* On 22 Jul 2010, rog...@sdf.org wrote:
> > spam "X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=([^ ]+)" "SA:%1"
> > # Add more patterns as needed for other spam engines you use.
>
> So, I'm experimenting with Bogofilter. Bogofilter, doesn't seem to
> be catching much at all and has to be trained -- so I've been m
Here's what I've simply settled on:
# Remap S to move spam to the spam folder
macro index S "unset wait_key\nbogofilter
-s\nset wait_key\ns=.Spam\n"
macro pager S "unset wait_key\nbogofilter
-s\nset wait_key\ns=.Spam\n"
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:35:43AM -0500, David Champion wrote:
>* On 21 Jul 2010, Roger wrote:
>> >> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
>> >> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
>> >
>> >I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttr
* On 21 Jul 2010, Roger wrote:
> >> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
> >> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
> >
> >I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttrc
> >
> > macro index z "s=mutt/spam\n" "move message to spam"
> > ma
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:12:34PM +0100, Steve Searle wrote:
>Around 07:56pm on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (UK time), Roger scrawled:
>
>> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
>> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
>
>I attach the following macros
Around 07:56pm on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 (UK time), Roger scrawled:
> Since I'm always saving/moving email to $HOME/.maildir/.Spam... you
> would think Mutt would catch-on after the 10th email. ;-)
I attach the following macros to the z key in my .muttrc
macro index z "s=mutt/spam\n" "move me
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 06:50:12PM +0200, Rado S wrote:
>=- Christoph Kluenter wrote on Wed 21.Jul'10 at 10:30:34 +0200 -=
>
>> Thank you very much. save-hooks is exactly what I want.
>
>There are some vars controlling save-location, if you want to make
>it constant.
force_name & save_name?
* Roger [07-21-10 14:57]:
>
> You do have a valid point with Mutt being *always* wrong, to the point it just
> makes up some folder name that doesn't even exist from the idea of the
> sender's
> email address!
mutt can only be wrong as it is configured (or not) to be.
> A likely more appropria
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the foldername.
>But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
>So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would parse
>the mail
>and sugges
=- Christoph Kluenter wrote on Wed 21.Jul'10 at 10:30:34 +0200 -=
> Thank you very much. save-hooks is exactly what I want.
There are some vars controlling save-location, if you want to make
it constant.
--
© Rado S. -- You must provide YOUR effort for your goal!
EVERY effort counts: at least t
* Am Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:02:08AM +0200 , schrieb Joost Kremers:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
> > when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the
> > foldername.
> > But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
> > So I thought it would be nic
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 09:36:54AM +0200, Christoph Kluenter wrote:
> when I press "s" to save a mail to another folder, mutt suggest the
> foldername.
> But mutt is mostly always wrong :-)
> So I thought it would be nice if I could write my own script which would
> parse the mail
> and suggest a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thus spake Nicolas Rachinsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > 3. When I get clearer with gpg, I try to make my 'uid' more informative
> >for others. But I found gpg doesn't provide good maintaining method
> >to update them. You can not update uid exc
Hi, all --
Since I'm a definite contributor, though I hope not terribly often, I
probably ought to chime in...
...and then Derek D. Martin said...
%
% At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
..
% > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
% >
> > I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> > flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> > mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> > stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
>
> Yeah, but the problem i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Derek D. Martin hath spake thusly:
[SNIP]
> discussions almost always result directly from discussions that
> originally WERE on-topic, and are unavoidable. Humans have a penchant
> for going off on tangents, and you can not p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, Roman Neuhauser hath spake thusly:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send
> As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
> set indent_str="> " # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
I have have this:
set indent_string="> " # Dont' be a moron. Leave it as is.
igor
--
Uptime : 31 days, 28 min
Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11 Jan 2002 16:37 -0700]:
> > 9o)
>
> BTW, what the heck is that thing?
He has a big nose and a monocle, obviously.
--
http://www.epic.org - Electronic Privacy Information Center
msg22976/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Alas! Knute spake thus:
> This is quoted text: - End forwarded message -
>
> So what do you think?
> (I think I need to put on my asbestos long john's!)
You die. You die and go to hell!
Just kidding ;)
> 9o)
BTW, what the heck is that thing?
--
Rob 'Feztaa' Park
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Alas! Roman Neuhauser spake thus:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-users would have a place to go.
I
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:24:47PM +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> Yeah, but the problem is that when 'chitchat' spins off from another
> thread, it rarely (in my experience) ends up getting moved. Although if
> people think that it will actually get used, I would support it
We had the "chitchat
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 06:37:52PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> I guess that quite a few of the subscribers are just devoted to
> flooding this list with chitchat. I would suggest creating
> mutt-chat, so that those who feel the urge to send non-technical, OT
> stuff to mutt-use
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 08:27:47 -0800
> From: "J. Scott Dorr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Anh Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Suggestion for List Etiquette
>
> Nah. :) He coulda just highlighted the appropriate lines (via
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 07:46:15AM -0600, Anh Lai wrote:
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Anh Lai wrote:
>
>
> ... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
> >
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text:
> > This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > This is quoted text: > somewhat diffe
Agree with you, too. Your post showed one well-tailored. :-)
best,
charlie
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 08:55:24AM +0100, Volker Moell wrote:
> Charles Jie wrote:
> > I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> > programs.
>
> But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just rea
... On 01/10/02, Knute decided to write ...
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
>
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text:
> This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related:
> This is quoted text: >
> This is quot
On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:24:17PM +0800, Charles Jie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>user id (short form, 8 hex digits) - an key ID for your convenience
> to specify a key for gpg, not guaranteed to be unique (non-ambiguous)
>user id (long form, 16 hex digits) - better ID but who'll use
Nick Croft wrote:
> As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
> set indent_str="> " # change this and I'll kill you! ;-)
i also like the bit from the muttrc man page:
You are strongly encouraged not to change this
value, as it tends to agitate the more fanatica
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Nick Croft wrote:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text:
This is quoted text: * Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is quoted text: > somewhat different but related:
This is quoted text: >
This is quoted text: > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker ch
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
> Alas! Imre Vida spake thus:
> > wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently?
> > some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
>
> This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use '>'
> just because I thin
* Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> somewhat different but related:
>
> wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char
> consistently?
> some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
>
> imre
>
As Tom Gilbert has it in his sample .muttrc:
set indent_str="> " # change this and
Alas! Imre Vida spake thus:
> wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char consistently?
> some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
This point has come up before. Although I personally like to use '>'
just because I think it's a good character for quoting (it looks like an
arrow
somewhat different but related:
wouldn't it be better to use > as a quote-marker char
consistently?
some of the alternatives like "%" i realy dislike
imre
Charles Jie wrote:
> I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
> programs.
But please: Don't snip *everything*! Just reading the answer or comment
(to an unknown question, because I deleted the original posting in the
meantime) ist more painful than ignoring superfluou
I Agree. For an hacker, his message should be as well tailored as his
programs.
charlie
* fman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
I don't know, but I doubt it.
See some of the nntp patches though:
http://www.mutt.org/links.html#patch
Juan --
...and then fman said...
% Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
Plans for official development: no
Plans for unofficial support: yes, discussed a few times in the past.
Take a wander through the mail archives for more info, including at least
one or to
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000, fman wrote:
> Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
Yeah, it already can. Hit 'qtin' or 'qslrn'. Works great. ;-)
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 09:25:10PM -0700, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
>
> And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
>
> Shawn
I hadn't realized how big it was, becuase I was reading it through an xterm
window. Should be ok now
fman proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>Is there plans to make enable mutt to read the news from a news server?
>
>-juan
See http://www.mutt.org - there is an NNTP patch. Read the archives -
this (and other alternatives such as newsfetch) were discussed a few weeks
back.
--
Suresh Ramasubramania
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * fman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000628 04:16]:
> > The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list.
> > I suggest someone write a book on how to use mutt.
> > Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket references.
> > Mutt is popular enought to deserve o
On 06/27 21:12 -0700, fman wrote:
> The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
> book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
> references. Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
but then clueless people would start using it...
-
On 2000-06-28 14:20:02 +0200, Gerhard den Hollander wrote:
> (note, this does involve some more or less complicated (c) issues with
> contributors to the online docs ...
Not necessarily; Open Content with restrictions on printing is
always an option (this is how "The Cathedral and the Bazar" work
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 01:19:20PM +0200)
> * fman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000628 04:16]:
>> The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list.
>> I suggest someone write a book on how to use mutt.
>> Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket references.
>> Mutt is
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 09:25:10PM -0700, Shawn D. McPeek wrote:
> And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
Quoting style should get some attention too... ;)
Marius Gedminas
--
Science is to computer science as hydrodynamics is to plumbing.
* fman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000628 04:16]:
> The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list.
> I suggest someone write a book on how to use mutt.
> Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket references.
> Mutt is popular enought to deserve one, no?
I had suggested this to O'Reilly two years
Shawn D. McPeek muttered:
>
> And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
[full quote deleted]
The same goes to full quoting of cause :-)
And - to whom it may concern - quoting sigs!
HTH,
Michael
--
Prof:So the American government went to IBM to come up with
And mention that a 32 line sig on a 3 line message is a bit excessive :)
Shawn
Previously, fman wrote:
% The muttfaq says to send suggestions to this list. I suggest someone write a
% book on how to use mutt. Maybe a small book like those o'reilly pocket
% references. Mutt is popular enought
Daniel --
...and then Daniel González Gasull said...
% Hi! :-)
%
% Myself wrote To Mutt users:
%
% > list to ask it, but, are there any standard email
% > headers to say something like this?:
This was the important part of your first post, we note.
% >
% > X-PGP-Advocacy: Hey, I prefer to r
Daniel --
My, I'm busy this morning :-)
...and then Daniel González Gasull said...
% Hi! :-)
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote To Mutt users:
%
% > You may find everything you wanted for the
% > pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2 and up (currently
% > 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsig
Hi again :-)
I just thought of a simpler and potentially easier answer to this whole
thing. Since you've already stepped up to the work of configuring *your*
environment (the aliases file) for these folks who can't get it together,
why not just configure your procmail setup to recognize any of t
Daniel --
...and then Daniel González Gasull said...
% Hello all, and sorry for the delay. I'm in exams.
I hope they've gone well!
%
% David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mutt users:
%
% > aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% >
% > would automatically readdress any email for
% >
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
% On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:59:55AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > What a cool idea. Care to share it?
%
% My pleasure, on the understanding that installing and using glimpse is left
% as an exercise for the reader.
No problem. All I have to do is
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 07:59:55AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> Dave --
>
> % grepmail wrapper that does all this for you. I've got something similar that
> % I use with glimpse. It does the search and, if something was found, it fires
> % up mutt with all the found messages in a folder. It ever wri
Dave --
...and then Dave Pearson said...
% On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
%
% > grepmail > /tmp/mutt-11241
% >
% > and then loads /tmp/mutt-11241 or whatever as the current box.
...
%
% grepmail wrapper that does all this for you. I've got something simila
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just had a suggestion for what might be a nice feature for Mutt. The
> grepmail program is nice since it greps for e-mails containing something
> and spits them out in standard mail format. We could add a search mail
> functio
Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
> My understanding was that *replying* to a mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] would
> address the reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I can find uses for this too. Some mailing lists around here can be
> reached via multiple aliases -- [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
> I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. Do I understand
> that a configuration like
>
> aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> would automatically readdress any email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
My
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 04:03:34PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We could add a search mail function that does:
>
> grepmail > /tmp/mutt-11241
>
> and then loads /tmp/mutt-11241 or whatever as the current box.
Mutt already has that feature.
l ~b
will limit the messages displayed
Stan Ryckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 21 Jun 2000:
> This is sort of a guess as well, since I'm going from memory, but
> what I think was asked.
My understanding was that he wanted to specify the "display name" for
several mail addresses, in the mail folder view. This is what
$reverse_a
At 10:35 AM 6/21/00 +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
>> Daniel --
>>
>> I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
>
>I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
>for the 'alias' setting?
On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
> Daniel --
>
> I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
for the 'alias' setting?
I am so used to the term 'alias' because I've always
Daniel --
You may find everything you wanted for the pgpmimeuser setting in v1.2
and up (currently 1.2.2 AFAIK), since there is now a clearsign mode.
With a [few] send-hook[s], you should be able to define whatever settings
you wish for whatever recipients you have. You shouldn't have ever had
t
Daniel --
I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal. Do I understand
that a configuration like
aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would automatically readdress any email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
If that's correct, I don't see why that's needed; just send you
On 2000-03-03 17:42:33 +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
> I don't think that indications to use the script are
> common enough to include it in the distribution.
I've commented out the gpg-2comp lines, and added plain
gpg lines. People who read their configuration files will
probably stumble over thi
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 10:36:14AM -0500, Alec Habig wrote:
> However, for a stable-version mutt, it would be best to have the
> default/recommended setup be as straightforward as possible. If one
> doesn't have the need to make old signatures, then there should be no
> need to require an ex
Robert Chien [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that from now on, whenever a new
> command/variable is added to mutt, the version number be
> reflected in mutt's manual accordingly, like this:
>
> 6.3 Configuration variables
>
> subscribe (version 1.1 and up)
> blah blah bl
On 03-Dec-1999, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> At 15:51 -0600 02 Dec 1999, Ronny Haryanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I still find it not trivial to do this: "If I am sending the message
> > as , regardless of in which folder I am, then do this and
> > that".
> How are you modifying the From header? If
At 15:51 -0600 02 Dec 1999, Ronny Haryanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still find it not trivial to do this: "If I am sending the message
> as , regardless of in which folder I am, then do this and
> that".
How are you modifying the From header? If you're using reverse name,
send-hooks work f
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:33:15AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> ARGH. It really should have been %?M?+& ?
> % starts the sequence
> ? starts the 'if'
> M is the regular % token to use for the condition
> ? prefaces the non-zero part
> + is what to print if the condition (%M) is non-zero
> & pre
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:09:51AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > > > You can use %M in the index_format to show the number of messages in a
> > > > > collpased thread. You can use something like %?M?+& to ge
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 05:09:51AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > > You can use %M in the index_format to show the number of messages in a
> > > > collpased thread. You can use something like %?M?+& to get just a + sign
> > > > in your index listing
Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > > You can use %M in the index_format to show the number of messages in a
> > > collpased thread. You can use something like %?M?+& to get just a + sign
> > > in your index listing for collapsed threads. See the help for index_format
> > > for more in
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:40:27AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> V collapse-allcollapse/uncollapse all threads
> v collapse-thread collapse/uncollapse current thread
No, actually now that I look at it again, I see uncollapse. Problem was, I
was looking for a hook
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:56:16AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > collapse-all and collapse-thread are actually toggles -- the names are
> > sort of misnomers.
>
> You know, after I sent that, I wondered if, like slrn, they might be
> toggles, but didn't h
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:56:16AM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I'm rather a bit used to slrn, I guess, but I noticed after going through
> > the help screen 5 times that you can collapse a thread, or collapse ALL
> > threads, but there is no "expand-all-
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'm rather a bit used to slrn, I guess, but I noticed after going through
> the help screen 5 times that you can collapse a thread, or collapse ALL
> threads, but there is no "expand-all-threads" or "expand-thread" short of
collapse-all and collapse-thread a
79 matches
Mail list logo
