On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Mark Andrews wrote:
And if I have a contract to commit murder that doesn't mean that
it is right nor legal. A contract can't get you out of dealing
with the law of the land and in most place in the world "aiding and
abetting" is illegal.
the topic at hand would appear to be
On (2012-01-31 11:09 -0800), Owen DeLong wrote:
> > - IP address mappable to a console port. So that accessing device normally
> > is 'ssh router' and via OOB 'ssh router.oob' no need to train people
>
> How about normal is 'ssh device' and OOB is 'console device'?
Home-baked systems are certa
In message , David Conrad
writes:
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce =
> that =3D
> >> space. We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) =
> =3D
> >> with the RIR nor the RIR's customer. The
That may not be a bad idea. Have you gotten your company's lawyers
involved? They may be able to get some sort of court action started and get
things moving. They may also be able to compel the ISP's to act.
2012/1/31 Kelvin Williams
> I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed a
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, David Conrad wrote:
In the dim past, I had a somewhat similar situation:
- A largish (national telco of a small country) ISP started announcing address
space a customer of theirs provided. Unfortunately, the address space wasn't
the ISP's customer's to provide.
- When th
Am a bit north of sd ... might make it down on Saturday.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Warren Kumari wrote:
Hi there all,
I'm arriving on Friday evening -- was wondering who all might be around on
Saturday?
Anyone interested in doing something? Sights
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:32:35 -0500, Chuck Church
wrote:
Shouldn't a forged LOA be justification to contact law enforcement?
It is, but if you want anything done about it before the polar ice caps
melt, you'll seek other paths as well.
a) law enforcement doesn't understand the problem. and
> -Original Message-
> From: John Schneider
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 5:34 PM
> To: Kelvin Williams
> Subject: Re: Hijacked Network Ranges
>
> Another interesting thing that I noticed, is that AS33611 is not
> advertising any prefixes other than yours. Either they do not have an
Hi there all,
I'm arriving on Friday evening -- was wondering who all might be around on
Saturday?
Anyone interested in doing something? Sightseeing, wandering around, etc?
W
--
Some people are like Slinkies..Not really good for anything but they still
bring a smile to your face when you
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:38:10 AM Christopher J.
Pilkington wrote:
> Does anyone have a link to a definitive document clearly
> showing FIB numbers for the ASR1001? I've got an email
> into our Cisco SE, but I don't think they're motivated
> to sell us a lower-end box. :-)
On that link,
On 1/31/12, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
> Are there any providers that Comcast doesn't regularly run hot? Seems like
> no matter who I deliver through at some magical point in the evening they
> start spiking jitter and a little loss. Almost like everyone hits PLAY on
> netflix at the same time.
You
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:15 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce that
> space. We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) with
> the RIR nor the RIR's customer. The RIR and/or the RIR's customer should
> resolve this issu
Mine is showing "United States v. Vladimir Tsastsin"
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
101 Haskins Way, So. San Francisco, CA. 94080
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Bonica
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20
> Internet number resource certification and origin validation sure
> would be nice here ;-)
this is arin address space. arin is the only rir which has not deployed
and there is running code
randy
> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue Jan 31 19:57:51
> 2012
> To: David Conrad
> From: Mark Andrews
> Subject: Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements (follow up to Hijacked
> Networks)
> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:52:57 +1100
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>
>
> In message <
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:52:57 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
> > - A largish (national telco of a small country) ISP started announcing
national telco. oooh ka...
> And if I have a contract to commit murder that doesn't mean that
> it is right nor legal. A contract can't get you out of dealing
> w
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>>
>> In message <7b85f9d8-ba9e-4341-9242-5eb514895...@virtualized.org>, David
>> Conrad
>> writes:
I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix =
>>> NAP. :)
>>
Internet number resource certification and origin validation sure would be nice
here ;-)
-danny
On Jan 31, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Kelvin Williams wrote:
> I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix NAP. :)
>
> We're still not out of the woods, announcing /24s and working
Steven Bellovin wrote:
Note this from the NY Times article:
The Megaupload case is unusual, said Orin S. Kerr, a law professor
at George Washington University, in that federal prosecutors obtained
the private e-mails of Megaupload�s operators in an effort to show they
were operating in ba
On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <7b85f9d8-ba9e-4341-9242-5eb514895...@virtualized.org>, David
> Conrad
> writes:
>>> I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix =
>> NAP. :)
>>
>> In the dim past, I had a somewhat similar situation:
>>
On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce that =
>> space. We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) =
>> with the RIR nor the RIR's customer. The RIR and/or the RIR's customer =
>> should resolve this
Some datapoints based on ~500mb constant UDP telemetry data feed (total)
spread across many different comcast endpoints.
All Cogent -> Comcast.
Even though there's heavy forward error correction provisioned to
accommodate 5-10% packet loss, it's hardly used. In fact, packet delivery
is incredibl
In message <7b85f9d8-ba9e-4341-9242-5eb514895...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad
writes:
> > I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix =
> NAP. :)
>
> In the dim past, I had a somewhat similar situation:
>
> - A largish (national telco of a small country) ISP started a
Another interesting thing that I noticed, is that AS33611 is not
advertising any prefixes other than yours. Either they do not have any of
their own (unlikely)
or they are advertising their own legitimate prefixes from another AS
however I doubt that is the case. It sounds like you were able to v
Folks,
I received a DoJ Victim Notification letter yesterday, which was pretty amazing
considering the fact that I don't run a network.
My letter referenced "United States v. Menachem Youlus". I suspect that the
letters that you guys received referenced a different case. Do I have that
right?
We started announcing /24s, combined with the shorter path it seems to be
fine.
Still jumping through hoops upstream.
On Jan 31, 2012 8:26 PM, "PC" wrote:
> Curious, What was the outcome of this?
>
> In any case, I'm hoping the major Tier-1s do the right thing and filter
> the rogue annoucements
Curious, What was the outcome of this?
In any case, I'm hoping the major Tier-1s do the right thing and filter the
rogue annoucements, while allowing the OP's. Hopefully after enough
pressure and dysfunction, they will give it up.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:15 PM, David Conrad wrote:
> > I hope
> I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix NAP. :)
In the dim past, I had a somewhat similar situation:
- A largish (national telco of a small country) ISP started announcing address
space a customer of theirs provided. Unfortunately, the address space wasn't
the IS
Aruba AP 105. This version comes with a virtual controller that can manage 16
APs without the need of an additional controller. For high capacity areas I
would go with Ruckus.
-Mario Eirea
On Jan 31, 2012, at 11:46 AM, "Joel jaeggli" wrote:
> On 1/30/12 12:46 , Jim Gonzalez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
I think the correct term for this is "bullet proof hosting". Now you know
where to go.
-Dan
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Kelvin Williams wrote:
I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix NAP. :)
We're still not out of the woods, announcing /24s and working with upper
tier c
I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix NAP. :)
We're still not out of the woods, announcing /24s and working with upper
tier carriers to filter out our lists. However, I just got this response
from Phoenix NAP and found it funny. The "thief" is a former customer,
wh
I really enjoyed the fact that I called the number, on what I learned
later was a "Sample", and when I picked the option to speak with an
agent I got "The mailbox is full" message. I feel safe...
Ryan Pavely
Director Research And Development
Net Access Corporation
http://www.nac.ne
Hi.
Just FYI, we have already launched a stable release.
Feel free to contact me off-list if interested.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
>> Bit odd, if it's a phish. Even more odd if it's actually from the Fed.
>
>
> It's definitely real, but seems like they're handling it as incompetently as
> possible.
Yep. That sounds about r
+1 on only IP's on the list where our resolver dns servers for customers.
Carlos Alcantar
Race Communications / Race Team Member
101 Haskins Way, So. San Francisco, CA. 94080
Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Crocker
Date:
The interesting thing is that I'm not seeing any new "hosts" from those
subnets in passive dns. It almost seems that their purpose for
hijacking the space was to direct traffic to themselves, possibly for
collecting login attempts.
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 1/31/12 1:00 PM, Kelvin W
Thanks for the advice. Filtering and route manipulation hasn’t been a
problem for me. I’m very careful to prevent leakage, etc. My current issue
is scaling my management of our prefix announcements. Every time I add a
new block, I need to modify all of my edge routers etc. I understand I can
use IR
You can take a closer look at the aspaths (lengths) to various global locations
by looking at the following:
http://bgptables.merit.edu/prefix.php?z=&z=&prefixcw=208.110.48.0/20&view=all&count=1000
http://bgptables.merit.edu/prefix.php?z=&z=&prefixcw=63.246.112.0/20&view=all&count=1000
http://bg
Haven't really been following, but you've got a 50/50 shot for BGP on Cogent
for us,
but Level3 is shorter so would take precedence.
208.110.48.0/20 3356 29791 11325 i
174 1299 29791 11325 i
208.110.49.03356 12189 19181 33611 i
174 12189
I would go at first by advertising your prefixes as a /24 as well, just
randomly checked 2 different locations and the as-path to 11325 is shorter
than to 33611
This seems to be the case for customers of Tiscali and L3, so this will
probably get most of your traffic back to you...
Regards,
Ido
--
Sorry -- was looking at the wrong thing. Doh!
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Schiller, Heather A
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:05 PM
To: 'Keegan Holley'
Cc: Kelvin Williams; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3
Looks fixed now..
Looks fixed now..
--heather
-Original Message-
From: Keegan Holley [mailto:keegan.hol...@sungard.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:50 PM
To: Schiller, Heather A
Cc: Kelvin Williams; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Hijacked Network Ranges - paging Cogent and GBLX/L3
To be honest I h
To elaborate slightly on what others have said in terms of protecting
against leaks;
it's a good idea to filter outbound in a conservative way such that you
only send
what you "expect" in terms of community values and/or prefixes and/or
AS-paths.
For instance, if something gets into your BGP that
On 1/31/12, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 31/01/2012 16:40, David Barak wrote:
>> Because downtime is a security issue too, and MD5 is more likely to
>> contribute to downtime (either via lost password, crypto load on CPU, or
>> other) than the problem it purports to fix. The goal of a network
>> eng
To be honest I haven't had much success it convincing a tier 1 to
modify someone else's routes on my behalf for whatever reason. I also
have had limited success in getting them to do anything quickly. I'd
first look to modify your advertisements as much as possible to
mitigate the issue and then
Or roll it up hill:
33611 looks like they get transit from 19181, who's only upstream appears to be
12189.
12189 gets connectivity from 174 and 3549.
174 = Cogent
3549 = GBLX/L3
--Heather
-Original Message-
From: Kelvin Williams [mailto:kwilli...@altuscgi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, J
Tim Chown writes:
> On 26 Jan 2012, at 16:53, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> On Jan 26, 2012, at 8:14 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>>
>>> Does this mean we're also looking at residential allocations larger
>>> than a /64 as the norm?
>>>
>>
>> We certainly should be. I still think that /48s for residential
If you both announce a /24, the BGP route selection process should begin to
return some of the traffic to these prefixes back to your AS.
Also, if you begin to advertise your prefixes as /24s and as a result, they
try to advertise /25s, I would venture a guess that their /25s would
get blocked enti
On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:11 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2012-01-30 11:08 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
>
>> What are people using for console servers these days? We've
>> historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for
>> an upgrade.
>
> This is very very common thread, replaying
I can routes are wrong for all /24 annoucements.
May be contacting Level3+Telia+AboveNet+Hurricane Electric since all these
are upstream providers of AS29791 which is your upstream carrier? I guess
they would be able to neutralize effect significantly by filtering those
routes?
On Wed, Feb 1, 20
Surely something is better than nothing. Advertise the /24's and the
/25's, see what happens.
At the least it's a step forwards until you get their routes filtered.
Tony
On 31 January 2012 18:22, Kelvin Williams wrote:
> Upstream requirements. Additionally, I don't believe it would do us any
Thanks Mark,
This helps and definitely shows Im heading in the right direction.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 03:04:15 PM Joe Marr wrote:
>
> > What do you use for reflectors, hardware(Cisco/Juniper)
> > or software daemons(Quagga)?
>
We are.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Chuck Church wrote:
> Shouldn't a forged LOA be justification to contact law enforcement?
>
> Chuck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelvin Williams [mailto:kwilli...@altuscgi.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Su
Shouldn't a forged LOA be justification to contact law enforcement?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Kelvin Williams [mailto:kwilli...@altuscgi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:01 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Hijacked Network Ranges
Greetings all.
We've been in a 12+ hour orde
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Kelvin Williams
wrote:
> We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal requesting that AS19181 (Cavecreek Internet
> Exchange) immediately filter out network blocks that are being advertised
> by ASAS33611 (SBJ Media, LLC) who provided to them a forged LOA.
>
> [ ...snip...]
U
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?
Most large transits and NSPs filter out prefixes more specific than a /24.
Conventionally, at least in my experience, /24's are the most-specific
prefix you can
2012/1/31 Justin M. Streiner
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Grant Ridder wrote:
>
> What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?
>>
>
> Many providers filter out anything longer (smaller) than /24.
>
Some will accept it but not propagate it upstream. This may be useful in
re
On 31/01/2012 17:27, George Bonser wrote:
> Wouldn't a program such as "conserver" running on a linux box someplace
> potentially provide these (maybe with a little extra hackery)? We use
> that quite a bit. One interesting option is that it allows another
> person to also watch the console sessi
Upstream requirements. Additionally, I don't believe it would do us any
good. If they're announcing /24 now, why would they not announce a /25.
On Jan 31, 2012 1:19 PM, "Grant Ridder" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?
>
> -Grant
>
> On Tue, J
You can break your blocks into /24's or smaller and readvertise them to
your upstreams. You can also modify local preference using community tags
with most upstreams. If you have tier 1 peerings you may be able to get
them to filter the bad routes if you can prove they were assigned to you by
ARI
Many/most transit providers filter prefixes longer than /24, so the
effectiveness may be minimal.
At the very least I'd advertise /24s yourself because if the forger is
geographically further away, some local sites may still work. Better than
nothing.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Grant Ri
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Grant Ridder wrote:
What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?
Many providers filter out anything longer (smaller) than /24.
jms
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Kelvin Williams wrote:
Greetings all.
We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal reque
Hi,
What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)?
-Grant
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Kelvin Williams wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal requesting that AS19181 (Cavecreek Internet
> Exchange) immediately filter out network blocks that are
Sounds like we want a well thought out plan in place in case there is a
screw up
with an org's lack of planning and management capabilities..
Mike
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 31/01/2012 16:40, David Barak wrote:
> > Because downtime is a security issue t
Greetings all.
We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal requesting that AS19181 (Cavecreek Internet
Exchange) immediately filter out network blocks that are being advertised
by ASAS33611 (SBJ Media, LLC) who provided to them a forged LOA.
The routes for networks: 208.110.48.0/20, 63.246.112.0/20, and
68.6
On 31/01/2012 16:40, David Barak wrote:
> Because downtime is a security issue too, and MD5 is more likely to
> contribute to downtime (either via lost password, crypto load on CPU, or
> other) than the problem it purports to fix. The goal of a network
> engineer is to move packets from A -> B. T
>
> I like feature list you posted, btw. If there were any console servers
> out there with these features, I would buy a bunch of them.
>
Wouldn't a program such as "conserver" running on a linux box someplace
potentially provide these (maybe with a little extra hackery)? We use that
quite
On 1/31/12 11:42 , chip wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone point me to ongoing discussion about IPv6 BGP SNMP MIBs
going on in the IETF? As I understand it RFC 4293 was somewhat
abandoned by most vendors. Cisco has a new BGPV4-2 Mib but that still
doesn't address all the needs. While I can try and
Hi,
I do not know all the details, but the high school i graduated from
recently implemented an Aruba system. From what i hear, it has never
worked as designed and the IT dept there says its hard to manage. I was
told the school got it since it was the cheapest.
-Grant
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at
On 31/01/2012 16:42, chip wrote:
> Can anyone point me to ongoing discussion about IPv6 BGP SNMP MIBs
> going on in the IETF? As I understand it RFC 4293 was somewhat
> abandoned by most vendors. Cisco has a new BGPV4-2 Mib but that still
> doesn't address all the needs. While I can try and pu
On 1/30/12 12:46 , Jim Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking for a Wireless bridge or Router that will
> support 600 wireless clients concurrently (mostly cell phones). I need it
> for a proof of concept.
an aruba controller and 8 dual radio aps.
>
>
>
>
> Thanks in adva
Hi all,
Can anyone point me to ongoing discussion about IPv6 BGP SNMP MIBs
going on in the IETF? As I understand it RFC 4293 was somewhat
abandoned by most vendors. Cisco has a new BGPV4-2 Mib but that still
doesn't address all the needs. While I can try and push all my
vendors to come up wit
From: harbor235
> Also, It does not matter how many attempts compromising a BGP session
> occurs, it only takes one, so why not nail it down.
Because downtime is a security issue too, and MD5 is more likely to contribute
to downtime (either via lost password, crypto load on CPU, or other) than
Hi Shacolby
Can you share some mtr results to Netflix, Google, etc ?
Curious to see how bad it is really.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
> Are there any providers that Comcast doesn't regularly run hot? Seems like
> no matter who I deliver through at some magical point
Hello,
I have a Ceragon IP-10G to provide backhaul access for an LTE network.
The client wants to have 50Mbps of throughput with an RTT of 50ms
on a single TCP session. The problem are the packet drops due to
microbursts due to tcp slow start come from a 1GE port and then they
get dropped at the r
That's still a different part of the packet. Below is the source
address in the ethernet header used to deliver the arp request itself.
In side the ARP payload there is also a field for source and
destination mac. I couldn't get tcpdump to show it even with the -n
and -vvv switches. Wireshark w
Are there any providers that Comcast doesn't regularly run hot? Seems like
no matter who I deliver through at some magical point in the evening they
start spiking jitter and a little loss. Almost like everyone hits PLAY on
netflix at the same time.
-shac
On Jan 30, 2012, at 9:27 PM, Ann Kwok wrote:
> Hello
>
> Our router is running simple bgp. "one BGP router, two upstreams (each 100M
> from ISP A and ISP B)
> We are getting full feeds tables from them
>
> We discover the routes is going to ISP A only even the bandwidth 100M is
> full
>
> Can
Hi folks.
I'm looking for an in-house solution for "circuit bidding". Today, when we
get a request for WAN services, transport, transit etc we have folks that
email out to a list of contacts and ask them for a price. I've seen some
pretty neat systems in the past where vendors can send us the
My thoughts are that you should filter traffic routed directly to your BGP
speaking devices, traffic routing through a edge device and to an edge
device are treated differently. BGP session protection using a MD5 password
by itself is not securing the control plane, but it is a component of an
over
We ran into a lot of quirkiness with Linux when we started rolling out
Linux-based CPE with XORP as a routing engine.
I've thrown some sane defaults you might want to consider into a text file at:
http://soucy.org/xorp/xorp-1.7-pre/TUNING
Specifically, you prob. want option 2 instead of 1 for ar
There was some discussion of this on tools-disc...@tools.ietf.org.
There was a temporary issue that I believe has been resolved.
--Richard
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Matt Taylor wrote:
> Fine for me, .au
>
> Matt.
>
>
> On 31/01/2012 9:59 PM, Sébastien Riccio wrote:
>>
>> Up from here (
Fine for me, .au
Matt.
On 31/01/2012 9:59 PM, Sébastien Riccio wrote:
Up from here (.ch)
Sébastien
On 31.01.2012 10:02, Mark Tinka wrote:
Is it just me?
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/tools.ietf.org
doesn't seem to think so.
Mark.
On 31/01/2012 9:59 PM, Sébastien Riccio wrote
Up from here (.ch)
Sébastien
On 31.01.2012 10:02, Mark Tinka wrote:
Is it just me?
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/tools.ietf.org
doesn't seem to think so.
Mark.
Am 31.01.2012 04:06, schrieb Joel Maslak:
There are several ways to handle this is, if you have at least two
/24s of space.
Let's say you just have two /24s, both part of the same /23.
[...]
Sad to see that deaggregation is still propagated to handle this issue. As a
matter of fact deaggrega
On (2012-01-31 10:01 +), Nick Hilliard wrote:
> I like feature list you posted, btw. If there were any console servers out
> there with these features, I would buy a bunch of them.
I think OpenGear supports all of them (according to co-worker who tested
them recently), but not 100% sure par
On 31/01/2012 09:11, Saku Ytti wrote:
> For me, required features are
This is part of the problem here. You want a terminal server which was
designed for console access. Most of the terminal servers on the market
are by-products of the modem dialin era and their development function was
aimed at
On (2012-01-30 11:08 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
> What are people using for console servers these days? We've
> historically used retired routers with ASYNC ports, but it's time for
> an upgrade.
This is very very common thread, replaying couple times a year in various
lists, with to my cursory lo
Is it just me?
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/tools.ietf.org
doesn't seem to think so.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
89 matches
Mail list logo
