Hello John!
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, John P. Verel wrote:
> I've just installed w3m 0.1.9-6, wanting to try it as my Mutt pager,
> from the RedHat Power Tools distro. I've moved the default config
> file into ~/.w3m/ (named config) When I start w3m with a fully
> expanded url, I get a segfault.
Hi!
Is it possible to make mutt send PGP signed messages in 8bit?
I have set allow_8bit, and unsigned messages use 8bit, but mutt insists on
using QP when I sign them.
I'm using 1.3.12i on Debian GNU/Linux unstable (sid) and GnuPG 1.0.4.
Regards,
Kalle
--
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | You c
Sez I:
> Is it possible to make mutt send PGP signed messages in 8bit?
> I have set allow_8bit, and unsigned messages use 8bit, but mutt insists on
> using QP when I sign them.
Never mind me, I discovered pgp_strict_enc. And I figured out why it's
there too. Bah.
Peace,
Kalle
--
Email: [EMA
i really love mutt, but fellow netscape users complain that my line length is too
long. How can I make it so it wraps after 72 characters?
Thanks, Ethan
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:58:29AM -0500, Ethan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i really love mutt, but fellow netscape users complain that my line length is too
> long. How can I make it so it wraps after 72 characters?
The short answer is that this is something you should get your editor to
do fo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ethan:
Really, it should be *their* problem.
Netscape v4.76 supports the function "Wrap incoming plain text
messages to window width", however, users in Netscape are not
allowed to select a numeric value for this option.
They need to stretch their
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:37:07PM -0500, Timberwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Really, it should be *their* problem.
Whatever the capabilities of Netscape may be, it's not their problem.
It's considered bad form to send mail that's not wrapped at 75 or so
columns. Mutt doesn't have an option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel:
Where is the standard for line wrapping limits set? Is that in an
RFC? If so, can you point me to the RFC that lays out the proper
form for outbound message character wrapping.
Thanks,
- -Timberwolf
On 28 Jan 2001, at 12:56, Daniel Eisen
Hi, Wilhelm.
Well, I wimped out and got the w3m-0.1.11-0.1mdk rpm and re-installed.
All's well. FWIW, my first reaction is that w3m is way better that
lynx. For example, compare the www.nytimes.com under each. Not even
close!
Thanks.
John
On 01/28/01, 10:28:09AM +0100, Wilhelm Wienemann wr
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:13:12PM -0500, Timberwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Daniel:
>
> Where is the standard for line wrapping limits set? Is that in an
> RFC? If so, can you point me to the RFC that lays out the proper
> form for outbound message character wrapping.
I don't know if it
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:13:14PM -0500, Timberwolf wrote:
> Daniel:
>
> Where is the standard for line wrapping limits set? Is that in an
> RFC? If so, can you point me to the RFC that lays out the proper
> form for outbound message character wrapping.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - -Timberwolf
Please
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001, Tabor J. Wells wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:09:58PM -0500,
> Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is thought to have said:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:13:12PM -0500, Timberwolf
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Daniel:
> > >
> > > Where is the standard for line
I cannot figure how to save options in the options screen in w3m?
John
On 01/28/01, 01:24:37PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> Hi, Wilhelm.
>
> Well, I wimped out and got the w3m-0.1.11-0.1mdk rpm and re-installed.
> All's well. FWIW, my first reaction is that w3m is way better that
> lynx. For
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:09:58PM -0500,
Daniel Eisenbud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is thought to have said:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:13:12PM -0500, Timberwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > Daniel:
> >
> > Where is the standard for line wrapping limits set? Is that in an
> > RFC? If so, can yo
I'm looking for a good mailcap entry to print from a w3m paged html
attachment from within mutt. Any suggestions?
TIA
--
John P. Verel
Norwalk, CT
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:31:21PM -0500, Ken Weingold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001, Tabor J. Wells wrote:
>
> > RFC 1855 (the Netiquette RFC) Section 2.1.1, contains the following:
> >
> > - Limit line length to fewer than 65 characters and end a line
> > with a carriage r
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:58:29AM -0500, Ethan wrote:
> i really love mutt, but fellow netscape users complain that my line length is too
> long. How can I make it so it wraps after 72 characters?
>
> Thanks, Ethan
>
if anyone else is interested in the answer to this, try this:
as root, add t
Upon re-reading this, I see I misstated my question. Viewing within
Mutt works fine with a mailcap entry like this:
text/html; w3m -T
text/html -dump %s; copiousoutput. However, piping to lpr or enscript
produces either a) a mess or b) nothing. What I'm seeking is a way to
natively print within
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:45:01PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> I cannot figure how to save options in the options screen in w3m?
Clicking on any of the [OK] fields on the Option screen seems to do it.
> On 01/28/01, 01:24:37PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> > Well, I wimped out and got the w3m
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 02:40:10PM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> very nice features. For example, you can pipe an e-mail message into it
> from your mailer (I use mutt), then type a colon (:) and w3m will
Well, _that_ was a stupid comment; of course I use mutt. I
John P. Verel wrote:
> I'm looking for a good mailcap entry to print from a w3m paged html
> attachment from within mutt. Any suggestions?
>
Well this works for my mutt attchments:
text/html; /usr/bin/w3m -T text/html '%s'; needsterminal; description=HTMLText;
nametemplate=%s.html
--
~~
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 05:10:00PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> Upon re-reading this, I see I misstated my question. Viewing within
> Mutt works fine with a mailcap entry like this:
> text/html; w3m -T
> text/html -dump %s; copiousoutput. However, piping to lpr or enscript
> produces either a) a
Yes, line wrapping is the editor's job. I suggest to use "set tw=72" or
"set textwidth=72" in the config file. "set co=72" only sets the width
of the display (number of columns), but does no real line wrapping in
the text. In Vim, you may hit "gqap" or "gqip" to format the current
paragraph (to th
Hello all,
here's the problem - I've got several accounts set up through fetchmail/procmail going
to different folders. I've got mutt set up to switch between the folders with
keybinds, and folder-hooks to change the from: header, etc. based on the name of the
folder i'm in, which of course c
24 matches
Mail list logo
