Re: IERS ponders reverse leapsecond...

ot; leap seconds over a 24 hour period will presumably just smear in the reverse direction. It would not surprise me at all if the liquid outer core keeps on its slowdown and a negative leap second would need to be scheduled sooner or later. Regards Marshall Eubanks On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 11

Re: 60 ms cross-continent

This was also pitched as one of the killer-apps for the SpaceX Starlink satellite array, particularly for cross-Atlantic and cross-Pacific trading. https://blogs.cfainstitute.org/marketintegrity/2019/06/25/fspacex-is-opening-up-the-next-frontier-for-hft/ "Several commentators quickly caught onto

GPS may be jammed for several hours per day in the SE US Jan 16-24

-media/all-news/2020/january/14/gps-jamming-expected-in-southeast-during-military-exercise?fbclid=IwAR3VMlOdPUFTHuoujPShqt3qhEIe3mAhSS-pU5M56CQ14zNX8qSBqWa5WcI Regards Marshall Eubanks

Re: EXERCISE: 2019 IAA Planetary Defence Conference - Day 5 Scenario

Yes, they kept moving the impact site around all week (both Denver and West Africa were mentioned at times). Some people wiser than I guessed Central Park early on, but I thought that was too obvious. Good thing I didn't make a bet on it. Regards Marshall Eubanks On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:

Re: Youtube Outage

Reports (and humor) are flooding twitter. On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:44 PM Ross Tajvar wrote: > > You beat my email by seconds. Yes, it is widespread. > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG > wrote: >> >> Is this widespread? > >

Re: California fires: smart speakers and emergency alerts

At a recent meeting on space policy a representative from Hughes/Echostar told us that, as they provide satellite connectivity to gas stations in the fire regions, they have been working with emergency services to give fire fighters directions to where they can go to get gas for their trucks, based

Re: Rising sea levels are going to mess with the internet

nyone there already knows about this. http://www.businessinsider.com/miami-floods-sea-level-rise-solutions-2018-4 Regards Marshall Eubanks > [...] > Despite its magnitude, this network is increasingly vulnerable to sea > levels inching their way higher, according to research presented

Re: Contact for Frontiernet - AS5650

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Ryan DiRocco < ryan.diro...@totalserversolutions.com> wrote: > Can anyone put me in touch with a contact from Frontiernet regrading > peering off-list? > > I've been contacting per...@frontiernet.net > since 02/2017 without response a

Re: Testing methodology for the Chinese quantum satellite link?

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > Does anyone who understands quantum networking better than I do have an > opinion on the testing methodology that the Chinese team used to confirm > entanglement? Their paper https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01339 This is somewhat higher leve

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://k12techtips.com/things.php?zf9bi> Marshall Eubanks

Re: Chile Status?

(pre-Earthquake). Regards Marshall > Colin > > On 17 Sep 2015, at 14:47, Marshall Eubanks > wrote: > > > > Given the huge (7.9 - 8.3) Earthquake last night, does anyone have any > > information about the status of the Internet in Chile, and in particular > > about

Re: Chile Status?

serving Chile from Miami. > > Excellent, thank you. I am sure there will be many local outages in affected areas, but that presumably means the country itself is still on the net. Regards Marshall > Best Regards, > -Phil > > > On Sep 17, 2015, at 9:47 AM, Marshall Eubank

Chile Status?

its magnitude, I would expect those fiber links to be at risk to undersea landslides. Regards Marshall Eubanks

United Airlines is Down (!) due to network connectivity problems

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/07/08/us-ual-flights-idUSKCN0PI1IX20150708 At least, that's what I just heard on the radio. I know no other details. Regards Marshall Eubanks

Re: REMINDER: LEAP SECOND

world should just adopt IAT as the time system in use. That is the best time we have, and it will never have steps. Yes, that means that you would need something like a time zone file to set your system clock by hand from local (UTC) time, but, then, we already have to have time zone files. Regards Marshall Eubanks

Re: Twitter contact

Twitter being twitter, there is no shortage of reports of this. http://www.neowin.net/news/twitter-bug-makes-tweets-look-old-wont-let-some-users-sign-in On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Chaim Rieger wrote: > Seems that your devices are set one year ahead. > > That is all >

Re: North Korean internet goes dark (yes, they had one)

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Marshall Eubanks < marshall.euba...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Javier J > wrote: > >> But I can ping them. >> >> https://nknetobserver.github.io/ >> >> And what would it matter if

Re: North Korean internet goes dark (yes, they had one)

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Javier J wrote: > But I can ping them. > > https://nknetobserver.github.io/ > > And what would it matter if its offline, they already block their > population. What exactly is offline? > The Kim of the moment, the elite, a few journalists, and the like. And, ass

Facebook down?

http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/facebook.com It's not just you! *http://facebook.com* <http://facebook.com/> looks down from here. Relevant because of the likely increase in productiviity Regards Marshall Eubanks

Re: F-ckin Leap Seconds, how do they work?

On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Peter Lothberg wrote: >> > Leap seconds are to align the artificial and very stable atomic timescale >> > with the irregular and slowing rotation of the earth. >> >> You are assuming facts not in evidence. The rotation is merely irregular w= >> ithin the capabiliti

Re: LinkedIn password database compromised

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Tei wrote: > The problem: > - Modern internet users must have lots of different login/passwords around > the internet.  Most of then in easy-to-break poorly-patched poorly-managed > servers,  like linkedin. > > The solution: > -  Reduce the number of authentication.

Re: LinkedIn password database compromised

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2012, at 2:14 AM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote: > >> Imaging signing up for a site by putting in your email and pasting >> your public key. >> > > I'm imagining my mother trying this, or trying to help her change it after > the hard dri

Re: LinkedIn password database compromised

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Lynda wrote: > Sorry to be the bearer of such bad tidings. Please note that I'm doing a > quick copy/paste from a notification I received. I've edited it a bit. > > Please note that LinkedIn has weighed in with a carefully worded blog post: > > http://blog.linkedin.

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:46 AM, PC wrote: > While there may be other grounds for telling them not to call you, the > do not call list is not one of them as it does not apply to business > to business solicitations. > > "The national Do-Not-Call list protects home voice or personal > wireless pho

Re: mulcast assignments

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Jeff Tantsura wrote: > Hi, > > All modern routers support mapping from IGMPv2 to PIM SSM, all static, some > others thru DNS, etc I am not sure what you mean here. To support SSM, you need IGMPv3. Most routers do support IGMPv3, but there is still a fair amount of

Re: IPv6 dark traffic collection restarted

Dear Geoff; On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: > Hi, > > In 2010, and again in 2011, I ran an experiment to examine the "dark" traffic > in IPv6. I did this by announcing the "superblock" 2400::/12 which has been > allocated to APNIC for its IPv6 allocations. The superblock

Re: Colocation in New York for a POP

On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Abdelkader Chikh Daho wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Can some one please tell us what is the best Colo in New york to set up a > POP (one cabinet) in order to get bandwidth, peering (NIIX, etc). > What are you trying to optimize ? If it is cash outlay, you might want

Re: OpenFlow @ GOOG

I wonder if this will be contributed to the DC (DataCenter) work currently gearing up in the IETF. Regards Marshall On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/04/going-with-the-flow-google/all/1 > > Going With The Flow: Google’s Secret Swit

Re: DNS issues with tools.ietf.org

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:35:34PM +0200, >  Marco Davids (Prive) wrote >  a message of 15 lines which said: > >> And what about this: > > But two name servers, gamay and shiraz still work. So the domain > works, so you can email the ho

Attack on the DNS ?

Anyone seen signs of this attack actually occurring ? http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/31/technology/with-advance-warning-bracing-for-attack-on-internet-by-anonymous.html?_r=1 The message called it Operation Global Blackout, and rallied Anonymous supporters worldwide to attack the Domain Name Syst

Re: airFiber

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Nick Olsen wrote: > It will need perfect line of site. And won't deal with NLOS like most 2/5 > ghz gear can. It's 24ghz. > At least on the East Coast, it would be best to install it during the summer. Put it up in winter, and any leaves that sprout in the path wi

Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:51 AM, George Herbert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marshall Eubanks > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM,   wrote: >>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said: >>>> The physics is not conducive

Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:14 PM, wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 13:16:59 -0700, George Herbert said: >> The physics is not conducive to improving the situation a lot. >> >> There's probably $1.5 billion in the ground already in neutrino >> detectors; the total combined detector bit rate is pretty p

Re: $1.5 billion: The cost of cutting London-Tokyo latency by 60ms

On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote: > That is why there's this neutrinos project > It's not faster than the speed of light though it can shoot through the Earth > and no cables cost involved > > So far the speed is 0.1 bit per sec > I bet for $ 1.5 billion neutrino communicat

Re: BBC reports Kenya fiber break

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Rodrick Brown wrote: > >> There's about 1/2 a dozen or so known private and government research >> facilities on Antarctica and I'm surprised to see no fiber end points on >> that continent? This can't be true. > >

BBC reports Kenya fiber break

Is anyone seeing this ? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-17179544 "East Africa's high-speed internet access has been severely disrupted after a ship dropped its anchor onto fibre-optic cables off Kenya's coast." Regards Marshall

Re: Iran blocking essentially all encyrpted protocols

And in response http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2012/02/10/as-iran-cracks-down-online-tor-tests-undetectable-encrypted-connections/ (quoting) : “Basically, say you want to look like an XMPP chat instead of SSL,” he writes to me, referring to a protocol for instant messaging as the deco

Re: Megaupload.com seized

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:37:16AM -1000, Paul Graydon > wrote: >> From what I understand about MegaUpload's approach, they created a hash >> of every file that they stored.  If they'd already got a copy of the >> file th

Re: "Illegal content" (Re: Megaupload.com seized)

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Jan 20, 2012, at 11:25, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >>  Public distribution without the permission of the copyright owner is >>  illegal. > > This is veering off the purpose of this list, but maybe it is operationally > significant to be abl

Re: Whacky Weekend: Is Internet Access a Human Right?

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Zaid Ali" > >> On 1/5/12 7:22 AM, "Jay Ashworth" wrote: >> >> >Vint Cerf says no: http://j.mp/wwL9Ip >> > >> >But I wonder to what degree that's dependent on how much our governments >> >make Internet a

Re: Whacky Weekend: Is Internet Access a Human Right?

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > Vint Cerf says no: http://j.mp/wwL9Ip With all due respect to Vint, I think that it isn't now, but it will be. Regards Marshall > > But I wonder to what degree that's dependent on how much our governments make > Internet access the most pra

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Keith Medcalf wrote: > > There is video hosting web sites on the intertubes? > > Now where would those be found, I wonder.  All I have ever seen is > macro-streaming that is fraudulently labeled and advertised as video -- the > worst being something called FlashVi

Re: IPTV and ASM

Dear Mike; On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mike McBride wrote: > Anyone using ASM (versus SSM) for IPTV? If so why? > >From what I understand, the answer is likely to be "yes" and the reason is likely to be "deployed equipment only supports IGMP v2." Regards Marshall > thanks, > mike >

Re: what if...?

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Eduardo A. Suárez wrote: > Hi, > > what if evil guys hack my mom ISP DNS servers and use RPZ to redirect > traffic from mom_bank.com to evil.com? > > How can she detect this? Does your Mom call you up every time she gets a dialog box complaining about an invalid

Range using single-mode SFPs across multi-mode fiber - was Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 47, Issue 56

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:34 PM, oliver rothschild wrote: > This is my first e-mail to the list and I hope it is not entirely As a suggestion, could you please in the future not use a subject such as "Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 47, Issue 56" for posts. It is MUCH better to use a topical subject line

Re: Strongest Solar Tsunami in Years to Hit Earth Today

On Jun 10, 2011, at 8:22 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/159964/20110609/nasa-solar-flare-tsunami-earth-sun-radio-satellite-interference-aurora-displays-coronal-mass-ejectio.htm > > -Hank > > If you are interested in the actual event, watch the AIA video of the ex

Re: Cox outage in Alexandria, Va.

On Jun 7, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote: > One of my employees is reporting that Cox told her a backhoe "cut a main > line" somewhere in the Alexandria, Virginia area earlier this morning. More > than likely a fiber cut I'd imagine. Apparently it's affecting about 50,000 > resident

Re: skype

On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > http://heartbeat.skype.com/ > > skype has been microsofted already. "small number of users" my ass. > probably 7/8 of the users i would see at this time are not on. On this topic, it has also been penetrated, by the Egyptian “Electronic Penetrat

$ 90 million fine for cutting Internet services

I remember some discussion of this outage on NANOG, and on what it was costing Egypt. Well, here is an estimate - almost $ 20 million USD / day (which actually sounds low to me). Regards Marshall http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/05/201152811555458677.html An Egyptian court has fi

Re: Had an idea - looking for a math buff to tell me if it's possible?with today's technology.

On May 20, 2011, at 5:16 PM, Sudeep Khuraijam wrote: > I could not help but admire nanog in its full form ;) and I cannot resist > anymore. Allow me to suggest the EPR paradox machine. > > The cost of regenerating unpredictable information is inefficient by orders > of magnitude, but wait.

Re: Yahoo and IPv6

On May 14, 2011, at 12:47 PM, Paul Vixie wrote: > Matthew Kaufman writes: > >>> My Desktop is not able to make any IPv4 socket connections anymore. I get >>> "Protocol not supported". So there are IPv6-only users, already bitten by >>> no . So that's -1 from me. >> >> Sounds to me like y

Re: 23,000 IP addresses

On May 10, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: >> On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena >> compliance fee. >> 23,000 * $150 each shou

Re: 23,000 IP addresses

e before. (It will take a while, and maybe a visit to the Supreme Court, before you can expect legal consistency here.) Note also that these generally do not go to trial. Regards Marshall >> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks >> wrote: >>> A Federal Judge has

23,000 IP addresses

A Federal Judge has decided to let the "U.S. Copyright Group" subpoena ISPs over 23,000 alleged downloads of some Sylvester Stallone movie I have never heard of; subpoenas are expected to go out this week. I thought that there might be some interest in the list of these addresses : http://www.

Re: 365x24x7

On Apr 15, 2011, at 12:50 PM, George Herbert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> >> >> On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Greg Moore wrote: >> >>> When I did this years ago I found 5 was really a minimum so that I could &

Re: 365x24x7 (sleep patterns)

>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of NANOG digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. 365x24x7 (harbor235) >> 2. Re: New hijacks, and lots of them (Ronald F. Guilmette)

Re: 365x24x7

On Apr 15, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Greg Moore wrote: > When I did this years ago I found 5 was really a minimum so that I could > cover weekends and then had extra coverage as needed during the week. > > I did find it was good to swap out the graveyard shift every 6 months or so. > > When I wo

Re: internet probe can track you within 690 m

On Apr 11, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20336-internet-probe-can-track-you-down-to-within-690-metres.html > "The new method zooms in through three stages to locate a target computer. > The first stage measures the time it takes to send a data p

Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet

On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Tony Finch wrote: > George Bonser wrote: >> >> What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to >> purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and >> sullying the company's image. > > Who is forcing them? Their lawyers. R

Re: New tsunami advisory warning - Japan

On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote: > >>> You guys forget a lot of folks on the list are working on cabling ships and >>> off shore platforms, its not all about what happens on

Re: New tsunami advisory warning - Japan

On Mar 28, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote: >> You guys forget a lot of folks on the list are working on cabling ships and >> off shore platforms, its not all about what happens on shore in this >> industry. > > > > Valid point ... however in deep ocean, these things are pretty imperce

Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet

On Mar 26, 2011, at 5:28 PM, George Bonser wrote: >> But do you really believe playboy are going to give up playboy.com? > > They aren't going to give up Playboy.com but they are probably going to > have to purchase playboy.xxx anyway. > > What bothers me is that most companies are now going

Re: ICANN approves .XXX red-light district for the Internet

On Mar 26, 2011, at 6:31 PM, John Levine wrote: >> Suppose, just for the sake of the argument, that a statute or >> precedent came about to the effect that a community which permits >> access to .xxx sites (by not censoring the DNS) implicitly accepts >> "that kind of thing" isn't obscenity under

Re: Nortel, in bankruptcy, sells IPv4 address block for $7.5 million

On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:07 PM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: >> On 3/24/2011 7:59 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote: >>> Because that's what IP addresses are. Totally worthless unless community >>> participants voluntarily route traffic for those IPs to the assi

Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables

In this WSJ article http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704893604576199952421569210.html or http://on.wsj.com/gaPk8V This caught my eye : About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ... It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything

Re: so big earthquake in JP

On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:34 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:11 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > >> On Mar 11, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Daniel Belin wrote: >> >>> Are we aware of how much the infrastructure has been damaged yet? Are >>> aftershocks still going? >> >> Subway & bus lines

Re: so big earthquake in JP

On Mar 11, 2011, at 9:08 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Daniel Belin wrote: > >> Are we aware of how much the infrastructure has been damaged yet? Are >> aftershocks still going? > > > The tsunami was 1/2 meter in Kauai > >

Re: so big earthquake in JP

On Mar 11, 2011, at 8:50 AM, Daniel Belin wrote: > Are we aware of how much the infrastructure has been damaged yet? Are > aftershocks still going? The tsunami was 1/2 meter in Kauai http://www.weather.gov/ptwc/?region=1&id=pacific.2011.03.11.133222&obs ETA's for the West Coast are around 7

Re: Internet to Libya ?

under gov. control) ? I believe that the cable landing is in Tripoli, so one cut could also isolate the rebel regions, unless there is an overland link to Egypt. Regards Marshall > > - Craig > > On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > >> Does anyone

Internet to Libya ?

Does anyone have evidence that the Internet is up to Libya today ? The Google "transparency report" is showing flatlines after about mid-day yesterday. http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/traffic/?r=LY&l=WEBSEARCH&csd=1298650426153&ced=1299255226153 Regards Marshall

Re: Christchurch New Zealand

h is operating normally. >> >> KAREN (The Kiwi Advanced Research Network) core in the south island is still >> operating, but most of the member sites in Christchurch are down: >> http://karen.net.nz/news-earthquake-network-update/ >> >> News is reportin

Re: Christchurch New Zealand

h Island, which is operating normally. >> >> KAREN (The Kiwi Advanced Research Network) core in the south island is still >> operating, but most of the member sites in Christchurch are down: >> http://karen.net.nz/news-earthquake-network-update/ >> >> News i

Christchurch New Zealand

There has been a bad Earthquake in Christchurch New Zealand with reports of fatalities. http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150099324847752&set=a.125583977751.103665.119452527751&theater Telecom New Zealand reports "Heavy damage" to their Christchurch building, but no deaths there. Is th

Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Switch for Internet

On Feb 16, 2011, at 12:15 AM, Joly MacFie wrote: > http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/16/technology/16internet.html > > There has been intense debate both inside and outside Egypt on whether the >> cutoff at 26 Ramses Street was accomplished by surgically tampering with the >> software mechanism tha

Re: US Warships jamming Lebanon Internet

On Feb 12, 2011, at 5:55 PM, de...@visp.net.lb wrote: > On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:39:59 -1000, Michael Painter wrote: >> de...@visp.net.lb wrote: >>> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:53:14 -0600, Jack Bates wrote: On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are u

Re: Internet blocked in Algeria?

On Feb 12, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Jim Cowie wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 6:05 PM, mikea wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 05:01:12PM -0500, Joly MacFie wrote: >>> Any confirmation of internet blocking? >>> >>> http://bikyamasr.com/wordpress/?p=26849 >>> >>> As massive street demonstrations are

Re: Egypt 'hijacked Vodafone network'

On Feb 3, 2011, at 2:20 PM, andrew.wallace wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Scott Brim wrote: >> On 02/03/2011 10:14 EST, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote: >>> >>>> Mobile phone f

Re: And so it ends (slightly off topic)

On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote: > Folks, > > Somehow, it is appropriate that this should happen on February 3. On February > 3, 1959, Buddy Holly, Richie Valens and JP Richardson (aka The Big Bopper) > died in a plane crash. Don McLean immortalized that day as "The Day The Mu

Re: Significant Announcement (re: IPv4) 3 February - Watch it Live!

On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Max Larson Henry wrote: > News conference starts now The exhaustion has made CNN http://www.cnn.com/2011/TECH/web/02/03/internet.addresses.gone/ Marshall > > -M > > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Randy Carpenter wrote: > >> >> It didn't work too bad. Do

Re: Egypt 'hijacked Vodafone network'

On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:24 AM, andrew.wallace wrote: > Mobile phone firm Vodafone accuses the Egyptian authorities of using its > network to send pro-government text messages. > > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-12357694 Here is their PR http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/press.html Note

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Feb 2, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Jim Cowie wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Teo Ruiz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 21:30, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > > > >> As an update, BGP for Noor.net has

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 31, 2011, at 5:14 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > As an update, BGP for Noor.net has been withdrawn. Even the Egyptian stock > exchange - egyptse.com - now appears to be off the Internet. > I have been told that the Egyptian Prime Minister has publicly announced that the Inter

Re: quietly....

On Feb 1, 2011, at 7:01 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:53 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 12:18:17PM +0100, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: >>> On 1 feb 2011, at 4:55, Jimmy Hess wrote: >>> IPv4's not dead yet; even the first RIR exhaus

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 28, 2011, at 8:32 AM, Mirjam Kuehne wrote: > Hi, > > We did some analysis of the situation in Egypt using the RIPEstat toolbox > (please note, this is a prototype and we're not sure how it will handle a big > load): > > http://labs.ripe.net/Members/akvadrako/live_eqyptian_internet_inci

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 31, 2011, at 5:41 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > >> As an update, BGP for Noor.net has been withdrawn. Even the Egyptian stock >> exchange - egyptse.com - now appears to be off the Internet. >>

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

-- Original Message - > From: "Joe Abley" > To: "Marshall Eubanks" > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Sent: Saturday, 29 January, 2011 7:32:07 AM > Subject: Re: Connectivity status for Egypt > > > On 2011-01-28, at 11:33, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > >>

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Jared Mauch wrote: > I have seen nation state disconnects where light is lost. I believe that was the case for Burma, for example. Marshall > > > Jared Mauch > > On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:44 AM

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: > On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:23 AM, Patrik Wallström wrote: >> On Jan 28, 2011, at 4:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> >>> Al Arabiya is reporting (via twitter) that the Internet has been shut of in >>>

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

Al Arabiya is reporting (via twitter) that the Internet has been shut of in Syria (where I have not heard of reports of protests). I have no confirmation of this as yet. Regards Marshall On Jan 27, 2011, at 9:47 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Roy wrote: > >> On

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 28, 2011, at 3:29 AM, Carlos Alcantar wrote: > Looks like you can still make phone calls into Egypt. So it's not totally > lights out... > Mobile is apparently being shut down now : http://www.vodafone.com/content/index/press.html Statement - Vodafone Egypt All mobile operators in Eg

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

On Jan 27, 2011, at 6:47 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote: > Around 2236 UCT, we lost all Internet connectivity with our contacts in > Egypt, and I'm hearing reports of (in declining order of confirmability): > > 1) Internet connectivity loss on major (broadband) ISPs > 2) No SMS > 4) Intermittent connec

Re: Is NAT can provide some kind of protection?

On Jan 15, 2011, at 9:19 AM, Leen Besselink wrote: > On 01/15/2011 03:01 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote: >> On 1/15/11 1:24 PM, Leen Besselink wrote: >> >>> I'm a full supported for getting rid of NAT when deploying IPv6, but >>> have to say the alternative is not all that great either. >>> >>> Because

Re: Internet to Tunisia

On Jan 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 11/01/2011 10:50, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >> I am hearing reports of Internet blockage in / to Tunisia, where a near >> full-on revolt is being coordinated / reported on by >> social media such as twitter ( #sidib

Internet to Tunisia

I am hearing reports of Internet blockage in / to Tunisia, where a near full-on revolt is being coordinated / reported on by social media such as twitter ( #sidibouzid ), Facebook and Youtube. Can anyone confirm that there is blockage ? Are there any in-country resources to check this ? There d

Next generation TV over the Internet: This revolution will be televised

Lenny Giuliano of Juniper (IETF MBONED co-chair) has written an article in Network World that I thought NANOGers might be interested in : http://www.networkworld.com/news/tech/2011/010511-tech-update-next-gen-tv.html He clearly describes the need for multicast in the upcoming video-centric Int

Re: sudden low spam levels?

On Jan 3, 2011, at 2:04 PM, Scott Howard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Ken Chase wrote: > >> I have two independent mailservers, and two other customers that run their >> own >> servers, all largely unrelated infrastructures and target domains, suddenly >> experiencing low levels of

Re: The tale of a single MAC

On Jan 2, 2011, at 8:39 PM, Corey Quinn wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2011, at 1:24 PM, Franck Martin wrote: > >> In the early 90's a friend of mine got a box of 10 HP cards with all the >> same MAC address. > > In my early days of network admining, a coworker told me a (apocryphal) story > of 3com sh

Re: Spamhaus under DDOS from AnonOps (Wikileaks.info)

On Dec 19, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Joe Greco wrote: >> On 12/18/2010 5:15 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: >>> >>> I get nothing from wikileaks.org, although the DNS is active : >>> >> >> $ host wikileaks.org >> wikileaks.org has address 64.64.12.170

Re: Spamhaus under DDOS from AnonOps (Wikileaks.info)

On Dec 18, 2010, at 4:00 PM, Jack Bates wrote: > On 12/18/2010 6:58 AM, Steve Linford wrote: >> For trying to warn about the crime gangs located at the wikileaks.info >> mirror IP, Spamhaus is now under ddos by AnonOps. The criminals there do not >> like our free speech at all. >> > > It appe

Re: "potential new and different architectural approach" to solve theComcast - L3 dispute

;m a content provider. > > I pay a -lot- for internet service already. That's how my bits and bytes > arrive in the tubes for those end users to recieve... > > +1 from here. Regards Marshall Eubanks AmericaFree.TV > > -- > david raistrickhttp:/

  1   2   3   4   >