There are other products out there that give more successful results much
quicker and with much less effort.
While I won’t spam the list with things, I’d be happy to share my experience
off-list if desired.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: NANOG on behalf of Smoot Carl-Mitchell
Date:
how those are treated
along the way. I just don’t understand how customer support can be such a
difficult thing.
Scott
From: Micah Croff
Date: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 6:21 PM
To: Scott Morris
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Subject: Re: Clueful BGP from TW-Telecom/L3
Last I dealt with
Is there per chance anyone hanging on here who is clueful about BGP working
with TW-Telecom and the recent integration with Level3
I have a client that I consult with whose route is not getting sent from TW to
L3 and the techs on the case are convinced we need to put different BGP
communiti
Is there per chance anyone hanging on here who is clueful about BGP working
with TW-Telecom and the recent integration with Level3
I have a client that I consult with whose route is not getting sent from TW to
L3 and the techs on the case are convinced we need to put different BGP
commun
Shop class can also teach you how to turn a wrench. How many people out
of that area go on to be the best mechanics you¹ve ever seen? Some do,
some don¹t. Certifications aren¹t any different. They are around to
establish a benchmark of minimally qualified knowledge. We all should
know the diff
All networking courses SHOULD have some version of binary in them. Too
many things rely on it to be skipped. Yes, in the real world we have
shortcuts. But when those shortcuts become the only thing everyone knows,
bad things may be left to happen. Besides, if one can¹t do binary, how
can they b
You can grab GNS separately and for free, which will allow you to build
the topologies that you are looking for.
That is what is used to demonstrate most of the Cisco courses between the
trainers.
Scott
From: Colton Conor
Date: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 at 9:59 AM
To: Scott Morris
Cc
Depends on how quickly you want them trained, and how they tend to learn
things
Reading is good, but can be boring and tedious and not always have all the
answers.
Standard ILT can be costly, but very quick and often standard (though I¹d
shop around for who you have as an instructor since that ca
Fundamental routing training would greatly help you here. I would suggest
looking for that.
If you are not peering with TATA, then your routes would not go to TATA
first. (unless the next-hop is indirect and that brings up other
fundamental routing things that you should learn about)
AS13335 is
And if they were the intended application of the term, I would think that
“cheese” would not the the appropriate choice to catch them. However,
cheese and crackers would seem to be more a snack, which is at least how
>I< interpreted that original comment.
Perhaps I need to drink more…
Scott
--
If there's anyone from the IP-side of Verizon Wireless, if you could
contact me off-list, that would be awesome! Saves me hours of pointless
phone calls. :)
Thanks!
--
*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CCDE #2009::D,
CCNP-Data Center, C
The ADA act does not allow people to have access to every single job
regardless of their handicap. So, if something requires the ability to
see certain colors, then that's a requirement.
Scott
On 8/31/12 10:30 AM, Philip Gladwin wrote:
> Maybe giving them access to a colormeter? :)
>
> http://it
Hell... who needs help doing any sort of work over there??? I'd love
to find a way to bind work and vacation spots together! :)
Scott
Twitter: @ScottMorrisCCIE
E-mail: s...@emanon.com
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeevl..
On 7/31/12 4:14 PM, Philip Lavine
A packet doesn't make a loop. A device would create that. So if you
are sending the packet out, but something else is sending it back, I'd
go take a look at where that's occurring on your devices.
If you disconnected the user in question, then what else has either
taken over that address, or wha
On 7/15/12 11:58 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
> On 2012-07-15 15:30, Scott Morris wrote:
>>> There was also in the past fec0::/10. For BGP updates you should be safe
>>> to filter out FC00::/6.
>> Unless I've missed something, RFC4193 lays out FC00::/7, not the /6.
On 7/15/12 5:38 AM, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
> On 2012-07-15 00:45, Tony Hain wrote:
>> There is no difference in the local filtering function, but *IF* all transit
>> providers put FC00::/7 in bogon space and filter it at every border, there
>> is a clear benefit when someone fat-fingers the confi
Can someone from Reliance Globalcom who is clueful on their BGP
operations please contact me offlist?
I appreciate it!
--
*Scott Morris*
s...@emanon.com
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeevl..
Hell, years ago, I only wanted to add three bits and give a set to each
continent with one leftover for the United Federation of Planets (and
Antarctica really didn't need one anyway)...
I was told that would be geographically discriminating! :)
Ah well, c'est la vie!Why be lazy when we can
The mismatch problem of DCE/DTE should definitely indicate that your
PVCs aren't up. But that shouldn't result in the high quantity of CRC
errors in the interface counters. That should just result in your LMI
enquiry count increasing with LMI response sitting at zero.
I have to say I've never tr
Now just where would the fun in THAT be? ;)
Scott
On 9/14/11 11:00 AM, James Jones wrote:
> Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Always L
Did you have backup tomatoes?
On 8/26/11 10:05 PM, Chris wrote:
> Irene is already past me. I'm outside of Jacksonville, Florida by the
> coast. Irene snapped my tomato plant in half overnight Wednesday.
>
>
>
Also, the quake on the east coast was much closer to the surface than
most west coast quakes, which could account for the feeling.
Scott (not a geologist)
On 8/23/11 6:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen conflicting numb
On 8/17/11 9:50 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
>> What would you rather rely on at 3am in the morning when things are
>> breaking? Someone who has just learned IS-IS or someone who already
>> has good experience with OSPF?
> what would you rather rely on at three in the morning when things are
> breaking,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I still get out plenty, thanks! :) It's been years in the making, and
more than served its purpose!
But convenient to have... And heats the home nicely in the wintertime!
And someone said it was all about the toys!
Scott
On 8/12/11 8:29 PM, va
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The learning curve isn't that big IMHO. However, it's all about comfort.
You should never design a network because "someone else does it this
way". While you can certainly take ideas into account about the WHY
their network looks that way, you need
Since IPv6 is like a frozen turkey
Just make sure they remember to take the giblets out... Based on
personal... u... "experience"... that will drastically change
when something (if ever) gets done!
;)
Scott
On 5/28/11 4:21 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> I just got off the phone with a leve
Aren't they already confused enough when any time I use my EVDO or 3G
Tether that someone believes I've been magically transported to New
Jersey or wherever the handoff is? ;)
Understand the logic behind it, but you probably statistically have
just as much chance of being correct a
Random re-encapsulation. Now there's an interesting protocol!
On 4/2/11 3:53 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
Not true.
The occupants of the aircraft survived. The aircraft did not.
Hm, in my recollection the payload made it to the dest
Isn't that what the uvula is for?
Oh... never mind wrong swallow. ;)
On 4/2/11 3:34 AM, Chad Dailey wrote:
> Swallows have MTU issues.
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41 11AM, Sa
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a
recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;)
Scott
On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
> I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I kno
It would be a lot easier to do it by continent.
3 bits at prepend. We only have 7 of those and Antarctica likely
doesn't need several billion addresses anyway. Got some leftover for
the United Federation of Planets. :) (or whatever other
semi-practical use that may be dreamed up)
You could
So Do you run a small network? Or are there LOTS of EX-girlfriends?
;)
Scott
On 1/27/11 5:30 AM, Ivan Brunello wrote:
>> Message: 10
>> Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 16:11:46 -0500
>> From: Christopher
>> Subject: Re: Network Naming
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Message-ID: <4d3f3c92.9050...@gmai
The catch is being able to do it without reloading!
"commit confirm" will help a lot as well. In case your commit
annihilates your ssh session. ;)
Scott
On 1/13/11 2:51 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 1/13/2011 1:48 PM, Michael Ruiz wrote:
>> Yeah another thing I love about the JUNOS is the rollba
Or why not just paste a REALLY large bogus config in there to max-out
the NVRAM chip? That's the one that's harder to move to a PC.
On the flash, moving to a PC is easier (at least if we're talking about
newer devices using PCMCIA!) :)
I suppose that everyone's level of detail is somewhat equiv
No worries.
Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI #21903, JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
[1]...@emanon.com
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeevl..
On 12/3
Well, you could always aggregate them (even same prefix) in your own
ASN and that would generate a fresh version of the route...
Scott
On 12/31/10 9:34 AM, Tarig Ahmed wrote:
Dear all
Hi
Is there any way to change AS Path "no prepend".
I am in a situation needs som
Size doesn't matter. It's how well you use it.
Route it, baby...
;)
On 12/21/10 1:56 PM, Bryan Fields wrote:
On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:
A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made
a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different oper
On 12/4/10 5:56 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> I recently calculated the capacity of a 747F full of LTO-4 tapes; it's
> about 8.7 exabytes. I *think* it's within weight and balance for the
> airframe.
>
> Cheers,
> -- jra
>
Just how much free time do you have? :)
Scott
Given that a meal is often comprised of several mouthfuls, wouldn't it
stand to reason that the entire address would suffice there? ;)
Scott
On 11/19/10 11:06 AM, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 14:14, Scott Morris wrote:
>
>> If 8 bits is a byte, then 16
If 8 bits is a byte, then 16 bits should be a mouthful.
;)
Scott
On 11/18/10 10:45 PM, George Bonser wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> as most of you are aware, there is no definite, canonical name for the
>> two bytes of IPv6 addresses between colons. This forces people to use
>> a description like
Maybe I WAY under-read the initial poster's question, but I was pretty
sure he wasn't talking about running it as a CORE routing protocol or
anything on the middle of their network where MPLS would be expected on
top of it!
If I missed it and he did intend that, then I'd certainly agree with you
On 9/30/10 12:57 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:13:11 +1000
Julien Goodwin [1] wrote:
On 30/09/10 13:42, Mark Smith wrote:
One of the large delays you see in OSPF is election of the designated
router on multi-access links such as ethernets. As ethernet is being
very commonly us
eered neighbors whereas OSPF
does) and you may have your justification.
If it's for nostalgia or "just because", then I'd say everyone agrees
that RIP has passed its usefulness!
Scott
On 9/29/10 11:32 PM, Chris Woodfield wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scott Morris wro
I think you're right that everything has its' place. But you gotta
know where that is and why you choose it!
RIP(v2) is great in that there aren't neighbor relationships, so you can
shoot routes around in a semi-sane-haphazard fashion if need be.
Whatever your reality you exist in like satellit
They're called "routers". ;)
Otherwise, your framing is completely different between those mediums,
so it's not like going from 100Base-FX ethernet to 100Base-TX ethernet!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CCD
Isn't that just CYA? Thank the lawyers and "corporate compliance
offices" and professional whiners.
Scott
John Peach wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 20:00:45 -0500
Tim Sanderson [1] wrote:
[snip]
THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
It only supported IPv5. :)
Scott
[1]deles...@gmail.com wrote:
What happened to CRS-2? :)
--Original Message--
From: Robert Enger - NANOG
To: David Hubbard
Cc: [2]na...@nanog.org
Subject: Re: CRS-3
Sent: Mar 9, 2010 4:20 PM
Forget Linksys: Didn't Peter Lothberg's mom have a CRS
I think that "good" is all relative to what you are most likely to be
able to reach from wherever your location happens to be!
Google's... Level 3's. Root DNS servers (anycast) Pick something.
Scott
Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
> I'd rather send him to something more open like kernel.org;
To be honest, when I figured a big BUNCH of d000 was going to hit the
Internet, I did not expect it to come from Italy.;)
Chuck Anderson wrote:
Anyone know why this ISP from Italy is advertising d000::/8 to the
IPv6 Internet?
show route d000::/8
inet6.0: 2446 destinations, 5143 r
But IGMP IS the control traffic with users. And PIM IS the control
traffic between multicast routers.
?
Scott
Glen Kent wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
>> On Dec 23, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Glen Kent wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Any idea if folks use AH or ESP to prot
So we're looking to complicate things for the same of complicating
them? Using a predictable "security" doesn't exactly make things secure
does it?
On the links that you are running PIM or IGMP on, do you not have a
predictable set of clients and therefore problems? Or are we trying to
protect
Look at "show mls qos map" to see the defaults that may be rewriting
your information depending on trust (or non-trust) mechanisms you have
configured.
If you trust CoS, a frame received with cos5 and dscp46 will get
rewritten to dscp 40 with default maps...
"show mls qos interface (intf)" is als
Could have been a server in drag? ;)
Karl Auer wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 20:48 -0700, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>> the mac address of the rouge server
>>
>
>
>
> It's R-O-G-U-E - rogue.
>
> Rouge is French for red and English for red make-up.
>
>
>
> Regards, K.
>
>
While entirely possible, I actually view it going the other way. RFC
3627 points out some nice issues as far as DAD and anycast operation is
concerned, but what I'd see (just my random opinion as I haven't
bothered to write an RFC) is that it would make entirely much more sense
to come up with a s
That was the point. :)
Scott
Matthew Petach wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Scott Morris <mailto:s...@emanon.com>> wrote:
>
> How many addresses do you like on point-to-point circuits?
>
> Scott
>
>
> I allocate a /64, but currentl
, there's some initial rhyme and
reason. Explaining that, getting buy in, and understanding the
limitations therein will make the next progression to VLSM simpler to grasp.
At least in my opinion. :)
Scott
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2009-10-13, at 08:05, Scott Morris wrote:
>
>> Wh
ming that just because someone is teaching that they don't
have a realistic set of experiences to go with it as the poster from
APNIC pointed out.
Just my two cents,
Scott
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2009-10-13, at 07:39, Scott Morris wrote:
>
>> No idea, I haven't looked at th
No idea, I haven't looked at that stuff in a while. But I would assume
so, as it's easier to build a foundation than jumping straight to
something difficult?
Or did you learn calculus in grade school? Just askin' ;)
Scott
Mark Newton wrote:
>
> On 13/10/2009, at
I'm going to have to pull the "mixed-hat" on this one. If you are
comparing this to a true "academia" environment, I'd agree with you.
Too much theory, not enough reality in things. However, I've yet to see
the part about where the person is being trained from.
I happen to train people at CCIE
I may be having my wires a little crossed (I'm not an electrical
engineer) but I was always under the impression that manipulation of the
physical characteristics like that from heat/dampness didn't reduce the
"speed" but the "quality" (like line noise/errors/etc) of the line.
Whether old telco li
I must have missed the phrasing that says "nobody else can make an
independent decision regarding any security measure above and beyond the
minimum standards"...
I'll go back and look for that.
Scott
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Scott Morris:
>
>
>> I&#
I'm trying really hard to find my "paranoia hat", and just to relieve
some boredom I read the entire bill to try to figure out where this was
all coming from
"(2) may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or
shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal
May seem a little simplistic, but how about Webmin. :) Runs on most
linux-type systems over SSL/https and allows you to administer your DNS
(and other services) without issues and provide the things you listed below.
Oh, and it's free. And it's already done.
Scott
Ben Matthew wrote:
F
From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:st...@ibctech.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 8:52 AM
To: s...@emanon.com
Cc: 'Zhao Ping'; na...@merit.edu
Subject: Re: ? how cisco router handle the out-of-order ICMP echo-reply
packets
Scott Morris wrote:
> There aren't sequence numbers wit
There aren't sequence numbers with ICMP. And the timeout value is
watched/triggered before the next ICMP is sent, so there shouldn't really be
any ordering problem/interpretation anyway.
HTH,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Zhao Ping [mailto:pzhao...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06
In case anyone cares... From my router's perspective:
/1 0
/2 0
/3 0
/4 0
/5 0
/6 0
/7 0
/8 20
/9 9
/10 20
/11 53
/12 159
/13 310
/14 560
/15 1,096
/16 10,235
/17 4,461
/18 7,593
/19 16,284
/20 19,075
/21
Do you put public IP addresses on every single device of yours? Or are some
devices configured with private ranges for internal movement (public
bridghead e-mail vs. internal databases?)
Or is everything internal private, and you simply NAT for public accessible
parts.
Seeing those addresses in
It's the "double-dog-dare". :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Craig Holland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 11:42 AM
To: Måns Nilsson; Steven M. Bellovin; NANOG
Subject: Re: an over-the-top data center
Just me, or is showing the floorplan not the typical beha
I sent e-mails to the AS contacts, but don't expect that to do much in the
middle of the night.No live person at the phone numbers.I can't even
get their web site to come up, although if they're re-routing the entire BGP
table internally, go figure. :)
BGPMon's a great thing though!
Som
esend, but if you could contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that will be much easier! Any emails to the subscribed address here won't
work, which is the problem I'm attempting to solve with Windstream! :)
Thanks in advance!
Scott Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
vance!
Scott Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wouldn't it be better to ask the folks in Hungary (AS20922) who are peering
with this site?
One side, I'd buy the typo. Both sides, mutual typos are a little more
difficult.
Not that conspiracy theories are all that much fun, but I'm finding the
one-sided mistake hard to believe. Either that o
Hehehe... I think the whois program searches for any instance of what you
type in. The TLD records appear intact and seem to reference the correct
name servers. NSLookups to different hosts return properly.
I suspect you're just getting caught up in the wonderful world of bad DNS
servers! :)
As long as your upstreams/partners are cool with that, there is no related
designation between how addresses are allocated versus how they are
announced.
In other words, TECHNICALLY you could advertise a whole bunch of /30's
You just run the risk of being filtered and/or ridiculed along the wa
Sorry for the off-topic, but is anyone hanging around here on the weekend
bgp clueful at New Edge Networks (or I suppose Earthlink as they were
purchased)???
Phhhlllease unicast me! I have a 15 second bgp thing that needs fixing
and has been an open support ticket for 5+ days.
Scott
80 matches
Mail list logo
