On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 01:46:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > * Dave Smith [04/23/02 10:19:26 CEST] wrote: > > Our wonderful corporate IT department has added a virus scanner to > > the main MTA. "Good for them", you might say. However, this > > particular scanner communicates its result by adding an extra text/plain > > attachment to the top of the mail. AIUI, this violates the PGP/MIME RFC, > > and most certainly breaks mutt. > > This is really bad[tm].
I know... > Any chance making it adding the information as an additional X- header? Well, I've asked. Well see what happens. For the moment, it appears to have stopped doing it - whether that's due to complaints (mine or others), or for other reasons, I don't know. > My suggestion would break a few things up, but why not change > the content/type with formail? It is also possible to change > the body (i.e. snip the message out) with procmail and > sed/awk. It's possible to do pretty much anything if I change to using fetch/procmail to get my mail, and move my mailbox to a local file. However, I'd like to avoid doing that if possible. I have no control over anything upstream of my client's connection to the IMAP server, so I can't do anything there either. -- David Smith Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] STMicroelectronics Home Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bristol, England