* On 2002.08.02, in <20020802115532.GC12347@erpland>, * "Jussi Ekholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [I Cc'd this message to mutt-users, too - I think this belongs there > instead of mutt-dev]
Maybe, but it's also a request for someone to further develop the documentation. :) > Anyway, what if I want Mutt to sort all mailing list folders first by > thread, then by date (most recent last) and finally by score; like Slrn > does for me at the moment. Could someone who uses scoring show me some > examples of how you sort the folders? I don't believe you can, until Daniel's latest threading patches make it into 1.5.n, n>=2. The new patches will isolate threading from sorting, so that you enable or disable threads but still have two sort parameters. > This interests me greatly, as well. > > > Can scoring only be used in sorting? > > I'm quite sure. Or if it couldn't be used, my knowledge about 'scoring' > (which comes from using Slrn) is very narrow and I simply don't > understand how scoring is effectively and powerfully applied in Mutt... No, the "~n" pattern operator evaluates scores. You can color, limit, search, etc. based on scores. E.g.: macro index ! "<limit>~n 500-<enter>" \ "Show only the really important stuff" But I don't know a lot. I don't use scoring, because I find that I have to use it consistently for all my mail to make it useful for any of my mail. -- -D. Fresh fruit enriches everyone. Takes the thirst Sun Project, APC/UCCO out of everyday time. A pure whiff of oxygen, University of Chicago painting over a monochrome world in primary colors. [EMAIL PROTECTED] We all know that. It's why everyone loves fruit.