Hi, * Sven Guckes [02-10-07 19:45:05 +0200] wrote: > * Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-07 13:14]:
> > score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100 > "~w"? using some patches, i presume? nntp? vvv.nntp, yes. > besides, as the square brackets are optional you > might as well leave them out. so how about these? > score '~s mutt ~w $newsgroup' +100 > score "~s mutt ~w $newsgroup" +100 Hmm, please don't ask why I didn't do it this way but put the brackets in. Thanks for help. * Michael Elkins [02-10-07 21:45:06 +0200] wrote: > Rocco Rutte wrote: > I think your quoting is the problem. Try this one instead: > score '(~s \\[?mutt\\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100 When thinking about my problem I knew there was something special about mutt I couldn't recall in that moment. Mutt removes the first level of backslashes when parsing rc files, I know. Shame on me. Thanks for help, too. But I have another question. I had some problems using a scoring rule like: score '~w ... (~s ... | ~s ...)' while: score '(~s ... | ~s ...) ~w ...' works as expected. Since there's no special AND operator (...meaning that no operator stands for AND) I think the order shouldn't matter at all but as it seems it does. Any thoughts? bye, Rocco
