hi all,
I have a whole lot of pine aliases (in .addressbook). I need to convert
them to mutt. Can you suggest a simple method or point to an existing
script for doing the same?
Thanks in advance,
Raju
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 07:49:17PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I'm tinkering around a bit with zsh.
>
> Does anyone have something better than this for mutt command
> completion? (I don't like that sub-directories hack too much, but
> it seems to be the only thing I get working.)
>
I don't
On 1999-08-31 16:00:11 +0530, Raju K V wrote:
> I have a whole lot of pine aliases (in .addressbook). I need to convert
> them to mutt. Can you suggest a simple method or point to an existing
> script for doing the same?
Under ftp://ftp.guug.de/pub/mutt/contrib/, there is a script named
addrbook
On 1999-08-31 12:43:58 +0200, Jimmy Mäkelä wrote:
> I don't know if it's better, but I use the following completion:
Nice. However, the recursive path searching seems to be a bit slow...
Hello mutters,
since 0.95.6i Mutt lacks color-support in my terminals.
I am very sure about my rc - files being correct, everything
else is working properly, too. If somebody on this list have
a clue: Please tell me!
---> I installed mutt-1.0pre1i-2.cfp.rhl5.i386.rpm on my
RH5.2 (not real
Hello ´Mutters´,
a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it.
Everything I need or I have discovered so far is working well - except of
color-support which makes mutt even easier to use. I had colors with 0.95.4us,
but since then they´re gone.
I installed the 1.0pre1i
I have some mail come in occasionally that
is, for example, in Russian, dos code page
1251, I think it is. Most of the characters
look blank, but they are really there. I
guess they have a high bit set and are not
coming out visible for me. I try changing
my console font to all the different ch
Hi,
>i'm using vim as my e-mail editor
I guess this is a good choice. Yup.
>notice it has margins on the right and left leaving space on both sides. it
>is also 'full' justified to those margins.
I'ld use something like:
:imap ,ip :se tw=40gqapk>ap
and then just type ,ip in the paragraph yo
Pete Toscano [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> hmmm, this is interesting and helpful, but i have a further question.
> how do you get vim (or is it even possible?) to "soft wrap" while
> editing and then insert characters when you exit or write? this
> would be nice in that, if you're editing a file
On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote:
>
>
> Hello ´Mutters´,
>
> a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it.
> Everything I need or I have discovered so far is working well - except of
> color-support which makes mutt even easier to use. I had
[please send all questsion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Bo?tjan Muller [NEONATUS] wrote:
> I would like to enable mutt to autosign all my outgoing mails except ones that
> go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be done, if it can be done at
> all?
You can do this
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 10:51:25AM -0700, esoR ocsirF cogitated:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello ´Mutters´,
> >
> > a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it.
> > Everything I need or I have discovered so far is worki
well, was it configured with
--with-slang
or
--with-curses=DIR
sounds like it wasnt, or your slang/ncurses paths are nonexistent/wack.
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 10:51:25AM -0700, esoR ocsirF wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello ´Mutters´,
I ran into an indexing bug that I think may need fixing... Let me explain
the circumstances:
1) My folder variable is set to ~/Mail
2) save-hook and mbox-hook both point to =received
3) I had a folder-hook > 'set move=no'
4) I called mutt -f Mail/received (from $HOME)
5) I went to change folders
That should work, although the following will also:
set pgp_autosign
send-hook email@somewhere "unset pgp_autosign; etc..."
Josh
> > go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be done, if it can be done at
> > all?
>
> You can do this (I believe) with send-hook, something like:
> send-
On 1999-08-31 14:32:44 -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> 6) Mutt then re-read the mailbox and presented every message twice.
> I assumed that it had rewritten/appended all the messages to
> received. The index DEFINITELY had every message twice...count on
> status line was doubled.
Funny. What kind of
That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks
are persistant.
On 1999-08-31 15:13:26 -0400, Joshua Weage wrote:
> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:13:26 -0400
> From: Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: pgp autosign
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PR
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:09:32PM +0200, Thomas Roessler cogitated:
> On 1999-08-31 14:32:44 -0400, Fairlight wrote:
>
> > 6) Mutt then re-read the mailbox and presented every message twice.
> > I assumed that it had rewritten/appended all the messages to
> > received. The index DEFINITELY had e
Oliver Immich [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> since 0.95.6i Mutt lacks color-support in my terminals.
> I am very sure about my rc - files being correct, everything
> else is working properly, too. If somebody on this list have
> a clue: Please tell me!
>
> ---> I installed mutt-1.0pre1i-2.cfp.rhl
Thanks a lot for your hints!
I uninstalled the rpm and configured the tarball
properly ( -> slang-0.99.38-8 is part of the 5.2 distro,
you wouldn´t guess that, would you).
Now, I´m having wonderful colors making my life easier.
Sorry for posting twice. First time seem to be gone lost...
Oliver
If that is the case, then anything that was changed with
a send-hook applies to all further messages that you send
until another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad
idea, and isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the
appropriate send-hook to use to switch back to "normal"
opera
Joshua Weage [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:15:16PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks
> > are persistant.
> >
>
> If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a send-hook
> applie
At 6:23 PM EDT on August 31 Joshua Weage sent off:
> If that is the case, then anything that was changed with
> a send-hook applies to all further messages that you send
> until another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad
> idea, and isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the
> a
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> set pgp_autosign
> send-hook email@somewhere "unset pgp_autosign; etc..."
No, that won't work, because once you send some mail to
, pgp_autosign will be unset, and remain unset.
> > send-hook ~A set pgp_autosign
> > send-hook ~[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Should mutt append the delimiter except against the root namespace
> {imapserver}, or should you just have to say 'set
> folder="{imapserver}Mail/" (mutt will never append the slash to imap
> folders)?
it's probably not useful for Mutt to append the de
Raju K. V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 3047603 Aug 28 19:01 mutt*
> -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail54665 Aug 28 19:01 mutt_dotlock*
This looks correct.
> -rwxrwxr-x 1 root mail 2694 Aug 28 19:04 /var/mail/root
That's fine, except that your
On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 03:22:42PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> I wonder, though, if our original poster, who used a setting like
> folder="{imapserver}INBOX." was attempting to get Mutt to translate
> "+folder" into "{imapserver}INBOX.folder", which means a folder
> literally named "INBOX.folde
27 matches
Mail list logo
