In message <d73af1af-b75e-49b6-937a-5fbe770ad...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad writes: > On Jan 31, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce = > that =3D > >> space. We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) = > =3D > >> with the RIR nor the RIR's customer. The RIR and/or the RIR's = > customer =3D > >> should resolve this issue with our customer." > >=20 > > And if I have a contract to commit murder that doesn't mean that > > it is right nor legal. A contract can't get you out of dealing > > with the law of the land and in most place in the world "aiding and > > abetting" is illegal. > > You appear to be making a large number of assumptions on limited = > evidence. In the case I'm familiar with, I can assure you that no laws = > were being broken (even if all the parties were in the same country, = > which they weren't). However, this is getting off-topic and I don't = > want to hijack the thread. The issue of route hijacking is quite = > serious and it will be interesting to see how this all works out.
And would sidr have helped. > Regards, > -drc > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
