Hi all.
I've got a couple of potential bugs, and some questions on how to
debug/report them.
First, the bugs:
o Mutt seems to be losing track of the number of new messages. Every
now and then, I end up with "New: 1" in the status bar at the bottom
of the screen, but there aren't any n
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 10:26:42AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Not sure how to phrase this
>
> My e-mail headers are being displayed in Mutt like so:
>
> X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 1.3^M
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]^M
> Subject: daily AMANDA MAIL REPORT FOR December 4
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 03:20:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My mail is being rejected by a receiver's mail server
> for policy reasons. Is there anything I can change
> with mutt to stop this from happening?
Either your mail address, your ISP, or an SMTP server on the route have
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP
> client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly,
> but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines.
Good, provided you use a recent
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 10:18:48AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear folks!
>
> Seem to have a problem with mutt-1.3.27.
> If I start it together with xterm (or also KDE konsole) using
> xterm -e mutt
> mutt and the xterm immediately crash without any output.
>
> But If I start first xter
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 12:46:17AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There do be something I miss since I moved from MS-windows to linux -
> the file manager. (But I mean the old style one instead of the web-style.)
[snip]
There are loads of X and text-based file managers around. I'm an xterm
ju
Hi all.
I'm trying to write a script which will mail any file specified as an
argument, to a specific user. However, I need the mail to be sent
GPG-encrypted. Obviously, I can use
cat file | gpg -e -a -r [EMAIL PROTECTED] | mutt -s "Hello World" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or equivalent, but that's a
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:30:03AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I'm not sure how to do this on the command line, but in a script
> (or possibly on the command line given enough voodoo) you could
> gpg-encrypt the file first, use --output to generate a gpg-crypted
> output file, and th
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 07:24:27AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It will at some point either require you to
>
> 1. Have an empty passphrase (not recommended)
> 2. Enter your passphrase (not so practical, may be?)
> 3. Have a script that contains the passphrase (security issue
Hi all. PGP/GPG newbie alert... :-)
As mentioned in another mail, I'm trying to mail some encrypted messages
around. I appear to be able to encrypt messages, but not decrypt them.
My mutt setup is as described in mutt-gnupg-howto.
Whenever I try to view an encrypted message, I get
> Date: Fr
Replying to my own mail...
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:11:28PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all. PGP/GPG newbie alert... :-)
>
> As mentioned in another mail, I'm trying to mail some encrypted messages
> around. I appear to be able to encrypt messages, but not decrypt them.
I've just t
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 05:37:19AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I agree that what you wish to accomplish (having mutt automatically
> encrypt a file that you attach for sending) should be possible. My
> suggestion there is to get the procedure nailed down manually and then
> try working on c
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 09:34:36AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> GPG signing works fine - I can sign mails (like this one), but I just can't
> encrypt them.
Of course, it helps if I actually do sign a mail when I say that I'm going
to...
--
David Smith Tel: +44 (0)1454 462
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 06:22:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> % The first one (concerning this thread) is unrelated to the batching/scripting
> % problem. I am simply unable to send a GPG-encrypted mail. I create the
>
> Hokay. This certainly will require some debugging, but I haven't h
"!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation"
macro index"!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation"
macro pager"!less /usr/local/doc/mutt/manual.txt\n" "Show Mutt documentation"
s
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 05:34:15PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> for that matter, is anything wrong with contrib/gpg.rc? works fine for
> me.
Thanks to all that replied, I've checked my settings against a number of
yours, and they're pretty similar.
Yes, I've tried contrib/gpg.rc; that's wh
Thanks to all you lot who helped...
Anyway, I've tracked the problem down - for some reason, the company mail
system is base64-encoding the encrypted part of the mail before delivering
it into my mailbox. Bizarre.
A quick wrapper script around GPG, and it's all fixed.
--
David Smith
Our IT group have just fixed the mail setup so that I can send mail to the
outside world...
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 11:05:16AM -0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We also have a local linux user's group and a mailing list.
> A comment was made to the mailing list that mutt was "handicapped"
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:03:37PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have just subscribed using a new email address but can't get the old
> address unsubscribed, which is still forwarded to me, so I get two copies
> of each msg.
>
> I've tried changing the 'From:' line in mutt to the old subs
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:35:30AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a way in Mutt to specify the To: field of an outgoing email
> based on addresses in a random text file? I'm aware of the alias capability to
> specify mailing lists, but if I simply have a file of email addresses, an
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is a copy of terminal after entering message which was and encrypted, but
> NOT SIGNED:
[unimportant bits snipped from message to shorten it]
>
> Date:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:44:55AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please tell me what am I missinterpreting. Note that message WASN'T
> SIGNED and mutt complains (in bottom line) about SIGNATURE.
One further thought - AFAIK, mutt will try to verify a signature even
if there isn't one available
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 11:09:23PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:41:06PM +0000, Dave Smith wrote:
> > Maybe I'm being stupid here, but it appears that mutt and GPG are
> > behaving correctly. How can it verify the signature on the message
>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 10:27:25PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have signed this message with a bogus key, so you can see what happens.
> My real key is available on www.keyserver.net.
Hmm, it doesn't appear to shout, since the key IDs don't match. I guess if
I were to create a key with a
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:10:11AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In and English accent (particularly Canadian/American) it /may/ sound
> feminine... but you should never assume that just because in your phonetics, a
> name sounds feminine, that it is. Indeed, never assume at all that you can
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 09:55:35AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to search for information in a mailbox. I know the / command,
> but that seems to only work for the page being displayed. Is there a
> way to find a particular message that contains a certain phrase from
> wi
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 01:17:10PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One more question popped in my mind; when GnuPG automagicly fetches
> a key of some person and verifies it, it goes to the key list (I mean,
> that I can check it out with 'gpg --list-keys'). Does this mean, that
> it is signed?
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 08:31:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 05:41:05:PM + Simon White wrote:
> > Text based rules,
>
> Almost. I only need a 'console' tv application only playing the audio
> and radio... and then I agree that text based *completely* rules. ;-)
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:09:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hi all. just a quick question from a newbie. i usually sign all my
> emails but one of the lists i write to complains that it will not accept
> emails with attachments due to the fact that they don't want to spread
> msft virus
Others have answered the other points, so I'll just answer this:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:00:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> so you are saying it is a totally subjective judgement call?
Yes. It's a question of trust, which is very difficult to compute
algorithmically...
The question i
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 09:21:21AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Once I mark a message as deleted and exit mutt, where does it move the
> message?
Assuming you answered "yes" to the 'delete ... messages?' question,
it goes to the Great Mailbox in the Sky.
> I.e., is the message recoverable/u
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 10:55:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:42:02AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> > I telnetted to my imap port and simply got
[snip]
> > * OK localhost IMAP4rev1 v12.264 server ready
> I think that's the WU IMAP implementation...
It looks identic
Hi all. I need some help.
Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to
the main MTA. "Good for them", you might say. However, this
particular scanner communicates its result by adding an extra text/plain
attachment to the top of the mail. AIUI, this violates the PGP/MIME
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 07:25:28AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...and then Dave Smith said...
> %
> % Hi all. I need some help.
>
> Hello!
Hello... :-)
> % particular scanner communicates its result by adding an extra text/plain
> % attachment to the top of
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:46:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Dave Smith [04/23/02 10:19:26 CEST] wrote:
> > Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to
> > the main MTA. "Good for them", you might say. However, this
> > particular
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:55:49AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to discover why mutt seems to take so much longer to send an
> email after I moved my mail server to a different machine,
It might be related to DNS lookup. Depending on the configuration of the
machine, it might tr
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:50:28AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would like to to have to specify a nickname, such as:
>
> alias "Smith, Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> alias "Jones, Bob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> alias "Jackson, Chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
>
> I'm willing to type in
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 10:13:38AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I plan on setting up an IMAP server for use with mutt. This will be
> my first time working with an IMAP server. Any suggestions on which
> server to use?
Depends on the system hosting the IMAP server, but I would suspect t
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 04:56:04PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> According to F-Secure Web site, this is a virus that exploits
> a flaw in Internet Explorer, and by extension mail readers
> that use it, such as Outlook. No surprise there! The only
> surprise to me is that 250k infected file
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
the list address, e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED] You may want to
cut-and-paste the list address, or configu
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:05:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list?
> > The same way you compose a new message to a person - hit 'n' and type
> > the list address,
41 matches
Mail list logo
