On 2015-09-20 09:06 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > ... so, no matter how "bad" a message is (let's say, a top post, a
> > thread hijack, an ALL CAPS subject, and unlimited line length LOL), the
> > worst it can score is 0. Am I right? I haven't used m
a message is (let's say, a top post, a
> thread hijack, an ALL CAPS subject, and unlimited line length LOL), the
> worst it can score is 0. Am I right? I haven't used mutt scoring yet,
> so I am trying to learn how to best put it to my purposes. It seems
> to me that for f
On 2015-07-29 20:19 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I'm using scoring to mark, auto delete, ... certain mails I do not
> want to read. I'd like to auto-score top posters for the next
> mail. For the first mail it is not possible due to scoring is based on
> header lines. B
Hello,
(I'm top posting here con intention to see how t-prot[1] will later
react on this mail).
I have installed it and it detects, for example, if the quoted lines
exeeds the limit (default=30); but it does not detect, at least I could
not figure out how, a "normal" top posting like this one he
Am Do, 30. Jul 2015 um 22:24:03 +0200 schrieb Heinz Diehl:
> First: you can't do that using procmail alone. A perl, python, ruby or
> whatever script will be needed. Simply pipe all incoming mail to your
> script via procmail.
May I suggest t-prot[1] which works great as a display filter in mutt?
On Thu Jul 30 22:24:03 2015, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> That said, I doubt such a script which *reliably* detects top-postings
> can be done. As a starting point for your language problem: simply
> check if the first line in the mail body ends with a colon (":").
It’s not so simple. The first line of th
On 30.07.2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> A top posting we see, when in the body of the mail before a line like
> this:
>
> On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> are some other text lines. Of course we need here a good regular
> expression because the line 'On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote
Hi Mattias -
* On 30 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> are some other text lines. Of course we need here a good regular
> expression because the line 'On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:'
> is highly configurable and language dependent.
That's why I wouldn't do it with anything regular-expr
El día Wednesday, July 29, 2015 a las 03:52:01PM -0400, Fred Smith escribió:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:38:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > Simplest idea I have is to add a procmail (or whatever) rule to detect
> > top-posting,
> > then insert a yes or no header into the message:
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 02:38:30PM -0500, David Champion wrote:
> Simplest idea I have is to add a procmail (or whatever) rule to detect
> top-posting,
> then insert a yes or no header into the message:
>
> X-Top-Posted: yes
>
> Then it's trivial to score it in mutt.
and just to satisfy m
Simplest idea I have is to add a procmail (or whatever) rule to detect
top-posting,
then insert a yes or no header into the message:
X-Top-Posted: yes
Then it's trivial to score it in mutt.
* On 29 Jul 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm using scorin
Hello,
I'm using scoring to mark, auto delete, ... certain mails I do not want
to read. I'd like to auto-score top posters for the next mail. For the
first mail it is not possible due to scoring is based on header lines.
But the sender could be scored with -10 or -20 for the next ma
Hi all,
is there a specific event / command to re-evaluate the message scoring? I
have a set of scores that rely on "~d >2d", but as long as my mutt instance
lives it is never re-evaluated. So as my mutt runs mostly for weeks the
score gets stays at the value that correct days ago, n
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:00:14PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
Suppose you want to score all threads with this form:
A>B>A>B
without any specifications about the name of authors.
Is it possible ?
I'm not aware of any way to do this generically.
me
Many thanks for your answer. One more question though:
Le mercredi 13 avril de l'année 2011, vers 09 heures et 39 minutes, Michael
Elkins écrivait:
> >- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's
> >following up to person B, but want to read what she says when she's
> >f
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 06:52:05PM +0200, Alexandre wrote:
- if you're really interested in what a person has to say only when
she's talking about a particular subject
~f alice ~s 'interesting topic'
- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's
following up to person
Hi
Scoring on Subjects and From headers is nice enough (man muttrc), but
how to score this:
- if you're really interested in what a person has to say only when
she's talking about a particular subject
- if you really don't want to read what person A has to say when she's
foll
he mailbox. So the mutt
designers put off doing that calculation until the last possible
moment: sorting. Unfortunately, this means that stuff like
this---scoring and anything else that happens BEFORE messages are
sorted (e.g. things triggered by folder-hooks)---*CANNOT* get access
to that thr
* On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 08:41PM +0900 Wilkinson, Alex
(alex.wilkin...@dsto.defence.gov.au) muttered:
> I would like to score any thread that i have replied to i.e. the
> entire thread.
>
> Is this possible ? If yes, any pointers ?
Let's see - what does the manual say about score?
Usage: score
Hi all,
I would like to score any thread that i have replied to i.e. the entire thread.
Is this possible ? If yes, any pointers ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT
1914. If
note: For efficiency reasons, patterns which scan information not
> available in the index, such as ˜b, ˜B or ˜h, may not be used
>
> Personally, I think that's a silly restriction, but you'd have to take
> that up with the developers.
Ah ok, sorry I didn't see that myself.
I guess I'll just use ~f mailinglist or something like that to take
care of the scoring.
Thanks,
Meli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:33 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
> Well it would make sense if any of your examples worked, but
> unfortunately they don't.
>
> I've tried mixing " and ' myself, except for the
> escaping-quotes-trick. That's new, but giv
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:18, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:01 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
>> ~h '^Envelope-to: u...@example.com'
>>
>>works when I'm limiting messages once inside the folder, but
>>
>>score '~h '^Envelope-t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 4 at 05:01 PM, quoth ssiza...@gmail.com:
> ~h '^Envelope-to: u...@example.com'
>
>works when I'm limiting messages once inside the folder, but
>
>score '~h '^Envelope-to: u...@example.com'' 41
>
>in my .muttrc doesn't.
Obviously.
27;t. Mutt complains about errors. I've tried
> replacing ' with " besides removing it completely, putting \ in front
> of my dots and removing everything but the domain name. But I still
> get errors.
score '~h "^Envelope-to: u...@example.com"' 41
Tha
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 15:14, Ed Blackman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:35:16PM +0100, ssiza...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently trying to set up a scoring policy for mail sent to
>> u...@example.com.
>>
>> The problem is, I only get m
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:35:16PM +0100, ssiza...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm currently trying to set up a scoring policy for mail sent to
u...@example.com.
The problem is, I only get mass-mailings to this adress, with
u...@example.com usually residing in the BCC. But the header contains
envelo
I'm currently trying to set up a scoring policy for mail sent to
u...@example.com.
The problem is, I only get mass-mailings to this adress, with
u...@example.com usually residing in the BCC. But the header contains
envelope-to: u...@example.com, I just don't get how to access this
infor
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Alexandre wrote:
[snip (16 lines)]
> i have that in ~/.muttrc, maybe you could try it:
[snip (54 lines)]
Thanks for the help. I will have a play with my muttrc.
Regards,
Chris.
--
oOoOo "I'd go over twelve percent for that..." - Nice Guy Eddie, oOoOo
oOoOo
Le vendredi 13 février de l'année 2009, vers 22 heures et 10 minutes, Chris
Willard écrivait:
> Hello All,
>
> Can someone please explain how scoring works for a beginner? I belong
> to a few mailing lists and some of them have quite a lot of messages.
>
> As I understa
Hello All,
Can someone please explain how scoring works for a beginner? I belong
to a few mailing lists and some of them have quite a lot of messages.
As I understand it I can use scoring to filter the messages but I am
not sure of how to do this and how scoring works!
Any help would be
t moment. Mutt
removes the first level of backslashes when parsing rc
files, I know. Shame on me. Thanks for help, too.
But I have another question. I had some problems using a
scoring rule like:
score '~w ... (~s ... | ~s ...)'
while:
score '(~s ... | ~s ...) ~w ...&#x
Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hmm, I thought so, too, and tried it before I asked the list
> for help because I doesn't work. I use:
>
>score '(~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
>
> ...which works as intended while:
>
>score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
>
> ...is applied
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-07 13:14]:
>score '(~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
> ...which works as intended while:
>
>score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
>
> ...is applied to all messages and doesn't work.
"~w"? using some patches, i presume? nntp
Hi,
* Michael Elkins [02-10-05 23:15:05 +0200] wrote:
> Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
> > score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
> If you specify all lowercase letters, Mutt will
> automatically use a case-insensitive search. If you use
> at least one uppercase letter, Mutt assumes case-sensitive
* Christian Garbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-05 19:41]:
> Is there a way to show the score of hidden messages in
> a [collapsed] thread (perhaps by setting the score of
> the root message to the sum of all hidden messages)?
no.
> Or can I flag the whole thread when a
> single message in the th
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-05 20:52]:
> see subject.
this reference is almost always BAD.
content changes - and subject should
be adjusted to fit the contents. so
subjects should not describe problems.
> Is there any way to specify case-insensitive scoring pattern
Rocco Rutte wrote:
> see subject. Is there any way to specify case-insensitive
> scoring patterns? This is minor important but I'm too lazy
> to write filters like:
>
> score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
If you specify all lowercase letters, Mutt will automa
Hi,
see subject. Is there any way to specify case-insensitive
scoring patterns? This is minor important but I'm too lazy
to write filters like:
score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
bye, Rocco
Hi there!
I've recently started to use the scoring mechanisms of mutt. My mails
are now colored depending on their score and some mails even get
flagged automatically.
I need the scoring for mailing lists. In my mailing list folders, I
use scoring as well as threading. I like all threa
ers first by
>> thread, then by date (most recent last) and finally by score; like
>> Slrn does for me at the moment. Could someone who uses scoring show
>> me some examples of how you sort the folders?
>
> I don't believe you can, until Daniel's latest threading p
ut it's also a request for someone to further develop the
documentation. :)
> Anyway, what if I want Mutt to sort all mailing list folders first by
> thread, then by date (most recent last) and finally by score; like Slrn
> does for me at the moment. Could someone who uses scoring sh
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there
instead of mutt-dev]
> I think the documentation about scoring is quite lacking.
I could somewhat agree; I've never been able to fully understand how
mails could
> X-Mailer: Mutt-1.3.27i (Debian Linux 2.4.16, i686)
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Aha, still suffering from schizophrenia! ;)
> Hey people.
Hi Michael,
> Is there a way to use scoring as a primary sort method but still have
> threading take effect? I tried putting th
Hey people.
Is there a way to use scoring as a primary sort method but still have
threading take effect? I tried putting threads as an aux sort, but it just
sort of groups them together, it doesn't thread them.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2002.03.05, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Jeremy Blosser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
> > addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
>
> David Champio
On Feb 28, Volker Moell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
> addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
David Champion has a patch for this... you can find a link to it from
www.mutt.org in the user patches section.
Hi, all!
Is there a posibillity to score all known mail addresses (i.e. all
addresses defined in aliases) in one single score statement?
I only found then ~l for all messages addressed to a known mailing list:
score ~l +100
Greetings,
-volker
--
http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama
e-mail addresses
set
alternates=pmak@animeglobe\.com|pmak@animelyrics\.com|pmak@trapezoid\.interserver\.net
set score # set scoring on
score ~A 5000 # default score is 5000
set score_threshold_delete=0 # Delete messages with score = 0
score ~F +1000 # Increase score of flagged m
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-02-13 14:11 -0500:
> On 2002.02.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
> > ~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
>
> Looks li
On 2002.02.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Andre Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
> ~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
Looks like you have a file (~/.procmail/spam) containing e-mail
addresses of peopl
Hi, I've just re-subscribed to this list!
I would like to use the same keystroke to add senders to my
procmail killfile and score them to 0 in mutt.
My setup (below) tells procmail to source the addresses in
~/.procmail/spam, and add the message to my spam/ Maildir:
#~/.procmailrc
FROM=`forma
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 04:56:16PM +0100, Johannes Segitz wrote:
> I would use it but mutts scoring abilities don't met my demands. I
> need something like the ability of slrn to create a scoring entries with
> one key (like "k" in slrn)
You could bind any key not bound
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:11:32PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Out of curiousity, how does everyone make use of message scoring?
I would use it but mutts scoring abilities don't met my demands. I
need something like the ability of slrn to create a scoring entries with
one key
* On Fri Dec 14, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Out of curiousity, how does everyone make use of message scoring?
I don't know about others, but I use scoring in a very limited way. In my
main folder, where I only put personal mail, I use this:
score ~N 2
folder-hook "!" '
Hey people.
Out of curiousity, how does everyone make use of message scoring?
Cheers,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, GnuPG pub key: 5BC8BE08
"...the word HACK is used as a verb to indicate a massive amount
of nerd-like effort." -Harley Hahn, A Student
Josh Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It builds for me with this, but you'll have to test it yourself :)
Maybe I should mention how to use it.
just add:
score_header "X-Priority"
to your .muttrc, and the messages with this header will use the
integer contents of said header as the inital s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Patched 1.3.24i ok, but doesn't build.
> Bombs out at this point:
>
> gcc -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/local/share/mutt\" -DSYSCONFDIR=\"/usr/local/etc\"
>-DBINDIR=\"/usr/local/bin\" -DMUTTLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\"
>-DHAVE_CONFIG_H=1 -I. -I. -Iintl -I./int
d on the
> > header field that my filter is generating?
>
> Well, way back I wrote a small patch that adds support for a custom
> scoring header to mutt. I'm sure it was messy, and it definately
> slowed folder opening (was noticable for very large folders), but you
> ca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Is there something else I can do to sort messages based on the
> header field that my filter is generating?
Well, way back I wrote a small patch that adds support for a custom
scoring header to mutt. I'm sure it was messy, and it definately
slowed fol
Hi, I am trying to get Mutt to work with a spam filter.
The filter is run through procmail,
and generates a custom header field: "X-Priority:"
Now I am trying to make Mutt score based on that header field,
but the manual has the following bit under the "Scoring" section
On 2001.09.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Cliff Sarginson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - What is the purpose/use of "scoring" of mail messages?
I'm sure that people use it in different ways, but fundamentally, it's
just a ratings system. Yo
After a long time using mutt I am trying to understand
more of it's features.
- What is the purpose/use of "scoring" of mail messages?
- Can i mark a message as undeletable (and reverse that)
--
Regards
Cliff
Not directly a technical question so Slightly OT;
A wise man once said "real man score their email"
Well poking around with scoring in mutt I would like to ask
any "real man" what strategy do you use in scoring mail?
give every incomming mail 50 points and then subtract or
ot;\ \ \ " (untested;
consider mutt often needs more than one "\" in such cases).
> Question #2: What is a message's default score, if no scoring matches
> it?
See the "score_*" variables in the manual. I use:
set score_threshold_delete=0
set score_threshold
llowing:
score ~s" " =0
score ~s\" \" =0
score ~s' ' =0
score ~s\' \' =0
score ~s\ \ \ =0
All of the above either give me "too many parameters" or "missing
parameter" errors. How can you specify this?
Question #2: What is a messa
I'm fairly new to mutt and don't understand how the scoring mechanism
works. I can score my own address, say
score '~f uzscd5@uni-bonn\.de' =
But how do I set up the rest of the score file properly ? What's
wrong with
score '~f Benji\ Fisher
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:14:03PM +0530, Abhay Ghaisas wrote:
> I know that lbdb is a separate program and has no direct relation to mutt.
> So, I think, one possible way it can be done is to add some kind of
> scoring feature in lbdb and increase the score of selected addressed fr
dress should get more priority and should be on
top.
I know that lbdb is a separate program and has no direct relation to
mutt. So, I think, one possible way it can be done is to add some kind
of scoring feature in lbdb and increase the score of selected addressed
from some macro magic from mutt
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:40:55AM +0100 or thereabouts, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
> Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
>
> --
>Johannes
6.3.60. index_format
Type: format string
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 11:10:43AM +0100, Johannes Zellner wrote:
> How do I set up colors for scores ? -- according to the
> manual there's no color `object' for score. Do I have
> to duplicate all score entries ?
>
> score '~C some@list\.org' 100
> color index yellow defaul
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 01:35:30PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > ahh, yes. Thanks. Now: is it possible to /show/ the
> > scores ? -- As far as I understand this, scoring is
>
> there will be different color
Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> ahh, yes. Thanks. Now: is it possible to /show/ the
> scores ? -- As far as I understand this, scoring is
there will be different colors (see the sample.muttrc)
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluesti
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:42:52AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
> > Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
>
> yes
>
> from
Johannes Zellner proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
> Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
yes
from the sample.muttrc -
unscore *
# score
# at that entry. If you prefix the score with an equal sign (=), the s
Hi,
is it possible to do scoring in mutt (like in slrn) ?
Would be useful for ML's with large bandwidth.
--
Johannes
Darrin Mison proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I had problems getting procmail to work about 6months ago and gave up on it.
> Does it require I particular style of email setup? I use mutt with getmail
> and ssmtp.
Nothing in particular - though I use it with sendmail 8.11.1 - where it plugs
i
I had problems getting procmail to work about 6months ago and gave up on it. Does it
require I particular style of email setup? I use mutt with getmail and ssmtp.
>
> As you are running a unix box you can surely use procmail locally - or add
> them to the access.db of _your_ workstation's se
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 04:52:01PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
> Your quoting is screwed up. Try
>
> score '~f terra.com.br' -
>
> instead. (Note that the last single quote character has moved.)
>
*laughs* No, that's just me not getting my cut-paste working so I did it by
han
Charles Krug proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Unfortunatly, not an option. Our email system was recently "improved" by
> moving it from a Linux box to an NT box. I'm just happy that it hasn't been
> further improved by moving it to Win2000.
As you are running a unix box you can surely use p
On 2000-11-01 10:06:28 -0500, Charles Krug wrote:
> score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
^
> Followed by:
> score_threshold_delete=0
> However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I
> misunderstanding how this is supposed to work? My intent is to
>
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 08:49:47PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Charles Krug proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > score ~A 1000
> > score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
> > Followed by:
> > score_threshold_delete=0
>
> > However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I mi
Charles Krug proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> score ~A 1000
> score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
> Followed by:
> score_threshold_delete=0
> However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I misunderstanding how
Block terra.com.br either at your mailserver or using procmail
:0:
List:
I've a number of lines in my .muttrc file like this:
score ~A 1000
score '~f terra.com.br -'# spambot
Followed by:
score_threshold_delete=0
However, I still get messages from terra.com.br. Am I misunderstanding how
this is supposed to work? My intent is to killfile that entir
Eric Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 05 May 2000:
> how does one do scoring with aliases?
Hmm, that's an interesting question, I've never heard of anyone ask how
one can do that.
The short answer is that it can't be done.
The long answer is still that it can
So I'm fairly new to mutt, so I could certainly be on crack and have over looked the
relevent documentation but how does one do scoring with aliases?
I would like to think something like the following is possible:
score '~f the_guys' 100
where the_guys is defined by:
alias th
I thought I'd try out scoring. Everything works fine until I decided to
remove one of my scoring rules. I was expecting certain messages to become
unflagged (since they do not receive a high enough score anymore), but alas,
they stay flagged. Putting '%N' in the index_format
e some
messages from which I only remember part of the content (eg. "What was
that URL again that I remember mailing to someone 3 months ago?").
Instead of using scoring, it would probably be possible to assign a
specific limit command to a macro and use this as necessary on demand.
That
s with the sorting by score ability of Mutt.
> >
> > Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
> > every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
> > sound likely or make any sense (what's different between
Unless Mutt does not support
> every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
> sound likely or make any sense (what's different between looking at ~e
> or ~h?).
Mutt only supports some pattern operators for scoring. There's a
reason, which I forg
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 03:08:56PM +0300 or thereabouts, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
(in a lightning-fast response)
> Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
> every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
> sound likely or mak
Telsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 01 Oct 1999:
> I'm having some difficulties with the sorting by score ability of Mutt.
Don't have any ideas on that, sorry... Unless Mutt does not support
every pattern match operator for scoring, only some. But that doesn't
Reilly "Regular Expressions" book, and I have looked for examples
in muttrcs on the web (only one used scoring, alas). I even grepped
the source directory for where the error message occurs, and although
I don't understand the code, the fact that it's from "pattern.c" is
a big
On Wed, Jun 23, 1999 at 10:19:17AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> So ':score ~s foo ' should do what you want just fine.
>
>From manual.txt:
Usage: score pattern value
Should that be ':score "~s foo" ' ?
Otherwise mutt reports "score: too many arguments"
--
(T.) Michael Sanders int
Quoth Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It's not prompting you for the info, but anything you can stick in your
> .muttrc can be done from a running mutt by doing :
>
> So ':score ~s foo ' should do what you want just fine.
>
Yes, but then what if you want to save the scores you've set in th
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=bjuZg6miEcdLYP6q; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Tue, Jun 22, 1999 at 10:54:59PM -0900, Matt Armstrong wrote:
> 2 - No way to show threads but still sort by score. In the threaded
> display, gnus can sort first by thread, then by score. Maybe
> something like:
>
> sort=thread,score
set sort=treads
set sort_aux=score
seems to work f
For the past four years I've used Gnus under Emacs as my MUA. I got
tired of the slowness and switched to mutt. I think mutt is awesome,
but I miss one thing from Gnus: scoring.
Mutt has the beginnings of it. I'll list what I miss and I solicit
comments about how I might go about
On 01/25/99 Daniel Eisenbud uttered the following other thing:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Phil Humpherys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> >
> > Hmm. Small section.. it'd be nice if you could configure some
> > scoring on the fly...
>
>
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:47:12PM -0700, Phil Humpherys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hmm. Small section.. it'd be nice if you could configure some
> scoring on the fly...
You can (":score ...") but of course then it doesn't get written out to
your .mu
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
