Trying to use tag-pattern inside a folder-hook

Hi all, I am trying to get mutt (1.3.28i) to automatically tag all messages older than a specific date. I thought I would enter something like: folder-hook . 'tag-pattern ~d >1w' But it just comes up with "tag-pattern: unknown command". I'm sure I'm doing something simple wrong, I just don'

Re: Trying to use tag-pattern inside a folder-hook

Mason, Sam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I am trying to get mutt (1.3.28i) to automatically tag all messages > older than a specific date. I thought I would enter something like: > > folder-hook . 'tag-pattern ~d >1w' > > But it just comes up with "tag-pattern: unknown command". I'm sure >

About wrapping lines.

Heya. I was just wondering, that is it possible for Mutt to wrap the lines before sending the message in the editor when replying? At least Slrn handles this, and it is quite nice feature indeed. I know, that Mutt can wrap the lines on pager and such forth, but what about before it sends the mes

Re: Trying to use tag-pattern inside a folder-hook

--h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Mason, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-01 07:01 -0400: > Hi all, >=20 > I am trying to get mutt (1.3.28i) to automatically tag all messages > older than a spec

Re: Trying to use tag-pattern inside a folder-hook

Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > folder-hook . "push D~d>1w" ^ This should read T!!! D is delete-pattern! Michael -- "How should I know if it works? That's what beta testers are for. I only coded it." (Attributed to Linus Torvalds, som

Re: Trying to use tag-pattern inside a folder-hook

--24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-01 07:19 -0400: > * Mason, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-05-01 07:01 -0400: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > I am trying to get

Re: Trying to use tag-pattern inside a folder-hook

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:31:04PM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > * "Mason, Sam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-01 10:20:59 +0100]: > > I am trying to get mutt (1.3.28i) to automatically tag all messages > > older than a specific date. > > try > folder-hook . 'push " ~d >1w\n"' Thanks for the re

Re: About wrapping lines.

Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > I was just wondering, that is it possible for Mutt to wrap the lines > before sending the message in the editor when replying? Nope. > Or should this be the editor's job? Yes. Set $editor to something apropriate. Michael P.S. please post to [EMAIL

Re: Directory Paths in Alias command

Roger, et al -- ...and then Roger Espasa said... % % Hi all, Hello! % ... % In ELM, you could define an alias such as: % % equip = Equipment Mgmt Folder = admin/equipment ... % % In MUTT, it seems that when the alias is expanded, it's % being sanitized by some routine, which transla

Re: mailbox read only

Willy -- ...and then Willy S said... % % hi, Hello! % % Yesterday I was playing with my procmailrc, and spambouncer. Since then, I can Were you playing with mutt, too, by chance? Did you compile and install a new version? % not delete the mail in my mailbox (/var/spool/mail/sutrisno). Th

Re: About wrapping lines.

Hi, all! ...and then Michael Tatge said... % % Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: % > I was just wondering, that is it possible for Mutt to wrap the lines % > before sending the message in the editor when replying? % % Nope. Jussi: I heartily agree with Michael. I wouldn't want to use

gbnet? (was Re: About wrapping lines.)

David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > ...and then Michael Tatge said... > % P.S. please post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Michael: He did, AFAICT. Is there a particular reason you made this note? Strange - now that I look at the headers, it's ok. Somehow the gbnet adresse came up as I hit . Don

Re: About wrapping lines.

begin Jussi Ekholm quotation: > > I was just wondering, that is it possible for Mutt to wrap the lines > before sending the message in the editor when replying? At least Slrn > handles this, and it is quite nice feature indeed. You don't want that anyway, you just think you do. If your editor

Re: About wrapping lines.

> job? I just don't like to enable wrapping in Emacs itself, because > I hate it when the editor handles the line length. Just do this: set editor="emacs --eval '(turn-on-auto-fill)'" and line wrapping will only be turned on when emacs is launched by mutt. And if you want to use a long line any

Re: About wrapping lines.

Hi, * David T-G [05/01/02 14:28:43 CEST] wrote: > ...and then Michael Tatge said... > % Jussi Ekholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > % > I was just wondering, that is it possible for Mutt to wrap the lines > % > before sending the message in the editor when replying? > % > % Nope. > Jussi: I he

Re: mailbox read only

* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > % Yesterday I was playing with my procmailrc, and spambouncer. Since then, I can > > Were you playing with mutt, too, by chance? Did you compile and install > a new version? I dont think so. I never touch muttrc, neither do I compile it again. I just play

Re: mailbox read only

Willy -- ...and then Willy Sutrisno said... % % * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: % > % Yesterday I was playing with my procmailrc, and spambouncer. Since then, I can % > % > Were you playing with mutt, too, by chance? Did you compile and install % > a new version? % I dont think so. I ne

Re: mailbox read only

* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Aha! While mutt_dotlock is group mail, it does not have the sgid bit > set, so it gets run as the calling user. You need root to > > chmod g+s /usr/local/bin/mutt_dotlock The above command really solved my problem. Thx man for the help! I can't believ

Re: mailbox read only

Willy -- ...and then Willy Sutrisno said... % % * David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: % > Aha! While mutt_dotlock is group mail, it does not have the sgid bit % > set, so it gets run as the calling user. You need root to % > % > chmod g+s /usr/local/bin/mutt_dotlock % The above command rea

Re: Selecting a mailbox

On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:37:40PM -0700, John Iverson wrote: [...] > I'm running plain 1.3.28i with no patches, and I'm pretty sure I > remember this behavior on earlier versions as well. I don't > think Dean mentioned his version. [...] I am running version 1.3.28i. Did someone say it was fixe

(wish) urlview w/ context?

Hello, I tried googling for this without success. I was wondering if anybody knows of a way to get urlview to show some context along with the URLs it presents. For example, some newsletters come littered with URLs, and especially when they reference mailing list archives, they get hard to deal

Re: Transition from Pine to Mutt

* Gour ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020430 09:21]: > Recently I noticed that my present sendmail+Pine configuration has some > problems - some emails are not reaching its destination, and my guess is > that it's because the emails are rejected by some spam blockers since > my Sender: header points on my l

[Announce] mutt-1.3.99 is out

Mutt-1.3.99 is available from . There should be no significant changes against 1.3.28, except for some minor bug fixes, and build fixes concerning environments which are iconv-impaired. Please test this versin thoroughly. It's, obviously, intended to be the

Re: (wish) urlview w/ context?

On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 02:30:57PM -0700, Vineet Kumar wrote: > I was wondering if anybody knows of a way to get urlview to show some > context along with the URLs it presents. For example, some newsletters > come littered with URLs, and especially when they reference mailing list > archives, the

new mail problems

Not sure if this is mutt or the server, but I am finding that when I come back to the computer after a while, mutt is not notifying me of new mail in any way, yet if I change to mail folders, there is new mail, marked appropriately with an 'N'. Why would this be? May be coincidental, but it seem

new mail problems II

Also, it seems that after I start using it again after being idle, I get notified of new mail as it should. -Ken