On Wed, May 04, 2022 at 08:49:42AM -0600, Akkana Peck wrote:
> lilydjwg writes:
> > I've switched to OAuth because I don't want to enable 2FA (which means
> > if I lost all my devices, I would lose access to my Google account).
>
> How did you get your OAuth tokens? I tried following
> https://git
lilydjwg writes:
> I've switched to OAuth because I don't want to enable 2FA (which means
> if I lost all my devices, I would lose access to my Google account).
How did you get your OAuth tokens? I tried following
https://github.com/google/gmail-oauth2-tools/wiki/OAuth2DotPyRunThrough
and
https://
On Tue, May 3, 2022, at 14:35, Derek Martin wrote:
> You're on vacation. You probably didn't bring a laptop, because...
> you're on vacation. You go out and leave your phone somewhere, never
> to be seen again. Now what?
This is getting a bit off topic, but I just want to add: in the situation
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 01:07:07AM -0400, José María Mateos wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2022, at 23:25, lilydjwg wrote:
> > Google doesn't disable app passwords (requires 2FA). Google is going to
> > disable account passwords login at the end of this month.[1]
> >
> > I've switched to OAuth because I d
On Mon, May 2, 2022, at 23:25, lilydjwg wrote:
> Google doesn't disable app passwords (requires 2FA). Google is going to
> disable account passwords login at the end of this month.[1]
>
> I've switched to OAuth because I don't want to enable 2FA (which means
> if I lost all my devices, I would lose
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 03:04:11PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:18:20AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> > Will Yardley writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for
On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 03:18:20AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> Will Yardley writes:
>
> > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
> >>
> >> Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for good this time
> >> in favor of Oauth.
> >
> > Any links / docs / backgrou
Will Yardley writes:
> On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
>>
>> Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for good this time
>> in favor of Oauth.
>
> Any links / docs / background on this?
>
> w
Probably this : https://getmail6.org
signature.asc
Descripti
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman wrote:
>
> Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for good this time
> in favor of Oauth.
Any links / docs / background on this?
w
Le Sun, May 01, 2022 at 02:17:40PM -0400, Ed Blackman a écrit :
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 14:17:40 -0400
> From: Ed Blackman
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org
> Subject: [OT] fetchmail replacement supporting Oauth
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
>
> Slightly off topic, b
Slightly off topic, but I am using this to download mail for mutt to read.
Google seems serious about disabling app passwords for good this time in favor
of Oauth. I use fetchmail to download (not leaving on server) mails from a
handful of single use gmail accounts to read locally in mutt
On 2021/04/07 18:03, Cameron Simpson wrote:
Just tried it on the satellite link with an overnight load of messages,
normally a 10 minute exercise with getmail (give or take). 411 messages,
8.5 seconds.
Nice.
...regexps...are appalling for email addresses. When testing
addresses, my filer doe
On 06Apr2021 23:12, Kurt Hackenberg wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:43:36AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>My new tool streams the fetches: it issues RETRs for every message up
>>front at maximum network speed - fully buffered and with no waits. A
>>parallel worker thread collects the messages
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:43:36AM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>My new tool streams the fetches: it issues RETRs for every message up
>front at maximum network speed - fully buffered and with no waits. A
>parallel worker thread collects the messages as they come in at full
>speed (the upstream s
Like several here, I fetch email from my ISP mail spool(s) and file
messages locally. If my laptop's been offline overnight there can be
hundreds of messages to fetch when I wake it up. On a satellite link
(geostationary) with a ping time of over 600ms this can be many minutes
of tedium.
The r
I don't use either email provider nor fetchmail, but from the symptoms
you've described, perhaps something like round-robin DNS is being used,
and one of the mail servers' certificates is incorrectly chained. A way
to verify this would be to look at the o
I use fetchmail to download emails from two different accounts into mutt. This
worked fine for years on my desktop and then my laptop when travelling. I am
currently travelling and using my laptop.
Some times I get the following output:-
fetchmail: No mail for b_d...@bigpond.net.au at
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:37:04PM +, Tony's unattended mail wrote:
> > However, I find dovecot deliver (which uses the sieve language
> > for filtering) to be much more readable/writable than procmail.
>
> Sieve does not include regular expressions -- I shit you not.
>
> Dovecote needs regu
/ Tony's unattended mail wrote on Sat 10.Nov'12 at 22:37:04 + /
> > However, I find dovecot deliver (which uses the sieve language
> > for filtering) to be much more readable/writable than procmail.
>
> Sieve does not include regular expressions -- I shit you not.
>
> Dovecote needs regular
> However, I find dovecot deliver (which uses the sieve language
> for filtering) to be much more readable/writable than procmail.
Sieve does not include regular expressions -- I shit you not.
Dovecote needs regular expression capability to be shoe-horned in by
some hokey plugin. Regular expres
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:49:48PM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 11:17:06PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:17:35AM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> > > No it doesn't deliver them to you. It sort of filters them online on the
> > > server. You can t
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:17:35AM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> No it doesn't deliver them to you. It sort of filters them online on the
> server. You can then use something like offlineimap to deliver them
> locally to you. I use imapfilter + offlineimap + notmuch + mutt and I am
> far from happy
/ Chris Green wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 18:13:10 + /
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:06:35AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:03:07PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > > Hi Chris, personally, i'd stick with what your current set-up.
> >
> > Ditto. I don't currently
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 11:06:35AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:03:07PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > Hi Chris, personally, i'd stick with what your current set-up.
>
> Ditto. I don't currently do this but that's only because port 25 is
> blocked by my ISP. I'v
* Derek Martin [11-08-12 12:06]:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:03:07PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > Hi Chris, personally, i'd stick with what your current set-up.
>
> Ditto. I don't currently do this but that's only because port 25 is
> blocked by my ISP. I've run my mail this way befor
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:03:07PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> Hi Chris, personally, i'd stick with what your current set-up.
Ditto. I don't currently do this but that's only because port 25 is
blocked by my ISP. I've run my mail this way before and would do it
again if it were a practic
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:48:45AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> > with mutt?
>
> Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous an
fetchmail + maildrop works for me.
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer mw...@iupui.edu
Asking whether markets are efficient is like asking whether people are smart.
pgpGksnsN8kgQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/ Chris Green wrote on Thu 8.Nov'12 at 10:51:59 + /
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:33:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> > * On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or conne
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:33:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move awa
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:17:35AM +0200, Nikola Petrov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 05:35:45PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I am using imapfilter with lua configuration file for my imap account.
> > > That does the job for me and I like the fact that I declare my filters
> > > with actual c
* On 07 Nov 2012, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>
> I haven't had it break crypto, but I'm one of 2 people at the company
> doing pgp signatures and both of us send *only* text/plain.
My memory is fuzzy but I think it was more complex multipart signed
messages that it broke.
> I have had it give me te
e else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> > > with mutt?
> >
> > Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous and reliable.
>
> Same here. I keep meaning to hook in an adaptive spam filter, but I
> haven't bothered so far. Maybe mutt just makes it so e
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:06:54AM +0100, Andre Klärner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:21:59PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> > Yes i think the benefits of using your own smtp delivery are worth it.
>
> I can only agree. And to avoid issues when my landline is down I have a VM
> on a big
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:33:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> I've used IMAP pickup in the past and it's OK for some IMAP servers. A
> year or two ago my employer moved my mailbox to MS Exchange. Exchange
> doesn't (necessarily?) hand you the exact e-mail it received. It
> parses incoming ma
On 07Nov2012 14:15, Chris Green wrote:
| I also have a fairly complex mail filtering script I wrote myself in
| Python which is fed mail via .forward.
|
| What's the current "state of the art" way to collect mail and deliver it
| through a filtering system to mutt? If I can do this all in one pr
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:21:59PM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
> Yes i think the benefits of using your own smtp delivery are worth it.
I can only agree. And to avoid issues when my landline is down I have a VM
on a big hoster that on one side delivers all my locally generated mails to
avoid
/ David Champion wrote on Wed 7.Nov'12 at 16:33:58 -0600 /
> * On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move away f
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 04:33:58PM -0600, David Champion wrote:
> * On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move awa
* On 07 Nov 2012, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> > one of the reasons I'd quite like to move away from SMTP. It *should*
> > be OK but I'm relying on the other end to
t; the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
> > >
> > > However I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
> > > maintenance so I'm considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
> > > system.
> > >
> >
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:48:08PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> No specific "protective measures" at all, it just relies on the sending
> server retrying if my SMTP server isn't running (or connected). That's
> one of the reasons I'd quite like to move away from SMTP. It *should*
> be OK but I'm r
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:48:45AM -0600, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> > What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> > with mutt?
>
> Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous and reli
as
> > > the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
> > >
> > > However I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
> > > maintenance so I'm considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
> > > system.
>
> May
ver I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
> > maintenance so I'm considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
> > system.
May I ask what it is that you are worried about using smtp delivery - I take it
you have various protective measures in place with your configuration?
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 01:04:17PM -0500, Tim Gray wrote:
> On Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15 PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> >I *don't* like procmail configuration files, they're one of the reasons
> >I wrote my own.
> >
> >What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> >with mutt?
On Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15 PM +, Chris Green wrote:
I *don't* like procmail configuration files, they're one of the reasons
I wrote my own.
What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
with mutt?
I use getmail and dovecot deliver. Getmail is great, fast, and
flexi
I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
> > maintenance so I'm considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
> > system.
> >
> > I also have a fairly complex mail filtering script I wrote myself in
> > Python which is fed mail vi
m considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
> system.
>
> I also have a fairly complex mail filtering script I wrote myself in
> Python which is fed mail via .forward.
>
>
> What's the current "state of the art" way to collect mail and deliver it
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:15:41PM +, Chris Green wrote:
> What does everyone else here do for collecting mail and filtering mail
> with mutt?
Fetchmail and procmail. Ugly, but ubiquitous and reliable. A friend
pointed me at something "better" for mail filtering, but I can&
I currently have my mail delivered to my desktop system using SMTP as
the system is on all the time and has a static IP.
However I always get paranoid when I reconfigure it and/or do other
maintenance so I'm considering moving back to a fetchmail/getmail based
system.
I also have a f
I read my mail via IMAP. From various computers. Every so often I run
fetchmail on one computer to download all mail and remove it from the
remote servers. I then don't have the full story on the server, but
that's perfectly fine.
There's one annyoing bit about this setup. Mail tha
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:53:05PM +0800, Qiming Ye wrote:
> My company uses an "IMAP (Exchange?) + Active Directory
> authentication + SSL(?)" email server, and my laptop joins the
> domain SOME-DOMAIN. I've been struggling to make it work on mutt +
> fetchmail,
Dear users,
Recently I've been forced to use Outlook as my work Email client and I miss
mutt badly.
My company uses an "IMAP (Exchange?) + Active Directory authentication + SSL(?)"
email server, and my laptop joins the domain SOME-DOMAIN. I've been struggling
to make it work
Hello lee,
lee wrote on 19.06.11:
>
> Do you have the same effects when changing the order of the polling
> entries? Perhaps the servers are just slow?
I did change the order, but couldn't detect a difference so far. I will now
look at the conversation between fetchmail and the s
Jan-Herbert Damm writes:
> running fetchmail fom the macro puts me into a terminal where the fetchmail
> program prints dots to mark its progress. When it is polling the second and
> especially the following mail-adresses, mails with only say 2500 bytes take
> approximately 15 secon
Hello Patrick,
thanks!
Patrick Shanahan wrote on 19.06.11:
> Are you only starting fetchmail from the
> mutt macro or do you also have it running as a daemon?
I am also running fetchmail from the crontab every 20 min as:
/usr/bin/fetchmail -s
running fetchmail fom the macro puts me
* Jan-Herbert Damm [06-19-11 06:59]:
> Fetchmail polls the first email-adress very fast and slows down immensely with
> every one that follows.
How have you determined this? Are you only starting fetchmail from the
mutt macro or do you also have it running as a daemon?
> I see
Hello all,
I searched web and fetchmail-faq but not the fetchmail-lists. sorry for noise
but I think there are many fetchmail users here and I would appreciate a
slight hint.
Fetchmail polls the first email-adress very fast and slows down immensely with
every one that follows.
I see fetchmail
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:10:44 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I just commented out the lines:
> sslcertck
> sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/
>
If you disable the "sslcertck", then fetchmail won't abort the
connection if the certificate validation fails. In other words,
On 10/24/10 07:33, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 22:23:37 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Yes, it works with all options now:
...
ssl
sslproto 'TLS1'
sslcertck
sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/
Right, but I'm wondering if the "sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/" line is
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 22:23:37 -0600, Joseph wrote:
>
> Yes, it works with all options now:
> ...
> ssl
> sslproto 'TLS1'
> sslcertck
> sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/
Right, but I'm wondering if the "sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/" line is
even needed; that directory should just b
i:/C=US/O=Equifax/OU=Equifax Secure Certificate Authority
There is actually a three-step chain involved. The two you show are
both sent to the fetchmail clientby the GMail server as part of the SSL
negociation process.
You can see that the first one (number 0) is issued to
"CN=pop.gmail.com&quo
glad you got it working Joseph.
pgphR3kVlAaUf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
* Joseph [2010-10-23 22:42 -0600]:
It wasn't the certificate problem, I think it was fetchmail was missing some
links or options.
I re-compile fetchmail, openssl and the problem is solved. All is
working, as it should.
Problem solved. Congratulations.
Breen
--
Breen Mullins
b...@sdf.org
, I think) or try to fix this.
If you want to try to track it down, you can try stracing the
job:
strace -e trace=open fetchmail
will tell you where fetchmail is looking for your cert. It should
give you a clue for a place to park a cert.
--
Breen Mullins
b...@sdf.org
It wasn't the certif
want to try to track it down, you can try stracing the
job:
strace -e trace=open fetchmail
will tell you where fetchmail is looking for your cert. It should
give you a clue for a place to park a cert.
--
Breen Mullins
b...@sdf.org
On 10/24/10 00:05, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 21:56:51 -0600, Joseph wrote:
I'm using openssl-1.0.0a-r3
I rebuild openssl, all hashes were rebuild, in addition I've reinstall
"fetchmail" and I think this solved the problem.
When I pull the mai
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 21:56:51 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I'm using openssl-1.0.0a-r3
>
> I rebuild openssl, all hashes were rebuild, in addition I've reinstall
> "fetchmail" and I think this solved the problem.
>
> When I pull the mail I no don't get a
ot; you're letting fetchmail continue with
the session even though it isn't able to verify the certificate chain.
Here's where the /etc/ssl/certs are from:
$ equery belongs /etc/ssl/certs/
[ Searching for file(s) /etc/ssl/certs in *... ]
dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a-r3 (/etc/ssl/certs)
Wel
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 20:54:39 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> If I comment-out the last two lines:
>sslcertck
>sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/
>
> it complains on certificate but I can fetch the mail.
Yes, by removing the "sslcertck" you're letting fetchmail
On 10/23/10 19:10, Breen Mullins wrote:
* Patrick Shanahan [2010-10-23 19:37 -0400]:
why do you need it, ie:
poll imap.gmail.com tracepolls with proto IMAP timeout 45
user '@gmail.com' there with password 'passwd' is
'' here options fetchall stripcr ssl
mda '/usr/lib/sendmail -i -oem -f
as of OpenSSL 1.0.0.
So, I'm wondering if you have v1.0.0 of the openssl tools installed, but
fetchmail is still linked against libssl v0.9.8, or something like that?
Nathan
On 10/23/10 21:21, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:53:42 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> * run "c_rehash ." within that cert directory. That should
> create a symlink named 594f1775.0 pointing to the .pem file.
Though my link was named: 578d5c04.0 -> Equifax_Secure_CA.pem
to adopt the setting:
defaults
protocol POP3
poll pop.gmail.com
user 'syscon...@gmail.com'
pass ""
ssl
sslproto 'TLS1'
sslcertck
sslcertpath /etc/ssl/certs/
but it fails completely:
fetchmail: Server certificate verification
On 10/23/10 22:48, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
if you do download that cert, you would then need to use something like this
command on it:
openssl x509 -in Equifax_Secure_certificate_Authority.pem -fingerprint -subject
-issuer -serial -hash -noout
Then, put it into your ~./certs directory ans r
* Patrick Shanahan [2010-10-23 19:37 -0400]:
why do you need it, ie:
poll imap.gmail.com tracepolls with proto IMAP timeout 45
user '@gmail.com' there with password 'passwd' is
'' here options fetchall stripcr ssl
mda '/usr/lib/sendmail -i -oem -f %F %T'
He's using sslcertck as recomme
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 14:53:42 -0600, Joseph wrote:
> > * run "c_rehash ." within that cert directory. That should
> > create a symlink named 594f1775.0 pointing to the .pem file.
>
> Though my link was named: 578d5c04.0 -> Equifax_Secure_CA.pem
That's wierd. What does
openssl x509 -hash
On 10/22/10 23:21, Joseph wrote:
I'm using fetchmail to pull mail from google but lately I've been getting this
error:
fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: unable to get local issuer
certificate
fetchmail: This means that the root signing certificate (issued for
/C=U
> I have had this working for ages and I do not have time to think about
> it, but I have the equivalent of syscon...@gmail.com, not syscon780 or
> syscon...@gmail.com@pop.gmail.com. I also have sslcertck after ssl. I do
> not know whether that would help.
From the info i've read, it definitely sh
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 09:08:52AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> On 10/23/10 08:53, Harry Strongburg wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:15:23AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
>>> fetchmail: socket error while fetching from
>>> syscon...@gmail.com@pop.gmail.com
>> Silly mistak
if you do download that cert, you would then need to use something like this
command on it:
openssl x509 -in Equifax_Secure_certificate_Authority.pem -fingerprint -subject
-issuer -serial -hash -noout
Then, put it into your ~./certs directory ans reshash it. (Thought i'd mention
that, you prob
> Yes, I have this package install, and tried to use dir: '/etc/ssl/certs'
> but it doesn't help.
Sorry, I hadn't checked earlier replies where Nathan had already suggested that
idea. There's a link to the cert you require on Google:
http://geotrust.com/resources/_root_certificates/certificate
On 10/23/10 21:17, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I'm confused. Where do I get: equifax.pem certificate?
I think Gentoo have a ca-certs-type package in thier repository don't they?
'app-misc/ca-certificates'
Surely that would have the equifax certificate you need?
Yes, I have this package
the
username, since GMail supports 'hosted' domains as well;
'syscon...@example.com' would be a different GMail user.)
poll pop.gmail.com with proto POP3 and options no dns user 'syscon780' password
'xx' options ssl sslcertck sslcertpath '/home/jo
> I'm confused. Where do I get: equifax.pem certificate?
I think Gentoo have a ca-certs-type package in thier repository don't they?
'app-misc/ca-certificates'
Surely that would have the equifax certificate you need?
pgpczl3AVIzQW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of the same name. So I
suspect if you installed that ebuild you'd find that the
Equifax_Secure_CA.pem file was already installed on your system, and
that you could skip the ~/.mutt/certs/ directory and the "sslcertpath"
option in your fetchmailrc file entirely. In addition to saving the
up-
On 10/23/10 12:34, Breen Mullins wrote:
* Joseph [2010-10-23 12:50 -0600]:
I'm using command:
openssl s_client -connect pop.gmail.com:995 -showcerts
and it printed out:
copy---
CONNECTED(0003)
depth=1 C = US, O = Google Inc, CN = Google Internet Authority
verify error
* Joseph [2010-10-23 12:50 -0600]:
I'm using command:
openssl s_client -connect pop.gmail.com:995 -showcerts
and it printed out:
copy---
CONNECTED(0003)
depth=1 C = US, O = Google Inc, CN = Google Internet Authority
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certif
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:21:22PM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> I'm using fetchmail to pull mail from google but lately I've been getting
> this error:
>
> fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: unable to get local issuer
> certificate
> fetchmail: This
sslcertpath /home/joseph/.mutt/cert/
but it still complains, certificate not trusted.
fetchmail: This means that the root signing certificate (issued for
/C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority) is not in the trusted
CA certificate locations, or that c_rehash needs to be run on the
certifica
/cert/
>
> but it still complains, certificate not trusted.
>
> fetchmail: This means that the root signing certificate (issued for
> /C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Authority) is not in the trusted
> CA certificate locations, or that c_rehash needs to be run on the
> certificate
On 10/23/10 08:53, Harry Strongburg wrote:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:15:23AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
fetchmail: socket error while fetching from syscon...@gmail.com@pop.gmail.com
Silly mistake there! :)
Fetchmail 'user' requires you do NOT have a domain-name added onto it.
The doma
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:15:23AM -0600, Joseph wrote:
> fetchmail: socket error while fetching from syscon...@gmail.com@pop.gmail.com
Silly mistake there! :)
Fetchmail 'user' requires you do NOT have a domain-name added onto it.
The domain-name is supplied at the "poll" argument.
Have fun.
On 10/22/10 23:21, Joseph wrote:
I'm using fetchmail to pull mail from google but lately I've been getting this
error:
fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: unable to get local issuer
certificate
fetchmail: This means that the root signing certificate (issued for
/C=U
I'm using fetchmail to pull mail from google but lately I've been getting this
error:
fetchmail: Server certificate verification error: unable to get local issuer
certificate
fetchmail: This means that the root signing certificate (issued for /C=US/O=Google Inc/CN=Google Internet Aut
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:05:52PM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
> One of my domains has been moved to a new server. I am not a sysadmin,
> but it is clear to me that a mistake has been with the configuration
> on the new server.
>
> Email is reaching the server. I can confirm that with SSH and
> vie
* Patrick Shanahan [100924 15:12]:
> * Tim Johnson [09-24-10 18:27]:
> > * Patrick Shanahan [100924 13:10]:
> > > * Tim Johnson [09-24-10 16:10]:
> > <<...> > Email is reaching the server. I can confirm that with SSH and
> > > > viewing /var/spool/mail.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas? Or recommenda
* Patrick Shanahan [100924 13:10]:
> * Tim Johnson [09-24-10 16:10]:
<<...> > Email is reaching the server. I can confirm that with SSH and
> > viewing /var/spool/mail.
> >
> > Any ideas? Or recommendation where to ask. I have ssh and root
> > access.
>
> It is a problem that your domain has be
Please feel free to recommend a different ML or forum if anyone
finds this question to be inappropriate to *mutt*.
Until then, here is the problem:
One of my domains has been moved to a new server. I am not a sysadmin,
but it is clear to me that a mistake has been with the configuration
on the n
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
