Re: Bogon ASN Filter Policy

o will be filtering prefixes that contain any of the Bogon ASNs listed below in the in the as-path. I highly encourage other networks to follow suit, as again it only helps us all. Thanks Job for kicking this one off, and I look forward to others to doing the same! Adam Davenport / adam.davenp.

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

I think tunnelbroker.net is an great community service, and a significant factor in global IPv6 adoption. For one, it's allowed me to experiment with v6 from my home ~5 miles from NYC, where there are still no options for native connectivity. Hats off to Mike and the entire HE team for maintainin

Re: Equinix IX Port Moves

I believe this isn't the actual process, however recent reorganization has brought with it a new tier of "entry level" order/service management that's not fully up to speed on things. You'll want to ask your account team for a dedicated project manager to help with the process. HTH, -a On Fri, J

Re: NANOG67 - Tipping point of community and sponsor bashing?

I think a fresh conversation is needed around what makes up a "minimally viable" feature set for an IXP: The days of an IXP "needing" to engineer and support a multi-tenant sFlow portal, because the only other option is shelling out the big bucks for Arbor, have long passed -- overlooking the plet

Ebay operations contact please

Can someone from ebay NOC (or similar) contact me off list for an issue with search results from a specific CIDR of our network that the end user swears doesn't happen elsewhere? Thanks. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may con

AS4233852001 advertising 192.0.0.0/2?

We were alerted to this by https://radar.qrator.net. This seems wrong from a number of angles . Adam

Re: GTT AS3257 router server

Clinton, I'll give this a look on our side and ping you directly off-list. Thanks. On 2/9/17 3:13 PM, Clinton Work wrote: If anybody is reading the NANOG list from the GTT NOC, can you look at your route-server with the BGP session flapping every couple of minutes. route-server.as3257.net>show

Re: Amazon Geolocation

Hey Sam, we had the same problem and were able to get it resolved (and help a few others get unblocked as well). Shoot me the affected blocks off-list and I'll forward them along. Adam On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 12:03 PM Anne P. Mitchell Esq. wrote: > Sam, may I share this with ou

Juniper BGP Convergence Time

and tricks would be much appreciated Thanks in Advance -- Adam Kajtar Systems Administrator City of Wadsworth akaj...@wadsworthcity.org - http://www.wadsworthcity.com Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cityofwadsworth>* |* Twitter <

Re: is odd number of links in lag group ok

On 15/05/18 16:28, Mark Tinka wrote: That said, an even number of links just leaves the warm & fuzzies turned on :-)... Well, power of two, surely? 6 is even, but is not a "good" number of links for a lag group. (Extreme X8 supports up to 64 links in a group, and Enterasys up to 127 if I r

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

gt; > Office: 815-570-3101 > > > > > > > > > >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Aaron Gould wrote: > >> > >> You sure it doesn't have something to do with 60 seconds * 3 = 180 secs > of > >> BGP neighbor Time out before it bel

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

e route locally. Just an idea. > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Adam Kajtar > wrote: > > > I could use static routes but I noticed since I moved to full routes I > > have had a lot fewer customer complaints about latency(especially when it > > comes to V

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

and it will lower failure > detection to circa 1 second. > > > > On 16 May 2018, at 17:49, Adam Kajtar wrote: > > > > I could use static routes but I noticed since I moved to full routes I > have > > had a lot fewer customer complaints about latency(especial

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > -- > *From: *"Adam Kajtar" > *To: *er...@gotfusion.net > *Cc: *nanog@nanog.org > *Sent: *Wednesday, May 16, 2018 9:32:27 AM > *Subject: *Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time >

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

Hello again: I've tried using the default route, adjusting bgp timers, and mutlipath. Unfortunately, these changes haven't helped much. Juniper support hasn't been very helpful also. Although, I think I might have found the solution. https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-

Re: Juniper BGP Convergence Time

down. Should be faster than relying on the BGP > process on withdrawing the route. Also does not require any config changes > at your upstreams. > > Regards > Baldur > > > ons. 16. maj 2018 18.52 skrev Adam Kajtar : > > > Erich, > > > > Good Idea. I can'

Re: AS3266: BitCanal hijack factory, courtesy of many connectivity providers

GTT takes all AUP violations extremely seriously.  Any offending parties mentioned in this thread have been dealt with accordingly, and GTT now considers the matter resolved from its side. On 6/25/2018 9:49 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Sometimes I see stuff that just makes me shake my head in

Re: Confirming source-routed multicast is dead on the public Internet

I can confirm that GTT does indeed filter IP sourced from 224.0.0.0/4 at its edge. On 7/31/2018 6:44 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: It is hard to prove a negative. So let’s prove a positive. One of the largest (2nd largest?) transit networks on the planet just affirmatively stated they filter

Re: Brocade SLX Internet Edge

I have no horse in this race, however one need only look at the NYIIX outages list to see how well the Brocade/Extreme SLX platform works on at-scale service provider networks... On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:55 PM Blake Hudson wrote: > > > Chris Welti wrote on 11/1/2018 10:03 AM: > > Nicolas Fevrier

Re: Stupid Question maybe?

the most significant bits of the local address. I have never seen noncontiguous network masks used in real life, but I may not be old enough. -- Adam Atkinson

RE: FastNetMon Usage in the wild

make mgmt. as happy to look at it) and you need some external support bits to do the Flowspec. -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services [cid:image001.png@01D9FB80.2D14BDE0] 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) https

Re: FastNetMon Usage in the wild

Sorry for the late reply... Sightline *Insight* is the piece the sales team won't sell me, and TAC won't support me, for deployment in our private-cloud environment: it has to be hosted on one of 3 canned server configurations. I am using Sightline/TMS virtually and it's fin

Congestion/latency-aware routing for MPLS?

trying to help them find better solutions. Nor am I an MPLS expert, as is obvious here. Thanks, -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services MERLIN 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) https://www.merlin.mb.ca<https://www.mer

RE: TFTP over anycast

~90% of the conflicts you would otherwise encounter if the anycast node isn’t extremely stable. If you become aware of a distributed DHCP server that actually works well in this environment, that’s worth a post to the list all by itself. -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services

Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

about allocation strategies seems appropriate to me if you have 100,000 subnets, not 100. Opinions wanted, please. -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services MERLIN 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) https://www.merlin.mb.ca<https

RE: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

I may have mis-read it (I admit I didn’t read it all that carefully) but I think RFC3531 is talking about the strategy for assigning /64s out of a larger pool (a /56, say). -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services MERLIN 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 (204) 977

Re: Q: is RFC3531 still applicable?

Understood, yes, but I should have been more clear: I'm talking about statically allocating my own internal /64s out of the /56 I've reserved for my org's own use. Is there any point in using a more complex scheme than just "next!" ? -Adam Get Outlook for Andro

DNSSEC failing when querying zones under ca. randomly but only from some regions

.|-- dns.google 0.0%10 19.2 17.8 14.7 21.5 2.2 I’ve tried the same queries from NYC and Seattle but do not trigger any failures. Thoughts? Adam

Re: DNSSEC failing when querying zones under ca. randomly but only from some regions

> On Jul 28, 2024, at 9:34 PM, Peter Potvin > wrote: > > We were actually having this same issue earlier tonight, though across .com > and .is domains as well. Interesting to see it's not just us. That’s an interesting observation, Peter. I hadn’t seen it outside of the .ca zone personally, b

NANOG92 travel grants or sponsorships?

Does anyone know if there are travel grants or sponsorships available for people who cannot afford the US$700 (~C$1k) registration fee and/or travel expenses, out-of-pocket? Asking for a friend *cough*... (Yes, I'm aware of the $100 Virtual option, it's not a good option for me.) -

RE: Re[2]: NANOG92 travel grants or sponsorships?

things much! -Adam Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services MERLIN 100 - 135 Innovation Drive Winnipeg, MB R3T 6A8 (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6404 (MB only) https://www.merlin.mb.ca<https://www.merlin.mb.ca/> Chat with me on Teams<https://teams.microsoft.com/l/chat/0/0?use

RE: Find carriers that peer in two IX's

Although this will not give you a side by side comparision I have been using the HE exchange report. Maybe that will help. https://bgp.he.net/report/exchanges Best Regards, -- adam gregory -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org

RE: Private Link between TOR and CHI

HE, I use them for similar applications. Best Regards, -- adam gregory -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Gard Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 3:05 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Private Link between TOR

RE: Amazon Streaming Department

Jason, we had a similar issue as well. I was able to get in contact with some helpful people at Amazon who got it fixed for us. I passed your info along to them. If anyone else is having the same issue, shoot me a message and I'll pass your info along as well. Adam -

Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption

ity - A server with Vyos, vMX or ASR1000v Does anyone have other recommendations? Thanks, Adam

Re: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption

h you get more performance). - Nokia IXR-R6 (not IXR-6) - Huawei NE20E-S2E I need to look these up. I'm guessing the Nokia has same CLIs as Alcatels. Thanks, Adam On Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:19:14 -0800 Adam Lawson wrote > Hi, > > I'm looking for suggestions on 1U

RE: Small full BGP table capable router with low power consumption

Hey Steve (or anyone else), How much RAM are you running on your 4431? We have a similar application and are trying to figure out whether to order a 4431 with the default 4GB RAM, or upgrade it proactively to 8GB to support the full BGP table. Thanks, Adam -Original Message- From

Re: AT&T/L3 interconnect?

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/presentations/Sunday/RAS_traceroute_N45.pdf On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Deepak Jain wrote: > > While jumping on the wagon of poking at a particular 175.x.x.x address, I > noticed something in my trace: > > 10 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms > att-level3-3

Re: Low end, cool CPE.

I'd take a peak at Juniper's branch model SRX line. Something like the SRX210 has a mini-PIM slot that can take a DOCSIS hand-off. Can't speak to pricing, however, but they're great little boxes. Adam On Nov 11, 2010, at 18:43, Leo Bicknell wrote: > > I've r

Re: Some truth about Comcast - WikiLeaks style

On 2010-12-15-12:15:47, Kevin Neal wrote: > Also assuming the backbone and distribution upgrades required between > their data centers and their customers costs nothing. It's not free > to get bandwidth from Point A (port with TATA) to Point B (Customer). I don't see how this point, however vali

Re: C/D[WDM]

+1 on the CUBO recommendation. In addition to muxes, we've worked with them as a supplier of (Finisar) colored optics; our dealings have been extremely favorable on all fronts. -a

Re: C/D[WDM]

On 2010-12-22-19:44:31, Drew Weaver wrote: > Yes, sorry I should've specified 10Gig-E and I would like to avoid > using CWDM/DWDM optics if possible I would just like to use regular LR > optics. The common misconception is that, just because you're not installing colored optics directly in your r

Re: FAA - ASDI servers

The new Potomac Consolidated TRACON in Warrenton, VA is relatively new and has the newer equipment with flat-screen scopes, touch-screen radio/phone controls, etc. It is an impressive facility. Adam On Jan 4, 2011, at 23:56, Owen DeLong wrote: > Most controllers still do. I haven't

Re: DSL options in NYC for OOB access

On 2011-01-24-17:04:25, Andy Ashley wrote: > Im looking for a little advice about DSL circuits in New York, > specifically at 111 8th Ave [...] You can get a CLEAR WiMAX fixed modem with static IP address for $50 (USD) monthly, or less if you opt for the low-bandwidth plan. Unscientific testing

OT: References for i/o Phoenix Datacenter

nding to do business with is never going to give you a negative reference. :) Thanks everyone and my apologies for the quick off-topic distraction. Adam

RE: BGP multihoming with two address spaces

Perhaps L3 is preferring the routes it hears from TW over the ones it hears from you. Perhaps there is a community string you can attach to your announcements to one or both providers which can help you further manipulate what they do with your routes ... -Original Message- From: Joseph Je

RE: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes

e interfaces, > and edge interfaces in the IGP performs better. Well it's not true anymore BGP PIC edge and core converges under 50ms. "fast external failover" and "local repair" where available long before -but yes that's applicable only for MPLS. adam

RE: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes

s locked in to a single provider (MPLS VPN) can rely on certain class of service (predictable delay, jitter and packet loss) properties you can't get out of a pure internet connection from NY to Tokyo. adam -Original Message- From: Leo Bicknell [mailto:bickn...@ufp.org] Sent: Wednesda

carrier comparison

se questions, out of respect for the carriers in question, I encourage you to email frank opinions off list. Or if there are third party tools or resources you know that I could consult to deduce the answers to these questions myself, they are most welcome. Thanks, Adam

RE: carrier comparison

ators that dwarf us. It's great to have received perspectives from both large and small operators. Thanks again, everyone. Adam -Original Message- From: Faisal Imtiaz [mailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:43 PM To: Vlade Ristevski Cc: nanog list S

RE: "Everyone should be deploying BCP 38! Wait, they are ...."

ET promoting participation on the BCP38 initiative by incorporating spoofer projects program in their program suite. If there's more of us maybe we can make a change. adam -Original Message- From: Robert Drake [mailto:rdr...@direcpath.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:56 PM To: nanog@nano

RE: out of band management gear

We used old fashioned Cisco 2500's with octal cables. Old school for small deployments. We have toyed with the idea of trying to obtain OOB access via 3G/4G instead of using a dialup modem. Has anyone tried that and if so, what hardware would you recommend? -Original Message- From: Ni

RE: Filter on IXP

oses. I'm not well versed with RIPE myself so I'm not sure whether there's a way to handle this situation. adam -Original Message- From: Jérôme Nicolle [mailto:jer...@ceriz.fr] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 6:03 PM To: Nick Hilliard; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Filter

RE: Filter on IXP

not be responsible for this mess and that BCP38 should be implemented by the participants of an IXP. As Saku Ytti mentioned several times Tier2 ISPs are in the best position for a successful BCP38 filtering at their network boundaries. adam -Original Message- From: Nick Hilliard [mai

RE: [c-nsp] OAM/CFM question on IOS-XR

lar level. This gets handy as the L2 (aggregation) domain at each end of the MPLS cloud gets bigger and it's more difficult to see which L2 box dropped the ball. Regarding the MPLS core in between, well you already have tools to identify the failed P/core box. adam > -Ori

RE: How to catch a cracker in the US?

> From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 8:06 AM > Although it's questionable whether or not it's possible to remotely absolutely > ascertain whether the attacking machine in question was being operated by > miscreants unbeknownst to its actual owner. Tho

DNSSEC in .au

/listinfo/dnssec-announce For further information about the implementation of DNSSEC in .au please see http://www.auda.org.au/industry-information/au-domains/dnssec/. Kind Regards, Adam King | CTO .au Domain Administration Ltd T: +61 3 8341 4111 | F: +61 3 8341 4112 E: adam.k...@auda.org.au

RE: BGPMON Alert Questions

ever) we'll have such a discussion about data packets, i.e. finding that someone is not doing packet-filtering based on BGP updates is absolutely and unacceptably shocking! adam

RE: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

> How is this good for the consumer? How is this good for the market? You are asking a wrong question all they care about is "Where's my money"TM adam

RE: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)

can afford running separate control-plane and edge infrastructure for some of the AFs, IPv6 AF being the first ran separately. adam

RE: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

ETF WG on identifying the gaps that > various MPLS applications have so they can be prepared for IPv6 MPLS > control and data planes. > > Long overdue, if you ask me, but at least it's starting to get some attention. > > Mark. You mean the SR right? adam

RE: Shared Transition Space VS. BGP Next Hop [was: Re: Best practices IPv4/IPv6 BGP (dual stack)]

se case is the: 3.2. Protecting a node segment upon the failure of its advertising node. Of the now expired: draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases-02. It's the first, complete and elegant FRR solution for the hierarchical MPLS implementations. adam

RE: Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.

ough. I guess one does some reading and tweaking before installing a box as a PE or Internet Edge. adam

Team Cymru / Spamhaus

Spamhaus!"), or words of praise ("Do it all! These services are wonderful!") before we take the plunge. Thanks, Adam

RE: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

mers as they have nowhere else to go anyways and use this advantage to force Netflix to become your customer (well paying customer as they would need big pipes). What would you do? Options a) and b) assumes of course that Netflix has good connections to their upstreams and not misusing their position into forcing the customer relationship into free peering one. adam

Re: Netflix To Cogent To World

I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of commercial options available for sending traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at scale and absent congestion. I contend that there is not. I, too, have found Netflix highly responsive and professional, as a peering partner... $0

Re: Netflix To Cogent To World

nd Verizon’s customers? > > -P > > On Jul 23, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Adam Rothschild wrote: > >> I think the confusion by Jay and others is that there is a plethora of >> commercial options available for sending traffic to Comcast or Verizon, at >> scale and absent conge

Re: Netflix To Cogent To World

look to the Tata situation (congested for multiple years), which was a textbook case of poor execution and damage control by all involved, as a recent example. Fool me once... On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:00 PM, Livingood, Jason wrote: > On 7/23/14, 1:18 PM, "Adam Rothschild" wrote: >

Re: Consequences of BGP Peering with Private Addresses

Also absent from this discussion is that the RIRs are still issuing address space, and interface addressing is perfectly reasonable justification. -a

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

It was a very long time ago, but I seem to recall being shown http://dk, the home page of Denmark, some time in the mid 90s. Must I be recalling incorrectly?

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Mark Andrews wrote: It was a very long time ago, but I seem to recall being shown http://dk, the home page of Denmark, some time in the mid 90s. DK should NOT be doing this. Oh, I'm not claiming it does it now. It certainly doesn't. I _think_ I was shown http://dk in about 1993 or 1994 as a

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Adam Atkinson wrote: It was a very long time ago, but I seem to recall being shown http://dk, the home page of Denmark, some time in the mid 90s. DK should NOT be doing this. Oh, I'm not claiming it does it now. It certainly doesn't. I should have checked before I wrote that.

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Mark Andrews wrote: _Now_ I get rend up at http://www.dk.com/ if I don't That's your browser "trying" to be helpful. If it is Firefox this can be turned off with about:config and browser.fixup.alternate.enabled to false. The default is true. Ah, thanks. I imagined it was FF trying to be he

Re: unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Florian Weimer wrote: It was a very long time ago, but I seem to recall being shown http://dk, the home page of Denmark, some time in the mid 90s. Must I be recalling incorrectly? It must have been before 1996. Windows environments cannot resolve A/ records for single-label domain names.

Re: Looking for an AT&T contact that can update a prefix list

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Joe Freeman wrote: > If there's an AT&T contact on the list, or if anyone knows how to get a > prefix filter updated, I'd appreciate a response. You'll want to mail rm-awmis at ems.att.com, following up with a phone call to +1-888-613-6330,3,2 once you get an auto

Re: AT&T Email/SMS gateway outage

This appears to have just been restored. -- Adam Kennedy Network Engineer Omnicity, Inc. From: Drew Linsalata mailto:drew.linsal...@gmail.com>> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 08:00:25 -0400 To: NANOG mailto:nanog@nanog.org>> Subject: AT&T Email/SMS gateway outage Marginally operation

Re: SORBS contact

Nick Hilliard wrote: Email is such a lousy medium for this. We're all much more decent people in person than over snarky emails. Speak for yourself!

Level 3 Peering Guidelines

I'm sorry to interrupt the discussion of "how long is your rack?" and "what do you do when your home ISP is down?" with something impacting some folks' cost and manner of selling services, however Level 3 just published its new peering guidelines, buried in comments on the L3/GX merger: http://f

Re: Level 3 Peering Guidelines

What are thoughts on public disclosure limited to capacity constraints? There is ample business reason for making the terms of specific interconnects private. On the other hand, knowing definitively that {mon,du}opoly broadband provider A is running its connections to transit provider B hot could

Re: Rate Limiting and Bit Counting

k check reveals that there is still a product with this name, and it sounds like it does similar things to the one I remember. It may well be overkill (and too expensive) for what you want, but I guess it goes on the list. -- Adam Atkinson

Re: L3 announces new peering policy

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: > Isn't it just more of the same, or am I brainnumb today? What's changed is the introduction of "bit miles" as a means of calculating equality, where traffic ratios might previously have been used. Explained further, as pointed out on-list ear

Re: Colocation providers and ACL requests

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Kevin Loch wrote: >> We have always accommodated temporary ACL's for active DDOS attacks.  I >> think that is fairly standard across the ISP/hosting industry. Indeed. We'll do it; ditto every reputable hosting,

RE: MPLS TE

ific te-tunnel Though you can configure a te-tunnel to act as a backup for a link Since one of your tunnels is dynamic it can be re-established around the failed link Though which tunnel is going to be used to forward traffic is based on how you instruct the trafic to use one of the tunn

RE: /. ITU Approves Deep Packet Inspection

So is it recommended now to go over all the NGN core routers and restore them to default with: no lawful-intercept disable cmd? :) adam

Re: Postini Exiting ISP Business?

We're in the same boat as Paul and have been investigating McAfee Email Protection (used to be MX Logic). A bit more expensive than Postini, but also more full featured. Additional options can be added on as well, like archiving & outbound encryption. We've thought about deploying a virtual ap

RE: OOB core router connectivity wish list

>"CMP" this is what we need. +1000

RE: L2 redundant VPN

> Run MPLS over these four boxes and build L2 pseudowires across Using link bundling and one router at each end has faster convergence and it's cheaper, you can do l2tpv3 if you can't have mpls adam

Re: IP Address Management IPAM software for small ISP

On Jan 23, 2013, at 14:42, "Blake Gillman" wrote: > Hey guys - We too are evaluating 6Connect, moving away from BlueCat Proteus. What are some of the reasons you are migrating away from BlueCat's products? -Adam > So far so good on the backend and with automation. &

RE: Metro Ethernet, VPLS clarifications

And for fun you can also do: Ethernet over PBB to VPLS Ethernet over PBB over VPLS -that's actually called EVPN adam -Original Message- From: Fabien Delmotte [mailto:fdelmot...@mac.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 4:07 PM To: Scott Helms Cc: NANOG; Abzal Sembay Subject: Re:

RE: Alcatel-Lucent and France Tel deploy 400G for testing

Can't find any statement whether the nifty proclaimed 400G wavelength is indeed a single 100GHz channel or just a bundled supper channel The only hint is the total capacity of a fiber of 17.6 Tbps with 44 wavelengths which is roughly the whole 100GHz spaced grid adam -Original Me

RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network

> > to watch the latest Quad-HD movie >"Multicast" -I'm afraid it has to be unicast so that people can pause/resume anytime they need to go... well you know what I mean adam

RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network

cal access/aggregation network. adam

RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network

>The only time real-time per se matters is if you're playing the same content >on multiple screens and *synchronization* matters. And there's the HFT where "real-time" really does matter :) adam

RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network

I don't see a need for multicast to work in Internet scale, ever. adam -Original Message- From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 6:02 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network On (2013-02-08 14:15 +), Aled Morris

RE: The 100 Gbit/s problem in your network

s in BW demands when the Austrian fellow jumped from space And regarding the global m-cast. Well we don't need it. You can get the IPTV streams via direct link or via common carrier's mvpn adam

Re: Suggestions for managed DNS provider?

+1 for DME these guys are fantastic. On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Raj Jalan wrote: > http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com > Cost effective. We use it for some level of failover and load sharing as > well. > > -Raj Jalan > @rjalan2 > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Dav

Re: cannot access some popular websites from Linode, geolocation is wrong, ARIN is to blame?

Constantine, I'm afraid you might be confusing the NANOG list with supp...@linode.com (which, incidentally, I've found to be good at providing timely assistance, more often than not). In any event, I've found that commercial GeoIP services rely on data from RIRs and the global routing table a bit

RE: Cloudflare is down

the outages are caused by human error. One way to partially rule out 1) is to have a fully customized stupid proof provisioning system - customized by those who know how stuff works. adam

RE: internet routing table in a vrf

r BGP advertisements it will not reload your VPN BGP process. - or you can deploy enhanced BGP error handling on the edges and hope for the best (actually this is what should be implemented as a first thing). adam

RE: internet routing table in a vrf

he speed of IGP convergence to inform the ingress PE to switch to a preprogramed backup path/NH (PIC CORE). There are already some RFCs that propose P-core to fast reroute to alternate PE in case the primary PE fails - can't wait :). adam -Original Message- From: Matt Newsom [mail

<    1   2   3   4   5   >