On 1/12/09, Jim Shankland <na...@shankland.org> wrote: > > Adam Young wrote: > >> I wouldn't take my word for it but truthfully, you get what you pay for. >> Given you have other, more reliable transit, adding Cogent may be ok. >> I wouldn't rely on it for anything serious though. >> > > That has not been my experience. Peering wars have been an issue, but > aside from that, they've been fine. (This is transit in San Francisco > at the gigabit-plus level.) > > Jim Shankland > > Seconded. We also have Cogent for gigabit transit. I had far more problems in the short time we used Level3 for transit than I've had with Cogent.
-brandon -- Brandon Galbraith Voice: 630.400.6992 Email: brandon.galbra...@gmail.com
