At 10:35 AM 6/21/00 +0100, Telsa Gwynne wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 01:00:47AM -0400 or thereabouts, David T-G wrote:
>> Daniel --
>>
>> I, for one, had trouble following your aka proposal.
>
>I did, also. I know this sounds silly, but was Daniel actually looking
>for the 'alias' setting?
Unfortunately I deleted the original post, but I'm pretty sure that it
was something like:
Given, in some situations (such as replying), what would be:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Convert (via this aka thing) to produce the header:
To: Joe Cool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in otherwords, fill in the "unneeded" part of the address.
>> Maybe I just need more explanation...
>
>Yeah, I'm guessing a bit, too :)
This is sort of a guess as well, since I'm going from memory, but
what I think was asked.
Stan
