ks and we used
> UltraDNS.
> >> The company was first operated from Sweden and later Austria.
> >>
> >> /Jonas
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
> > jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
> > Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
> > First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
> All this is pretty moot point if you run a localized copy of your database
> (mysql or postgres) and connect via unix domains sockets.
>
>
True. It mostly affects shared/smaller hosting providers who have customers
that want direct access to the database remotely over the public netwo
gt; complain...
>
> Not the worse angle we've seen
>
>
> >
> >
>
Is L3 really pushing more streaming traffic than LLNW? Is ending
settlement-free peering with Google (Youtube) coming down the pipeline?
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
stomer without them seeing it.
If Comcast were to raise the price to the customer directly, I think you'd
see defection to other services (if available in the area, like DSL or
Clearwire).
Doesn't Verizon FIOS provide 50-150Mb/s to the home now for the same cost as
Comcast? Exhorting a carrier of content to your customer can't be a good
business decision.
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
ed to look at
Clear as well. Curious as to reliability, link performance, and support
quality.
Thanks!
Brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> More politely stated, it’s not the responsibility of the operator to
decide what belongs on the network and what doesn’t. Users can run any
services that’s not illegal or even reuse ports for other applications.
That being said commonly exp
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Ian McDonald wrote:
> Until the average user's cpe is only permitted to use the resolvers one has
> provided as the provider (or otherwise decided are OK), this is going to be a
> game of whackamole. So long as there's an 'I have a clue' opt out, it appears
> to
Is it too late to demand code be in open Github repos with changes
tracked at no cost?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Gary Buhrmaster
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Lamar Owen wrote:
> .
>> Tracking code changes fuels an entire industry, and several websites.
>> :-)
>
> The
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:49 AM, William Herrin wrote:
> What would make sense is some sort of attribute on the DNS record
> which instructed servers not to cache it for so long that mistakes
> have a lasting impact.
>
Or a pub/sub method of sending an immediate invalidation request, similar
to
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Phil Gardner wrote:
> Is there anyone out there that has ideas about how to waive or lower that
> installation fee while only having a 1 year contract?
I've worked with Comcast Business on <10 installations for clients,
and the only time I was able to get installa
dy should be surprised that the registration
> information doesn't say "Cisco." Think about it: would they want "whois
> overpromisesunderdelivers.com" to say "Cisco" all over it?
>
>
Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're
gear just works.
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
They are not, per se, connected to the Internet, and thus won't be
> >>>> "zorched", at least in the sense you are using it.
> >>>>
> >>> Hence 'public-facing'.
> >>>
> >>> ;>
> >>>
> >>> --**--**
> >>> ---
> >>> Roland Dobbins //<http://www.arbornetworks.**com<
> http://www.arbornetworks.com>
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>The basis of optimism is sheer terror.
> >>>
> >>> -- Oscar Wilde
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
t; more than 20 Gbps. But dems da breaks.
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
I knew of a place that used to push "fake" traffic over a link to ensure
they were in the cheaper (higher) tier. Who knew business rules overriding
engineering could result in non-optimal situations.
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Keegan Holley wrote:
> Depends on the provider. Many just do not want to manage hundreds of
> customer ACL's on access routers. Especially when it would compete with a
> managed service (firewall, IDP, DDOS) of some sort. Some still are under
> the impression th
http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Hands
Hello NANOG!
I'm doing some research regarding short-term (~1 week) high speed (~10-15Mb
down/at least 5Mbps up) wireless connectivity in the Heber City, UT area.
The only provider I found was Blaze (http://www.blazewifi.com) (besides
ILECs/incumbents). Does anyone have any experience with them?
Hey!
New message, please read <http://studioprodutora.com.br/fallen.php?po1>
Brandon Galbraith
Hey!
New message, please read <http://arttogoghparty.com/across.php?y>
Brandon Galbraith
Quick hijack: Can anyone recommend a device that will terminate to a
phone, supports SIP, *and* can fallback to SIM for emergency calls?
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Pedersen, Sean wrote:
> +1
>
> Used them in a past life as a SIP ALG and NAT router for a “bring your own
> broadband” hosted
Have you monitored your user's home Comcast connection with regards to
packet loss or latency, preferably from network-near the SIP
termination point?
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
> Any chance someone on this list is affiliated with Comcast who could contact
> me off-li
Have you tried experimenting programmatically to determine if its
based on which DNS servers the client is using to resolve?
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Nathanael C. Cariaga
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if anyone here I can discuss offline about Google Global
> Cache? I am interested in
1) Rate limit the software update download ("Us")
2) Have device OS download the update in the background, and be resilient
to failures with retries ("Manufacturer")
3) Don't present the update notification to the user until the update blob
is already cached on the device ("Manufacturer")
Only i
Site appears up and available, over Comcast Business fiber and Cogent from
Chicago (using Chrome 28).
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Matthew Huff wrote:
> My traceroute goes through, but we don't go through Verizon. However, the
> web server is returning an error that it is unavailable. It's
Google is speeding up its initiative to encrypt all DC to DC traffic, as
this was suspected a short time ago.
http://www.informationweek.com/security/government/nsa-fallout-google-speeds-data-encryptio/240161070
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jacque O'Lantern <
jacque.olant...@yandex.com> wrot
Working with Comcast and their ethernet product, they don't battery
back the on-site gear (fiber/ethernet switch), but I do get a phone
call within minutes of them noticing the switch they provided is down.
They care enough to call me, but battery backup is my/our
responsibility.
Brandon
On Thu,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:03 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Now it would be trivial to setup syslog and sshd to give only the sessions
>> that complete the handshake, however I'm also not sure how responsive some
>> of the abuse contacts may be. I'll keep my restrictive network settings for
>> the
+1 for Joshua's comments. Used them in a small rollout (~20k sqft of
office space across two buildings), was extremely pleased.
Authentication can tie into OAuth (Google Apps) or LDAP/AD. Email or
SMS alerts for *everything*.
Would highly recommend them.
Brandon
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:30 AM,
If your flows are a target, or your data is of an extremely sensitive
nature (diplomatic, etc), why aren't you moving those bits over
something more private than IP (point to point L2, MPLS)? This doesn't
work for the VoIP target mentioned, but foreign ministries should most
definitely not be trust
On 12/6/13, 9:39 AM, "Brandon Galbraith"
> wrote:
>
>>If your flows are a target, or your data is of an extremely sensitive
>>nature (diplomatic, etc), why aren't you moving those bits over
>>something more private than IP (point to point L2, MPLS)? This doesn'
Possibly related to their mass outage last night around 5:12am CST
(ticket number HD005596458). We're connected at their 427 S La
Salle POP in Chicago.
brandon
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Matthew Crocker
wrote:
>
> On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jason Canady wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately Cogen
Have you talked to Cybermesa[1] or LC Wireless (co-op)[2]?
[1] http://www.cybermesa.com/
[2] http://www.lcwireless.us/
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Tri Tran wrote:
> The only known option is with Cibola for 7M/1M.
> If anyone know of an alternate provider with higher bandwidth please
> a
Are you looking to cache it at your ground station? Or on the client side?
brandon
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Warren Bailey
wrote:
> Dear NANOG Gods,
>
> Has anyone heard of a nifty way to cache the netflix library without using
> their Open Connect Appliance? I am not trying to dodge cop
On 4/9/07, Christian Kuhtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking forward to a future where pc104/isa bus based routers
> figure
> prominently in the ip core!
Have recently checked the weight requirements for core routers?
Seriously heavy lift capacity launch vehicles would be required...
no
On 5/29/07, Quinn Kuzmich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a more serious note, I'd contact them and ask for them to stop.
Barring that call a lawyer and have a fancy letter sent to someone's
boss.
While you're pursuing that route from a legal/business side, on the
technical side I'd suggest n
Pv4, no.
> William
>
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
y.)
>
> In the (very?) long term, IPv4 over IPv6 tunneling could end up being
> one way that organizations can get IPv4 connectivity when the default
> changes from only-IPv4 to only-IPv6. (Yeah, I know that day may never
> come...)
>
> Thanks,
> Bill Bogstad
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
Has anyone had any experience working with the Illinois Tollway for dark
fiber? Looking for good or bad experiences offline.
Thanks!
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
but hopefully not at the
expense of bulk data. If it's a huge issue to support FTP data transfers,
they could at least provide a means through the web service to get bulk data
intelligently.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
I'm looking for colocation in Belize for some equipment, but am having a bit
of trouble finding anyone with significant carrier-neutral space there. Has
anyone had any success in finding such space there? Off-list replies
preferred.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
;
> 3. ARIN says no, B hasn't shown that they need it
>
> 4. A and B say screw it, and B announces the space anyway
>
> 5. ???
>
>
Alternate #4: A "rents" the space to B without ARIN knowing it, while A
continues to claim that the space belongs to them.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
hat the
difference is (besides a bit of technical work with the latter). It will be
interesting to see what happens as the last of the IPv4 space is exhausted.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I'm sure if you approached the CDN that hosts the #apple updates they would
> be willing to put a copy of swcdn.apple.com on your network, as well as
> appldnld.apple.com
>
> The squid user forums have lots of tips about how to do this for
his in the wild? I wasn't aware DoS/DDoS attacks were
suddenly legal.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.492.0464
rk (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
> Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
>
>
+1 fasterdata.es.net. Excellent resource.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
ce? That's not
logical!". Had no problems 3-4 years ago getting these sorts of "circuits",
but it appears it's gone the way of the dodo now. Any emails off-list are
appreciated.
--
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464
I just wanted to follow up and say Thank You to everyone who responded to my
email regarding getting an "alarm line" from AT&T. I've made some headway
once I reached someone with clue, and everyone was extremely helpful with
the information they provided.
--
Brandon
real
> power.
>
> I agree however that if the only Twitter access is via regular computer it
> loses most of its value in this situation.
>
> Mike
Twitter allows you to specify that you want SMS notification when someone
you're following makes an update.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
s/minnesota-regulators-try-block-access-gambing-sites-042909.html)?
>> Such as a list or the letter to the providers?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Ken
Please see ongoing thread on geoIP to see how to go about doing this =)
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
developers
onboard early, as you can only do so much at the network level without the
app being aware.
-brandon
>
> --
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
s have the same IP
> addresses as their production masters, but have a different IP address to
> synchronize with.
>
Or you use RFC1918 address space at each location, and NAT each side between
public anycasted space and your private IP space. Prevents internal IP
conflicts, having to deal with
ell.edu/uscode/47/230.html). Apart from the fact
> that the phrase "common carrier" does not occur in that section,
> subparagraph (f)(2) says:
>
> Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit or expand
> any law pertaining to intellectual property
licated, centralized, nice looking solutions.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamssonemail: swm...@swm.pp.se
>
>
http://www.coralcdn.org/
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
a single router as a "core", don't you think?
>
Is two enough? ;)
>
> --
> Richard A Steenbergenhttp://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
prevent you from having to hunt down MIBs/OIDs for devices. If you have a
database of your devices, it's fairly trivial to import them into Cacti once
you have the device profiles (I use a shell script and curl).
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Shane Ronan wrote:
> How do I send out an email if the network is down?
>
>
Why not use an e-mail to SMS gateway from whichever carrier?
>>
>
>
Your external monitoring box sends the email? You do have something doing
external monitoring,
May I suggest to vote with your feet and take your business somewhere
>> else. They obviously are not interested in you, your traffic or your
>> money.
>>
>> MarcoH
>>
> Already done. All they are doing is continuing to provide fodder for
> engineers to tell their bosses why to NOT consider 174 transit when it's
> brought up.
>
> -Dave
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
ueeze on me to fix it.
>
> Barring that, what recommendations might the NANOG community have for
> an extremely rock-solid e-mail hosting company? I realize that may
> mean self-promotion, but hey, bring it on.
>
>
> Much appreciated!
>
>
> -Andy
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
Not to go too off-topic, but if there is a more preferred location for me to
ask, please let me know. I'm looking for recommendations on open source
packages that people are using for monitoring power utilization of their
network/server gear.
We're using Cacti currently, pulling the data from APCs
dependence and active/active/etc. is where it's at in terms of
> high availability in the 21st Century. GSLB, et. al.
>
> ---
> Roland Dobbins // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> Sorry, someti
d Dobbins // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical
> insights.
>
>-- xkcd #625
>
>
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
On 10/2/08, Jean-François Mezei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Question:
>
> Is it possible to setup an akamai feed in hours once you know your
> website is to be swamped ?
>
> Obviously, the system managers there might not have been warned in
> advance that the politicians would place a huge loa
depeering.
>>
>
> Not a theory.
>
>
Indeed. It appears, using Sprint's looking glass, that they're completely
partitioned from Cogent. YMMV.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt;
>
>So would some "CGN" (Carrier Grade Nat anyone) too.
>
>Last I knew Cogent wasn't doing any IPv6.. has that changed?
>
>- Jared
>
>
Not that I know of. We tried to get IPv6 transit from Cogent several months
ago (we already have IPv
On 10/30/08, Paul Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/sprint-nextel-severs-its-internet-connection-to-cogent-communications,603138.shtml
>
>
The most interesting part of the press release to me is:
In the over 1300 on-net locations worldwide where Cogen
amp; L3 de-peering Cogent,
>> it causes a lot of news in the press & noise on NANOG, so why didn't you
>> know Teleglobe depeered Cogent?
>>
>
> Imagine the news had they all depeered cogent at the same time.
Imagine the lawsuits and government regulation had that occurred.
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nail to keep their new found Tier
1 status (and not pay anyone for transit), I would think this would bode
worse for Sprint, since most of their transit customers could migrate to
Cogent (saving $$$ and not having to face future depeerings). Just my $0.02.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
l:
http://www-td.rutgers.edu/documentation/Reference/RUNet_Network_Device_Naming_Convention/
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
all correct). The difference is the
> selection of hardware and added routing hardware.
>
> The issue is, that those additions, that Juniper, Imagestream and Vyatta
> add, are not available on the standard platform, so it can't be quite
> compared.
>
> Kind regards,
>
road and suddenly can't get ahold of
customer service via their international phone number. Automation in the
right places works wonders for both convenience and the bottom line. In the
wrong places, it's a sawed off shotgun pointed at your feet.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
more problems
in the short time we used Level3 for transit than I've had with Cogent.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
;ll give you my direct contact info...
>
> If you like this idea, and are willing to also provide this sort of thing
> to the community (either in this, or in another area), please let me know --
> I'll look into setting up a website / mailing list / something...
>
W
> security.
>>
>>
> Back to my original question: is there really not a better solution?
>
> ~Seth
>
>
When in doubt, throw more capacity at it. I'm only half-kidding. Sometimes
that's the cheaper solution depending on the problem.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
On 1/28/09, John Martinez wrote:
>
> http://www.internetpulse.net/
>
>
Sent to "outages" a bit ago:
Cogent is currently experiencing problems on their backbone in Chicago,
manifesting as packet loss and latency. The master ticket # is 853582.
-brandon
--
B
gt; Backhoe fade I'm used to. But now fire fade? Lovely.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
Sprint as the preferred path:
>>>
>>> routy-border0>show ip bgp 216.113.0.0/17
>>> BGP routing table entry for 216.113.0.0/17, version 78286019
>>> Paths: (3 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
>>> Not advertised to any peer
>>> 12
gt;
Sounds like those consumer ISPs better get started on rolling out dual
stacks to the CPE.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
clients" connecting to IPv6 "servers" - NAT64 does not.
>
> The server must have an A record in DNS, and the client must use that
> name to connect to - just like NAT-PT.
>
> --
> Nathan Ward
>
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
ture
> boxen that still do not boot correctly from USB.
>
I've used a hot glue gun to glue a USB key to the device/server/etc in
question. Works very well against being bumped or accidentally dislodged.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
gt; really providing an SLA, it's simply not defrauding the customer.
>
> That ain't gonna happen.
>
> The housing laws you mention are the exception, not the rule. Very,
> very, very few businesses have any liability for lack of performance
> other than the money you paid them. And some not even that.
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
d
> will be flying to the east coast again this fall on the second voucher.
>
> When traveling by car I have far more control over the proposed route,
> time-of-day for travel, planned or spontaneous stops, etc. In exchange
> for this control I am also responsible for the outcome of my own travel
> plans.
>
> jc
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
adeeasy as a primary for quite a few domains, but also
have had good luck with DynDNS as well.
-brandon
>
> ---
> Peter Beckman Internet Guy
> beck...@angryox.com
> http://www
;
> >
> > I know websites are one thing, but the chances of the
> > website going down, a TDM switch being wacky and now
> > clients traversing their networks complaining all at
> > once seems a little out of the ordinary.
> >
> > =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+
> > J. Oquendo
> > SGFA, SGFE, C|EH, CNDA, CHFI, OSCP
> >
> > "It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to
> > ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things
> > differently." - Warren Buffett
> >
> > 227C 5D35 7DCB 0893 95AA 4771 1DCE 1FD1 5CCD 6B5E
> > http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5CCD6B5E
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
pany lied regarding
their usage/need, no? Just a thought, although I am by no means an expert in
the field of contract law.
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Voice: 630.400.6992
cs/annual_rprt.html
>
> - Kevin
>
>
More specifically:
https://www.arin.net/about_us/corp_docs/annual/2008/
-brandon
--
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141
On 7/24/07, Owen DeLong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 24, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo wrote:
I have no idea what the root cause of today's outage is. I will be
interested in hearing from any credible source as to any actual details,
but, I'm betting that right now, any such cred
Anyone noticing major Cogent routing issues in Chicago? Just lost
connectivity from several locations to their equipment on La Salle St.
-brandon
Is anyone else experiencing routing issues with their Cogent connectivity in
the Chicago area? Their NOC is aware of it, but was unable to provide any
ETR.
On Feb 18, 2008 11:05 AM, Rod Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
Markets have proven to be excellent mechanisms for allocating resources
> fairness is a distinct issue) and might be the medication required given the
> apparent hoarding of IP addresses.
>
> Nor is the trading of IP addresses inc
On 4/22/08, Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Apr 2008, at 12:47, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> >> You mean a computer? Like the one that runs file-sharing
> >> clients?
> >
> > Like the one that nobody really wants to watch large quantities of
> > television on?
>
>
> Perhaps more like the m
On 4/23/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well. here's your problem; depending on the architecture, the
> > IP addressing structure doesn't necessarily map to the
> > network's cost structure. This is why I prefer the
> > P4P/DillTorrent announcement model.
>
>
> What's with th
On 5/28/08, Skywing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's somewhat ironic of a sentiment you referred to there, given that the
> conception that one should have to hand over one's SSN for "verification" to
> anyone who asks for it is the kind of thing that many of these
> spammers/phishers thrive o
On 6/17/08, Christopher Morrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Netfortius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anybody used (and been successful at) a bit-torrent-like agent for
> fast
> > distribution of LEGAL software (install programs of large-DVD size),
> across
>
Has anyone had any experience with asking Comcast Business Services for IPv6
connectivity? Off-list replies are preferred (feel free to contact me if
you're looking for the same thing, will pass along any info I obtain).
Thanks!
-brandon
On 6/23/08, Nathan Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Do 'normal' web hosting providers allow customer created scripts to create
> TCP sessions out to arbitrary things?
>
Doesn't PHP provide a fair amount of TCP functionality that can be used
simply by uploading the code you need to your shared
On 6/27/08, Adam Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My personal opinion is that all of the FOSS NMS solutions are sorely
> disappointing, Observer included. It seems to be something that no one has
> quite gotten right yet!
>
> Adam.
>
Very true. One product (not OSS, somewhat pricey) we've
Is anyone seeing Cogent issues in the Chicago area? We have several racks
with them, and our connectivity just dropped off.
-brandon
Cogent is indeed having a problem in the Chicago area. No ETR. Master ticket
# 759401.
-brandon
On 7/10/08, Darrell Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ...what did big 'ol 174 say?
>
>
> Cogent Network Status/DNS Server Status Description:
> Welcome to Cogent Communications' Network Status Message. Today is
> 7/10/08 @ 12:30 ET. At this time, some customers in the Chicago region
> may be ex
On 9/11/08, Jo Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2008, at 6:23 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> It's possible that in the shuffle of company
>> renaming/rebranding/rejiggering-of-people they lost this bit in the
>>
>
> Is it just me, or isn't keeping valid contact information on you
Not resolving on Comcast in Chicago either.
-brandon
On 9/24/08, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tuc, stuck on puck wrote:
>
>
> I hate to use NANOG for outages... But can anyone else get to
>> puck.nether.net or the outages.org list?
>>
>
> outages.org doesn't ev
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
