On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:01:05AM +, Jeffery Small wrote:
> John:
>
> Thanks you for all the great information.
You're welcome. Crypto is interesting and very practical. But don't get too
interested. Most of the mixmaster developers and several key cryptographers
have
John:
Thanks you for all the great information.
--
Jeff
John Long writes:
>On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:32:18PM -0800, Jeffery Small wrote:
>>
>> I just installed mixmaster on my Ubuntu 15.10 system and am trying it out.
>> I have a question. The mutt manual says:
&
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 08:32:18PM -0800, Jeffery Small wrote:
>
> I just installed mixmaster on my Ubuntu 15.10 system and am trying it out.
> I have a question. The mutt manual says:
>
> "To use it [i.e., mixmaster], you'll have to obey certain restrictions.
> Mo
I just installed mixmaster on my Ubuntu 15.10 system and am trying it out.
I have a question. The mutt manual says:
"To use it [i.e., mixmaster], you'll have to obey certain restrictions.
Most important, you cannot use the Cc and Bcc headers."
When I look in my /etc/mixmaster/
Hi,
* sigi wrote:
> I'm using mixmaster 3.0.0-2 with mutt 1.5.18-6+b1 on debian lenny and it
> all works just fine. So the manual seems to be very outdated
Updated now, thanks.
Rocco
pgpJfQ9J5Fo79.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 05:17:10PM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> Just a small followup to my own post. I found the mixmaster changelog
> and it appears that mutt support was added to the version 3 beta 25.
> i.e. not long after the manual article reference was correct. The chan
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 01:45:24PM +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I did quite a bit of work with mixmaster years ago and I think some of
> the information in the manual was from me. I am no longer interested in
> using mixmaster but I sort of keep an eye on it. Recently I have
>
I did quite a bit of work with mixmaster years ago and I think some of
the information in the manual was from me. I am no longer interested in
using mixmaster but I sort of keep an eye on it. Recently I have
returned to using mutt on linux after a spell using it on cygwin. I am
using the Ubuntu
* Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09.12.07 17:30]:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:51:44PM +0100, Francesco Ciattaglia wrote:
> > * Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]:
> > > Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely b
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:51:44PM +0100, Francesco Ciattaglia wrote:
> * Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]:
> > Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I
> > was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curiou
* Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]:
> Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I
> was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have
> no intention of ever using it again. The support is for a very old
&g
Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I
was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have
no intention of ever using it again. The support is for a very old
version of Mixmaster and not for the more recent version 3 betas.
Should Mixm
I fear that code has gone untested and unmaintained for a long time.
On 2007-02-05 17:49:55 +0100, gab bag wrote:
> From: gab bag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:49:55 +0100
> Subject: Mutt mixmaster gpg pgp
> X-Spam-Level:
>
I'm using mutt with mixmaster and gnupg all fine apart from mixmaster .If i
send a mail not forwarded by any mix
chai the mail get delivered right with content , pgp signature and everithing
.If i send it through a mix chai it
gets delivered reporting only the pgp signature and no conten
Trying to build mutt 1.4 with mixmaster support fails under SuSE 8.0:
./configure --with-mixmaster
[...]
make install
[...]
compose.c: In function `mutt_compose_menu':
compose.c:1205: `OP_COMPOSE_MIX' undeclared (first use in this function)
compose.c:1205: (Each undeclared ide
Why doesn't mutt support mixmaster 2.9bxx? The mutt manual says:
Mixmaster support in mutt is for mixmaster version 2.04 (beta 45 appears
to be the latest) and 2.03. It does not support earlier versions or the
later so-called version 3 betas, of which the latest appears to be c
More out of curiosity than anything, does anyone know the status of
mixmaster and it's ability to work within mutt?
I've been using mutt on a Red Hat box, and just recently switched over
to Debian. The default apt-get for mutt had mixmaster as a choice up
with the headers, so I star
On Sun, 06 Jan 2002, Ken Wahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the issue with the newer versions of Mixmaster was that they
> didn't accept the -T switch to view remailer lists? 2 nights ago I
> spent hours on the mutt-users mail archive reading anything that had to
Hi.
When I was setting up Mixmaster with mutt, I didn't find the
recommended version of Mixmaster, so I tried Mixmaster 2.9beta32. It
didn't quite work, but I figured out it was because Mixmaster now
wanted commas between the remailers in the command line.
I haven't bothered r
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons
to read:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
> > this feature. How does it work?
> &g
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons
to read:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
> > this feature. How does it work?
> &g
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons
to read:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
> > this feature. How does it work?
> &g
On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 06:40:33AM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke rearranged the electrons
to read:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> > In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
> > this feature. How does it work?
> &g
On Wed, Nov 08, 2000 at 02:08:43PM +0100, Erwin Kaiser wrote:
> In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
> this feature. How does it work?
> TIA Erwin
Did you compile with mixmaster enabled? Look at "mutt -v" to see whether
you did. If not l
In the manual I read about sending mail via mixmaster but I cannot activate
this feature. How does it work?
TIA Erwin
As we have discussed here mixmaster support in mutt in for version 2.0.4
of mixmaster. The later mixmaster 2.9b23 does not have the -T flag
needed to read the type2.list file.
I have written a patch to mixmaster 2.9b23 that alters main.c to add the
-T flag. This now works with mutt. Get it of
this topic have
> little non-junk traffic. Only three people have expressed interest in
> mixmaster support from the mutt lists. The mixmaster community seems to
> be terribly small. There are some indications that interest in anonymous
> mailers has declined over the last 4 - 5 years [
I have been trying to explore various issues about the mixmaster support
in mutt, but I am having difficulty in bringing these issues to a
conclusion. Here however is a summary, followed by some questions.
Mixmaster has versions 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and then a set of
versions loosely called
On 2000-08-21 13:21:25 -0700, rex wrote:
>> However I understand that version 2.9beta23 which I tried first
>> does not support the "-T" flag. I then tried version 2.0 and
>> this also appears to not support the "-T" flag. So, what
>> versions of m
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 02:08:53PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
>
> However I understand that version 2.9beta23 which I tried first does not
> support the "-T" flag. I then tried version 2.0 and this also appears to
> not support the "-T" flag. So, what
I have recently started to play with mixmaster but have had a mixed
experience. I have been overseas and off the mutt lists for a while but
I did look up the discussions on egroups and found that there had been a
discussion about mixmaster support. It seems that mutt calls mixmaster
with the &qu
Howard --
...and then Howard Arons said...
% On Jul 13, 2000, Christian R Molls and Ronny Haryanto wrote something
% like:
% > * Howard Arons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000713 20:48]:
% >
% > > "--with-mixmaster option"? I've read the INSTALL or CONFIGURE files
On Jul 13, 2000, Christian R Molls and Ronny Haryanto wrote something
like:
> * Howard Arons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000713 20:48]:
>
> > Er, where in Mutt's documentation is there a reference to this
> > "--with-mixmaster option"? I've read the INSTALL
* Howard Arons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000713 20:48]:
> Er, where in Mutt's documentation is there a reference to this
> "--with-mixmaster option"? I've read the INSTALL or CONFIGURE files,
> and I don't find it. What other config options have I mi
On 13-Jul-2000, Howard Arons wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2000, Mat wrote:
> > Hi there,
> > i'm trying to configure mutt with mixmaster, here is my situation:
> >
> > - installed mutt-1.2.4i compiled with --with-mixmaster option
>
> Er, where in Mutt's
On Jul 13, 2000, Mat wrote:
> Hi there,
> i'm trying to configure mutt with mixmaster, here is my situation:
>
> - installed mutt-1.2.4i compiled with --with-mixmaster option
Er, where in Mutt's documentation is there a reference to this
"--with-mixmaster option
On 2000-07-13 12:20:34 +0200, Mat wrote:
> PS I've also installed Mixmaster client version 3
> (latest) but got the same error, and by the way client
> doesn't recognize -T option.
Well, what you describe is an incompatible change against
the 2.0 series of mixmaster, agains
Hi there,
i'm trying to configure mutt with mixmaster, here is my situation:
- installed mutt-1.2.4i compiled with --with-mixmaster option
- installed Mixmaster 2.9beta22 client under Linux.
- properly configured muttrc with:
set mix_entry_format="%4n %c %-16s %a" # Format of
Mixmaster support is supposed to handle MIME correctly. Maybe you
are experiencing problems with some remailer on the route? (You may
also send me a test message which is supposed to exhibit the problem
you believe to observe, I'll have a look at it then.)
On 2000-01-18 19:54:28 +0200, So
Hi,
I have just upgraded to 1.1.2i and find its mixmaster support really cool.
I have one suggestion:
If the outgoing message consists of multiple parts, the user should be
allowed to choose (using a .muttrc variable perhaps) whether the
'Mime-Version:' and 'Content-Type:
40 matches
Mail list logo
