We started announcing /24s, combined with the shorter path it seems to be fine.
Still jumping through hoops upstream. On Jan 31, 2012 8:26 PM, "PC" <paul4...@gmail.com> wrote: > Curious, What was the outcome of this? > > In any case, I'm hoping the major Tier-1s do the right thing and filter > the rogue annoucements, while allowing the OP's. Hopefully after enough > pressure and dysfunction, they will give it up. > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:15 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > >> > I hope none of you ever get hijacked by a spammer housed at Phoenix >> NAP. :) >> >> In the dim past, I had a somewhat similar situation: >> >> - A largish (national telco of a small country) ISP started announcing >> address space a customer of theirs provided. Unfortunately, the address >> space wasn't the ISP's customer's to provide. >> - When the ISP was notified by both their RIR and the organization to >> which the address space was rightfully delegated, the ISP's response was: >> >> "We have a contractual relationship with our customer to announce that >> space. We have neither a contractual relationship (in this context) with >> the RIR nor the RIR's customer. The RIR and/or the RIR's customer should >> resolve this issue with our customer." >> >> It as an eye-opening experience. >> >> Regards, >> -drc >> >> On Jan 31, 2012, at 4:49 PM, Kelvin Williams wrote: >> >> > >> > We're still not out of the woods, announcing /24s and working with upper >> > tier carriers to filter out our lists. However, I just got this >> response >> > from Phoenix NAP and found it funny. The "thief" is a former customer, >> > whom we terminated their agreement with. They then forged an LOA, >> > submitted it to CWIE.net and Phoenix NAP and resumed using space above >> and >> > beyond their terminated agreement. So now any request for assistance to >> > stop our networks from being announced is now responded to with an >> > instruction to contact the thief's lawyer. >> > >> > kw >> > >> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> > From: Kelvin Williams <kwilli...@altuscgi.com> >> > Date: Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:43 PM >> > Subject: Re: [#135346] Unauthorized BGP Announcements >> > To: n...@phoenixnap.com >> > >> > >> > We'll be forwarding this to our peers in the industry--rather funny that >> > Phoenix NAP would rather send us to the attorney of the people stealing >> our >> > space than bothering to perform an ARIN WHOIS search, or querying any of >> > the IRRs. >> > >> > Interesting... Very interesting... So, who all do you have >> > there--spammers and child pornographers? Is this level of protection >> what >> > you give to them all? >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Brandon S <brand...@phoenixnap.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> Thank you for your email. Please direct any further questions regarding >> >> this issue to the following contact. >> >> >> >> Bennet Kelley >> >> 100 Wilshire Blvd. >> >> Suite 950 >> >> Santa Monica, CA 90401 >> >> bkel...@internetlawcenter.net >> >> >> >> Telephone >> >> 310-452-0401 >> >> >> >> Facsimile >> >> 702-924-8740 >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Brandon S. >> >> NOC Services Technician >> >> >> >> ** We want to hear from you!** >> >> We care about the quality of our service. If you’ve received >> >> anything less than a prompt response or exceptional service or would >> like >> >> to share any >> >> feedback regarding your experience, please let us know by sending an >> email >> >> to management: >> >> supportfeedb...@phoenixnap.com >> >> >> >> -- >> > Kelvin Williams >> > Sr. Service Delivery Engineer >> > Broadband & Carrier Services >> > Altus Communications Group, Inc. >> > >> > >> > "If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail." -- >> > Abraham Maslow >> >> >> >
