Yes, they kept moving the impact site around all week (both Denver and West Africa were mentioned at times). Some people wiser than I guessed Central Park early on, but I thought that was too obvious. Good thing I didn't make a bet on it.
Regards Marshall Eubanks On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:21 PM Sean Donelan <s...@donelan.com> wrote: > > > EXERCISE Only > > The scenario was chosen to stress the partcipants, not an actual asteroid > impact. It was a fictional scenario. This was only an exercise. > > 60 meter asteroid impact in New York City, NY (roughly Central Park, NYC) > > 10,117,016 population directly affected > > Estimated unsurvivable area (complete destruction) 32 square miles > > > Internet Communications > > 30 Internet exchange points (1 unsurvivable, 8 critical damage, 20 severe > damage, 1 serious damage) > > 708 Data centers (16 unsurvivable, 229 crtical damage, 446 severe damage, > 16 serious: > > 6,300 Points of presence (1853 unsurvivable, 453 critical damage, 1447 > severe damage, 456 serious damage) > > > Indirect Internet impacts > > Mass communications > > Social media, misinformation and malinformation > > https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/pd/cs/pdc19/ > >
