On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 10:51:25AM -0700, esoR ocsirF cogitated:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 1999 at 12:39:02AM +0200, Oliver Immich wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello ´Mutters´,
> >
> > a few days ago I started using mutt and I am very very happy with it.
> > Everything I need or I have discovered so far is working well - except of
> > color-support which makes mutt even easier to use. I had colors with 0.95.4us,
> > but since then they´re gone.
> > I installed the 1.0pre1i rpms on my RH 5.2 today. Everything´s fine but
>color-support.
> > The rc-file is correct (I even used the ´old´ one without success).
> >
> > So, if anybody have a clue - please tell me...
> >
>
> Just for the fun of it ;-)
>
> I am using mutt 1.0pre1i installedfrom a .deb onto debians unstable
> and the color works fine. Perhaps it is not mutt that is a problem but
> your distribution?
Well THAT was uncalled for. :/
Although I agree that mutt is likely not the problem...I'm running RH 5.2
and colour works fine in 0.95.6i and 0.95.7i. I installed from
source/tarball though, not the RPMs.
Check your term type with printenv, and check mutt -v and see if it's
listed as +HAVE_COLOR.
mark->
--
Fairlight-> ||| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Fairlight Consulting
__/\__ ||| "I'm talking for free... | http://www.fairlite.com
<__<>__> ||| It's a New Religion..." | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\/ ||| PGP Public Key available via finger @iglou, or Key servers
