Just picking a random point here... On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 05:04:22AM -0500 I heard the voice of Philip Mak, and lo! it spake thus: > > I think that mutt is a good e-mail client, but the default configuration > is sub-optimal (vim doesn't format paragraphs well by default, some of the
Well, vim does whatever you've configured it to do, it's not a part of mutt :) Thus, either vim was doing the same bad formatting using it under pine (and I remember it being an IMMENSE pain to use an external editor in pine), or you were just using *twitch*shudder* pico, in which case you could *twitch*shudder* use pico for your editor in mutt just as easily. When I made the pine->mutt switch, back around 0.6 days, I was lucky in having a friend who used mutt, who thinks in ways vaguely like the ways I do, so I just snarfed his .muttrc and went with it. I still have pine-remnants in my config (my change-folder is still bound to 'l', for instance, but that works out to be more efficient anyway. Composing a new message is bound to 'c', and that is probably LESS efficient, but that point's more arguable). -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix Systems Administrator | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Specializing in FreeBSD | http://www.over-yonder.net/ "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is because I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet"
