Update: apparently Salt Typhoon got in through the Lawful Intercept systems at
ISPs.
https://www.wsj.com/tech/cybersecurity/u-s-wiretap-systems-targeted-in-china-linked-hack-327fc63b?st=byoB7m
Some of you probably already knew, but was news to me…
-george
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iP
If it wasn’t for how clunky they are with email sites, I’d suggest moving to a
cloud somewhere. But …
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 29, 2024, at 8:01 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 29, 2024, at 10:56 AM, Jay Acuna wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 9:22 AM Jared Mauch
This is terrible advice, but you might need another netblock for the
eyeballs. Possibly a small one with enterprise NAT, but something outside
the AWS list ranges...
-George
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 7:35 PM Justin H. wrote:
> That matches my experience with these types of problems in the past.
Oof. Get ready to replace all spinning media you may have there.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 12, 2023, at 4:06 PM, Nick Olsen wrote:
>
>
> Just a heads up to anyone else colo'd at 365 TPA1/TAMSFLDE. Currently seeing
> floor temps of ~105F as reported by equipment. Started yeste
I think “the whole building burned” is a bit hyperbolic. Building was covered
in the now known to be spectacularly flammable exterior foam insulation panels.
Those panels are now largely banned because of several fires.
It had intact windows and fire sprinklers when the cladding ignited on o
>
> On Mar 15, 2022, at 2:06 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> It violates the international rule determining what your time zone should be
> based on what your longitude is.
>
> That is not trivial.
It’s an informal convention, not “rule”, and it not vaguely consistent in
practice now. You’
I don’t know about Scott’s situation but the original hijack report was shown
to have an innocent explanation. My apologies.
-george
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 4, 2022, at 6:06 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
>
> --- george.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> https://bgpstream.com/event/287556
>
https://bgpstream.com/event/287556
Beware of further such activity…
-george
Sent from my iPhone
I don’t hear anyone in the networks field supporting doing it.
It was a yikes that the request was made, but not looking at all likely to
happen IMHO.
-george
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 1, 2022, at 2:12 PM, Brian R wrote:
>
>
> The problem with all this talk, especially with trusted in
Posted by Bill Woodcock on Twitter…
https://twitter.com/woodyatpch/status/1498472865301098500?s=21
https://pastebin.com/DLbmYahS
Ukraine (I think I read as) want ICANN to turn root nameservers off, revoke
address delegations, and turn off TLDs for Russia.
Seems… instability creating…
-george
And WhatsApp and Instagram. Twitter users nationwide agree anecdotally.
What I’m getting is DNS failure.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 4, 2021, at 9:07 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
>
> https://downdetector.com/status/facebook/
>
> Normally not worth mentioning random $service having
(Crying, thinking about racks and racks and racks of AT&T 56k modems strapped
to shelves above PM-2E-30s…)
The early 90s were a dangerous place, man.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2021, at 8:05 PM, Wayne Bouchard wrote:
>
> Didn't require any additional time at all when equipmen
I’ve seen Dell rack equipment leap for safety (ultimately very very
unsuccessfully…) in big earthquakes. Lots of rack screws for me.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2021, at 9:41 AM, Andrey Khomyakov
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks,
> Happy Friday!
>
> Would you, please, share your tho
Reported widely on Twitter by his personal friends, Dan Kaminsky passed away
yesterday. The DNS community has lost an immense contributor.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 10, 2021, at 7:45 AM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> Sad to see of course, but also a little surprising that fire suppression
> systems didn’t, well, suppress the fire.
>
> Unless they didn’t exist?
I am assuming you haven’t had a real datacenter fire before.
I’ve ha
Northridge quake. I was #2 and on call at CRL. That One Guy on dialup in
Atlanta playing MUDs 23x7 pages that things are down. I wander out to my
computer to dial in and see what’s up, turned on TV walking past it, sat down
and turned computer on, as it was booting on comes a live helicopter
> On Jan 21, 2021, at 12:59 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> > How many other Belize defuncts do they have? How many offshore countries
> > like Belize are there in the region?
>
> Based on my cursory knowledge of offshore corporate registrations in Belize,
> Panama and the Cayman Islands, identif
I've already had to spike one widely announced WAN UDP protocol that
someone had proposed without thinking through security and DDOS features.
Please don't let's try that trick again.
We have perfectly good approaches that don't involve insecure
untraceable transport layers. This isn't 1985. TCP
This is annoying behavior, because unless you are doing something weird
with actually signing DNS or TCP DNS, the router can just inject a fake
response for their one DNS name they need into any UDP DNS stream with a
tiny bit of inspection. Hijacking all of DNS is the DUMB way to do it.
And eithe
Sonic both has their own FTTH and layers on top of ATT FTTH with Fusion IPBB I
think it’s called. I don’t know the resale agreement details in place but it’s
openly advertised as such on Sonic’s site.
Waiting for the true deal to land in my neighborhood ...
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> O
The SF Bay Area shelter in place rules specifically exempt news media,
telecommunications and internet including infrastructure services thereof
(presumably large internet companies, network and security vendors, etc), fuel
deliveries.
I could use infrastructure vendors excuse but $current_cl
Not that I specifically recall since late 90s. All the local problems
became nationwide.
If you want to start one, sign me up.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 6:53 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > dear lazynet. is there a list, irc, slack, ... for ops in the
> > southern bay area? need to find/discuss colo,
Do you really want asset management tools, or configuration management
tools with asset discovery / inventory capability?
Juniper supports Chef configuration management pretty extensively, and is
widely used for systems management and patch management on Linux. Scales
to multisite well. There ar
Most importantly, if you're running out of 1918 space is a totally
different problem than running out of global routable space.
If you patch common OSes for 240/4 usability but a significant fraction of
say unpatched OSes, IOT, consumer routers, old random net cruft necessary
for infrastructure ar
Worthwhile noting however that they’re not reliably pushing notifications to
people on their notifications list.
Worthwhile checking fundamentals you do depend on with your own low level
monitoring.
-George
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 18, 2019, at 10:30 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> O
If this is re os33.com where Alex emailed from, the front page is Lets
Encrypt. Which is a strange choice for a financial SAAS?...
Alex, if your internal app site certs are Symantec that could well explain
it; check your cert locations.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:30 PM Guillaume Tournat
wrote:
I’m confused.
People are using last hop (wireless) arguments against HTTPS Everywhere; that’s
the part that requires full bandwidth either way (as your non-HTTPS cache is
upstream somewhere). The fiber links that are physically fixed and can handle
in many cases better lasers, are the ongoing
...Anne's contact is better placed for abuse incidents but if they fail I have
an alternate contact who has also indirectly helped before. He's a programmer
not abuse ops guy but does know the other teams well and has helped.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Feb 26, 2018, at 1
Yes; you should subscribe to outa...@outages.org for better reports. (Short
summary - yes, no root cause/TTR yet).
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 16, 2016, at 12:49 PM, David Hubbard
> wrote:
>
> Anyone seeing issues with Level 3 networking right now? We’re seeing huge
> On May 11, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> ...
> You're replacing one single point of failure with another.
>
> Personally, my network gets NTP from 14 stratum 1 sources right now.
> You, and the hacker, do not know which ones. You have to guess at least
> 8 to get me to move to you
from my iPhone
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016, George Herbert wrote:
>> Come on, the audit requirements should have diversity/redundancy concerns in
>> them.
>>
>> That's standard in all the audits I have
Come on, the audit requirements should have diversity/redundancy concerns in
them.
That's standard in all the audits I have done or participated in.
If these ones don't I have a marketing opportunity to teach a HA seminar and
followon consulting to the IG.
George William Herbert
Sent from my i
My guy (who is coder team not ops) confirmed he got the forwarded email and is
passing it to the right ops folks, but those ops folks will have to reach back
out again to Chris.
You might try Michael's contacts if you don't hear anything in a few hours at
most.
George William Herbert
Sent from
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 2:51 PM, "Michael J Wise" wrote:
>
> Let's try that again, once more with feeling.
Put that tablet away
I'm asking you, please, no
It isn't right, it isn't fair!
There were firewalls everywhere
I think that exploit wasn't there...
George William Herbert
Sent from my
So...
Before I go on, I have not been in Todd's shoes, either serving nor directly
supporting an org like that.
However, I have indirectly supported orgs like that and consulted at or
supported literally hundreds of commercial and a few educational and nonprofit
orgs over the last 30 years.
I know someone (not ops but ha can forward internally); forwarding to him.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 2:18 PM, Christopher Tyler
> wrote:
>
> Does anyone have a contact at Craigslist?
> Some of our IP addresses got blocked and we are getting no response
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 12:19 PM, George Metz wrote:
>
> Based on the "standard" (per the Windows admins) file storage space of 700
> meg, that sounds like 3TB for user storage. Even if it were 30TB, I still
> can't see a proper setup costing more than the OC-12 after a period of two
> years.
At enterprise storage costs, that much storage will cost more than the OC-12,
and then add datacenter and backups. Total could be 2-3x OC-12 annual costs.
If your org can afford to buy non-top-line storage then it would probably be
cheaper to go local.
However, you should check how much of th
er clusters / onsies.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 13, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2016, Roland Dobbins wrote:
>>> On 13 Mar 2016, at 3:03, George Herbert wrote:
>>>
>>> It's a symptom of trying to save a
> On Mar 11, 2016, at 11:57 AM, "Mark T. Ganzer" wrote:
>
> but I will instead ask this for your consideration: Do servers in "test,
> stage, development, or any other environment" really need to have the same
> environmental, power and connectivity requirements that "production" servers
If you're asking if one can get a provider's router to handle the outside
physical part of a DC connection... As an ISP service so you don't need your
own router hardware...
I was working on this for a recent ex client and asked Level 3 exactly that
question. I believe I had the right network
https://bgpstream.com/event/19524
Second Sonatel hijack in last half hour-ish. Anyone on NANOG?...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
You guys aren't devious enough.
These guys are in violation of CAN-SPAM. To the tune of exceeding the
statutory maximum $1,000,000 per ISP last *month* for some of you, much less in
the statute of limitations period. You could probably point to refusal to
remove as justifying the triple dama
My read on the situation is Yet Another Intermediate Cacheing Fail in storage,
a well known problem. Yes, do a pull the power test on your storage so you
KNOW what's committed...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 5:44 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
> As the sayin
A whole pile of new vulnerabilities including remote code exploit were
revealed against specific models about 3 weeks ago; I had not heard of any
exploits, but, ...
Which is why the models and IOS versions would be very useful.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Rashed Alwarrag
wrote:
> Still I d
> Brandon Ewing wrote:
>
>> David Bass wrote:
>> The n2k ToR is not a great design for user or storage interfaces if most of
>> your traffic is east/west. It is great as a low cost ilo/drac/choose your
>> oob port, or if most of your traffic is north/south. Biggest thing to
>> remember i
I wasn't the implementing engineer but I've been at two places that did that, a
larger game company and a network gear manufacturer in their engineering
support computational hubs. I was there during planning and rollout at the
game company, very early in the Nexus lifespan.
Both sites brough
Cruel, cruel man.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 19, 2015, at 6:56 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
>
> SSL is no problem. We just had a whole thread about breaking it. :-)
>
>
>> On January 19, 2015 5:16:43 PM CST, George Herbert
>> wrote
Emulating game traffic... Good luck with that. You'll probably have to figure
it out and build your own models per service, though a lot is encapsulated in
https.
In terms of showing it to the public, look at Zabbix and Zenoss; both do
dashboards and managing multiple realtime monitoring / pe
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:18 PM, Randy Epstein wrote:
>
> Actually, he didn’t hack its records either. He exploited a bug in BIND.
...returned a legit response plus a tacked-on glue record for www.internic.net
anytime you queried his nameserver, which he tricked people into doing with
mixt
And that was July 1997 not 96, though that does nothing to make me feel younger
...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 4:16 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>
>
> He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far from
> the f
He didn't hack the registry, he hijacked its records. And this is far from the
first time a registry account was hacked. But, yeah, *still* not secure enough.
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 24, 2014, at 2:17 PM, Randy Epstein wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/14, 5:08 PM, "Michael
"Nobody will ever need more than 64K...M...G..."
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 10, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Izaac wrote:
>
>> On November 10, 2014 4:49:08 PM EST, lobna gouda
>> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Any recommendation, not looking for anything fantasy, my understanding
>> it sh
Ok. As a highly on- list-topic example of why distrust is called for...
Without referring to the systemd source code*, does anyone know what systemd
uses to select between networking subsystems (i.e. NetworkManager, the new
standard as of RHEL 7, vs /etc/ sysconfig/network-scripts/, etc.).
> On Oct 22, 2014, at 9:30 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
>
> The people that like systemd (like myself) have wisely learned that
> the people that hate systemd, hate it mostly because it's different
> from what came before and don't want to change. There's no way to
> argue rationally with that.
> On Oct 21, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> GNOME is probably the linchpin.
>
> But it's not just RH. It's Debian, and by extension *buntu, and SuSE, and
> at least one other major independent parent distro that I can't think of
> just now...
>
> And as far as I know, it's done
On Oct 19, 2014, at 6:19, "Jay Ashworth" wrote:
>>
>> How widespread were the effects on backbone communication circuits from
>> those quakes?
>>
>>> On October 18, 2014 3:22:58 PM EDT, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>>
>>>> O
You should restate the "predates"; I was on console on earthquake.berkeley.edu
at the time Loma Prieta let go, using among other things (then) Forumnet (now)
ICB in a chat, and one of the immediate damage indications was that everyone at
UC Santa Cruz dropped offline.
Topic important, though, I
Any idea how well CeroWRT stands up to nation-state level intrusion efforts?
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 24, 2014, at 10:24 AM, char...@thefnf.org wrote:
>
>> On 2014-07-24 12:04, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
>> So the EFF is pushing development of an open CPU router
>> htt
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> The problem is partly a technological one. If you have a fiber span from
> east<-> west it doesn't make sense to OEO when you can just plop in a bidi
> amplifier.
Almost certainly, most of the fiber going through the building just hits
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 5:02 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
>
> At 05:10 PM 7/15/2014, George Herbert wrote:
>
>> Layer3 runs right through Laramie. With a redundant run slightly south.
>> What conversations have you had with them?...
>
> At first, Level3 completely
> On Jul 15, 2014, at 8:03 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
>
> At 06:49 AM 7/15/2014, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
>
>> Ah but they are charging you for it. You are paying approximately 40x as
>> much for your bandwidth as you should be (you said you paid 20 USD/Mbps -
>> an outrageous rate). You have a li
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> Brett's concerns seem to center around his
> ability to be cost-competitive with the big
> guys in his area...which implies there *are*
> big guys in his area to have to compete with.
He 's running wireless links, from web and prior i
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> In my experience the bandwidth is typically the lowest part of the cost
> equation.
>
> Why transcode on 1k nodes when you can do it once and distribute it at lower
> cost,
> including in electricity to run the host CPU.
>
> Centralize
> On Jul 11, 2014, at 10:31 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 11, 2014, at 8:18 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
>
And, for the record, it's pretty widely acknowledge that "The World"
(Barry Shein) was the world's first commercial ISP - offering shell
access in 1989, and at some poin
> On Jul 11, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Would it really be plausible for a small ISP to host caching clusters for
> every streaming content supplier out there?
No, but if you have typical internet user streaming uptake, Netflix and Akamai
and then...
Short list, most of the
As long as the various stateful firewalls and IDS systems offer hostile
action detection and blocking capabilities that raw webservers lack, there
are certainly counterarguments to the "port filter only" approach being
advocated here.
Focusing only on DDOS prevention from one narrow range of attac
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Lee Howard wrote:
>
> You're describing best practice. Yes, of course, you should have well
> documented technical and business needs for what's open and what's closed
> in firewalls, and should have traceability from the rules in place to the
> requirements, and
hen
listen to feedback on why things are failing.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Lee Howard wrote:
>
>
> On 4/17/14 4:45 PM, "George Herbert" wrote:
> >
> >> There's a fair argument to be made which says that kind of NAT is
> >> > unhealthy.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Timothy Morizot wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2014 10:04 AM, "William Herrin" wrote:
> > That's correct: you don't understand. Until you do, just accept: there
> > are more than a few folks who want to, intend to and will use NAT for
> > IPv6. They will wait until NAT is a
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> ...
> It's a bigger risk to think that NAT somehow magically protects you against
> stuff on the Internet.
> Also, if your problem is that someone can screw up firewalls rules, then
> you have bigger issue in your organization than IPv6.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
>
> Chris Adams writes:
>
> > Once upon a time, Rob Seastrom said:
> >> Along the same lines I'm troubled by the lack of divergent sources
> >> these days - everything seems slaved to GPS either directly or
> >> indirectly (might be nice to ha
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Mar 24, 2014, at 9:21 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 11:07 PM, Naslund, Steve
> wrote:
> >> I am not sure I agree with the basic premise here. NAT or Private
> addressing does not equal security.
> >
> > Hi St
Crap, was looking at the non-locking ones. Ignore that.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 3:54 PM, George Herbert wrote:
>
> https://www.21cii.com/ITStudio/Content/Resources/Images/Appendix/Plug%20&%20Power/SB%202P-3W_505x447.png
>
> I think the 250 v 15 amp plugs fit in the 20 amp sock
https://www.21cii.com/ITStudio/Content/Resources/Images/Appendix/Plug%20&%20Power/SB%202P-3W_505x447.png
I think the 250 v 15 amp plugs fit in the 20 amp sockets, but the 20s don't
fit in the 30 sockets.
This sort of thing is usually an adapter, a little cylinder with a L6-20R
on one end and a L6
Right. Nonzero chances that you (Joe's site) are the target...
Also, check if you have egress filtering of spoofed addresses below these
DNS resources, between them and any user objects. You could be sourcing
the spoofing if not...
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
>
>
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > Anyone familiar with secure organizations
>
> there are such things?
>
> we should be more cautious with absolutes, usually :)
>
Nothing is absolute, but there are certainly "white" organizations which
have no attempt to be secure, and much
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Masataka Ohta <
mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote:
> Anthony Junk wrote:
>
> > It seems as if both Yahoo and Google assumed that since they were
> > private circuits that they didn't have to encrypt.
>
> According to Snowden, there are government agents at key
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
> * mi...@stillhq.com (Michael Still) [Fri 01 Nov 2013, 05:27 CET]:
>
> Its about the CPU cost of the crypto. I was once told the number of CPUs
>> required to do SSL on web search (which I have now forgotten) and it was a
>> bigger number than
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/sudan-security-clashes-subsidy-protesters-20360418
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
> On 9/25/13 18:29:58, Jeff Kell wrote:
> > On 9/25/2013 8:25 PM, Tammy Firefly wrote:
> >> with the old fashioned pair of diagonal cutters appli
Numbers from memory and filed off a bit for anonymity, but
A site I was consulting with had statistically large numbers of x86 servers
(say, 3000), SPARC enterprise gear (100), NetApp units (60) and NetApp drives
(5000+) go through a roughly 42C excursion. It was much hotter at ceiling
lev
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
>
> What is it about people that makes them free-load on services like NTP
> chimes and DNSBLS but refuse to stay in contact with(or at least
> contactable by) the providers when important stuff is pending?
>
Several generations of employees p
I know how we got here, but perhaps we can take corporate parentage and how big
.com is now to -discuss?
What happened with the registry data that caused the outage and what can /
should be done about it / to prevent it happening again still seem to me to be
operational topics.
George Willia
The indications and claim are that the root cause was registrar internal
goof, not hostile action against name servers.
The story is not yet detailed enough to add up; getting from point A to
point B requires steps that so far don't really make sense. A more
detailed explanation is hopefully to b
At the DNS Servers or service provider level, one can (and I often do) have
redundant providers.
At the registrar level? ...
Not with our current infrastructure, as far as I know how.
The Internet: Discovering new SPOF since 1969!
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 20, 2013,
Poisoning a domain's NS records with localhost will most certainly DOS the
domain, yes.
I have not yet seen the source of this; if anyone has a clue where the
updates are coming from please post the info.
Is there anything about ztomy.com that has been seen that's supicious as in
they might be th
That's nothing.
I was in a business office colo facility in San Jose in the 2001 timeframe,
that had a (as I recall) 12-rack long patch panel setup for the 2 or 3
floors they occupied. All the phones and LANs used the same panels.
They'd used red cable for everything. There was no - zero - cabl
Also, what are reliability and redundancy requirements.
10 gigs of bare naked fiber is one thing, but if you need extra paths
redundancy, figure that out now and specify.
Is this latency, bandwidth, both? Mission critical, business critical,
less priority? 24x7x365, or subset of that, or interm
+1 ; go Graybar.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:25:54PM +, Warren Bailey wrote:
> > We walked up the counter all the time, however that was in Alaska so the
> > rules may be different down here.
>
> You can walk up with a credit
Central Computers is ok on no-name server components, but not at all for
rack / cabling / power / management / etc. Micro Center was right next to
places I go to eat over there, but all gone.
I can almost see Frys off Lawrence/Scott from here, and there's a Graybar 3
miles the other direction. T
Widely discussed on outa...@outages.org list (hint!) but for those not yet list
members over there, 13 or more states in southeast US affected, reportedly
routing / layer 3 issue, possibly BGP to outside but not clear. Some service
restorations discussed.
George William Herbert
Sent from my i
Seconded Graybar. If necessary, in the absence of Graybar or for tiny
stuff, a Frys or Home Depot or Lowes.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Joe Hamelin wrote:
> Graybar.
>
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Warren Bailey <
> wbai...@sat
In europe? He probably was thinking of a Volvo 245...
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> > From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "TJ"
>
> > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Owen DeLong
> > wrote:
>
> > > > "Never underes
Packets, shmackets. I'm just upset that my BGP over Semaphore Towers
routing protocol extension hasn't been experimentally validated yet.
Whoever you are who keeps flying pigeons between my test towers, you can't
deliver packets without proper routing updates! Knock it off long enough
for me to
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn23309-information-superhighway-approaches-light-speed.html
>
> Information superhighway approaches light speed
>
> 18:00 24 March 2013 by Jacob Aron Nothing moves faster than light in a
> vacuum, but larg
On Mar 23, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Kyle Creyts wrote:
> Will they really demand ubiquitous, unabridged connectivity?
Let's back up. End users do not as a rule* have persistent inbound
connections. If they have DSL and a Cable Modem they can switch manually (or
with a little effort automaticall
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:10 PM, cb.list6 wrote:
> I am pretty sure Class E is completely defunct and not used anywhere
> since Cisco and Juniper routers do not forward the packets (circa 2008
> testing) and no known host accept it as a valid address, AFAIK.
Both the net and host sides of this ar
It is (or was) fairly commonly in use among internal nets which
overflowed RFC 1918 or have to internetwork with other heavy users of
RFC 1918 space. I know of at least two service providers and one cell
network who were using it for that 3 years ago.
Someone leaking internal routes for such? Or
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:30 PM, david raistrick wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, George Herbert wrote:
>
>> The mindshare shift is happening, but the change won't snowball until
>> IT admins - in bulk - really get it.
>
>
> and keeping in mind that the bulk still don
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>Matthew wrote:
>>[...]
>>> 1. Decreased application complexity:
>>
>> Yeah. After IPv4 goes entirely away. Which is a long, long, LONG time from
>> now. Until then…
>>
> I don't think so. I think IPv4's demise as a supported internet p
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
