot of Class E address space (240.0.0.0/4) at their
borders?
I'd put those is in the martian category.
Has this space been reinstated in some as yet unknown to me RFC?
No it hasn't.
Thanks,
Buz
On 3/23/13 9:13 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 07:47:12PM -0700, Kyle Creyts wrote:
You do realize that there are quite a few people (home broadband
subscribers?) who just "go do something else" when their internet goes
down, right?
[...]
Will they really demand ubiquitous, un
On 3/23/13 11:20 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
1M sq ft datacenter in former VZN CO at 375 Pearl:
http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/it-infrastructure/worlds-largest-high-rise-data-center-ope/240151399
From the story:
"""
Intergate.Manhattan is not only one of the largest facilities [at 32 stories,
On 3/26/13 10:10 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 9:39 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/26/2013 09:28 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Mar 26, 2013, at 5:59 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu said:
Now explain how you find a recursive nameserver that isn't li
On 3/26/13 7:04 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:06 PM, John Levine wrote:
As a white-hat attempting to find problems to address through legitimate means,
how
do you …
You make friends with people with busy authoritative servers and see
who's querying them.
I'm confused.
On 3/28/13 1:50 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
nyt reports capture of scuba divers attempting to cut telecom egypt
undersea fiber.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2013/03/27/world/mi
On 4/1/13 11:59 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 19:40:03 +0100, Tony Finch said:
You should be able to get a reasonable sample of IPv6 resolvers from the query
logs of a popular authoritative server.
Hopefully, said logs are not easily accessible to the miscreants.
Misc
On 4/3/13 6:25 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
I'm shocked Ookla hasn't been eaten by some major ISP. Speed tests are the root
of most complaints. Your link is congested (oversubed) and you then attempt to
completely saturate your bandwidth to tell your provider what a suck job they
are doing. I can'
On 4/3/13 3:20 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
Try it with upwards of 900ms of variable latency.
on linux
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root netem delay 900ms 150msdistribution normal
and then you can slowly test the internet to your hearts content.
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original
On 4/8/13 7:23 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 4/8/2013 7:20 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
BTW. It is AIUI quite possible with MAP to provision a "whole" IPv4
address or even a prefix to the subscriber, thus also taking away the
need for [srcport-restricted] NAPT44 in the CPE.
The problem is NAPT44 in the
On 4/12/13 3:41 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 4/11/13, Oliver Garraux wrote:
Agreed; but it would seem that unstoppable forces have been set into
motion by ICANN, to cause it to happen, regardless of whether it is
beneficial to the community, and regardless of any objections from the
public...
Yes
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question[1], which I'd know the answer to if I ran bigger
networks:
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specifically* to cater
to the fact that HTTPS requires a dedicated IP per DNS name?
It doesn't, or doesn't if if you
On 4/25/13 9:27 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Apr 26, 2013, at 00:19 , joel jaeggli wrote:
On 4/25/13 6:24 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
Ok, here's a stupid question[1], which I'd know the answer to if I ran bigger
networks:
Does anyone know how much IPv4 space is allocated *specif
On 4/25/13 10:16 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 07:49:03PM -0700, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 04/25/2013 07:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
AWS stands out as a complete laggard in this area.
Heh... that's why I put all kinds of question marks and hedges :)
That's disappointing about aws
On 4/24/13 1:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Geoff Huston wrote:
However, personally I find it a little hard to place a high
probability on Tony's projected exhaustion date of August this year.
I also have to qualify that by noting that while I think that a
runout of the
On 4/26/13 1:49 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Apr 23, 2013, at 5:36 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
I'm looking at an IP-KVM. I don't need anything high res as I only
need to see Linux consoles, BIOS, and RAID. What I am looking for:
Non-Java client that runs on Linux (or a WebUI that will deploy a
dece
On 4/28/13 3:46 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
-- for example: large Cable providers getting together and agreeing to
implement a 100ms RTT latency penalty for IPv4
we do not see intentionally damaging our customers as a big sales
feature. but we think all our competitors should do so.
This business
On 4/30/13 8:23 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
On 30.04.2013 17:07, Chris Boyd wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at le
On 5/2/13 3:54 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
Hang on -- University of New Orleans's AS is 23666?
http://bgp.he.net/AS26333
Looks like "SISTELINDO-AS-ID PT Sistelindo Mitralintas":
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=as23666
?
- ferg
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Paul Ferguson wrot
On 5/20/13 2:45 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 04:42:23PM -0700, Seth Mattinen wrote:
On 5/19/13 4:27 PM, Ben wrote:
Do you actually need stateful filtering? A lot of people seem to think
that it's important, when really they're accomplishing little from it,
you can block ports
On 12/9/11 18:22 , Keegan Holley wrote:
>>
>>
>>> assumption that writable SNMP was a bad idea but have never actually
>> tried
>>> it. I was curious what others were using, netconf or just scripted
>> logins.
>>> I'm also fighting a losing battle to convince people that netconf isn't
>>> evil. I
On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>
>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>> business the way they would like?
>
> This sniping elicited by the above seems inappropriate and
> unprofessio
On 12/10/11 21:42 , Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 12/10/11 17:48 , Barry Shein wrote:
>>
>>>> I just had a personal email from a brand new ISP in the Asia-Pacific
>>>> area desperately looking for enough IPv4 to be able to run their
>>>> business the way th
Netflix uses CDNs for content delivery and the platform runs in EC2. What would
peering with them achieve?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 11, 2011, at 18:06, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
> Which leads to a question to be asked...
>
> Is netflix willing to peer directly with ISP / NSP's ?
>
> Regards.
>
s to akamai and level3
>> Faisal
>>
>> On Dec 11, 2011, at 10:21 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>>
>>> Netflix uses CDNs for content delivery and the platform runs in EC2. What
>>> would peering with them achieve?
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>
On 12/12/11 02:05 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Vitkovsky, Adam
>> [mailto:avitkov...@emea.att.com] Sent: 12 December 2011 09:19 To:
>> Eric Parsonage; valdis.kletni...@vt.edu Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: RE: Sad IPv4 story?
>>
>>> and models that doesn't take "we m
On 12/14/11 18:46 , Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>> Fyi, I just was rejected from arin for an ipv4 allocation. I demonstrated I
>> own ~100k ipv4 addresses today.
>> My customers use over 10 million bogon / squat space ip addresses today,
>> and I have
On 12/15/11 13:43 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:36:32PM -0800, David Conrad
> wrote:
>> ARIN's job (well, beyond the world travel, publishing comic books, handing
>> out raffle prizes, etc.) is to allocate and register addresses according to
>> community
On 12/15/11 14:12 , Jeff Wheeler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> We know rather alot about the original posters' business, it has ~34
>> million wireless subscribers in north america. I think it's safe to
>> assume that adequate d
On 12/17/11 00:14 , Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Friday, December 16, 2011 05:02:33 AM Joe Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, UUNET did the opposite by setting
>> origin to unknown for peer routes, in an attempt to
>> prefer customer routes over peer routes. We moved to
>> local preference shortly th
I haven't done wireless in downtown palo alto, only metro-e however.
Given your proximity to 345 hamilton (under 1000 feet most likely) I
would think at&t would be in a position to offer fairly high-rate dsl,
On 12/16/11 10:24 , Darren Bolding wrote:
> Apologies if this is not the most appropriat
On 12/23/11 11:16 , Joel Maslak wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:18 AM, jacob miller wrote:
>
>> Am having a debate on the results of speed tests sites.
>>
>> Am interested in knowing the thoughts of different individuals in regards to
>> this.
>
> It's one data point of many.
>
> Depending
On 12/24/11 15:33 , Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Karl Auer wrote:
>
>>> Not necessarily. You can use ARP and DHCPv6 and you don't have
>>> to waste time and power for DAD.
>
>> IPv6 does not do ARP, it does ND.
>
> First of all, ND use is optional and, if ND is used, RA
> must be used.
>
> It means t
On 12/30/11 08:47 , Kevin Loch wrote:
> It is very common to have different "routers" (routers, firewalls or
> load balancers) on the same vlan with different functions in hosting
> environments. It is also sometimes necessary to have multiple default
> gateways on the same vlan for load balancin
On 12/28/11 07:30 , Ryan Malayter wrote:
> Except nowhere in there is the prefix length for the test indicated,
> and the exact halving of forwarding rate for IPv6 leads one to believe
> that there are two TCAM lookups for IPv6 (hence 64-bit prefix lookups)
> versus one for IPv4.
A cam (assuming
On 1/6/12 12:31 , Bonald wrote:
> Hi,
> We need to purchase some switch that support 1gbit QinQ.
> Any suggestions ? We need to connect 9 schools together in layer2.
> All 9 schools have 1gb link from our provider, provider gaves us 5 vlan to
> work with.
> We have around 35 vlan in-house.
>
> We
Greetings,
The BOF topic that I proposed during the recent thread:
Re: Sad IPv4 story?
Got approved, I'm still looking for 1-2 additional speakers to round out
the agenda. To recap:
* IPV4 run-out means new entrants will from the outset deploy techniques
the present operators consider undes
On 1/13/12 11:19 , -Hammer- wrote:
> OK, So I'm doing a lot of reading lately on Nexus as we are about to get
> into the 7k/5k game and of course a lot of the marketing revolves around
> VPC. Every time I see it referenced, I keep remembering a reasonably
> reliable Nortel implementation called Spl
On 1/15/12 09:56 , Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Abdullah Al-Malki (a.almalki1402) writes:
>> Hi fellows,
>> I am supporting a big service provider and sometimes I face this problem.
>> Sometimes I want to access my customer network and want to extract some
>> verification output "show commands" from a la
On 1/15/12 11:30 , Ken King wrote:
> I need to choose a wireless solution for a new office.
>
> up to 600 devices will connect. most devices are mac books and mobile phones.
>
> we can see hundreds of access points in close proximity to our new office
> space.
>
> what are the thoughts these d
On 1/17/12 23:45 , Leigh Porter wrote:
>
>
> On 18 Jan 2012, at 05:06, "toor" wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I am wondering if anyone else has seen a large amount of DNS
>> queries coming from various IP ranges in China. I have been trying
>> to find a pattern in the attacks but so far I have come
On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> My question is when is FiOS going to get v6 natively? could we get the
>> engineers there to actually do something as opposed to trials of
>> non-production systems that'll never actually get deploye
By the same token, The mobile broadband network is not some also-ran adjunct to
the residential broadband service.
On Jan 18, 2012, at 16:45, "Justin M. Streiner" wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>
>> On 1/18/12 15:56 , Justin M. Streiner wrote:
&
On 1/21/12 11:38 , George Bonser wrote:
>> Not that I would not be a bit miffed if personal files disappeared,
>> but that's one of the risks associated with using a cloud service
>> for file storage. It could have been a fire, a virus erasing file,
>> bankruptcy, malicious insider damage... Does
vendors that specify a minimum distance for lx typically spec 2 meters.
even EX shouldn't spike the receiver at that distance as long as the max
RX is about +1.
On 1/25/12 11:26 , jon Heise wrote:
> we are moving a router between 2 data centers and we only have LX sfp's for
> connection, is ther
On 1/27/12 12:35 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>>> lots of folks still use it yes. is it helpful? maybe? maybe not? is
>>> this peering over a shared media (like a 10base-T hub).
>>>
>>> You migh
On 1/27/12 14:53 , bas wrote:
> While I agree _again_!
>
> It does not explain why TOR boxes have little buffers and chassis box
> have many.
you need purportionally more buffer when you need to drain 16 x 10 gig
into 4 x 10Gig then when you're trying to drain 10Gb/s into 2 x 1Gb/s
there
On 1/27/12 15:01 , George Bonser wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From: bas Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012
>> 2:54 PM To: George Bonser Subject: Re: 10GE TOR port buffers (was
>> Re: 10G switch recommendaton)
>>
>> While I agree _again_!
>>
>> It does not explain why TOR boxes have
On 1/27/12 15:40 , bas wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Joel jaeggli wrote:
>> On 1/27/12 14:53 , bas wrote:
>>> While I agree _again_!
>>>
>>> It does not explain why TOR boxes have little buffers and chassis box
>>>
On 1/27/12 06:13 , Eric Tykwinski wrote:
> The PS Vita still uses a proprietary memory card format, so it's not just
> download only.
> The best example of download only would be OnLive, which basically is a game
> system that only delivers on demand games.
Onlive isn't download at all. the games
On 1/27/12 02:35 , Tei wrote:
> Can internet in USA support that? Call of Duty 15 releases may 2014
> and 30 million gamers start downloading a 20 GB files. Would the
> internet collapse like a house of cards?.
Given the way the these things are staged, the pre-order/pre-load model
works pretty
On 1/30/12 12:46 , Jim Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a Wireless bridge or Router that will
> support 600 wireless clients concurrently (mostly cell phones). I need it
> for a proof of concept.
an aruba controller and 8 dual radio aps.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in adva
On 2/2/12 21:59 , Randy Bush wrote:
>>> The suits won, and many nerds either threw in with them or revealed
>>> their affinity for the easy life and gave up. Being principled and
>>> turning away dirty money or exercising the "fire the customer" clause
>>> tends to be disliked by corporate officers
On 2/5/12 17:20 , Glen Kent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Most routers today are basically IPv4 routers, with IPv6 thrown in.
> They are however designed keeping IPv4 in mind.
>
> With IPv6 growing, if we were to design a native IPv6 router, with
> IPv4 functionality thrown in, then is it possible to design a
On 2/6/12 06:48 , Glen Kent wrote:
> One example that comes to my mind is that a few existing routers
> cant do line rate routing for IPv6 traffic as long as the netmask is
> < 65.
I'm sorry that's bs. It's trivial to partition a cam in order to do
/128s in a single lookup. that's actually the w
On 2/8/12 08:59 , keith tokash wrote:
>
> Hi,
I've done it either way, I prefer to put the v6 peers in a different
group than the v4 peers so that I can group the policies at the group
rather than neighbor level.
> I'm prepping an environment for v6 and I'm wondering what, if
> any, benefit th
On 2/11/12 19:34 , Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> yes, domain names that cannot be typed in with any keyboard/charset on
> any computer out there, excellent idea, devide and conquerer, i wonder
> who came up with that idiotic plan again, probably the ITU or one of
> their infiltrants in icann.
If it'
On 2/15/12 20:14 , Mario Eirea wrote:
> This is my guess too, i guess there is some bleed over from their antenna
> arrays.
Even the most directional sector antenna in the world has a back lobe...
and there there's the clients...
there's no magic bullet you simply can't do it all in one ap with
On 2/15/12 21:04 , Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. wrote:
> How widespread would you say the use of IS-IS is?
>
> Even more as to which routing protocols are used, not just in ISPs, what
> percent would you give to the various ones. In other words X percent of
> organizations use OSPS, Y percent use EIGRP,
On 2/16/12 05:03 , Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> Nanosecond Trading Could Make Markets Go Haywire
> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/02/high-speed-trading/
>
> "Below the 950-millisecond level, where computerized trading occurs so
> quickly that human traders can't even react, no fewer than 18,52
On 2/17/12 06:18 , Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
> actually most west european countries have laws against having your
> employees lift up stuff heavier than 20 kilos :P
>
> you generally don't have insurance on your network-dude to handle such
> things *grin* if it drops on his foot, you're screwed.
On 2/17/12 11:47 , Kiriki Delany wrote:
> Why not just simultaneously settle all trades at the same time? Once every
> minute, or every 5 minutes, or per day?
>
> There are many solutions to the problem. I'm sure those that can take
> advantage of the latency don't want the solution.
Ask yourse
On 2/20/12 08:54 , Matthew Petach wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>> Speaking of that sort of thing, I'd really LOVE if there were a device about
>> the size of a netbook that could be hooked up to otherwise headless machines
>> in colos that would give you keyboard, vid
On 2/20/12 09:55 , Leo Bicknell wrote:
> In a message written on Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:51:59AM -0800, Joel jaeggli
> wrote:
>> Things with legacy ports on them are on the way out. given an ipmi
>> manager that doesn't suck there should be no reason to connect to th
On 2/20/12 09:57 , Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Tei wrote:
>> I am a mere user, so I all this stuff sounds to me like giberish.
>>
>> The right solution is to capture the request to these DNS servers, and
>> send to a custom server with a static message "warning.h
On 2/22/12 07:50 , Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Feb 22, 2012, at 2:02 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
>
>>> PC LOAD LETTER?!?!?!?!?
>>
>> PC LOAD LETTER is not the issue.
>>
>> One country that insists on using different paper sizes to everyone else,
>> but also happens to set a lot of hardware and softwar
On 3/9/12 20:42 , Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sander wrote:
>>
>>> Splitting the allocation can be done for many reasons. There are
>>> known cases where one LIR operates multiple separate networks,
>>> each with a separate routing polic
On 3/9/12 22:02 , George Bonser wrote:
> An ISP that has been given a /32 or larger allocation from PA space
> and might have 10,000 customers each assigned their own /48 could
> instantly more than double the size of the IPv6 routing table if they
> disaggregated that /32.
>
> The problem here i
301 - 400 of 977 matches
Mail list logo
