I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement. This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists.
-jim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: > In my view, there is a core problematic statement in this document: > > “Military and propaganda agencies and their information infrastructure are > potential targets of sanctions.” > > What is a “propaganda agency”. A political party? An incumbent candidate > for re-election? The IRS? Anyone the “majority” disagrees with? > > Propaganda is in the eye of the beholder, and we’ve seen both sides of the > political aisle sling this term in recent elections and legislative debates. > > I think it is a colossal mistake to weaponize the Internet. The potential > for unintended consequences is huge, as is the potential for intended, > politically-driven consequences > > -mel beckman > > > On Mar 10, 2022, at 5:03 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > > > maybe it is just that i am sufficiently anti-authoritarian that i try > > not to have the hubris to set myself up as the authority. maybe that > > in itself is hubris. > > > > as i was raised by someone who was a conscious objector in ww2, i can > > not bring myself to contribute to weapons etc. so i have donated to > > folk such as https://razomforukraine.org/ which is focused on medical > > support. > > > > randy >
