nearly anyone
else.
Also seems a better value for money than the absurd cross connect pricing
found almost everywhere, unless you meet in the street.
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 08:18 Mehmet wrote:
> There are a lot
Of course, Comcast sells its own VoIP services, which I'll bet work just
fine; so they don't have a huge incentive to go out of their way to make
their competitors' product work on their network.
Jim Shankland
On 9/11/24 2:19 PM, Tom Beecher wrote:
How can such a lar
from (and to) that office over an encrypted
tunnel to our nearby datacenter. Go figure. This was Comcast business
service, with a publicly routed (i.e., not RFC 1918) /27 allocated to it.
Jim Shankland
On 9/10/24 2:22 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
We've just moved to tunneling anything VoIP
Hello folks,
Are there any folks from ip2location lurking on the list? Could you ping me
directly. We have a geofeed issue I'd like to ask about.
Thank you.
Jim Bonnet
Broadcom CloudOPS
--
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted
with it, or attached
Not even the first time tata and cogent separated. Will avoid public
details but I was on the keyboard at 6453 that time.
On Fri, May 17, 2024, 6:05 PM William Herrin wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 9:55 AM Ben Cartwright-Cox via NANOG
> wrote:
> > Also poking around on RIPE Atlas suggests th
Hi Kenneth,
We have been working internally and with our third-party domain reputation
source to get your domain removed from their malware list.
Jim
From: NANOG on behalf of
Validin Axon
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 at 2:15 PM
To: Tom Beecher
Cc: NANOG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Help with
ard first level support
has no clue.
Jim
I many years ago worked at Tata, responsible for their BGP, they are giving
you the right answer, Comcast has to be the one contacting them, as then
both sides can see what is being sent and received and can resolve this
issue.
-jim
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 10:04 AM Jamie Chetta via NANOG
wrote
Transit 1G wholesale in the right DCs is below $500 per port. 10gigE full
port can be had around $1k-1.5k month on long term deals from multiple
sources. 100g IP transit ports start around $4k.
The cost of transport (dark or wavelength) is generally at least as much as
the IP transit cost, and
That is extremely good and important advice! It seemed much less
pertinent back when I was in my 30's, but planning for the unexpected
is, or should be, a key part of all our jobs.
Jim Shankland
On 9/26/23 10:01 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
One thing you should consider about running a &q
matter of
principle there: it should be possible to have an email account without
having all the emails stored by a third party. If the answer ends up
being, "Oh, just use gmail, everybody else does!" ... well, so be it, I
guess, but we should be clear that something got lost in that tran
n't arise so much for using the TACACS+ / Tac_plus service Solely for
Accounting
(in addition to basic remote syslog).
client implementation we use), which only supports *OpenSSH*
> certificates.
>
--
-Jim
ts to distribute users and
Authorizing configurations to
devices as local authorization through secure protocols as favorable to
those network authentication systems
that transmit sensitive decisions and user data across the network using
Insecure protocols.
--
-Jim
2 HTTP/2.0" 400 150 "-" "Agent-Probe"
Sep 7 19:11:30 web4.domainmail.net nginx: 172.68.1.174 - _ "POST
/dms2/services2/ServerMMS2 HTTP/2.0" 400 150 "-" "Agent-Probe"
Sep 7 19:11:31 web4.domainmail.net nginx: 172.71.142.51 - _ "
th an mbox file on it if we cared to look.
-Jim P.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2023-09-01 at 10:16 -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> and i just have to wonder about sending passords over the net in
> cleartext in 2023. really?
>
> randy
For those that wish to do something about it...
$ ~/mailman/debian/patches$ cat 21-mas
On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 5:59 PM William Herrin wrote:
A server generation is about 3 years before it's obsolete and is
> generally replaced. I suggest making the old address operable for two .
> generations (6 years) and black-holed for another generation (3 more
>
As you mention.. there is
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 12:09 PM Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> On 5/4/2023 9:09 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:
>
> I can't speak for aptum, but I'm curious as to why this is important to
> you?
>
> > SWIP'ing or delegating address space is a requirement of the contract
> signed with ARIN wh
For me, that's easiest to do with Linux or MacOS (terminal). But sure,
if "open on a Linux machine" still means "point and click", then you're
absolutely correct.
Jim Shankland
Hello all
Are there any admins from openai on the list? Our egress IP's appear
blocked and we'd like to get some assistance in unblocking them.
If you are able to assist feel free to ping me directly and I can provide
all the details.
Really appreciate your time,
Jim Bonnet
Cloud
year break. They’ve fed it up
> to their tech people towards the ISD. Details available off-list.
>
> Any insights are welcome, and as I said, I’d like to understand where the
> source list is as it starts out working then gradually breaks, so someone
> is publishing things and they are going out further.
>
> - Jared
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
Have you tried NOC not sure who from their actively monitors the list
anymore? Forwarding to a former colleague.
-jim
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 2:49 PM Norman Jester wrote:
> Contact me off list... seeing major loss at 64.86.252.65 in your path.
>
> Norman Jester
> 619-319-7055
>
I dont think ive every agreed with Owen this much, maybe this is the first
sign the wording is ending further proving his statement :)
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:30 PM Owen DeLong via NANOG
wrote:
> Oh, I’m not ignoring it, I’m just rather underwhelmed by it and given how
> long it took SIDRWG to
d /24 will not be covered by any smaller prefix.
>
> What do you think about this approach ?
>
> Also maybe you know - some advices for edge routers that have at least
> 8x100G interfaces and "good" memory for prefix count ? Thanks
>
>
> --
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
Seriously search the list people. Even a little effort on your own. Same
question a few days ago.
-jim
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022, 3:45 PM Joshua Pool via NANOG wrote:
> Anyone have a contact for AKAMAI?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Josh
>
It's been doing it for ages for p=reject, but not p=none (the latter
being Jared's situation)
There are toggles in MM2 to do DMARC address rewriting for p=none and
p=quarantine in addition to p=reject.
-Jim P.
i cant see BGP taking out SS7.
-jim
On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:45 PM Snowmobile2004
wrote:
> According to Cloudflare Radar
> <https://radar.cloudflare.com/asn/812?date_filter=last_24_hours>, Rogers
> BGP announcements spiked massively to levels 536,777% higher than normal
&
; an ISP we barely noticed anything. Before this the two most popular speeds
> were the 100/20 and 1000/500 plans, 50% of users would order the 1000/500
> plan, most without really knowing why but it was only about $20 different
> so why not. As an ISP the 1G users only used about 10%-20% mor
ice.
> > Having
> > said that, please consider at least one more way to perform 2FA,
> > maybe send
> > a code to the email address or something else.
>
> i use google authenticator with arin.net
There's also the RedHat supported app FreeOTP.
-Jim P.
e.com/watch?v=yVXN1oEWKZE
That guy also did one on the subject of this thread:
Court Orders All ISPs to Block Three Specific Services:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9LrieGDMac8
>
-Jim P.
Having lived in and continue to spend as much time in Montreal as I can.
This list made be laugh, especially for a group where most of us do a lot
of travel.
Other then no right on red. Montreal like any other city. Don't be an ass
and enjoy yourself.
On Thu, May 5, 2022, 9:56 AM Nanog News
:
> Anyone from Disney+ here? If you can reply off-list I'd appreciate it. I
> have emailed every place I can think of to solve a geoip problem affecting
> hundreds of customers, no reply in weeks.
> Would appreciate some help thanks in advance.
> --
> Norman
> JellyD
their published limits. Arista was the only one in 2 days I didn't break.
Use case big fast simple L3 BGP router.
-jim
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:11 AM David Hubbard <
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
> Hi all, would love to get any current opinions (on or off list) on the
> sta
If then industry still hasn't adopted v6 full in 25 years maybe it's v6
that should be given up it, that it clearly wasn't what customers wanted.
Perhaps we should should have a small group working on the next iteration.
-jim
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 5:54 PM Jacques Latour wrote:
Terrible idea on so many levels.
-jim
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022, 12:30 PM Patrick Bryant wrote:
> I don't like the idea of disrupting any Internet service. But the current
> situation is unprecedented.
>
> The Achilles Heel of general public use of Internet services has
I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement.
This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists.
-jim
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman wrote:
> In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document:
>
> “Military and propa
Have you found anyone. Not there any more but can probably still find
someone for you.
-jim
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022, 10:11 AM Drew Weaver wrote:
> Does anyone have a contact for AS 6453 or are there any AS 6453 folks on
> list?
>
>
>
> Seeing some routing trouble from their c
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 1:02 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 11/20/21 10:44 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> that it needs 400M addresses. If you wanted to reclaim ipv4 addresses it
> seems that class D and class E would be a much better target than loopback.
> Mike, not that I have any stake in this
400M
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 8:24 PM David Conrad wrote:
>
...
> Some (not me) might argue it could (further) hamper IPv6 deployment by
> diverting limited resources.
It may help IPv6 deployment if more V4 addresses are eventually
released and allocated
Assuming the RIRs would ultimately like to prov
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 11:05 AM John R. Levine wrote:
..> The IETF is not the Network Police, and all IETF standards are entirely
> voluntary.
Yes, however the IETF standards can be an obstacle -- if they are, then
it is reasonable to adjust that which might impede a future useful development:
r
This is actually worse than our collective progress on replacing v4 to
date.
-jim
On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:31 PM Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
> This seems like a really bad idea to me; am I really the only one who
> noticed?
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-schoen-intarea-unicast
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:38 PM Robert L Mathews wrote:
> I didn't see the page, but for what it's worth, this is governed by this
> ICANN policy:> https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/errp-2013-02-28-en
It is common that registrars repoint nameservers and redirect web traffic when a
domain's r
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 1:29 PM Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:44:04PM +, [..]
> It depends on where you are (from my resolver, I get
> 64.130.197.11). This is because the name voyager.viser.net is not
> stable yet. Depending on your resolver, it points to 64.130.2
rts of things arise?
>>
>>
>>
>> I checked google, maxmind and a handful of others and those all know that
>> we are in the US.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Drew
>>
> --
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
I don't see posting in a DR process thead about thinking to use alternative
entry methods to locked doors and spreading false information. If do
well. Mail filters are simple.
-jim
On Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, 7:35 p.m. Niels Bakker,
wrote:
> * deles...@gmail.com (jim deleskie) [Tue 05
World broke. Crazy $$ per hour down time. Doors open with a fire axe.
Glass breaks super easy too and much less expensive then adding 15 min to
failure.
-jim
On Tue., Oct. 5, 2021, 7:05 p.m. Jeff Shultz,
wrote:
> 7. Make sure any access controlled rooms have physical keys that
Having done peering for many $big_boys_club and $small_isps, it always
comes down to politics, $$ and time. The balance may change but end of day
its those variables and its a painful game some days. From all sides :(
-jim
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:07 PM Laura Smith via NANOG
wrote
On Saturday, September 25, 2021 21:55 Chris Adams wrote:
> More than once, I've had to explain why zero-filling octets, like
> 127.000.000.001 (which still works) or 008.008.008.008 (which does not),
> is broken.
Zero filling IPv4 is just evil. How about this party trick?
> % ping -c 1 010.010
ort 1723.
-Jim P.
Suspect for most th answer is poorly. This is a conversation I've had with
a few people about how they could be well made
-jim
On Thu., Sep. 9, 2021, 12:45 p.m. Randy Bush, wrote:
> to control inbound traffic, how do bgp optimizers decide how to tune
> what they announce? slfow?
>
> >
> > Geolocate and VPN or Not are often kind of tied to the same kinds of
> reporting services and it may well be that whatever provider HBO is using
> for one is also being used for the other.
> >
> > Owen
> >
> >
>
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
tions,
bad guys/good/in the middle nation to find out about dissidents, activists,
and journos than flow data. I think letting any of those people think ToR
is safe as being a much bigger risk.
-jim
Disclosures for those that don't know. I've never worked with Team Cymru,
I do know them
It won't get them depeered, nor should it. I don't currently based much
value in RPKI for BGP.
On Mon., Aug. 9, 2021, 8:43 a.m. Rubens Kuhl, wrote:
> From a Cogent support ticket:
> "Hello,
>
> Please see the attached LOA.
>
> Regarding the RPKI ROA, for now, we don't create ROA for our prefixe
ts on certain issues specifically
against botnets, malware, DDoS risks; they distribute to the IP block
owners on need-to-know.
> Jean
--
-Jim
scribe, have something in place that
> drops anything from them, and move on with your day.
--
-Jim
apply to very small businesses though where they could afford
> to try to ignore the ransom request and rebuild more securely hoping the
> criminals will move on and not come back for revenge.
>
--
-Jim
used to decrypt it both pieces of
info pass through systems completely administered by the same provider
at some point.
The end user has no visibility and lacks so much as a contract they
would breach by deploying the update.
> NOTE: I have no idea how chrome does it's thing here... but I expect the code
> is
> visible on chromium.org ? Perhaps even here:
--
-Jim
Also saw a major traffic drop. There is a Root Cause to be issued early in
the week I'm told.
-jim
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:42 PM Siyuan Miao wrote:
> Yea, it was down but both RS are online and feeding us unreachable
> nexthops during the outage .
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 202
ir residents for the
bandwidth provided. I know of muni owned networks where the residents are
paying $30/month for full 1GigE ISP service, and all the other costs are
paid by their property taxes servicing a long term bond for the
construction costs.
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
really
> ever been accurate.
>
> There are a bunch of examples in this thread of reasons why 'more than X'
> is a good thing for the end-user, and that average usage over time is a bad
> metric to use in the discussion. At the very least the ability to get
> around/out-of serialization delays and microburst behavior is beneficial to
> the end-user.
>
> Maybe the question that's not asked (but should be) is:
> "Why is 100/100 seen as problematic to the industry players?"
>
>
>
> --
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
up (wired)
>> 5 Mbps down / 1 Mbps up (wireless)
>>
>> 2021 ??? / ??? (some Senators propose 100/100 mbps)
>>
>> Not only in major cities, but also rural areas
>>
>> Note, the official broadband definition only means service providers
>> can't
>> advertise it as "broadband" or qualify for subsidies; not that they must
>> deliver better service.
>>
>>
--
Jim Troutman,
jamesltrout...@gmail.com
Pronouns: he/him/his
207-514-5676 (cell)
While I have no design to engage in over email argument over how much
latency people can actually tolerate, I will simply state that most people
have a very poor understanding of it and how much additional latency is
really introduced by DDoS mitigation.
As for implying that DDoS mitigation compan
wasted 5 minutes of your life. So typical.
ProTip: Click "Access Control" on the left hand side of the page after
you get the "Unknown authorization request ID" error. :)
-Jim P.
gs, because Wish injected an ad for some plausibly NSFW item.
no thanks.
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather
to skid in broadsi
to be sent to the mailinglist with no context.
That is to say, the discourse user's comments come to the mailinglist
without the previous comment/content/quote. So you will get emails to
the mailinglists with just "Yes I agree" or "That was amazing to read"
without context.
-Jim P.
ailing-lists, with the ability for
anyone to create their own sub-forums.
it was quite popular for a while.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well pre
Your asking if anyone does it or your offering your services?
-jim
On Tue., Mar. 9, 2021, 3:56 p.m. Nathanael Cariaga,
wrote:
> Apologies for this shameless plug, but wanted to ask if any folks on this
> list who does network/infrastructure security testing? Please to reach back
>
obsolete protocol" is using a
normative, rather than empirical, definition of "obsolete". In the
empirical sense, things are obsolete when people stop using them. Tine
will tell when that happens.
Jim Shankland
ve a lot of rules.
:-)
that being said, it was not my intent to start a deluge of requests for money,
or in memorial posts.
and, even if it did, those threads would soon die off, as with all the other
threads.
--jim
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:04:02AM -0800, Sabri Berisha wrote:
> - On Jan 25, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Jim Mercer j...@reptiles.org wrote:
> > https://www.gofundme.com/f/ed-hew-medical-expenses
>
> Just a headsup for those outside of Canada. My transaction was processed
> in CAD i
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:23:11AM -0800, William Herrin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 8:40 AM Jim Mercer wrote:
> > unsure if this is allowed or not, but, here goes.
>
> This is a lie.
there are a myriad of lists focused on free speech issues, and domestic and
international
unrelated, but, David Tilbrook, an early Unix pioneer, passed away a week or
so ago. due to COVID.
https://leahneukirchen.org/blog/archive/2021/01/remembering-the-work-of-david-m-tilbrook-and-the-qed-editor.html
--jim
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 04:59:27PM +, Mel Beckman wrote:
> So of
unsure if this is allowed or not, but, here goes.
https://www.gofundme.com/f/ed-hew-medical-expenses
some of you may remember ed.
some, maybe not.
but, as the uucp maps maintainer for canada, he was quite influential in
the rise of email, and to some degree, the internet, in canada.
--jim
y, but I do know that press releases and congress have
> discussed that possibility, so it cannot be ruled out.
There's this old blog post from 2010: T-Mobile: Clever or Insane?
https://blog.wireshark.org/2010/04/t-mobile-clever-or-insane/
Best regards,
Jim Y.
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 06:15:21PM -0500, Izaac wrote:
> Got links?
bot.
--
Jim Mercer Reptilian Research j...@reptiles.org+1 416 410-5633
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of
arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather
to skid
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:08:12AM -0500, sro...@ronan-online.com wrote:
> less the Internet content become moderated by a small group of private
> platform owners.
it already is.
it is just that it is moderated in their favour, to create more ad impressions
and re-sellable data points.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:50 PM wrote:
> Could we make the battery just a little more powerful? How much power
> would a bit of circuitry waiting for a "turn on! there's a new message
> coming in!" need? []
If your network connectivity, or web browser, or cellular reception
stops working;
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:02 PM Rich Kulawiec wrote:
[snip]
> streaming company need to be able to authenticate the alerts from
> all those different agencies. Those agencies also need to secure [...]
The agencies would already submit their alerts through IPAWS gateways
managed by FEMA;
otherwi
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 12:01 AM Mark Foster wrote:
> And I don't see that opening up a UDP port on every end-user device to
> receive some sort of broadcast (unicast?) is going to be great security. ...
Yeah: This is probably best done by either requiring the streaming services to
know where
round wide, but it is what it
is and everyone should be aware of it.
-Jim P. ("Who the hell would code something like that?!?!")
your time.
--
Jim Bonnet
Broadcom SED
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I remember having this discussion more than 20yrs ago, minus the ARIN bit,
couldn't get every to agree to it it then either :(. We don't need more
rules, we just need to start with basic hygiene. Was a novel idea :)
On Mon., Apr. 20, 2020, 2:41 p.m. Christopher Morrow, <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> w
tes
can't support TLS 1.2 or later?
--
Jim Goltz
HHS/NIH/CIT/Network Services
-Original Message-
From: John Adams
Sent: Tuesday, 31 December, 2019 05:05
To: Matt Hoppes
Cc: Constantine A. Murenin ; North American Network
Operators' Group
Subject: Re: Wikipedia drops
Using a TPIA provider here at home in Nova Scotia same issue.
-jim
On Tue., Nov. 12, 2019, 6:29 p.m. Michael Crapse,
wrote:
> Myself and a few other ISPs are having our eyeballs complain about
> disney+ saying that they're on a VPN. Does anyone have any idea, or who to
> contact
It doesn't seem to be simply a matter of backlogged messages finally going
out. My friend replied to the mystery messages received from me and I
thought she was accidentally responding on the wrong thread. Her texts
seemed spontaneous and disjointed which is why I assumed she was on the
wrong threa
aches you.
(Sorry, it's Friday afternoon. I'll show myself out.)
Jim
**
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:08 PM Jeff Shultz wrote:
>[snip]
> What has most people (from anecdotal observation) concerned is that we
> are usually more than one or two carriers out from an IXP where the
> speed test server will be, and don't have a lot of influence on paths
> and carriers that we a
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:44 AM Kevin McCormick wrote:
>
> If the DNS request comes from an IP in matching a CIDR network address in the
> ULS record, then the server would respond with an error message telling the
> application to use the configured local DNS server.
All if this is ultimately
Hi Phil,
Contact me off list with the locations impacted and I will look into it.
Jim
On 10/2/19, 7:00 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Phil Lavin" wrote:
> While we can say this should just work, the reality is, it's not very
reliably true and I would not build product
On October 1, 2019 9:39:03 PM UTC, Matt Palmer wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:50:33AM -0400, Jim Popovitch via NANOG
>wrote:
>> On 10/1/2019 4:09 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>> > possible that this is various AWS customers making
>iptables/firewall mistakes?
&
nd the AWS external firewalls)
-Jim P.
On 8/17/19 3:16 PM, Damian Menscher wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:05 PM Jim Shankland <mailto:na...@shankland.org>> wrote:
I'm seeing slow-motion (a few per second, per IP/port pair) syn flood
attacks ostensibly originating from 3 NL-based IP blocks:
88.20
argeting a broad set of
destinations in parallel; if source addresses are forged, they are from
a fairly narrow set of source IPs.
The atypical pattern seems noteworthy in itself. Not a crisis, but not
quite routine, either.
Jim
eeing the same thing? Any thoughts on what's going on?
Or should I just be ignoring this and getting on with the weekend?
Jim
triggered :)
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 11:31 AM Bryan Holloway wrote:
>
> On 6/4/19 9:20 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 3/Jun/19 15:41, Fletcher Kittredge wrote:
> >>
> >> Here is your checklist in descending order of importance:
> >>
> >> 1. market opportunity
> >> 2. finding the right pa
Louie,
Its almost like us old guys knew something, and did know everything back
then, the more things have changed the more that they have stayed the same
:)
-jim
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:52 PM Louie Lee wrote:
> +1 Also on this.
>
> From my viewpoint, the game is roughly the sam
her up the incline, the
question is will it continue another 10+ years, where the growth rate is
nearing straight up :)
-jim
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:26 PM Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Tom Ammon wrote:
>
> > Netflow for historical data is great, but I guess what I
On January 31, 2019 1:55:26 AM UTC, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:41 PM Jim Popovitch via NANOG
>
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 17:22 -0800, Matthew Petach wrote:
>> > Any chance this could wait until say the Tuesday
>> > *after* t
t
364 days that they need a few more days to get ready for?
-Jim P.
you a
free trial of the system.
-jim
www.mimirnetworks.com
On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 11:30 PM Erik Sundberg
wrote:
> Hi Nanog….
>
>
>
> We are looking at replacing our Netflow collector. I am wonder what other
> service providers are using to collect netflow data off their Core a
1 - 100 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
