So we're looking to complicate things for the same of complicating them? Using a predictable "security" doesn't exactly make things secure does it?
On the links that you are running PIM or IGMP on, do you not have a predictable set of clients and therefore problems? Or are we trying to protect against something I'm not thinking of? ;) Scott Glen Kent wrote: >> Would encrypting multicast not fundamentally break the concept of multicast >> itself, unless you're encrypting multicast traffic over a backbone? >> >> > > No, i wasnt alluding to encrypting the multicast traffic. I was > thinking of using ESP-NULL (AH is optional) for the IGMP/PIM packets. > > Affably, > Kent > > >
