I have just spent some time compiling and installing ncurses. After
doing so I went into mutt and got:-
S-Lang Error
Malloc Error
SLcurses_initscr: init failed
As you see my mutt was compiled with Slang.
I then found that most (also uses Slang) gave:-
Unable to create keymaps.
I then realised
In my efforts to improve my use of mutt, I got round to trying
mail2muttalias.py. It is interesting that in avoiding bloat in
mutt itself by using other programs you introduce bloat elsewhere
in your file system! OK, I had installed python as I want to learn
to write some CGI stuff in python rath
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 01:40:52PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> Has anyone ever got cursesmodule to compile under AIX 3.2.5 and if so
> could they give me a blow by blow account of how to get it compiled
> and used with mail2muttalias.py?
I think you would have much more success if you asked
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 01:29:42PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I have just spent some time compiling and installing ncurses. After
> doing so I went into mutt and got:-
> S-Lang Error
> Malloc Error
> SLcurses_initscr: init failed
> As you see my mutt was compiled with Slang.
> I then found
Hi Mutters!
Now, I've been using mutt for years, but I don't understand this:
I switch from tcsh to zsh as my login shell and all of a sudden I
only get coredumps. :-(
Who can tell me what is wrong, please?
eule:~>gdb /usr/bin/mutt
GNU gdb 4.17.0.11 with Linux support
Copyright 1998 Free Softwa
(Mutt 1.0pre2, pgp 5 on what's basically Red Hat Linux 6.0 with some
security updates)
1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there any
> way to ge
On 13/Sep/1999, McKisson, Shawn wrote:
> Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling mailing
> lists? Are there any other reasonable alternatives?
If it were not, I wouldn't be using it :-)
But I think you won't get a different answer in this list :-D
Manoj Kasichainula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 12:16:15PM -0400, G . Sumner Hayes wrote:
> > 1. I'm used to using mutt with procmail, which lets me use the procmail
> > filter in PGP-Notes.txt to read old-style (not PGP/MIME) messages. Now
> > I'm using IMAP mail, which
Hi,
I was wondering, is there a way to use mutt on the command line to
extract an attachment from an email? What I'm trying to do is have a
script that will save to a predefined directory all attachments
included in a mail piped through it.
Any other tool that will do this for me maybe? For exam
Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
handle this quite nicely.
Josh
> G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> > any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures
On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering, is there a way to use mutt on the command line to
> extract an attachment from an email? What I'm trying to do is have a
> script that will save to a predefined directory all attachments
> include
Keith Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 11 Sep 1999:
> Can (some of) the various expandos in, for instance, index_format,
> especially %s and %F, be used in the print_command string variable?
> I tried it with %s, but mutt just passed it through without expansion.
I'm not that knowledgea
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 02:36:12PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>McKisson, Shawn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> Would you say that mutt is probably the best mail client for handling
>> mailing lists?
>
>Yes. List-reply, threading (not just viewing, but deleting/etc. as well),
>intelligent handling
"R. Marc" wrote:
>
> > In my opinion, wmmail is useless until you have a permanent connexion.
>
> I'm sure you have reason for this opinion, but if you use fetchmail
> wmmail is simply grand, permanent connection or no, IMHO.
>
> [snip]
> > and most of the time people are trying to minimise the
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will
> handle this quite nicely.
I read mail on more than one machine. I can have fetchmail leave the
mail on the server, but then it doesn't get deleted from the server when
I delete it.
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there some reason you do not want to use fetchmail? It will handle
> this quite nicely.
Fetchmail will pull the mail from the IMAP server and, presumably, store
it locally on your workstation. That's pretty much what it's for,
anyway.
When using a
Hello,
If I compile mutt-1.0pre2 with ncurses, the following line in my muttrc
does not work correctly:
color status black cyan
Instead I get brightblack on cyan while in the index and normal black on
cyan in the pager. Actually, regardless of the specified color, I
always get bright v
G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures on
> this mail?
I guess I'm kinda lucky, in that I have login access on the server where
my mail gets stored, so
[I'm CCing this to HJ to see if he can send me the other patches he
mentioned]
I <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I read via IMAP from multiple machines, so no fetchmail/procmail combo works]
> The rest of the office is using Outlook with PGP
> support, but that sends old-style PGP bodies and sets the
20 matches
Mail list logo
