Joshua Weage [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:15:16PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks
> > are persistant.
> >
>
> If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a send-hook
> applies to all further messages that you send until another send-hook is
> encountered? IMO, that is a bad idea, and isn't mentioned in the
> manual.
With all the stuff that send-hooks and other hooks can do, it isn't really
feasible to have them just apply one time.
> What is the appropriate send-hook to use to switch back to "normal"
> operation, yet still allow other hooks to work properly?
It's the hook mentioned in the message you originally replied to. /All/
matching send-hooks are executed for a given message, in order. So what
you want to do is set a default behaviour first:
send-hook . "default behaviour"
The regexp '.' matches all messages, so this will be executed for ... all
messages. Put more specific hooks after that:
send-hook . "default behaviour"
send-hook user@somewhere "other behaviour"
This is at least mentioned in the manual in the folder-hook section.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"If Microsoft can change and compete on quality, I've won." -- L. Torvalds
PGP signature
