Upstream requirements. Additionally, I don't believe it would do us any good. If they're announcing /24 now, why would they not announce a /25. On Jan 31, 2012 1:19 PM, "Grant Ridder" <shortdudey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > What is keeping you from advertising a more specific route (i.e /25's)? > > -Grant > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Kelvin Williams > <kwilli...@altuscgi.com>wrote: > >> Greetings all. >> >> We've been in a 12+ hour ordeal requesting that AS19181 (Cavecreek >> Internet >> Exchange) immediately filter out network blocks that are being advertised >> by ASAS33611 (SBJ Media, LLC) who provided to them a forged LOA. >> >> The routes for networks: 208.110.48.0/20, 63.246.112.0/20, and >> 68.66.112.0/20 are registered in various IRRs all as having an origin AS >> 11325 (ours), and are directly allocated to us. >> >> The malicious hijacking is being announced as /24s therefore making route >> selection pick them. >> >> Our customers and services have been impaired. Does anyone have any >> contacts for anyone at Cavecreek that would actually take a look at ARINs >> WHOIS, and IRRs so the networks can be restored and our services back in >> operation? >> >> Additionally, does anyone have any suggestion for mitigating in the >> interim? Since we can't announce as /25s and IRRs are apparently a pipe >> dream. >> >> -- >> Kelvin Williams >> Sr. Service Delivery Engineer >> Broadband & Carrier Services >> Altus Communications Group, Inc. >> >> >> "If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." -- >> Abraham Maslow >> > >
