G . Sumner Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now I'm using IMAP mail, which doesn't go through procmail. Is there
> any way to get mutt to automatically verify old-style signatures on
> this mail?
I guess I'm kinda lucky, in that I have login access on the server where
my mail gets stored, so I can still filter my mail through a script
before it's put in my mailbox. I suppose if a person has no login
access on the mail server where delivery is performed, the "Just Use
Procmail" party-line falls flat.
Someone did post a patch on mutt-dev that lets Mutt recognize old-style
PGP messages by scanning the body. Seems slow and inefficient, but in
the case you describe, probably the only thing that'll work.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fuzzy Fox) || "Just about every computer on the market
sometimes known as David DeSimone || today runs Unix, except the Mac (and
http://www.dallas.net/~fox/ || nobody cares about it). -- Bill Joy '85
