Re: mutt IMAP configuration for outlook.office365.com

2020-03-16 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
Hi Greg, I'm glad everything is working for you now. On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 09:20:03PM -0500, Greg Marks wrote: For the benefit of anyone else who may have these problems, a possible .muttrc configuration file that one can use for IMAP access to outlook.office365.com e-mail accounts contains t

Re: mutt IMAP configuration for outlook.office365.com

2020-03-15 Thread Greg Marks
g > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.mutt.org/mailman/listinfo/mutt-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > mutt-users-requ...@mutt.org > > You can reach the person managing t

Re: mutt IMAP configuration for outlook.office365.com

2020-03-12 Thread Sam Kuper
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:32:13PM -0500, Greg Marks wrote: > Dear Mr. Kuper, Please don't address me as "Mr", but anyhow... >> I would suggest attempting the same workaround that you used for the >> IMAP password. I.e. escape the dollar sign in the smtp_pass field >> with a backslash. > > But

Re: mutt IMAP configuration for outlook.office365.com

2020-03-12 Thread Greg Marks
e escaped? > > There is a small amount of information, mixed in with misinformation, that > Web searches unearth, e.g. > > > https://askubuntu.com/questions/81924/sasl-authentication-failed-with-mutt-and-gmail-why >https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Mutt > > I

Re: mutt IMAP configuration for outlook.office365.com

2020-03-12 Thread Kevin J. McCarthy
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:55:14PM -0500, Greg Marks wrote: Up until recently this worked perfectly. It began to fail, however, after I changed my e-mail account password to something containing a dollar sign, of the form abc$def. Hi Greg, I have a couple suggestions to try. The first is to

Re: mutt IMAP configuration for outlook.office365.com

2020-03-12 Thread Sam Kuper
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 06:55:14PM -0500, Greg Marks wrote: > my university e-mail account [..] uses outlook.office365.com [..] Commiserations. Universities used to be capable of hosting their own email servers. > It would be great to get some authoritative guidance on this! Here is my guidanc

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-14 Thread Dan McDaniel
On Sat 14.Jan.12 09:26, Tim Gray wrote: On Jan 13, 2012 at 03:38 PM -0600, Dan McDaniel wrote: I tried this since I too have been looking for a solution to this kind of problem. However, I am getting only partial success. I can tell it's sourcing the profiles as I move between folders because th

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-14 Thread Tim Gray
On Jan 13, 2012 at 03:38 PM -0600, Dan McDaniel wrote: I tried this since I too have been looking for a solution to this kind of problem. However, I am getting only partial success. I can tell it's sourcing the profiles as I move between folders because the color of the status bar changes, but it

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-13 Thread Dan McDaniel
On Thu 12.Jan.12 20:51, Tim Gray wrote: On Jan 12, 2012 at 02:02 PM -0800, Tracy Reed wrote: I've been a mutt user for well over 10 years but more and more I am running into limitations which I am having trouble solving. I don't have exactly the same setup, but I do select a 'profile' dependi

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-13 Thread Tim Gray
On Jan 13, 2012 at 08:41 AM +, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: Also $reverse_name will set the From: address to the right value depending on which address was used in the email you're replying to. You will need to set $alternates in the config file for that. Ah yes, I left out that bit.

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-13 Thread Chris Green
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:47:11PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * Tracy Reed [01-12-12 21:24]: > > > > Tim's suggestion of imapfilter looks to be a very good one. I just need to > > have > > that running on some machine somewhere accessing all of my accounts and > > classifying things and th

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-13 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
with the folder-hook, you need to have a default at the top of them so it reverts back to that value when changing folders. Do you have that in your config file? Also $reverse_name will set the From: address to the right value depending on which address was used in the email you're replying to.

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Tracy Reed [01-12-12 21:24]: > > Tim's suggestion of imapfilter looks to be a very good one. I just need to > have > that running on some machine somewhere accessing all of my accounts and > classifying things and then neither my imap client nor my mail server have to > worry about doing that

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Christian Dysthe
On 01/12/12 at 10:34pm, Tim Gray wrote: > On Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30 PM -0800, Tracy Reed wrote: > >I can't forward all email to one account but pulling it all down to one > >location with offlineimap is a possibility. I'm just concerned about not > >being > >able to access my mail with my iphone if

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Tim Gray
On Jan 12, 2012 at 06:30 PM -0800, Tracy Reed wrote: I can't forward all email to one account but pulling it all down to one location with offlineimap is a possibility. I'm just concerned about not being able to access my mail with my iphone if I pull it all down and delete it from the server.

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Tracy Reed
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 08:51:56PM -0500, Tim Gray spake thusly: > I don't have exactly the same setup, but I do select a 'profile' > depending on what folder I'm in. I set up each profile in it's own > file, like so: I'll have to go this route then. As you suggested, I think I am getting stuck w

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Tracy Reed
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 05:09:52PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan spake thusly: > man fetchmail This is nice because it feeds into the local mail system and I can use procmail etc... > there is also offline-imap I have played with it when I was experimenting with the sup mail client. Both fetchmail an

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Tim Gray
On Jan 12, 2012 at 02:02 PM -0800, Tracy Reed wrote: I've been a mutt user for well over 10 years but more and more I am running into limitations which I am having trouble solving. I don't have exactly the same setup, but I do select a 'profile' depending on what folder I'm in. I set up each

Re: Mutt/IMAP/filtering

2012-01-12 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Tracy Reed [01-12-12 17:03]: > > I would also like to be able to sort mail. Mutt doesn't do this and I can't do > sieve on the server side for most of my accounts. I do have procmail on the > server side for one of them. How do most people handle this? Do most people > use > fetchmail and pipe

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-21 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:31:48PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote: > Pressing a key wakes up mutt, and if it's been more than $mail_check > seconds it'll go poll all your mailboxes before doing anything > else. I'd recommend raise mail_check to 120 to poll mailboxes every > two minutes instead of every

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-19 Thread Brendan Cully
On Monday, 19 October 2009 at 21:16, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote: > On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > Usually mutt works okay using IMAP over GPRS and header/message caching > > enabled. Sometimes it's slow, when the connection has a long delay and > > there is n

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-19 Thread Jeffrey Ratcliffe
On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 02:04:19PM +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Usually mutt works okay using IMAP over GPRS and header/message caching > enabled. Sometimes it's slow, when the connection has a long delay and > there is no data coming in. I have noticed that a couple of times, when > using

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-17 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2009-10-17 14:04:19, schrieb Christian Brabandt: > > Thats normaly, because mutt load always a bunch of headers per message > > from the imap and "mailboxes" give your mutt the rest, if you POLL the > > Mailfolders. > > No it is not. Oh yes... I have backtrace of it. If you let mutt poll

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-17 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2009-10-16 16:43:35, schrieb Toby Cubitt: > Offlineimap claims to be extremely fast at synchronising IMAP folders, so > it might be usable over GPRS. Even Offline-IMAP must download the messages... Here @me it it will not help, because I get many VERY big messages with PDF Datasheeits appached

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-17 Thread Christian Brabandt
Hi Michelle! On Fr, 16 Okt 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Jeffrey, > > Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe: > > Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband > > connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS > > connection, and then, although

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-16 Thread Morris, Patrick
Omari Norman wrote: On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:43:35PM +0100, Toby Cubitt wrote: Offlineimap claims to be extremely fast at synchronising IMAP folders, so it might be usable over GPRS. In any case, it can be left to run away in the background, so it's speed doesn't have much impact on mutt's

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-16 Thread Omari Norman
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 04:43:35PM +0100, Toby Cubitt wrote: > Offlineimap claims to be extremely fast at synchronising IMAP folders, so > it might be usable over GPRS. In any case, it can be left to run away in > the background, so it's speed doesn't have much impact on mutt's > responsiveness oth

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-16 Thread Morris, Patrick
Toby Cubitt wrote: Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe: Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the index at a speed one might expe

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-16 Thread Toby Cubitt
Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe: > Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband > connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS > connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the > index at a speed one might expect, navigating ar

Re: mutt + imap + gprs

2009-10-15 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Jeffrey, Am 2009-10-15 22:11:06, schrieb Jeffrey Ratcliffe: > Mutt works well with my gmail account via IMAP over a broadband > connection. However, I would like to also use it over a GPRS > connection, and then, although mutt starts up OK, and displays the > index at a speed one might expec

Re: mutt/imap oddities

2002-08-14 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 20:07:04 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: > Change your $index_format so that the size of messages is shown in > 'bytes' instead of 'lines' - Search for 'index_format' in the manual. BTW, is there a way to have the default size in lines, but in KB (with the suffix 'k') when the

Re: mutt/imap oddities

2002-08-14 Thread Bruno Postle
On Wed 14-Aug-2002 at 11:17:25 -0700, Martin Siegert wrote: > > 1) When I start mutt the following screen comes up (I am using imaps): > > -- Mutt: SSL Certificate check (r)eject, accept (o)nce You need to specify where you want to save certificates: set certificate_file=~/.mutt-certif

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-22 Thread Steven G . Harms
David, I use 1.3.9i and the IMAP functionality, while admittedly beyond comprehension in better than the 1.2x series, is still very slow. I'd really like to get more Mutt users here, but the slow spool and respool of the IMAP folders is a showstopper (versus PINE IMAP or Netscape Mail). It's

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-22 Thread Christian Ordig
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:30:19PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I must say that the its speed in > processing IMAP stores strikes me as slow. I think this is because > mutt doesn't seem to have any caching mechanism. As a result, each > tim you open an imap subfolder you have to wait for it

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-22 Thread Kai Blin
* Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22/01/02, 08:43:27]: > Good, provided you use a recent (beta) copy (e.g. 1.3.26). > > However, I'm having some stability problems (about 1 segfault/day), but > hopefully this will be fixed soon. Did you report them? I have none. What's your OS/Distribution? Did

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sam, I use mutt at work to read mail from an IMAP store. While I love mutts functionality, I must say that the its speed in processing IMAP stores strikes me as slow. I think this is because mutt doesn't seem to have any caching mechanism. As a result, each tim you open an imap subfolder you h

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-22 Thread Gerhard Häring
Le 21/01/02 à 21:37, Samuel Padgett écrivit: > I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP > client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly, > but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines. mutt + IMAP works very well for me. It should be avail

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-22 Thread Dave Smith
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP > client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly, > but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines. Good, provided you use a recent

Re: Mutt IMAP -- how good?

2002-01-21 Thread David Rock
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 09:37:55PM -0500, Samuel Padgett wrote: > I'm considering switching to IMAP. How good is Mutt as an IMAP > client? I'm currently just accessing local mbox files directly, > but I'd like to be able to access my mail from other machines. I use IMAP to access the Exchange s

Re: Mutt IMAP indexing slower than Pine?

2001-06-14 Thread Adrian Chung
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:05:17PM -0400, Louis LeBlanc wrote: > On 06/14/01 12:05 PM, Adrian Chung sat at the `puter and typed: > > Ah, that explains it... Are there plans to ever make this is user > > configurable option? It takes forever to view mail in a mailbox that > > has over 2000 messag

Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail

1999-12-01 Thread Chris Green
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 11:49:37AM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote: > > PS you can find out which IMAP server you're using by just telnetting > to port 143 of your mailhost. The first line of greeting should give > you the version string. > Nothing to do with this thread really but I just tried this

Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail

1999-11-30 Thread John P . Looney
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 11:49:37AM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned: > > The folder should be set to "New" if the server considers it to contain > > RECENT messages, but this "New" flag should not be cleared until you > > actually view the folder through the "index" screen - it should not be > > cl

Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail

1999-11-30 Thread Brendan Cully
On Wednesday, 24 November 1999 at 11:43, John P . Looney wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:04:57PM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned: > > In short, does mutt put all folders that have unread mail in the "new > > mail" list, or only those that have mail that has arrived since you last > > opened the

Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail

1999-11-24 Thread John P . Looney
On Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 08:04:57PM -0500, Brendan Cully mentioned: > On Tuesday, 23 November 1999 at 12:30, John P . Looney wrote: > > Anyone that's using IMAP - change "RECENT" to "UNSEEN" in > > imap/imap.c:1208, and "new mail" checking will feel a lot better. > > > > Thanks to Brendan Cully

Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail

1999-11-23 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 20:04 -0500 23 Nov 1999, Brendan Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In short, does mutt put all folders that have unread mail in the "new > mail" list, or only those that have mail that has arrived since you last > opened the folder? It already depends on the folder format. For mbox folders (

Re: Mutt/IMAP & new mail

1999-11-23 Thread Brendan Cully
On Tuesday, 23 November 1999 at 12:30, John P . Looney wrote: > Anyone that's using IMAP - change "RECENT" to "UNSEEN" in > imap/imap.c:1208, and "new mail" checking will feel a lot better. > > Thanks to Brendan Cully for pointing me in this direction... I haven't used non-IMAP mutt in such a

Re: mutt+imap

1999-01-31 Thread Brandon Long
On 01/30/99 Brandon Long uttered the following other thing: > > I'll look into it, but I need to see the message? Nevermind, I found it. This patch contains the more correct fix. The problem is, we request a limited set of headers for the index, but we need more headers when we actually view t

Re: mutt+imap

1999-01-31 Thread Brandon Long
On 01/19/99 Gero Treuner uttered the following other thing: > > In further private communication the problem appears to be in the imap > parts. > > Markus reported that a simple mail shown above is not decoded when > viewing it from the imap server directly. After saving it to a > folder and vie

Re: mutt+imap

1999-01-19 Thread Gero Treuner
Hi! On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 03:56:45PM +0100, Gero Treuner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 01:35:53PM +0100, Markus Hofmann wrote: > > Quoting Heikki Kantola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > According to Markus Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > i'm trying to read mails from a M$-Exchange Server wit

Re: mutt+imap

1999-01-18 Thread Gero Treuner
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 01:35:53PM +0100, Markus Hofmann wrote: > Quoting Heikki Kantola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > According to Markus Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > i'm trying to read mails from a M$-Exchange Server with imap. it works > > > but the german-umlauts aren't displayed correctly.

Re: mutt+imap

1999-01-18 Thread Markus Hofmann
Quoting Heikki Kantola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > According to Markus Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > i'm trying to read mails from a M$-Exchange Server with imap. it works > > but the german-umlauts aren't displayed correctly. > > How are those shown? something like '=20D'. the header seems t

Re: mutt+imap

1999-01-18 Thread Heikki Kantola
According to Markus Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > i'm trying to read mails from a M$-Exchange Server with imap. it works > but the german-umlauts aren't displayed correctly. How are those shown? > any hints? If those 8-bit characters appear as question marks there's at least two possiblitie