Re: GPG-PGP

hello, just to say that I finally win :) I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;) On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote: > [clip] > Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages "in line" or must I > force my friends to use mutt ? (I try but is

Re: GPG-PGP

On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote: > just to say that I finally win :) > I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;) > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:18:50PM, Benjamin Michotte wrote: > > Is it possible to ask mutt sending signed messages "in line" or must I > > force

Re: GPG-PGP

Philip, et al -- ...and then Philip Mak said... % % On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Benjamin Michotte wrote: % % > just to say that I finally win :) % > I convert 3 friends to use mutt and they're really happy now ;) Yay! Good job :-) ... % I used mutt a few months ago but gave up on it because I coul

Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

Hi, I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla. One important porting work is dealing with the multiple accounts I keep, especially the mailing list. * But I found the flow of incoming mail dropping down. vim mailing list sent me a message telling me my mail is bouncing. On 12/28 and 29, I rec

Attachment umask

msg.pgp Description: PGP message

Re: mutt document in korean

* Michael Elkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-12-07 10:37]: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 09:33:07PM +0300, Im Eunjea wrote: > > I wrote some page about Mutt in korean language. > > > > > > And I'm doing translation mutt manual(from source tarball) also. > >

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

Charles -- ...and then Charles Jie said... % % Hi, % % I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla. % % One important porting work is dealing with the multiple accounts I keep, % especially the mailing list. Piece of cake with mutt. % % * But I found the flow of incoming mail dropping down.

Re: Attachment umask

Markus -- ...and then Markus Boelter said... % % Hello! % % Is it possible to set the "Save-Attachment"-Umask to % 022? Is it also possible to define a path in the configuration? Not AFAIK. I whipped up a little script to set the umask, change to a directory, and then pump the message through

Re: Attachment umask

Markus -- ...and then Markus Boelter said... % % Hi! Hello! % % On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:22:47AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % % [...] % > I named the script wmunpack and, except for receiving attachments in an % > encrypted email (in which I decrypt-save to the mailbox and run wmunpack % > f

Re: Timestamps "feature"

> The reason mutt does this is that a number of new mail notifier programs > (such as xbiff and pals) use the modification time to detect the arrival > of new mail. If mutt did modify the mtime, then everytime you (for > example) deleted an email, you would be notified of having new mail, > which

$display_filter perl script

Hi, [ Note: I am no longer subscribed to this list, so please Cc me on any followups ] I've attached a script to be used as a $display_filter. It is an extension of the quotefix ruby script Thomas Hurst posted sometime back. It is my first attempt at perl, so it _will_ get better over time. But,

Binary version for MUTT

Title: Binary version for MUTT Dear all I Checked out the set of source code for MUTT and was trying to install and build following the procedure. However we have a C++ compiler and it gives errors in codes. Even after converting C code to C++ it fails later as key words New , delete etc are

Re: Binary version for MUTT

Mohit -- ...and then Srivastava, Mohit said... % % Dear all % I Checked out the set of source code for MUTT and was trying to install and % build following the procedure. % However we have a C++ compiler and it gives errors in codes. Even after % converting C code to C++ it fails later as key w

Re: Binary version for MUTT

Mohit -- ...and then Srivastava, Mohit said... % % we have Solaris 5.7 % we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. How interesting. It's usually fairly straightforward; sunfreeware.com even has a precompiled package version. % It would be great if u can add for for Solari

Re: Binary version for MUTT

Mohit, et al -- ...and then David T-G said... % % ...and then Srivastava, Mohit said... % % % % we have Solaris 5.7 % % we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. % % How interesting. It's usually fairly straightforward; sunfreeware.com % even has a precompiled package vers

Re: Timestamps "feature"

Felipe -- ...and then Felipe Contreras said... % % >The reason mutt does this is that a number of new mail notifier programs % >(such as xbiff and pals) use the modification time to detect the arrival % >of new mail. If mutt did modify the mtime, then everytime you (for % >example) deleted an em

Re: Binary version for MUTT

So sprach »Srivastava, Mohit« am 2001-12-31 um 14:27:52 - : > I could find one for Linux which does not run on UNIX. Which UNIX? > * > This message is confidential and for use by the addressee only. If you > are not

RE: Binary version for MUTT

Title: RE: Binary version for MUTT we have Solaris 5.7 we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. It would be great if u can add for for Solaris . Thanks and regards Mohit -Original Message- From: David T-G [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 20

Re: GPG-PGP

Just picking a random point here... On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:04:22AM -0500 I heard the voice of Philip Mak, and lo! it spake thus: > > I think that mutt is a good e-mail client, but the default configuration > is sub-optimal (vim doesn't format paragraphs well by default, some of the Well, vi

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

Charles Jie wrote: > > (My MTA is postfix (on Mandrake 8.1). Mutt is 1.3.24i. procmail 3.21.) > I wonder whether the following files (copied from 'man procmail') have > anything wrong. Help, please. > > * My ~/.forward: > > "|IFS=' '&&p=/usr/bin/procmail&&test -f $p&&exec $p -Yf-||exit 75 #jie"

Re: Binary version for MUTT

Srivastava, Mohit wrote: > we have Solaris 5.7 > we tried installing GNU C compiler buw were having problems. > It would be great if u can add for for Solaris . a few things... 1) you're probably going to need to install packages other than gcc. if you're using gcc, you should probably use th

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 17:15]: | Charles Jie wrote: | > | > (My MTA is postfix (on Mandrake 8.1). Mutt is 1.3.24i. procmail 3.21.) | > I wonder whether the following files (copied from 'man procmail') have | > anything wrong. Help, please. | > | > * My ~/.forward: | > |

Thanks and a further question

Thank you very much, David. I like Mutt's configurability and think it's the best MUA of programmers, isn't it? I don't think the missing of mail is Mutt's fault, either. What I suspect is procmail, which I found hard to understand it in short term. I place my question in mutt-users@ (sorry :-)

Re: Good vim configuration?

Hi Thomas, * Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Die 25 Dez 2001 12:14:19 GMT]: [ ... reformating paragraphs in replys ... ] > I use par(1), http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/ How (with which parameters) do you use it? I saw it a few months ago but got confused with parameters... Ciao, Gregor

Re: Thanks and a further question

Charles Jie muttered: > Q: Is it possible to query Mutt server for a listing of posting for one > day so that I can collate it with those mail I got? How? Check the mutt homepage. There are some archives listed there. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/ HTH, Michael -- PGP-Key: http://

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

René Clerc wrote: > * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-12-2001 17:15]: > > > with postfix, just: > > "| /usr/bin/procmail -t" > > > > should be fine. > > > > the fancy sendmail style trickery shouldn't be necessary. > > But, make sure in your postfix/main.cf the following line is pres

Where to put 'procmail'?

Thank you both for hints about procmail, Will and Ren. Your suggestions make me curious about the issue of procmail that I postpone putting back my .forward. 1. In main.cf, I found a line: mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -Y -a $DOMAIN 2. In /var/log/syslog, I also found this command is

Re: Where to put 'procmail'?

Charles Jie wrote: > > Your suggestions make me curious about the issue of procmail that I > postpone putting back my .forward. > > 1. In main.cf, I found a line: > > mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail -Y -a $DOMAIN [...] > Q1. I know the 'procmail' in .forward precedes that in main.cf. B

Re: Good vim configuration?

* Gregor Zattler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > * Thomas Hurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Die 25 Dez 2001 12:14:19 GMT]: > > [ ... reformating paragraphs in replys ... ] > > I use par(1), http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~amc/Par/ > > How (with which parameters) do you use it? I saw it a few months ago > but g

List-Reply problems

Hi I'm having trouble replying to this list. If I enter ,L for a 'list-reply' I get the @gbnet address come up as the To field. I now have 'subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in my .muttrc but cannot seem to make it work. What might be causing this? Much thanks Nick

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

If you have postfix, procmail, getmail (or whatever) logging at a reasonable level of verbosity, you will see the disposition of all messages, bounces and so forth, in your logs, eg, /var/log/mail.log, ~/Procmail/log, ~/.getmail/getmail.log. On 12/31/01, I received this from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: Good vim configuration?

Alas! Thomas Hurst spake thus: > > How (with which parameters) do you use it? I saw it a few months ago > > but got confused with parameters... > > I stole PARINIT="grTbiqR B=.?_A_a Q=_s>:|" from someone and call it with If I'm not mistaken, that looks _exactly_ like what the man page tells you

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you tried running without the .forward? John On 12/31/01, 07:05:28PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to substitute Mutt with Mozilla. > > One

A happy new year!

Folks, a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you, mutt wouldn't be the program it is. . .. . . ° . °. .° \~/ V |

Re: Please help verify my procmail settings to go with mutt

Alas! John P Verel spake thus: > While I'm on RedHat, not Mandrake, my suspicion is that Mandrake may be > set up so that you do not need a .forward file for postfix. Have you > tried running without the .forward? Well, I've used Mandrake in the past (and Debian in the present), and to my knowle

Re: A happy new year!

Alas! Thomas Roessler spake thus: > Folks, > > a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you, > mutt wouldn't be the program it is. To you as well! Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, a

Re: Good vim configuration?

* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Alas! Thomas Hurst spake thus: > > > I stole PARINIT="grTbiqR B=.?_A_a Q=_s>:|" from someone and call it > > with > > If I'm not mistaken, that looks _exactly_ like what the man page tells > you to use if you want to "use par now, but understand it

Re: A happy new year!

Rob -- ...and then Feztaa said... % % Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous % network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of % you get to party (hopefully) :) Oh, quit your whining -- you know you're in hog heaven :-) Happy Holidays to

Re: A happy new year!

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001, Thomas Roessler wrote: > a happy new year and the best wishes to all of you. Without you, > mutt wouldn't be the program it is. And thanks to you, Thomas, for keeping all of us sane, though email anyway -Ken

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2001-12-28 11:19 -0500, Dan Boger wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote: > > There is one guy out there who has particular and very annoying > > writing idiosyncracies (think Prince or B1FF). I wrote a filter to > > translate his prose to something less obnoxiou

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > I thought that > > > > message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle" > > > > would do the trick but Mutt says "pipe-message: unknown command". > > It's (incl. the angle brackets) isn't it? I've tried that too a

Re: Using message-hook to run messages through a filter

On 2001-12-28 17:15 +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 05:09:05PM +0100, Andre Majorel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I thought that > > > > message-hook "~f joe@blow\.com" "pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle" > > > > would do the trick but Mutt says "pipe-message:

Getting pgp to work

Here is the error message that appears after I try and sign my mail with my gpg key: Can't open PGP subprocess!: No such file or directory (errno = 2) I figured that it couldn't find the ~/.gnupg directory, but it's there. I have set pgp_sign_as="my key id" in my muttrc.

Re: Good vim configuration?

Alas! Thomas Hurst spake thus: > > > I stole PARINIT="grTbiqR B=.?_A_a Q=_s>:|" from someone and call > > > it with > > > > If I'm not mistaken, that looks _exactly_ like what the man page > > tells you to use if you want to "use par now, but understand it > > later". Then again, maybe it just loo