* Brian Salter-Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06.12.07 21:31]: > Is anyone using the mixmaster support in mutt? I ask merely because I > was involved in improving this about 7 years ago, and I'm curious. I have > no intention of ever using it again. The support is for a very old > version of Mixmaster and not for the more recent version 3 betas. > > Should Mixmaster support be kept? It is unlikely to carry on working > even with the old mixmaster code (version 2.4 beta 46 from September > 2002), and that code may soon be not available. > > Brian. * Ciò letto, correndo giovedì 06 dicembre 2007, alle 21 e 38 rispondo così:
Last Mixmaster changes are dated 2007 september, see: http://svn.noreply.org/svn/mixmaster/trunk/Mix/HISTORY I would like to use mixmaster support, yes. I wrote also a complete reference guide* for using mixmaster with Mutt, but it's kept in stand-by, because of incompatibility between recent versions of Mutt and Mixmaster. It's an ideal argument for a flame war... anonimity: good or bad? IMHO it's good in some situations. In the country where I live, others are the instruments to protect yourself from abuse, crimes, ecc.. So I like Mixmaster as matter of study, in some sense. In other countries, perhaps, anonimity could be matter of life. * in italian and as a part of "Il Nirvana con Mutt" (see website in sig). ciao Ataualpa aka Francesco Ciattaglia. -- - Linux is better: Open & Free! || www.ataualpa.altervista.org
