> On Oct 21, 2014, at 6:03 PM, Jay Ashworth <j...@baylink.com> wrote: > > GNOME is probably the linchpin. > > But it's not just RH. It's Debian, and by extension *buntu, and SuSE, and > at least one other major independent parent distro that I can't think of > just now... > > And as far as I know, it's done; SuSE packages already largely don't even > include initscripts. Enough to make a grown man fork RHEL (or, CentOS). George William Herbert Sent from my iPhone
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Christopher Morrow
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Barry Shein
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Ricky Beam
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Barry Shein
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jay Ashworth
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Ricky Beam
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Jay Ashworth
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] George Herbert
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd [OT] Miles Fidelman
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Tom Hill
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... nanog
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Elmar K. Bins
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Daniel Ankers
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Matt Palmer
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... nanog
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Barry Shein
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Linux: concerns over systemd ... Miles Fidelman