> > Ideally, we would have a solution where an entire MPLS infrastructure > > could be built without v4 space, demoting > > v4 to a legacy application inside a VRF, but the MPLS standards wg > > seems content with status quo. > > There is work ongoing in the MPLS IETF WG on identifying the gaps that > various MPLS applications have so they can be prepared for IPv6 MPLS > control and data planes. > > Long overdue, if you ask me, but at least it's starting to get some attention. > > Mark.
You mean the SR right? adam
